News

A Tyee Series

Tyee's Climate Change Crash Course Quiz

You've taken the course. Now test your knowledge. And earn a diploma.

By Eric Nadal, 1 Feb 2013, TheTyee.ca

new_life.png

Who says facts need to be dry?

Related

How much do you know about what's happening in our climate? If you've been following the Tyee's eight-part Climate Change Crash Course, then you'll ace this climate facts quiz. Take the test, check your answers and prove you're a citizen climate expert! The quiz should take just minutes to complete but take as much time as you wish and feel free to look at the course material as you go (the eight bold-faced headings in this exam link back to pertinent course material). If you get 12 or more answers right, download a certificate of completion declaring you to be a qualified settler of arguments with climate change deniers. Ready? Begin…

Physics:

1) The most abundant greenhouse gas in the atmosphere is:

a) oxygen
b) methane
c) carbon dioxide
d) water vapour

2) CO2 captures and re-radiates:

a) heat arriving from the sun
b) visible light energy arriving from the sun
c) infrared energy radiating from the earth
d) energy from radio waves

Heat:

3) The extra energy that our elevated CO2 level pours into the Earth's climate system is how many times more than humanity's total energy use:

a) 1,000 times
b) 600 times
c) 30 times
d) 5 times

4) Carbon dioxide is the most important greenhouse gas because:

a) it captures more heat than any other greenhouse gas.
b) it's the most abundant greenhouse gas.
c) it is stable, long-lasting, and keeps the atmosphere warm enough to hold water vapour.
d) it is produced from burning fossil fuels.

CO2 in the past:

5) The sun used to be much dimmer. The Earth stayed relatively warm most likely because:

GET YOUR CLIMATE CHANGE DIPLOMA

How did you do on this quiz? The key is at the end. If you got 12 or more answers right, you receive an official (looking) certificate verifying that you have completed an important journey of intellectual improvement on behalf of all humanity. Print it out by clicking here.

a) CO2 levels were much higher than today
b) the many animals alive then warmed the atmosphere
c) there were a lot of volcanoes
d) Earth's orbit brought it closer to the sun

6) More recently, the world was too warm for polar ice sheets to form when carbon dioxide levels were:

a) several times higher than at present (levels are now about 394 parts per million)
b) less than half of today's level
c) there is no correlation between CO2 and ice ages
d) around today's level or slightly higher, between 350 and 550 ppm.

CO2 and weather

7) Climate change is bringing Canada:

a) less rain, as the world gets drier
b) both more rain and more rainy days
c) no change to our precipitation
d) fewer rain days and fewer big storms

8) Today's climate change is different from past climate shifts because:

a) Earth has never been this hot before
b) it's happening hundreds of times faster
c) the ocean is absorbing much more heat than before
d) this time we can predict exactly where on Earth we'll get different weather

The forecast:

9) By the end of this century, climate models predict that extreme drought will affect how much of the world's farm land:

a) nearly one-third, or 30 per cent
b) more than half, or more than 50 per cent
c) about one-tenth, or roughly 10 per cent
d) about what it is today: less than five per cent

10) Warmer temperatures will affect plants and wildlife by:

a) helping plants grow faster and reducing the stress on animals from extreme cold
b) encouraging plants and animals to move to follow the weather they prefer
c) disrupting weather patterns and ecosystems that plants and animals depend on, leading to extinctions
d) creating more room for them to live, as glaciers and ice-caps melt

Ticking clocks:

11) The world's oceans have been soaking up a lot of both heat and carbon dioxide. Lately, this absorption has:

a) increased, as fossil fuel emissions and temperatures rise
b) decreased: while oceans are still absorbing heat, they're absorbing less CO2 as their water becomes saturated
c) hasn't changed: the oceans are still soaking up as much heat and CO2 as ever
d) in fact, the oceans don't play any role; climate change happens in the atmosphere

12) The warming Arctic could affect the rate of climate change by:

a) slowing it down, the way ice in a glass of water makes it cooler
b) speeding it up, as reduced ice and snow cover is available to reflect sunlight back out to space
c) speeding it up, as the once-frozen permafrost releases the carbon from defrosted organic matter
d) both b and c: less reflection, and more carbon from melting permafrost

Uncertainty:

13) When scientists talk about the "uncertainty" of climate change, they mean:

a) they use dice to decide what conditions they will forecast for any given day in the future
b) that they don't entirely understand the behaviour of greenhouse gases and have to make guesses
c) that they are confident about the general trends of climate change, but can't predict all its details
d) that climate change might not be happening at all

14) The latest real-world observations about climate change indicate that:

a) some changes, like the melting of ice-sheets and ocean rise, are actually happening faster than predicted
b) scientists are right to be "uncertain" because the observations don't match their predictions
c) climate change is only happening in some places on the planet, not everywhere
d) climate change actually stopped in the late 1990s

The carbon math:

