A prominent civil rights advocate told an Olympics forum he’d given up trying to change the hard-set plans of organizers and security planners. Then he walked out of the event altogether.
David Eby’s pessimism may not have been genuine – his departure a carefully planned stunt. But the sense of inevitability evoked by the B.C. Civil Liberties Association executive director was one of the major themes of the evening.
Thursday’s forum brought together security forces, Games organizers, city councillors and activists to discuss civil liberties in front of a packed crowd at Simon Fraser University’s Harbour Centre.
Before he left the stage, Eby all but threw up his hands at the hope of having a productive discussion. “Nothing anyone says here today will make you change your plan or tactics at this late stage,” he said.
Bud Mercer, the man effectively in charge of Olympics security, suggested as much. He’d just returned from a trip to Ottawa to get the Privy Council’s approval for Exercise Gold, the last major security test before the Games.
“We fared very well,” Mercer said. “We’re good to go.”
VANOC director of commercial rights management Bill Cooper also signalled there was little organizers could – or would be willing – to change at this point. Corporate sponsors are an essential revenue base for the Olympics. And VANOC must do everything it can to protect their rights from ambush marketers.
“No matter your position on the Games,” he said. “To ensure their success we need to have confident and satisfied commercial investors.”
Vision Vancouver councillor Geoff Meggs took the stage with a not-so-subtle swipe at the previous NPA-led council. His assessment of the Inner-City Inclusive Commitment Statement – an important piece of the bid process – bordered on resignation.
“I’m frustrated – as many are – that it wasn’t pursued as aggressively as I would have liked,” Meggs said. “But that’s how the electoral process works. A different council came in and they had different priorities.”
A similar feeling of frustration was articulated by Pivot Legal Society lawyer Laura Track. She lamented the 373 per cent rise in Metro Vancouver’s street homelessness since 2002.
Olympics bylaws, the Assistance to Shelter Act and security/protester issues informed most of the discussion. There was little consensus over an exhausting two and half hours. Cries of “bullshit” and “liar” echoed often from the assembled crowd.
But if the goal of the evening was a lively debate, the evening was certainly a success. And in the closing words of organizer Am Johal: “We were not trying to sign a peace treaty.”
Geoff Dembicki reports for the Tyee.
12
Login or register to post comments
MichaelT
2 years ago
I don't like where Eby is taking the BCCLA
Under previous leadership I bequeathed life insurance policies to the BCCLA, but certainly will no longer do so.
I do not think Eby is the right man for this organization.
The man is out of his league.
We need a high-minded, intelligent Civil Libertarian not a raving, polarizing partisan as leader of the BCCLA.
I can't be the only one.
MichaelT
2 years ago
I don't like where Eby is taking the BCCLA
Under previous leadership I bequeathed life insurance policies to the BCCLA, but certainly will no longer do so.
I do not think Eby is the right man for this organization.
The man is out of his league.
We need a high-minded, intelligent Civil Libertarian not a raving, polarizing partisan as leader of the BCCLA.
I can't be the only one.
MichaelT
2 years ago
I don't like where Eby is taking the BCCLA
Under previous leadership I bequeathed life insurance policies to the BCCLA, but certainly will no longer do so.
I do not think Eby is the right man for this organization.
The man is out of his league.
We need a high-minded, intelligent Civil Libertarian not a raving, polarizing partisan as leader of the BCCLA.
I can't be the only one.
MichaelT
2 years ago
I don't like where Eby is taking the BCCLA
Under previous leadership I bequeathed life insurance policies to the BCCLA, but certainly will no longer do so.
I do not think Eby is the right man for this organization.
The man is out of his league.
We need a high-minded, intelligent Civil Libertarian not a raving, polarizing partisan as leader of the BCCLA.
I can't be the only one.
MichaelT
2 years ago
I don't like where Eby is taking the BCCLA
Under previous leadership I bequeathed life insurance policies to the BCCLA, but certainly will no longer do so.
I do not think Eby is the right man for this organization.
The man is out of his league.
We need a high-minded, intelligent Civil Libertarian not a raving, polarizing partisan as leader of the BCCLA.
I can't be the only one.
MichaelT
2 years ago
I don't like where Eby is taking the BCCLA
Under previous leadership I bequeathed life insurance policies to the BCCLA, but certainly will no longer do so.
I do not think Eby is the right man for this organization.
The man is out of his league.
We need a high-minded, intelligent Civil Libertarian not a raving, polarizing partisan as leader of the BCCLA.
I can't be the only one.
MichaelT
2 years ago
I don't like where Eby is taking the BCCLA
Under previous leadership I bequeathed life insurance policies to the BCCLA, but certainly will no longer do so.
I do not think Eby is the right man for this organization.
The man is out of his league.
We need a high-minded, intelligent Civil Libertarian not a raving, polarizing partisan as leader of the BCCLA.
I can't be the only one.
MichaelT
2 years ago
I don't like where Eby is taking the BCCLA
Under previous leadership I bequeathed life insurance policies to the BCCLA, but certainly will no longer do so.
I do not think Eby is the right man for this organization.
The man is out of his league.
We need a high-minded, intelligent Civil Libertarian not a raving, polarizing partisan as leader of the BCCLA.
I can't be the only one.
MichaelT
2 years ago
I don't like where Eby is taking the BCCLA
Under previous leadership I bequeathed life insurance policies to the BCCLA, but certainly will no longer do so.
I do not think Eby is the right man for this organization.
The man is out of his league.
We need a high-minded, intelligent Civil Libertarian not a raving, polarizing partisan as leader of the BCCLA.
I can't be the only one.
Wilfride Laurier
2 years ago
Mr Eby
Mr Eby and the BCCLA should be concentrating more on what is a real concern about civil rights and less of what is obviously a political agenda.
Jeffrey J.
2 years ago
Hats Off to David Eby
The BC Civil LIberties Association has never been so active and vital. Mr. Eby has brought renewed vigour to the defence of citizens and liberties that are under attack by the Campbell and Harper regimes.
We now live in a time of secret lists, compiled by anonymous enforcement agencies. No one knows how they got on the list. No one knows how to get off. No fly lists. $1 billion budget for security. Police and military agencies answerable to no one.
We've seen this movie before. It usually ends poorly for a society. This is why we study the 1930's Italy and Germany.
We will need more David Eby's if we want to retain civil democracy.
Great coverage as always.
Freddy
2 years ago
A Two-Vote Electoral System
A Two-Vote Electoral System Proposed
The need for electoral reform resonated with me. While the Single Transferable Vote concept was not acceptable to BC Voters, I believe it would be a mistake to give up on electoral reform. I believe first-past-the-post voting system is wrong because it allows disenfranchisement and encourages voter apathy.
I would support a simpler electoral reform, such as a Two-Vote electoral system. The province would be divided into 43 constituencies which would elect two representatives. The ballot would allow a Voter to choose their top candidate using the traditional “first-past-the-post” method, and allow a second vote for Voter’s alternative choice of a political party or identified independents. Simple rule, between your two votes, you can’t vote for the same party twice (unless you wish to register an abstention).
This simple binary voting system would not be as perfect as STV, but would result in a legislature that is more representative. Knowing you have two representatives to choose from in your constituency would encourage greater voter turnout because their votes would matter and result in increased representation.
Freddy Braun,
life insurance