Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.
BC Politics

‘Creative Accounting’: The NDP Faces Questions on Its Housing Promises

The opposition says the province is falling far short of its commitment to build 114,000 new housing units.

Andrew MacLeod 4 Apr

Andrew MacLeod is The Tyee's Legislative Bureau Chief in Victoria and the author of All Together Healthy (Douglas & McIntyre, 2018). Find him on Twitter or reach him at .

Whether the British Columbia government is on track to deliver on its promise of building 114,000 housing units within 10 years depends on what is counted and how the word “build” is understood.

While Premier David Eby and Housing Minister Ravi Kahlon are declaring victory, the BC Liberal Opposition says the actual number of units that have been built is a fraction of what the NDP promised.

“With tens of thousands of new homes now complete, under construction, or in development, we are on track to meet our target of 114,000 units in 10 years and go beyond that because we know that the need for housing doesn't stop in 10 years,” Eby said Monday while announcing an update on B.C.’s housing plan.

Kahlon said, “We are already projected to deliver 108,000, open or under active construction, by 2027, with tens of thousands of more homes coming through other avenues.”

The number matters largely because of the very specific promise the NDP made during the 2017 election campaign.

The platform document included the promise six times with slightly different wording each time about what an NDP government would do:

In each case, the NDP was clear it intended to “build” housing units.

But background documents released Monday show the government has expanded what it is counting.

To date since the 2017 election, there have been 15,783 units completed through BC Housing and 2,876 units of student housing, according to the government. These units are already open and housing people.

Another 11,326 units are under construction and 10,278 are “in progress,” though the ground is yet to be broken on them.

That adds up to 40,263 units that the government considers “directly funded and financed.”

But in its total number of units added, the government also includes 600 secondary suites built thanks to changes made in 2019 to the BC Building Code, 2,000 units entering the rental market due to changes preventing strata councils from restricting rentals, 11,000 created through federal rental financing and 20,805 units estimated to have come into the market thanks to the speculation and vacancy tax.

In other words, almost half of the 74,668 units the government claims have been added to date are “policy created” rather than newly built units.

The same is true of the 108,600 units the government says will be added by 2028 — nearly 40,000 of them are “policy-driven homes.”

According to Kahlon, it was always the plan to count those units towards the NDP’s housing promise.

“From the beginning it was always that we were going to build, it was going to be directly funded, it was going to be private sector, it was going to be through policy,” Kahlon said. “We said that from the beginning.”

The issue had come up before in debate of his ministry’s budget and the clear response to the opposition had been that the government would include all the units created or brought into the market, not just the ones it built, he said.

BC Liberal housing critic Karin Kirkpatrick, the MLA for West Vancouver-Capilano, said that means the government is now counting units that were built in the 1980s. “I have to really question those numbers and why they're, you know, reassessing something that was already built,” she told reporters.

Later, during question period in the legislature, Kirkpatrick said that halfway through the 10-year housing plan the NDP has abandoned it and admitted defeat. “The premier's failing on housing by every measure,” she said. “Instead of trying to build his way out of a housing crisis, the premier is trying to spin his way out of it.”

Peter Milobar, the finance critic and MLA for Kamloops-North Thompson, accused the government of “creative accounting” on housing numbers. “It's no wonder that BC Housing is under a forensic audit when we see how this government likes to play fast and loose with numbers when it comes to housing.”

The 32-page Homes for People plan released Monday included various measures, many of which have been previously announced or promised.

They include zoning changes to allow for more units on lots that have been for single family homes, forgivable loans for homeowners to build secondary rental suites, building more homes near public transit, introducing a flipping tax and accelerating permitting.

Eby said that the government has been making progress after taking over from a BC Liberal government that neglected housing for 16 years.

“Obviously more needs to be done,” he said. “People are still struggling to find housing.” Interest rates, global inflation and a quickly growing population have added to the challenge, he said.  [Tyee]

Read more: BC Politics, Housing

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion and be patient with moderators. Comments are reviewed regularly but not in real time.


  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Keep comments under 250 words
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others or justify violence
  • Personally attack authors, contributors or members of the general public
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context


The Barometer

Are You Concerned about AI?

Take this week's poll