The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
Get our free newsletter
Sign Up
Analysis
  |  
Politics
  |  
Elections

Political Parties’ Voter Profiling Is a Threat to Democracy

They exempted themselves from federal privacy laws and collect sensitive personal information.

By Sara Bannerman, Julia Kalinina and Nicole Goodman 27 Jan 2020 | The Conversation

Sara Bannerman is an associate professor and Canada Research Chair in communication policy and governance at McMaster University in Hamilton.

Julia Kalinina is a law student at York University in Toronto.

Nicole Goodman is an assistant professor of political science at Brock University in St. Catharines, Ont.

This article originally appeared in The Conversation Canada.

The data collection practices used by political parties could pose a threat to voters’ engagement in the democratic process and could have negative implications for Canadian democracy.

British Columbia’s privacy commissioner recently found that political parties in the province collect sensitive personal information about voters such as income, ethnicity, religious affiliation and political beliefs without their knowledge or consent.

In the United Kingdom, an investigation launched following the Cambridge Analytica scandal "uncovered a disturbing disregard for voters’ personal privacy." It concluded that Cambridge Analytica had aggregated Facebook users’ personal information without their consent for use in political campaigns. In the U.K., it was used it to send micro-targeted information to voters.

Similar practices have been uncovered around the world.

British Columbia’s privacy commissioner noted that similar — and largely unchecked — digital practices in Canada pose significant risks for "our democratic system of governance."

Elections all over the world are becoming increasingly electronic and data-driven. At the same time, data is quickly becoming such a highly valued commodity that recent publications have not only described it as the "oil" of the 21st century, but as its "plutonium."

Canadian voters remain largely unaware of the types of personal information that political parties collect. Many also don’t know that federal privacy legislation does not apply to political parties in Canada, leaving parties largely beyond the reach of federal law in their use and collection of data.

That may change, however. Canada’s Competition Bureau recently announced it is investigating the three largest federal political parties amid allegations they "made misleading statements about the manner in which they collect and use Canadian voters’ personal information."

How are voters affected?

As researchers, we sought to find out how the collection and use of personal information by federal political parties affect voters’ willingness to interact with campaign personnel during elections.

As a part of the Digital Ecosystem Research Challenge, we conducted a survey of Canadians during the 2019 federal election campaign. We informed respondents that political parties may collect a wide variety of personal information about voters, including their religion, gender, ethnicity and political views.

After being informed about these data collection practices, more than half (51 per cent) of respondents said that they would be "somewhat" or "very" unlikely to speak with campaign personnel. This suggests that awareness of federal parties’ collection of personal information may discourage some voters from engaging with party officials during elections. This is concerning given that engagement between voters and parties during campaigns is an important way to mobilize the vote.

At the same time, our study suggests something can be done. More than 40 per cent of respondents said that a party’s stance on privacy made a "moderate" or "major difference" in their willingness to engage with campaign officials.

Strong privacy practices appeal to voters

If data is the new means of parties targeting and reaching out to voters, good privacy laws and policies could perhaps promote Canadians’ willingness to engage with them and enhance voter confidence in party institutions.

Current federal laws merely require political parties to publish their privacy policies publicly, including online. Federal privacy law does not set minimum standards for the content of policies and establishes no mechanism for ensuring parties’ compliance. Nor does it provide a mechanism to ensure parties abide by their privacy promises.

Canadian federal law provides no way for people to find out what information parties hold about them. British Columbia is the only province in Canada where privacy law binds political parties. This allows the B.C. privacy commissioner to examine political parties’ data collection practices.

Stronger powers required

Extending federal privacy laws to political parties will not fix all of the troubling data collection practices of the digital 21st century, but it’s a start.

Daniel Therrien, Canada’s privacy commissioner, supports extending privacy legislation to political parties, as does the House of Commons ethics committee.

The Cambridge Analytica scandal erupted in a country where political parties are bound by privacy legislation. U.K. privacy laws did not stop political parties from amassing large quantities of data and using it to micro-target British voters.

However, British privacy laws did enable the U.K. information commissioner to investigate and require parties to provide information about their practices. These laws also enabled the U.K. privacy commissioner to impose fines, to instigate criminal investigations and to issue warnings to all major British political parties.

In Canada, voters have little information about what exactly is being done with their data. That’s because federal privacy law does not impose specific legal requirements on how political parties collect and use their data, and there are insufficient enforcement mechanisms or investigatory powers.The Conversation

Left unchecked, this power could have consequences for voter trust in federal political parties and democratic engagement in elections.  [Tyee]

Read more: Politics, Elections

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Tyee Poll: What Coverage Would You Like to See More of This Year?

Take this week's poll