On the eve of more than 60 rallies protesting Stephen Harper's long prorogation of Parliament, the co-creators of the group that sparked these nationwide protests have published their thoughts about the relationship between social media and politics.
Christopher White, the graduate student who created Canadians Against Proroguing Parliament (CAPP), published an essay on rabble earlier this week. Here's an excerpt:
We are not, as the traditional thinking goes, an apathetic people. We care deeply about our country, but for too long the increasing cracks in our political system have made it seem beyond repair, leaving people feeling frustrated and disempowered. Finally, we have an issue that unites us, one that we can wrap our heads around while keeping an eye on the eventual end game. This prorogation is far more than a matter of parliamentary procedure, it is emblematic of an institution that has turned its back on its people. We can stand outside and rage against the machine for as long as we like, or we can work together and take it apart, brick by brick and rebuild it anew. The upcoming rallies are not the culmination of our efforts, they are the beginning. Let's start with prorogation and use our inevitable success to push for greater reforms, ones that ensure that our government is accountable, transparent, and responsive to the demands of the electorate. As in, you know, do what it's there for.
Shilo Davis, an early CAPP member who took on the hard job of coordinating tomorrow's rallies, published her thoughts in today's National Post.
At last count, the CAPP Facebook group had over 200,000 members, with more joining every hour. That makes it not only the biggest Facebook group in Canada, but also the quickest large-scale grassroots political mobilization in Canadian history. CAPP has more Facebook followers than all of the major political leaders combined...
It was this online gathering that gave rise to the “real world” organization of CAPP, which is planning rallies in more than 50 cities and towns across Canada tomorrow. Without the initial Facebook throng, there is no way that such a disparate collection of citizens could have organized themselves so quickly across such great distances (the planned rallies cover every province and territory except Nunavut). ....
We don’t pretend that 200,000 people will take to the streets on Saturday. That’s not the point. Three weeks ago, Mr. Harper calculated that proroguing Parliament would be less politically costly than allowing MPs to hold the government accountable for its actions — specifically, to continue investigating the Afghan detainee issue. We’re out to prove him wrong, and dramatically increase the political cost of disrespecting democracy.
Among the 60 or so rallies planned over the next several days are at least a dozen in British Columbia. These include not only events in Vancouver (1 p.m. at the Vancouver Art Gallery), Victoria (1 p.m. at Centennial Square) and Kelowna (1 p.m. at corner of Gordon and Hwy 97), but also Duncan, Courtenay, Kamloops, Maple Ridge, Nanaimo, Penticton, Prince George, and Prince Rupert.
Monte Paulsen reports for The Tyee. Join him on Facebook.


18
Login or register to post comments
Van Isle
2 years ago
I wonder if ALL politians
I wonder if ALL politians will pay attention to this rally tomorrow. The general feeling I get from my peers, adult children and their friends is that they're pissed-off with all politians, never mind what their political strips are.
Sask Resident
2 years ago
Not the Quickest
I don`t think that the anti-proroguing Facebook group is the the quickest large-scale grassroots political mobilization in Canadian history. I suggest the grassroots swell against the attempted coalition that included the Quebec separatists in 2008 would the most rapid and largest mobilization. Many MPs of all strips except maybe BQ MPs received emails, phone calls and letters. My MP, a Liberal, was almost accosted on the street over the issue of including separatists as part of the governing coalition. Estimates of numbers are in the hundreds of thousands if not closer to a million. The opposition party was backing down rapidly if Harper had not prorogued Parliament.
Dan the socialist
2 years ago
Yet in a city the size of
Yet in a city the size of Toronto with millions of people only 50-60 show up to protest.
It is the Canadian way. Were lazy and yeah we will sign a online petition or join a facebook group as that is easy but when it come to the hard work or getting off our butts we just expect someone else to do it.
No wonder this country is in the mess it is in and politicians get away with what they do.
realisticman
2 years ago
procrastination prorogation
I wonder if they extend this prorogation thing a bit. After all, it's only closing for 5 weeks, or 25 days of ranting in the house. Anyway, I was planning on reading my new copy of "100 Simple Secrets of Happy People, The: What Scientists Have Learned and How You Can Use It" by David Niven.
