Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.
News
Indigenous
Rights + Justice
BC Politics

The Haida Get Their Land Back

By affirming Indigenous land ownership, BC and the Haida Nation are signalling a new era for Indigenous relations.

Serena Renner 23 Apr 2024Hakai Magazine

Serena Renner is a journalist and editor based in Victoria with an eye on climate solutions, Indigenous sovereignty and the coast.

[Editor’s note: This article was originally published by Hakai Magazine. Read the original story on their website.]

Twenty years ago, Geoff Plant, then the Liberal attorney general of B.C., made an offer to the Haida Nation. Many West Coast First Nations, including the Haida, had never signed treaties with the Canadian government ceding their traditional lands or resources, and Plant was trying to revive the faltering process of treaty making. He wanted to smooth over relations with Indigenous Peoples, but he also wanted to help the province extract more resources from Indigenous lands. To entice the Haida — a nation known throughout Canada for its political savviness and resolve — he had what he thought was a bold bargaining chip.

Like many other officials, Plant viewed the B.C. government as the clear landlord of provincial lands, including those of the Haida Gwaii archipelago — 10,000 square kilometres of forested islands located roughly 650 kilometres northwest of Vancouver, and the Haida’s home for at least the past 13,000 years.

A map of a western chunk of North America shows the position of Haida Gwaii, off the coast of northern B.C.
Haida Gwaii features 10,000 square kilometres of forested islands that the Haida Nation has been stewarding for at least 13,000 years. In addition to its 200-plus islands, the nation considers the airspace, seabed and marine areas of Haida Gwaii part of its Indigenous territory. Map by Mark Garrison.

So here was Plant’s pitch: the B.C. government would give the Haida control of 20 per cent of their lands, but that would require the nation dropping a title case it had recently filed with the B.C. Supreme Court. “Title” refers to the inherent right to own and manage Indigenous territories based on traditional use and occupation. The Haida maintained that their territory included all of the land area in the archipelago, as well as the surrounding airspace, seabed and marine waters.

The Haida saw Plant’s offer to the door.

“Why would we give up 80 per cent of our land to get 20?” said Gidansda (Guujaaw), the then president of the Council of the Haida Nation, to media at the time. “This case is about respect for the Earth and each other. It is about culture, and it is about life.”

The Haida’s steadfastness paid off. Although Haida leaders have kept a potential court case in their back pocket all these years for leverage, they ultimately haven’t needed it. On April 14, the Haida Nation and the province announced the Gaayhllxid/Gíihlagalgang “Rising Tide” Haida Title Lands Agreement. In it, the B.C. government formally recognizes Haida ownership of all the lands of Haida Gwaii.

This is the first time in Canadian history that the colonial government has recognized Indigenous title across an entire terrestrial territory, and it’s the first time this kind of recognition has occurred outside of the courts. Experts say it marks a new path toward Indigenous reconciliation.

“It’s groundbreaking, really,” says John Borrows, a member of the Chippewas of Nawash First Nation and an expert in Indigenous law at the University of Toronto. Although Indigenous title is widely considered an inherent right that doesn’t need to be granted by an external government or court, Borrows says, First Nations struggle to enforce it without legal backing. And so far, only two courts in Canada have recognized Indigenous title.

An aerial shot of a river surrounded by evergreens and lush greenery.
The remains of traditional cedar longhouses and carved mortuary and memorial poles mark the long-standing Haida presence at Nans Dins (Ninstints) village on SG̱ang Gwaay (Anthony Island) — one of over 200 islands that make up the archipelago of Haida Gwaii. Photo by Russ Heinl via Alamy.

In 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld title for the Tŝilhqot’in Nation in the B.C. Interior, and just recently, in mid-April 2024, the Supreme Court of British Columbia affirmed it for the coastal Nuchatlaht First Nation. However, neither ruling recognizes title across an entire traditional territory, and since the 1970s, Canadian courts have urged federal and provincial governments to resolve such differences through negotiation. Now, with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and growing public support on their side, the Haida and the province have finally done just that.

Gaagwiis (Jason Alsop), president of the Council of the Haida Nation, says the agreement ends a dark chapter in his nation’s history with the provincial government and provides a fair starting point for real reconciliation.

“What it signifies,” says Gaagwiis, “is a new foundation based on Yah’guudang, or respect, of recognizing this inherent title that pre-existed [European contact] and will continue to exist as the basis going forward. And, essentially, the province kind of ceding their claim to this land.”

The new agreement will soon be enshrined into B.C. law, naming the Haida as the rightful owners of all 200-plus islands of Haida Gwaii, which they have been stewarding for millennia. After a two-year transition period, the Haida Nation will manage the 98 per cent of its archipelago that was formerly considered Crown land, including protected areas and other forested lands. Having more of a say over the logging industry — which has clear cut over two-thirds of the islands’ old-growth forest since 1950 — has been a focus of the Haida’s title fight since the very beginning. The agreement won’t affect private property or municipal and provincial services, from highways to hospitals, which will continue to be regulated by the province.

