Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.
2010 Olympics

Three Billion Watch the Games? That's Crazy Talk

Hey, lots will tune in. But number claimed by IOC and politicians deemed absurd by experts.

Geoff Dembicki 11 Feb

Geoff Dembicki reports for The Tyee.

image atom
Visa ad for Olympics. Big audience, but not that big.

Organizers and government partners of the 2010 Winter Games like to talk big. Three billion TV viewers for the duration of the Olympics, they say. Or was that three billion for the opening ceremonies alone?

Both scenarios are misleading at the very least, an expert in television viewership told The Tyee Wednesday.

And the notion that half the world will tune in for day-one of the Olympics is plain hyperbole, said Robert Thompson, founding director of the Bleier Center for Television and Popular Culture at Syracuse University. "Those numbers strike me as awfully high," he said.

Whopping predictions

This Friday, the Olympics will open to global fanfare. Organizers have promised a spectacular ceremony and a huge viewing audience. A 2007 VANOC press release called the opening day spectacle "an event of historic importance" that will unfold in front of a "world audience of three billion."

The Government of Canada reiterates the same impressive numbers. In a recent Vancouver Sun op-ed, Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson suggested three billion TV viewers during the Games.

International Olympic Committee president Jacques Rogge gave the same projections in a Tuesday speech, repeating the "record number" that has been cited in news stories.

Under the first scenario, half the world watches the opening day festivities at B.C. place.

To put that in context, Thompson said, about one third of Americans tuned in for the last Superbowl. It was a television ratings record.

It's extremely unlikely Vancouver's opening ceremonies would trump those numbers in the U.S., Thompson said. And if half the States isn't watching, he said, how likely that half the world will?

IOC produced three billion figure

"My guess is that marketing of the Olympics is like the marketing of anything else, and the idiom of the day is hyperbole," Thompson said.

He found the second scenario -- three billion viewers over the course of the Games -- more plausible, if a little disingenuous. Given our globalized, media-saturated world, he said it's possible half the planetary population will be exposed to the 2010 Olympics in some way. But that could mean walking by a public TV set, or hearing mention of it on the radio.

"There's a big difference between that and the people who will be actively consuming broadcasts on a regular basis during the course of the Games," Thompson said.

Last December, an anonymous B.C. Winter Games Secretariat official said the three billion figure comes from the IOC. It applies for the duration of the Games, not the opening ceremonies.

That hasn't been entirely clear in recent media reports which still claim the huge number for day one of the Games.

European study zeroes in on logic flaw

A 2006 study from the European Tour Operators Association concluded that TV viewership projections for the Olympics are based on potential total audiences, not actual viewers.

"It is like judging an individual book's popularity by counting how many people live near book shops or who have access to public libraries," it read.

Over time, tentative estimates become fact, said Joe Weiler, a University of British Columbia law professor and member of the school's Olympic Studies Research Team.

"These figures get tossed around until they become conventional wisdom and then nobody actually thinks about it," he said.  [Tyee]

Read more: 2010 Olympics

  • Share:

Get The Tyee's Daily Catch, our free daily newsletter.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.


  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

Most Popular

Most Commented

Most Emailed


The Barometer

Should Fossil Fuel Ads Be Restricted?

Take this week's poll