The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.

Leaked: Secret Final Draft of CETA Treaty

Groundbreaking deal in the works exposed in Germany. A Tyee first look.

By Andrea Rexer 14 Aug 2014 |

Andrea Rexer is a German journalist working for The Tyee for two months on a journalism grant (The Burns Fellowship). Back home she heads the Frankfurt office of one of Germany's biggest daily national newspapers, Sueddeutsche Zeitung. She covers economics and financials. Sueddeutsche Zeitung has 1.5 million readers daily and is considered a left-liberal newspaper. Andrea studied in Germany and Chile and has worked from Vienna/Austria, Buenos Aires/Argentina and several cities in Germany. In 2014 she earned the Ludwig Erhard prize for economic journalism. On twitter: @andrearexer.

image atom
A German TV station is making public a final draft negotiated in secret between Canada and the European Union.

For politicians in Canada and Europe this will be obligatory summer reading: A large chunk of the final proposed text of the free trade agreement CETA between Canada and the European Union, negotiated in secret, was leaked today.

The whole treaty is said to have 1,500 pages. But the German Public Television Station ARD has so far only put the first 521 pages online. The appendix with detailed data is still missing.

The CETA (Comprehensive and Economic Trade Agreement) has been subject to criticism from a wide range of groups, amongst them environmental movements and globalization critics. Most opponents don't denounce free trade, but question many other aspects that come along with the deal. Actually, only about one third of the document discusses trade -- the rest is about balancing power between governments and investors.

Investor rights

One controversial chapter is about investor rights (ISDS). It gives investors the option to bypass the court system and settle conflicts in a private and sometimes clandestine way. A first glimpse at the documents shows that investor rights in the CETA deal are quite broadly defined, but are not the same as under the North American Free Trade Agreement between Canada, U.S. and Mexico (NAFTA). As a consequence of being part of NAFTA, Canada has had to pay investors more than $170 million so far in such settlements. Opponents of CETA fear that those special rights undermine democracy because they weaken the power of local and national governments. Investors might sue governments if their regulation hinders investment.

The proponents of the deal say that those investor rights are necessary in some European Countries, where the legal system isn't good enough -- e.g. in countries like Romania, Bulgaria or Cyprus. That's why investors should have access to private settlement procedures.

The most prominent opponent of ISDS so far is the German government. In a letter to the German parliament, the Ministry of Economics has said that it "doesn't consider Investor Rights to be necessary in a trade deal between countries with developed Legal Systems." That's why there had been rumours that the Germans might oppose the deal, and might even stop it, but sources that are close to the government in Berlin have said to The Tyee that the Germans "are quite aware that they are not the only country inside Europe." In other words: The Germans have accepted that they cannot stop the deal.

"We wouldn't be opposed to reducing tariffs. But this deal is about giving rights to corporations," said Garry Neil, executive director of the Council of Canadians in an interview with The Tyee.

Scott Sinclair of the Ottawa-based think tank Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives said: "The outcome of the deal is that corporations win and citizens on both sides of the Atlantic lose."

Treaty tilts in Europe's favour

A first glimpse on the document shows that the treaty is more favorable to the European Union than to Canada.

The main benefit for Europe is easy to name: Canada opens its public procurements to European corporations. European companies are much stronger when it comes to public tenders because there aren't as many Canadian companies willing to bid in European public procurements.

The benefits for Canada are not as clearly defined. Canadian companies hope to get better access on European markets -- though it's not clear that what Canada gains here outweighs what it gives up.

Canada will open its dairy market and enlarge the import quota for cheese. A source close to the negotiations told The Tyee that Canada now imports about five per cent of its dairy products and that if CETA is implemented, that figure will rise to about nine per cent. The Canadian consumers may benefit in lower prices and more variety in dairy consumption. The losers, however, might be Canadian dairy producers whose income is likely to fall.

Other agricultural producers in Canada stand to benefit from the treaty. Europe has agreed to open its market for fish and meat. Many European consumers, however, are resistant to buying North American meat. They are afraid that it doesn't meet their quality standards, especially when cattle are treated with hormones.

Overall, Canada's trade deficit with the EU is likely increase further. Preliminary studies compiled earlier by the European Commission and the Canadian government show CETA would allow Canada to increase its exports of goods and services to the EU by 12.5 billion dollars while the EU would be able to increase its exports to Canada by 25 billion dollars.

Canada has also committed to lengthen patent protection for drugs, which might cost public healthcare annually $800 million more, according to the CCPA. The reason for the higher cost is that generics will come later into the market, the monopoly protection for pharma industry is longer with CETA.

More to come

If the Europeans would gain more from the deal, Canadians would profit as well. Both sides pushing the deal hope it will create new jobs, and that the economy will grow faster in all countries. Not even the opponents doubt that some CETA provision will produce benefits, but the debate lies in how big, and how fairly distributed, such benefits might be.

These are notes drawn from a first scan of the leaked treaty language. In the coming days, The Tyee will report more in detail about the treaty and how it will affect consumers and citizens in Canada and Europe. Next up, for example: How will CETA affect local buying provisions for public institutions in Canada?  [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: What Coverage Would You Like to See More of This Year?

Take this week's poll