“The idea that each legal system is recognizing the other one is a turning point,” Borrows says. “It’s also radically democratic and participatory.”

This marks a new kind of relationship, which can draw on the best of Haida and western influences, he adds. And unlike a treaty or court decision, which are more set in stone, this approach requires ongoing negotiation that can adapt and evolve with the times.

“It can keep people at the table, learning and working together with one another and trying to find that path to mutuality,” Borrows says.

The federal government is notably absent from the agreement for now. Both the province and the Haida Nation say their federal partners were delayed by procedural constraints, but plan to sign on eventually. (The feds were part of two other agreements — a reconciliation framework and a recognition of Haida governance — that led up to this title recognition.)

Gaagwiis says the Haida are also still negotiating with Canada over their rights to control the waters surrounding Haida Gwaii, which fall under federal government jurisdiction. These waters — teeming with shellfish, herring, sea cucumbers, five types of salmon and more than 20 species of whales, dolphins and porpoises — are not included in the land agreement but are paramount to the coastal First Nation and are a key part of its overall title declaration.

A number of people in a large, traditional red-cedar canoe in the ocean.
Haida Hereditary Chief Gidansda (Guujaaw) leads a group of paddlers aboard 'Luu Taas' (‘Wave Eater’), a 15-metre red-cedar canoe designed by acclaimed Haida artist Bill Reid for Expo 86. Carving and paddling cedar canoes is one example of how Haida people are inextricably linked to both land and sea. Photo courtesy of Guujaaw.

If marine areas or any other outstanding issues, such as financial compensation for past damages, can’t be sorted out through negotiation, the courts are still a fallback. The Haida Nation’s 20-year-old title claim, which hasn’t been judged in court, could still be heard as early as 2026.

While Indigenous Peoples in Canada and abroad are hailing this land title agreement as inspiring and precedent setting, Murray Rankin, B.C.’s minister of Indigenous relations, says the Haida’s unique circumstances made the process more successful.

“Haida Gwaii is not downtown Vancouver,” Rankin says. It’s a remote territory where the provincial government controlled the vast majority of the land, which is mainly protected and unprotected forest, as opposed to an urban environment composed mostly of private properties. The population of Haida Gwaii is 45 per cent Haida. The Council of the Haida Nation, which represents the Haida people, has a 20-year-old constitution, agreements with every local municipality and widespread support from non-Indigenous residents. And they’ve been on better terms with the provincial government since 2009, when they hashed out the Kunst’aa guu-Kunst’aayah Reconciliation Protocol (which translates to “the beginning”).

Of course, they also have a strong historical claim to the archipelago, complete with extensive archeological evidence. And, unlike some other Indigenous communities whose territories overlap, the Haida Nation doesn’t have to contend with competing land claims. A 2002 decision from the B.C. Court of Appeal on a forestry lawsuit called these facts “inescapable.”

All of this has created ideal conditions for negotiation that may elude other Indigenous communities, such as Cowichan Nation on the south coast of B.C., who are currently fighting the province in court over their own title claim. The province says it prefers negotiation, however. That’s in part because court rulings are not only costly but often opaque, Rankin says. “I hope [the Haida agreement] is a step toward other kinds of positive resolutions,” he adds.

Perhaps unexpectedly, the provincial government’s marked shift is a welcome one to Geoff Plant, the former attorney general who once offered the Haida 20 per cent of their land. Plant now works for a Vancouver-based law firm and spends a lot of time in meeting rooms trying to convince business people of the benefits of acknowledging Indigenous title; he says doing so breeds better engagement, harmony and certainty. And he now recognizes how flawed the government’s former approach was, which he compares to building and defending a wall between the province — which he once referred to as the landlord — and First Nations. “It’s clearer in hindsight what’s wrong with that,” Plant says.

Indigenous leaders in Canada and around the world have helped society reckon with the injustices Indigenous communities have faced, and power, public opinion and legal precedent have all shifted in response.

“We should see that, collectively, as an opportunity to build a better society,” Plant says. “Let’s figure out how to work constructively within that world rather than pretend that it doesn’t exist.”

The provincial wall may not have fully crumbled, but the tide is rising against it. And at least on Haida Gwaii, a colonial government is no longer lord of the land.  [Tyee]

  • Share:

Get The Tyee's Daily Catch, our free daily newsletter.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion and be patient with moderators. Comments are reviewed regularly but not in real time.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Keep comments under 250 words
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others or justify violence
  • Personally attack authors, contributors or members of the general public
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

Most Popular

Most Commented

Most Emailed

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Are You Concerned about Your Municipality’s Water Security?

Take this week's poll