The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.

BC Local Election Spending 'Obscene', Says Watchdog

A look at money raised and spent by municipal electioneers across the province.

By Bob Mackin 25 Feb 2015 |

North Vancouver-based journalist Bob Mackin is a frequent contributor to The Tyee. Find his previous Tyee articles here.

Dermod Travis has one word to describe the sums of money raised and spent by local politicians and parties in British Columbia's 2014 local elections: obscene.

Vision Vancouver and its $3.4-million machine got most of the attention after Elections B.C. released financing reports on Monday, but other communities also saw increases in 2014.

B.C. recently joined Ontario and other provinces by extending municipal terms from three years to four, but while Ontario caps individual donations at $750, B.C. has no such limit.

And while changes may be coming -- a committee of the legislature was struck to hear testimony about enacting limits on fundraising and spending -- Travis, the executive director of IntegrityBC, said the BC Liberals are in no rush to act.

"I don't expect legislation to be tabled in this session at all; maybe next fall, maybe the spring session after that," Travis said. "But as long as you can spend these types of dollars, I'm still a little baffled where the B.C. government will set the limit and [it] actually have meaning."

Regulations are such that reports filed by the mayors of Burnaby, Surrey and Vancouver state they received no donations, nor did they spend anything on their winning election campaigns. Derek Corrigan, Linda Hepner and Gregor Robertson were the faces of their parties last fall, but it was their parties that collected the donations and spent from central accounts.

There was one major exception in Metro Vancouver. Richmond's Malcolm Brodie, an independent, was re-elected for a fourth time. His report shows total expenditures of $451,294.69 to beat challenger Richard Lee and his three-person Richmond Reform slate, which spent $89,946.54.

Brodie's form shows $140,990.74 in election expenses and $148,810,14 in permissible payments plus a $161,493.81 surplus. His campaign raised $265,160 in donations and reported $190,417.50 in permissible deposits, primarily funds left over from his last campaign.

Nearly all of the $113,736.78 income reported by Richmond Reform was connected to its city council and school board candidates Sunny and Kenneth Ho. It is not uncommon, Travis said, for candidates to make sizeable donations to their own campaigns.

"If you don't have a cap on individual donations, you really don't have an assurance that the money they're donating to their campaign is their money," Travis said.

One underdog win

Brodie's 2014 campaign had a head start -- his form shows $172,333.92 in surplus funds and interest carried over from his 2011 campaign. Brodie also reported $72,250 from his 2012 fundraising dinner and $54,800 from his 2013 dinner. His biggest donations in 2014 were from Westmark Developments for $6,900 and $6,025 from Great Canadian Gaming, the casino company that operates River Rock Casino Resort in Richmond.

Over in Burnaby, Corrigan's NDP-allied Burnaby Citizens Association showed $484,648.68 income and it spent $473,728.97 to stay in power. In 2011, it spent $269,217. The biggest single donor was CUPE Local 73 for $91,125.

In the City of North Vancouver, Darrell Mussatto was returned for a fourth term. He raised $91,394.79 and spent $74,051.24, almost $23,000 more than 2011's $51,686.43.

In Victoria, new mayor Lisa Helps proved an underdog can still win. Her $88,546.06 campaign upset incumbent Dean Fortin's $126,636.42 campaign. By comparison, Fortin raised $70,530 in 2011 donations.

While Helps got no help from unions, Fortin counted $10,600 donations from both B.C. Government and Service Employees' Union and CUPE B.C. and locals 50 and 1978.

Former BC Liberal cabinet minister Ida Chong lost her Oak Bay-Gordon Head seat in a $128,726 campaign in 2013 to Green Andrew Weaver. She mounted an unsuccessful comeback to the political arena with a $108,120.45 mayoral campaign. Chong received a $100 donation from former caucus mate Moira Stilwell and $1,000 from retired veteran bureaucrat Robert Plecas.

The next big vote in B.C. is the Metro Vancouver plebiscite on a 0.5 per cent sales tax hike to fund TransLink expansion. Unlike the local elections, there is no requirement for campaigners or third parties to disclose who donated what.  [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: Are You Preparing for the Next Climate Disaster?

Take this week's poll