Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.
Municipal Politics

Lots Less Waste, But Vancouver Is Still Going to Miss Its Green Goal

City has cut waste going to landfills by 23 per cent since 2008, still short of the 2020 target.

Michelle Gamage 28 Feb

Michelle Gamage is an independent journalist and photographer based in Vancouver with an environmental and feminist beat. You can find her on Twitter here.

It’s a slow Wednesday morning at the Vancouver South Transfer Station near the Fraser River. Snow has blanketed the city and green bin pickups have been halted while crews are diverted to snow removal and salting.

But trucks are still arriving, dumping their loads on the floor for inspection or directly into the giant pit in the middle of the hangar. A single bulldozer roars inside the building as it climbs over the piles of garbage, pushing waste along an incline till it cascades into a waiting 53-foot-long container.

The entire city’s waste — about 3,000 tonnes a week — is brought here to be compacted before being shipped to the landfill, said Brennan Sharma, superintendent of transfer and landfill operations and engineering services at the transfer station.

In early February, Vancity credit union released a report congratulating British Columbia for producing the second least waste per capita in Canada, just behind Nova Scotia. According to State of Waste: How B.C. Compares in the War on Trash, Vancouverites produce 318 kilograms of waste per single-family residence per year, one of the lowest amounts in Metro Vancouver.

That’s even better than the number first published in the report, said Albert Shamess, director of zero waste and resource recovery for Vancouver. Originally the report said Vancouver residents produced 426 kilograms of waste per household, but Shamess noticed an error in calculation right away. This city’s waste is, after all, his business.

But despite Vancouver’s shiny standing, it looks like it will miss one of the goals of the Greenest City Action Plan. The plan called for the amount of solid waste sent to the landfill and incinerator to be cut by 50 per cent from 2008 levels by 2020.

Waste calculations are always two years behind, so the 2019 update is based on 2017 numbers. They show Vancouver had only reduced its waste by 23 per cent since 2008. That’s a cut from 480,000 tonnes of waste produced in 2008 to 371,000 tonnes in 2017, according to the latest action plan update — but still 240,000 tonnes short of the goal.

“The 50-per-cent target was set based on things that were happening at the time, and the whole structure of how we deal with waste has since changed,” Shamess said. “In 2010 there was the impression we could recycle our way out of the problem. If you’re looking for an area where the lights have gone on for people, it’s realizing that recycling can’t be the only answer. It can’t be just about recycling and composting and recovery of materials. It has to be focused on… reduction, too.”

Shamess spotted a miscalculation in a recent report on how much waste British Columbians produce. Waste is, after all, his business. Photo by by Michelle Gamage.

The 2020 Action Plan set aggressive goals, but the hope at the time was aggressive goals could make aggressive change, said Mike Harcourt, former B.C. premier and mayor of Vancouver, in a phone interview. Harcourt was part of the Greenest City Action Team in 2009, which helped develop the 10-year goals with then Vancouver mayor Gregor Robertson. “[These 10 years were] like the scientific method, trial and error. So where did we error and what can we do to regroup and do it again better?” Harcourt said.

The most important factor in dramatic social shift is often desperation, like when Sweden’s access to oil was cut off in the 1970s OPEC crisis, he said. That pushed Sweden to turn its waste into fuel using incinerators, and now, by 2030, the country is slated to be entirely energy self-sufficient, said Harcourt.

“They did it because they had to. [When it comes to waste reduction in Vancouver,] we don’t have to — we should — but we don’t have to... We’re not desperate enough to have to do something,” he said.

That is not to say Vancouver has been slacking in its efforts.

Shamess said residents participated in the city’s waste reduction efforts at amazing levels, and Vancouverites have changed their attitudes to waste diversion. The ban on throwing out organics, such as food scraps or paper, and the landfill ban on dumping clean wood helped divert 60,000 tonnes of material in 2015 alone when the programs were first launched, according to the Vancity report.

But residential waste is just under half the total produced in Canada, with the industrial, commercial and institutional and demolition, land-clearing and construction sectors contributing the rest, according to the report.

And there’s only so much a single municipality has control over, said Shamess.

“We’re trying to focus on what we can do with construction and demolition waste within the city, that would go a long ways to getting us to that 50 per cent goal... But how do we move forward in those areas? That’s where it really comes into provincial regulatory requirements. Maybe they’ll mandate Recycle BC to do more in the commercial side instead of just the residential area.”

Initiatives like the clean wood ban and the Green Demolition Bylaw — where a certain amount of waste from houses being torn down must be recycled or salvaged — have helped, but the ultimate shift must come from society moving from a linear consumption practice to a circular one, said Shamess.

Instead of extracting, manufacturing, using and disposing of materials, we instead need to recycle and recover materials at every stage.

The Vancouver Zero Waste Centre is an open-air compound where Vancouverites can drop off accepted materials for free. Photo by by Michelle Gamage.
When canisters end up with the rest of the waste they can be compacted and cause small explosions said Sharma. But that’s rare because it’s free to drop off the canisters he added. Photo by by Michelle Gamage.
Chip bags, stand-up pouches and plastic bags and overwrap must be separated, but all are acceptable recycling materials and can be dropped off for free at the Vancouver Zero Waste Centre. Photo by by Michelle Gamage.

Enter the Vancouver Zero Waste Centre, revamped in early 2018 to accept and recycle even more materials. Household items like bikes, books, used propane tanks, cooking oil, electronics, large appliances and more can be dropped off for free. The list of materials that can be recycled is ever expanding: chip bags, colourful Styrofoam, mesh avocado sacks and grocery bags are now recyclable. Residents can use the Waste Wizard search engine on the city’s recycling website to find where they can properly recycle items.

Certain materials, like mattresses, can be recycled, but must be dumped at the transfer station for a $15 fee first, said Sharma.

You’d be surprised what people get rid of, said Ron Campbell, who works at the centre. As an avid photographer his jaw dropped to see a woman dump a functioning $6,000 lens in the electronics recycling bin a few weeks ago.

“She was just fed up with it and didn’t want to deal with it anymore!” he laughed. The centre has a zero-tolerance policy that forbids employees from taking items home, but occasionally certain items are held aside to be admired for a short while. An antique radio and a metal pig — to celebrate the Lunar New Year — rest on a surface near the electronics bin.

Items brought to the Zero Waste Centre are repaired and donated, or recycled for their materials, said Shamess.

582px version of Oldschoolcool1.jpg
There is a zero tolerance policy for employees taking items given to the Vancouver Zero Waste Centre — but this old-fashioned radio has been set aside to admire for a while. Photo by Michelle Gamage.
582px version of Yearofthepig.jpg
Ron Campbell holds the wooden pig set aside after it was donated in honour of the year of the pig. ‘I was born in the year of the pig!’ he laughs. Employees are forbidden from taking donated materials home, but the pig was set aside in honour of the Lunar New Year. Photo by Michelle Gamage.

Back at the transfer station Shamess is optimistic when he talks about Vancouver’s new goal of producing Zero Waste by 2040.

New initiatives like the Single-Use Item Reduction Strategy will help shift consumer perspectives and behavioural change for residential, industrial and commercial and demolition, land-clearing and construction waste he said.

The 2040 goal is ambitious, but it doesn’t mean that we have to build a society where people no longer throw things away said Shamess — it just means we need to build a way to recover all of those materials.

Note: Story updated on Feb. 28, 2019 at 12 p.m. to edit a caption that incorrectly stated Vancity miscalculated waste data.  [Tyee]

Read more: Municipal Politics

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.


  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context


The Barometer

Are You Concerned about AI?

Take this week's poll