The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
Opinion

How NDP and Greens Could Unite to Improve Workers’ Lives

Divisions on union certification are already clear. But don’t assume they’ll spoil the alliance.

By Paul Willcocks 14 Jul 2017 | TheTyee.ca

Paul Willcocks is a journalist and former publisher of newspapers, and now an editor with The Tyee.

Andrew Weaver’s vow to kill the NDP’s plan to make it easier for workers to unionize sparked quick comment about troubles ahead for the NDP-Green alliance.

The Green leader’s comments even made it into Jacobin, a U.S. socialist website and magazine, where an article warned Weaver’s “hard line” against working people is a reminder to “be wary of nominally progressive parties that lack a firm base among the poor and working class and their organizations, namely trade unions.”

That’s a leap, based on one issue. The real tests are ahead.

It is a significant issue. NDP premier John Horgan wants to reverse the BC Liberals’ 2002 changes to the certification process. Before the changes, if 55 per cent of employees signed cards saying they wanted to be represented by a union, the Labour Relations Board certified them and they went on to the task of negotiating a first contract.

The Liberals ended that and required a secret ballot vote on certification.

Horgan wants to go back to the old system. Weaver has said, “It’s simply not going to happen.”

Unions like the card signup system because workers can organize quietly, collect enough signatures and present the employer with a done deal. They don’t like the requirement for a vote because it gives companies time to persuade or pressure employees to vote no.

You can make credible arguments for either approach. Alberta’s NDP government has compromised with a system where unions are certified automatically if 65 per cent of workers sign cards, assuming that indicates strong enough support that a vote isn’t needed.

What’s much more important are the Green’s views on the role of unionization in reducing inequality and protecting employees.

Research has established that requiring votes results in significantly lower rates of unionization. And lower rates of unionization increase inequality.

The NDP believes that reversing the long decline in unionization rates — from 37.6 per cent in 1981 to 28.8 per cent in 2014 — will help restore balance in worker-employer relations, reduce inequality and help families. (Though unions aren’t mentioned once in the party’s 99-page election platform.)

So do the Greens agree? The party platform is no help in answering that question. It pledges to “Modernize labour laws to recognize new and emerging types of work relationships in the emerging economy by introducing a fairer, more responsive and more inclusive code that contributes to increased competitiveness.” That could mean anything or nothing at all, and any mention of “increased competitiveness” raises the spectre of tipping the employer-worker balance in favour of companies.

The NDP-Green agreement is clearer. It promises to “Improve fairness for workers, ensure balance in workplaces, and improve measures to protect the safety of workers.”

Achieving those goals doesn’t depend on ending the secret certification vote. In fact, some of the NDP’s concerns about the process could be addressed with Green support. The labour code now requires votes to be held within 10 days of the time the Labour Relations Board decides there are enough signed membership cards. Cutting that to three days would reduce the chance for pressure from both sides without compromising Weaver’s commitment to secret ballots.

But the issues are much broader than how unions are certified, and there’s more the NDP and Green alliance can do together to improve workers’ lives. We’ve moved from large workplaces, where unions could justify long organizing efforts, to small, disconnected units, often with temporary workers.

In 1976, 12.5 per cent of working people had part-time jobs; last year that was up to 19.2 per cent. In 1989, 8.4 per cent of Canadian workers were self-employed; that has almost doubled to 15.3 per cent as short-term contracts and part-time work replaced traditional jobs.

Those dramatic changes in the way we work have not been reflected in labour codes, pension plans, employment standards or workplace safety regulations.

The new government has a wide range of options to restore fairness. Sectoral bargaining — proposed in 1992 by an expert panel reviewing B.C. labour laws — would allow employees in a sector to bargain together. So rather than organizing one fast food restaurant and trying to negotiate a contract, a union could represent workers at different outlets, and even different companies, and negotiate a common collective agreement.

Employment Standards Act changes could guarantee equal pay for part-time workers doing the jobs as full-time employees and ensure all workers have basic benefits like paid sick leave.

And without changing a single rule, the government could end the anemic enforcement of employment laws by stepping up inspections and targeting workplaces that provide precarious employment. (An Ontario program targeted 103 employers who had previously violated employment standards. The blitz found only 28 were obeying the law.

The fundamental goal should be maintaining an equitable balance of power between employers and workers, recognizing either side will exploit any imbalance. (It’s notable that the BC Liberals did not end the ban on replacement workers during a strike despite requests from the business community, recognizing that would tip the balance too heavily.)

But that balance hasn’t been maintained. More than one-third of Canadian workers — 6.2 million people — are self-employed or working part-time. They have great difficulty in bargaining collectively and their interests are not adequately protected by employment standard legislation and practices that have not changed to reflect the new reality. Precarious work, in various forms, has replaced traditional jobs.

All of which have given employers increasing power while reducing the ability of workers to bargain effectively for wages, working conditions and security. At the same time, Employment Standards Act provisions that made sense — and could be enforced — in a traditional work environment offer no real protection to casual or contract workers.

The result has been growing inequality, more precarious work and a growing sense among working people that the game is rigged against them.

They’re right. The work environment has changed dramatically, tipping the scales in favour of employers, and governments have failed to make the changes needed to restore balance. The erosion of workers’ security and rights hasn’t been the inevitable result of economic forces; it reflects governments’ failure to fulfill their role in this critical area.

The new provincial government needs to look at every aspect of the laws and regulations that affect working life, from WorkSafeBC to the labour code to employment standards, and then make the changes needed to restore balance (without swinging the pendulum too far the other way).

The Greens’ support — or lack of support — for that kind of initiative will provide a clear answer about their commitment to fair treatment for working people.  [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Do not:

  •  Use sexist, classist, racist or homophobic language
  • Libel or defame
  • Bully, threaten, name-call or troll
  • Troll patrol. Instead, downvote, or flag suspect activity
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities

Do:

  • Verify facts, debunk rumours
  • Add context and background
  • Spot typos and logical fallacies
  • Highlight reporting blind spots
  • Ignore trolls and flag violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity
  • Stay on topic
  • Connect with each other

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Tyee Poll: Are You Preparing for the Next Climate Disaster?

Take this week's poll