Frank
2 years ago
Dan the Socialist
There is no correlation between protesting in the street and registering a protest on Facebook.
And as for our country being in a mess, its not because of voters not demonstrating in the street its because of non-voters such as yourself.
Frank
2 years ago
realisticman
You'll remain a very negative person in my eyes as long as you keep saying no to helping the poor, the disabled and so on.
When you stop cheering the victories of the rich over the poor and instead support spending public money to alleviate the gross injustices in our society you might be on the road to becoming a positive person that actually likes other people.
Until then, you and Wilf are the most negative people I know.
shepsil
2 years ago
Rally in Victory Park a great success.
One of the better rallies I've been to. Charlie Demers was MCing it, NDP MP's & MLA's, 2 Liberal MP's, Council of Canadians, Sierra Club's George Heyman and many more. Easily 2,000 people attended.
realisticman
2 years ago
Frank
"...you keep saying no to helping the poor, the disabled and so on."
I don't know whether to laugh or sue you, Frank. Could you define "so on", just for clarity. My continued and consistent support for state assistance for the needy is well documented and bolstered with my personal tax receipts.
Your personal opinion is less interesting except for the unusual venue of your comment above in a thread regarding Federal Politics.
Are you perhaps becoming curmudgeonly and squirm at mention of anything other than gloom?
Frank
2 years ago
r'man
Clarify? You support the provincial Liberals, a party that has demonstrated over and over again that its motto should be "Nothing can be done".
It and federal Conservatives are the most negative political parties in Canada.
And the reason you support them is because when it comes to poverty issues, income disparity issues, healthcare issues, etc you agree with their stand against doing anything to help.
canary
2 years ago
rallies
BC girl (I'm really in the older demographic...but just a girl at heart) goes to Ontario.
Yes, I've been here over the Christmas holiday and still here before I return to my home in the Lower Mainland next week.
But I was out on Saturday morning shaking hands with (surprise!surprise) many people in my own age group and youngers(surprise,surprise)Liberals,NDP's and Green people, like myself who are probably the Facebook-instigators. Well God Bless them!
There are many roads to Rome and Ottawa, and for that matter and there are many roads to the understanding of the need for improvements to our voter representation in the House of Commons.
I got to this rally in a smaller centre outside Hamilton after I connected via e-mail with Shilo Davis,a McMaster student and one of the organizers to these amazing rallies.
I was so proud to see such a great turnout in my home province of B.C.
Millions of Canadian tax dollars go into the running of our parliament;Mp's must discuss and resolve the public's business. Get to work!Together!
realisticman
2 years ago
Frank
Negative?
"BC Liberal Platform - A Proven Plan For A Golden Decade"
http://www.bcliberals.com/news/bc_liberal_party_news/bc_liberal_platform_-_a_proven_plan_for_a_golden_decade
"Four years of Conservative action for Canada
January 22, 2010
This Saturday marks the four year anniversary of the Conservative Party win in the 2006 general election. Since that victory, our Conservative Government has delivered real results that have made a difference in the lives of Canadians and their families."
http://www.conservative.ca/EN/2459/112284
"Make a Contribution
Your donation will help us build a better Canada. One that is generous and open and leads the world by example. Please make a contribution right now and help us realize the Canada we dream of.
Our country awaits — Let’s get started."
https://www.liberal.ca/donate_E.aspx
Please define 'negative' Frank.
Sask Resident
2 years ago
Rallies, Now What?
So Facebook and the Toronto media got a lot of people out to protest, but what did they protest? No yelling, screaming and playing to the camera in Question Period for a month? No parliamentary committee members claiming that Canadian soldiers are war criminals? No unelected Senators holding up and modifying legislation passed by the elected MPs? No long debates in the House for photo-ops that would hold up the delivery of aid to Haiti? No public forum for Liberal MPs to blame all of Canada's problems on northern BC, Alberta and Sask?
