The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.

Flotilla Protesters Buoyed by Delay to $1.7 Billion LNG Plant

Woodfibre LNG puts enviro review on pause to address Squamish Nation concerns.

By Bob Mackin 13 Jul 2015 |

North Vancouver-based journalist Bob Mackin, a regular contributor to The Tyee, has reported for local, regional, national and international media outlets since 1990. Find his Tyee articles here.

While the proponent of a Howe Sound liquefied natural gas plant has pushed pause on the $1.7-billion project, area residents haven't suspended their campaign against it.

More than three-dozen power and sail boats -- as small as a rigid inflatable and as big as a yacht -- travelled around Bowyer Island midday July 11, blowing horns, displaying signs and banners and chanting "No LNG, No LNG!" under ominous clouds.

The Concerned Citizens Bowen and My Sea to Sky's Save our Sound Day had a hint of celebratory mood; the flotilla protest took place two days before the originally scheduled end of Woodfibre LNG's six-month environmental assessment review period.

The company behind the project, which has stated it would pay $2 million in local taxes a year and employ 100 full-timers, announced a delay to its application review on June 30 after the Squamish Nation Chiefs and Council issued 25 conditions for approval.*

The Squamish Nation worries the plant, proposed at a former pulp and paper mill, would pollute the air, land and water, and it wants insurance coverage in the event of a spill or explosion. The nation's conditions are similar to the 18 issued by the District of Squamish on April 30.

"As expected, the conditions reflect Squamish Nation's commitment to protecting land, water and heritage and our focus now is to take the time to review them and work with Squamish Nation to understand their conditions," said Woodfibre LNG vice-president Byng Giraud in a June 30 news release.

Woodfibre LNG proposes to produce 2.1 million tonnes of LNG a year with a 250,000 square-metre storage facility.

Natural gas supplier FortisBC, which built a pipeline in 1990 for the Sunshine Coast and Vancouver Island, proposes a 52-kilometre long, 20-inch diameter gas pipeline from north of the Coquitlam watershed to Squamish that would feed the plant.

Owner Pacific Oil and Gas Ltd. is part of Indonesian billionaire Sukanto Tanoto's empire.

Plant would fire up 2018

Woodfibre LNG still hopes to get regulatory approval and begin construction before the end of the year, but the plant wouldn't be in full operation until 2018, the year after the next provincial election.

582px version of BCLNGFlotilla_610px.jpg
Boaters celebrated the fact that Woodfibre LNG is briefly in irons. Photo by Bob Mackin.

With as many as 20 proposals for LNG plants in B.C., the Howe Sound facility is considered the most important politically for the BC Liberals. Woodfibre LNG would be visible from the Sea to Sky Highway, so the media and skeptical residents of B.C.'s most-populous region could see for themselves the hype around Premier Christy Clark's strategy to build a new industry for exporting fracked B.C. shale gas to Asia.

Many area residents aren't enthusiastic about the plant or the prospect of six to eight tankers, nearly twice the size of BC Ferries, plying Howe Sound every month. Insights West's July 10-published poll for the anti-tanker Dogwood Initiative found that the debate over Woodfibre LNG could decide the fate of Conservative MP John Weston in the October federal election and lead to the election of former West Vancouver mayor Pamela Goldsmith-Jones.

Weston has positioned himself as a supporter of Woodfibre LNG, while Goldsmith-Jones has said she's listening to people's questions and concerns about the project.

Of those who responded, 23 per cent in West Vancouver-Sunshine Coast-Sea-to-Sky Country said they would vote Liberal, one per cent better than Conservative. Meanwhile, 19 per cent would vote NDP and nine per cent Green. Some 25 per cent of respondents, however, were undecided.

Woodfibre LNG could also be the first of a triple play of industrial development on the west side of Howe Sound. The Burnco gravel mine and terminal across from Gambier Island's north point and Aquilini Renewable Energy's Port Mellon waste incinerator would further industrialize the fjord.

"There is no regional plan for Howe Sound, it's a very piecemeal approach," said Concerned Citizens Bowen's Anton van Walraven. "What we have to do as communities around the sound, we have to demand a planning process. We have to develop a vision."

Van Walraven said communities must study the area's ecological, recreational, real estate and industrial values and decide on how to find a "good mix of all those things."

The flotilla protest came, coincidentally, in the wake of BC Ferries' announcement that its planned conversion of two Spirit-class ferries to natural gas would be delayed from 2017 to 2018. North Vancouver's Seaspan and shipyards in Poland and Italy were shortlisted.

*Story corrected July 13 at 12:15 p.m.  [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: Are You Preparing for the Next Climate Disaster?

Take this week's poll