Books

Michael Pollan, Garden Fresh

The 'In Defense of Food' author on picky-eating kids, Obama's menu for America, the 100-Mile Diet and more.

By David Beers, 12 Jun 2009, TheTyee.ca

michaelpollanfresh.png

Pollan: Bring on the Reformation!

  • In Defense of Food
  • Michael Pollan
  • Penguin Press (2008)

Michael Pollan's famous motto for a smart, healthy diet is "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." Add to that: "And when you happen to be on your publisher's expense account, splurge." The night we met up to chat at a place of his choosing, he tucked into a roasted slab of B.C. wild Chinook salmon, a tangle of salad greens and several glasses of good Okanagan Pinot Gris in the swank environs of the Blue Water Café in Vancouver's Yaletown neighbourhood.

Pollan, who lives in Berkeley, California, has championed the cause of stronger local food networks with his bestsellers The Omnivore's Dilemma and In Defense of Food. He was in town last week to sign books and headline a sold-out picnic fundraiser to preserve the University of British Columbia's urban farm as a working laboratory for sustainable agriculture. His rousing talk drew a standing ovation, and even a few tears.

As a dinner companion, Pollan is loose, friendly, and, as you might expect, intellectually omnivorous, peppering his interviewer with more questions than he was asked.

Along the way, he sketched the current state of food politics inside the White House and within his own home. He was surprised to learn the 100-Mile Diet was launched right here in British Columbia (on The Tyee) and said meeting 100-Mile Diet creators Alisa Smith and James MacKinnon is on his list of things to do (message delivered, Alisa and James). He compared today's food movement to Martin Luther's reform of the Church and he predicted certain breakdown for a North American food system far too dependent on cheap energy and big corporations. Between bites, here's what else Pollan shared with The Tyee…

On raising an ultra-picky eater:

"My 16-year-old son Isaac has been a very complex, tortuous food story. He was a terrible eater. One of the reasons I got interested in writing about food is he didn't eat anything. I love food, my wife loves food, and he just was tortured about food. He was one of these kids -- and there are many of them -- who only ate white food. He ate bread, pasta, rice, potatoes. There are a lot more of these kids than there used to be. I'm not exactly sure why.

"But he basically found food scary and overwhelming. And so he controlled that by eating food that was as bland as possible. He was the same way about clothes. He didn't like any variety in clothing. So he wore black clothes for about eight years of his childhood. Ate white, dressed black. In both cases, in retrospect, he was trying to reduce sensory input. It was overwhelming. Smell was overwhelming, taste was overwhelming, colour was overwhelming. And he just had trouble processing.

"A very interesting turnaround happened about two years ago. He discovered food. He became very serious about it, partly through cooking. And now he loves food. But he doesn't eat everything. No seafood, for example. But he'll eat any kind of meat, many kinds of vegetables. Last summer he worked a summer job in a kitchen. He worked as a chef. So he's gone through this really interesting transformation.

"But I've since heard that many chefs have gone through this as children. That they couldn't eat because their sensory apparatuses were overly receptive. And I heard this story from [famous Chez Panisse owner and chef] Alice Waters, who herself was a very, very picky eater as a child. She predicted Isaac would flip around. She met him when he was young and actually tried to cook for him when he was eleven. Such a waste of her talent! (laughs).

"So anyway, my son's whole journey around food has been interesting for me to watch. And now he likes to cook and we cook together and he's a good cook. But now, of course, he's a horrible food snob. It'll be like, he's doing homework so I'm doing the cooking, and he'll say, 'What are we having?' And I'll say, 'Well, I've got this nice grass-fed steak I'm going to make'. And he'll say, 'Can you make a reduction to go with that? Maybe a Port reduction would be good'. And I'll say, 'Fuck you! If you want to do a Port reduction, you do it'! (laughs) And depending on how much homework he has, he will do it. He'll make this delicious Port reduction for his steak. He's a complicated character."

On the personal politics of pint-sized picky eaters:

"Kids' relations to food are complex. This generation will have its own neuroses, that's for sure. But it's very concerning that there are such high levels of allergies among kids nowadays. The reasons are as yet unexplained. But I've heard that it has complicated kids' relationships with food because so many have allergies, or think they do.

