The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.

UBC Rejects Divestment against 'Expressed Will' of Students and Faculty, Says Campaigner

Board of governors presents alternative fund, notes low turnout for divestment votes.

By Katie Hyslop 16 Feb 2016 |

Katie Hyslop is The Tyee's education and youth reporter.

The University of British Columbia's board of governors' decision to create a Sustainable Future Fund rather than scrap the university's fossil fuel investments was a far-from-satisfactory resolution for many of the students and faculty who voted in favour of divestment.

''It's pretty shocking when a university chooses to ignore the expressed will of both its students and faculty,'' said Alex Hemingway, a UBC PhD student and divestment coordinator with the UBCC350 environmental activist group.

The board has deliberated on divestment since April 2014, when the student union first voted in a referendum in favour of divesting the university's $1.4-billion endowment fund from fossil fuel companies.

That same month, the board announced another referendum was required, leading to a 2015 faculty referendum where over 60 per cent voted in favour of divestment.

Yesterday, the board voted in favour of creating a separate Sustainable Future Fund, with a seed of $10 million from UBC's $193-million Trek Endowment, saying it would have more of an impact on climate change than divestment.

The new fund is restricted to a two per cent investment in carbon producers and only environmentally, socially, and corporately responsible companies.

But UBCC350 quickly panned the decision, claiming the board's deliberations didn't include consultation with students, faculty or staff, and occurred mostly behind closed doors.

''If we had had an opportunity to go into a more serious investigation of the issue with the board, I'm hoping some of them would have come around. But we haven't seen that yet and that's what we've been asking for,'' Hemingway said.

Low turnout at votes: board

The board countered that UBC support for divestment is suspect because only about 20 per cent of students and faculty actually voted.

''We didn't have a counter-petition or referendum on not divesting,'' said Philip Steenkamp, vice president external relations and communications, who spoke on the board's behalf.

Both sides are seeking to address climate change, he added, but there are different views on how best to do it.

While the board can't move investments from the endowment to the new fund, Steenkamp said current investors have the option to move their money, and the school will encourage new investors to consider the fund.

Hemingway said turnout for the divestment votes was consistent with any student union election. The Tyee reached out to the Alma Mater Society, UBC's undergraduate student union, for comment, but as it is reading week no one was available.

The Sustainable Investment Fund is a drop in the bucket compared to the university's fossil fuel investments, Hemingway said.

''We're talking about a $10-million fund that is emblematic of the type of hand-waving and half-measures that we see in responses to climate change, both here at the university and more broadly in Canada. What we actually need is emphatic, dramatic action now.''

Fight not over, vows campaigner

Fossil fuels encompass a small portion of the $1.4-billion endowment fund: approximately $85 million of the endowment is invested in energy corporations, and $41 million of that is invested in companies that climate campaigners want UBC to divest from over five years.

But divestment isn't consistent with the board's fiduciary responsibility to the university to get the most out of their investments, which in turn support students' scholarships and bursaries, Steenkamp said.

''We can be an active investor and work with companies in helping them improve their practice over time,'' he said, noting that some energy companies like Shell invest in renewable energy research.

For its part, UBCC350 believes taking money away from fossil fuel companies could force change.

''If a company began agreeing to the fact that they had to leave 80 per cent of their fossil fuel reserves in the ground, then we should talk about taking them off the [divestment] list and allow investments again,'' Hemingway said.

The board sought legal advice from law firm Koskie Minsky on whether the divestment proposal met the university's Endowment Responsible Investment Policy divestment criteria, and based yesterday's decision on the firm’s advice.

According to Hemingway, the firm didn't conclude that divestment from fossil fuels is inconsistent with fiduciary duties, but that the divestment proposal didn't provide the necessary alternative: higher-return investment suggestions for replacing money lost from divesting in fossil fuels.

That's why the students proposed taking five years to divest to allow time to identify more ethical investment alternatives to fossil fuels, Hemingway added.

''That would give time for more fossil-free pooled funds to emerge on the market. There are a few in Canada already… and there are more that are going to be coming online.''

Hemingway noted the fight is not over: UBCC350 is considering shelling out for a legal analysis of the board's decision, as well as asking UBC alumni to withhold donations until the school divests.

No post-secondary institution or pension plan in Canada has yet divested from fossil fuels, though many, including Dalhousie University, McGill University, and the Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan have considered it. The University of Toronto's president is expected to make a decision on divestment this spring.

According to Fossil Free, an umbrella organization of divestment campaigns, over 500 organizations worldwide, including universities and schools, churches, foundations, and pension funds have committed to divest $3.4 trillion from fossil fuel companies.  [Tyee]

Read more: Energy, Education,

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: Are You Preparing for the Next Climate Disaster?

Take this week's poll