journalism that swims
against the current.
BC Politics

Health Ministry Asks Staff Not to Delete Records Related to 2012 Firings

Deputy's memo comes in wake of scathing report on BC gov't email deletions.

Andrew MacLeod 24 Nov

Andrew MacLeod is The Tyee's Legislative bureau chief in Victoria and the author of A Better Place on Earth: The Search for Fairness in Super Unequal British Columbia (Harbour Publishing, April 2015). Find him on Twitter or reach him here.

image atom
'Please take all steps necessary to preserve these records whether or not they are transitory in nature,' deputy health minister Stephen Brown wrote to staff. Photo: Government of BC.

The deputy minister of health sent an email yesterday to all staff in the ministry asking them not to delete or destroy any records related to the 2012 firings that the provincial ombudsperson is investigating.

Stephen Brown wrote to health ministry staff that Ombudsperson Jay Chalke had sent him a letter requesting that "Ministry staff ensure the preservation of all electronic and paper records that currently exist and which relate or could relate to the subject matter of the referral."

Brown wrote that Chalke also requested, "From this point forward and until the conclusion of the investigation, Ministry staff ensure that they do not delete or otherwise destroy any electronic or paper records that relate or could relate to the subject matter of the referral, whether or not those records are transitory."

Premier Christy Clark's government spent the fall session of the legislature defending its record of deleting emails and failing to keep documents, following the Oct. 22 report by Information and Privacy Commissioner Elizabeth Denham titled: "Access Denied: Record Retention and Disposal Practices of the Government of British Columbia."

In that investigation, Denham's office "uncovered negligent searches for records, a failure to keep adequate email records, a failure to document searches, and the willful destruction of records responsive to an access request," Denham said. "Taken together, these practices threaten the integrity of access to information in British Columbia."

Reminder comes three years after firings

The opposition NDP hammered the theme in the legislature, drawing attention to the lack of records on numerous files, including the 2012 health ministry firings.

In September 2012, the health ministry announced allegations related to data management, contracts and conflicts of interest that would lead to seven firings and the freezing of several drug research contracts. Work that stopped as a result included an assessment of Premier Christy Clark's pet anti-smoking program.

The government has since reinstated two of the people who were fired, settled out of court in three wrongful dismissal and defamation lawsuits, and Clark has apologized for some of the firings and for misleading the public. Two lawsuits are ongoing.

A review by lawyer Marcia McNeil of what went wrong with the firings was released in December 2014, but McNeil wrote that she could not answer the basic questions of who made the decision to fire the workers or why.

McNeil wrote in her findings that throughout her investigation no employee would acknowledge their own role in any decision-making, resulting in a lot of finger-pointing. Her investigation was also stymied by a "dearth of documents," such as reports, briefing notes, and meeting notes, which she noted are "frequently prepared in situations where discipline may be contemplated."

The legislature's finance and government services committee in July asked Chalke's office to investigate "events leading up to the decision to terminate the employees; the decision to terminate itself; the actions taken by government following the terminations; and any other matters the Ombudsperson may deem worthy of investigation."

In his email to health ministry staff, Brown claimed the ministry has already produced a large number of records related to the firings, both in response to freedom of information requests and during McNeil's investigation.

However, he wrote, "effective immediately, all records that specifically or generally reference the events covered by the Ombudsperson’s mandate must be retained until further notice. Please take all steps necessary to preserve these records whether or not they are transitory in nature."

Health policy researcher and author Alan Cassels said that it's odd that Brown would be reminding people to keep records three years after the firings were made. "The horse hasn't just escaped from the barn, the barn's burned down," he said.

Despite numerous requests to the government since 2012 for information about the firings, little that's substantial has been released, Cassels said. "To be told there aren't any records, it stretches credibility to the breaking point. You just can't believe them."

Last week Chalke appeared before the finance committee to request a $7.1-million budget for 2016-2017, up by $542,000 from the previous year. The increase is needed largely due to the health firings investigation, referred to his office by the finance committee, which has already taken resources away from his office's regular work responding to complaints from the public, he said.  [Tyee]

Read more: Health, BC Politics

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.


  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context


The Barometer

What Environmental Impacts Are Most Concerning to You This Summer?

Take this week's poll