So what was the protest for? If you hate the present government, get the opposition to vote it down so you can have your say in an election.
Frank
2 years ago
realisticman
"Please define 'negative' Frank."
Always saying "NO" to fixing child poverty, to keeping operating rooms open, to not busing kids 3 hours a day, to housing the homeless etc etc.
Your parties always run on the banner that the NDP spends too much money on things and that they will rein in government spending.
Yet the facts show your parties spend more money than anyone else, but not on social problems. Instead its always about diverting public money into the private hands that don't need more money.
Your parties cater to the mindset of individualism which is against "community". A mindset that says when kids are poor its their parent's fault and not only can't we help them, we shouldn't help them.
What has been Campbell's response to 6 years of leading the country in child poverty? He hasn't cared, its not his problem. Same with those of you who defend him on websites like this, you defend his government, you don't advocate for change.
You, realisticman, always say "No".
Frank
2 years ago
Sask Resident
Sounds like you don't like parliament. Let's see what proroguing did shall we?
Your prime minister tossed a year of work into the garbage. 35 pieces of legislation that had been introduced are now in the garbage. Legislation that you defended as being necessary until Harper told you to change your opinion.
Your PM cancelled the ability of MP's to hold the government accountable by making it answer questions in the House. You don't like questions about your gov't's actions and prefer dictatorship so of course you'd be happy that Harper is ruling the country right now without having to answer questions about it.
The Senate has every right to hold up legislation while it gives it a thorough going-over. And what is your answer to that? You want to pack the Senate with lots of Conservatives. No wonder you guys hate the NDP idea of abolishing the Senate.
Parliament holds up aid to Haiti? That's a pretty anti-democratic view of the world buddy.
"So what was the protest for?"
It was a protest against dictatorship.
Sask Resident
2 years ago
Frank and the Senate
I have three ideas for the Senate, elect them, abolish it or fill it with anybody but Liberals. Except for Alberta, the provinces seem to refuse to elect candidates for Senate. Two Senators-elect in Alberta were appointed to the Senate. Sask plans to pass the required legislation to elect Senator candidates. No constitutional changes are required.
To abolish the Senate, a majority of the Senate would have to agree (little chance of that) as well as a majority of the provinces representing a majority of the population. Canada loves constitutional meeting.
Fill it with non-Liberals who have agree to resign if the provinces begin to elect Senators and give the PM resignation letters post dated for 8 years. With a majority, then Harper can more forward on Senate term limits or Senate abolition.
Otherwise we still have a Liberal dominated Senate that answer to the Toronto Liberals.
Sask Resident
2 years ago
Frank & Chretien
Canada had a dictatorship but nobody protested. Chretien had a majority in the House without any MPs in 3 provinces, a Liberal majority in the Senate that seldom held up legislation passed by the elected House. Chretien got away with pepper spraying Canadians to protect his good friend and Indonesian dictator, with choking a Canadian that would have put anyone else in jail, and with having a Vancouver lawyer arrested because the lawyer might have had a pie. But where were the protests against the dictator?
Harper does not have a majority in the House. If the opposition thinks they can do better, in a month they can vote non-confidence and the voters can decide if the Toronto regional Liberals should govern or one of the two national parties, either the NDP or CPC.
Frank
2 years ago
Sask Resident
"But where were the protests against the dictator?"
We on the Left did protest many Chretien policies, for one who do you think was getting pepper sprayed at APEC?
But where were you guys on the Right? You guys seem to have an aversion to protesting.
And you didn't address the fact that Parliament didn't take a break, it was shut down and will be restarted when Harper wants it to be. Unlike taking a break for Christmas, things will not resume, all that legislation is dead.
And finally, as for the Senate, the answer is to elect them or abolish them. Your 3rd idea, replacing a Liberal majority with a Conservative majority doesn't fix anything.
Frank
2 years ago
Sask Resident
Just how much actual protesting have you ever done?
Or like Steppeup, do you only complain about protesters not protesting what you're against?