15) Scientists say that any more than about 450 parts per million of CO2 in the atmosphere could create runaway climate change by melting permafrost and our remaining ice sheets. At our current rate of emissions, we'll break through that level:

a) by the end of the century
b) in 200-300 years
c) by the end of this decade
d) within less than 30 years

16) We can avoid pushing our atmospheric carbon "budget" beyond the tipping point of 450 ppm if we:

a) switch from coal and oil to natural gas, including unconventional natural gas, for our energy supply
b) limit fossil energy use to only conventional oil and gas supplies
c) close down all coal-fired power plants immediately
d) climate 'lag' means it's already too late to avoid disastrous global warming

Answer key:

1:d 2:c 3:b 4:c 5:a 6:d 7:b 8:b 9:a 10:c 11:b 12:d 13:c 14:a 15:d 16:b

How did you do? If you got 12 right, you may now download a certificate to frame and hang in a place of pride. Point to it regularly when guests visit, reminding them that you know more about climate change than they do.

Get the certificate by clicking here.

Thanks and congratulations!  [Tyee]

Read more: Energy, Environment

11  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • ireckon

    15 weeks ago

    Authority

    "In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual." - Galileo Galilei, contrarian astronomer.

  • Hakuin

    15 weeks ago

    an astronomer

    who would NOT be a denialist today. BECAUSE he was a SCIENTIST.

  • the crucible

    15 weeks ago

    hypothesis vs theory

    In science, what is the difference?

    Both provide logical explanations for observed phenomena. Both provide predictions for future observations. Both have an internal consistency. They can generally be described by math.

    A hypothesis graduates to being a theory as it passes the test results it predicts. If a hypothesis produces no new testable predictions, it remains that way forever. The "best" hypothesis (making and passing the most testable predictions) is the one graduated to a theory.

    A theory is the working basis for science studies and research. It has a track record of performing well and making testable predictions. This does not make it inviolate, as new evidence can modify or even invalidate it (it predicts something cannot happen, that is observed to happen).

    As a result, scientists are somewhat unique in personality. They constantly work in an environment where the "rules" they work within could (in theory) shift at any time. A good scientist constants double checks their work, verifies that anyone else can exactly reproduce their results, and is always on the watch for things that "don't fit" within theory.

    Modern science is becoming very depend on statistics. This adds another layer into the caution and assumptions a scientist must deal with. "Probability" becomes an element they need to work with. Peer review of a simple experiment is child's play compared with peer review of statistical probabilities. The math is easily checked, but testing that the math and data sets represent real world results is much more difficult.

    One has to respect the temerity of today's scientists. But they do produce results even in the face of these challenges.

  • RickOshea

    15 weeks ago

    I Thought I Was Wrong But I Was Mistaken.

    A while back when, for a short time, it seemed sub atomic particles had been measured travelling faster than the speed of light and that Einstein's theory of relativity was wrong, my climate change denying neighbours where ecstatic. "See!", they condescended, "scientists are totally fallible and they certainly do not know everything..."

    I tried to remind them that before science and the scientific method, 'human understanding' in general was chronically wrong about everything but now the opposite is true.

    My neighbours moved away before Einstein was vindicated (a loose cable had messed up the measurements) so I did not get a chance to follow up. However, I can tell by the stuff the put up on FaceBook (wattsupwiththat.com claptrap) they still believe ideology trumps science when something as important as consumerism and 'free market' capitalism is at stake.

  • Hakuin

    15 weeks ago

    Scientists are delighted to be proven wrong

    PROVEN. That's how the reality based community functions. Priests and crackpots though....

  • ireckon

    15 weeks ago

    Deadbeats

    Cumon guys can't somebody with a certificate make it into the "best comment" section?

  • ireckon

    15 weeks ago

    Disapointment

    I was hoping my certificate would be signed by Gordon Campbell, the only BC Premier to fight C02.

    Could we somehow raise his stature from godfather to saint?

  • Hakuin

    15 weeks ago

    any CO2 Drunko accidentally prevented

    was cancelled out by the bottles he opened.

  • Steve Hetherington

    15 weeks ago

    Thanks Reck

    Gorden Campbell---a saint
    Thanks so much---can't recall the last time I had such a great laugh----my Gawd my belly aches

  • b-anonymous

    15 weeks ago

    Test is half correct

    Scientifically, the answers to questions 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 & 11 are correct. Many of the other "answers" are speculations, and we cannot say for sure, scientifically, whether those answers are correct or not.

    Without a doubt, we need to stop burning fossil fuels and move to solar energy solutions. The focus should be on solar solar solar. Forget about this climate change thing. It's not working. It is not convincing the public, the politicians, industry, or anyone. We need another rallying cry. Global warming/Climate Change fear mongering is a failed tactic. Stop it. Think of something better. PLEASE!!

  • Hakuin

    15 weeks ago

    You can forget about climate change

    Climate change ain't gonna forget about you.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.