"I've discovered cooking and gardening are great ways to get kids to reorient their relationships to food in a positive way. Kids will eat things that they'll pick in the garden that they'll never eat off the plate. Or they'll eat things that they've cooked themselves. Because I think a big issue for them is control. Food is really, I think, a primary political phenomenon. It is the first time you can control what you take into your body, and the first time you can say no to your parents and assert your identity. So I think food and politics are very intertwined."

On whether Barack Obama is going to be good for food:

"We don't know yet. I think Obama gets the issues. He's a great dot connector. He connects the dots between the way we grow food and the health care crisis and the climate change crisis and the energy crisis. He understands that and he's spoken about that eloquently. The question is how much political capital he is going to put into changing the system.

"So far the most significant thing is what his wife has done, the way Michelle Obama has been talking about food, especially the importance of giving your children real food. When she planted a vegetable garden at the White House, she was very careful to let the world know that it was an organic garden. And that's a big deal, because organics are fighting words in this battle and in fact the industry came back at her.

"A group with the wonderful name of the Crop Life Association, which is the lobbying group for the pesticide manufacturers, was very upset that she was casting aspersions on conventional agriculture. The Crop Life Association really should go by the opposite name, the Bug Death Association. (laughs) They understood Michelle Obama's garden to be a critique of non-organic agriculture. And it was a critique. But their backlash hasn't deterred her. She is going to make food one of her issues.

"I was a bit surprised. I thought she was going to be leading with, like, war widows, families of soldiers, which she said was going to be her issue. But this came out first. And she's got great feedback on it and is going to do more, from what I've heard.

"On Obama's side, you've got Tom Vilsack who is the Secretary of Agriculture. As the former governor of Iowa, he seemed like a real conventional choice. But in fact he's been quite surprising, too. He's also planted a garden at the Department of Agriculture, which you could dismiss as symbolism, but he's talking a lot about local food and urban agriculture. Most significantly, he appointed as his number two a woman name Kathleen Merrigan, who is a genuine reformer. She founded the organic program at USDA, she wrote the original organic law for Senator Patrick Leahy and she's a real staunch supporter of sustainable agriculture and she's running the Department of Agriculture! That's pretty mind blowing. We'll see. She's up against incredible forces of inertia."

On the health dollar costs of America's 'diet catastrophe':

"At some abstract level Obama sees that he's not going to get his health care costs under control unless we change the way Americans eat. Because the crisis of rising costs in the American health care system can be translated very simply as the catastrophe of the American diet, which represents probably half of what we spend on health care in America. We spend about $2 trillion a year. The Centers for Disease Control says that 1.5 trillion goes to treat chronic disease. Now you've got smoking in there, alcoholism, but other than that, chronic disease is mostly food related. So you really can't get control of that system unless you are preventing some of those chronic diseases. And the way you do that, really, is to change the food system. But, you know, it's very, very hard to do.

"My bet is that what we'll see from the Obama administration is a lot of support for alternative groups such as local and organic. Money for farmers to transition, money to rebuild local food economies. Whether we'll actually see an attack on conventional agriculture is less likely, given the politics of it. The reason is you can't do anything with the current agriculture committees we've got in Congress. You can't drive any reform through. It's going to take a few years to change the populations of those committees."

On whether he's trying to rally a movement in time to avert disaster, or just prepare us for the inevitable mess caused by scarcer oil, degrading ecologies, and global warming:

"It's more the latter. We need to have these alternatives around and available when the shit hits the fan, basically.

"One of the reasons we need to nurture several different ways of feeding ourselves -- local, organic, pasture-based meats, and so on – is that we don't know what we're going to need and we don't know what is going to work. To the extent that we diversify the food economy, we will be that much more resilient. Because there will be shocks. We know that. We saw that last summer with the shock of high oil prices. There will be other shocks. We may have the shock of the collapsing honey bee population. We may have the shock of epidemic diseases coming off of feed lots. We're going to need alternatives around.

"When we say the food system is unsustainable we mean that there is something about it, an internal contradiction, that means it can't go on the way it is without it breaking up. And I firmly believe there will be a breakdown."

On whether he's a fan of the 100-Mile Diet:

"I think the 100-Mile Diet, as a pedantic exercise, is really important. People really learn a lot. They learn what's available. They learn how much they appreciate things that come from far away. It was one of the great teaching exercises. And we need those. People don't know where their food comes from and they have no idea what they are eating.

But you know, when I was working on The Omnivore's Dilemma I talked to Joel Salatin, a farmer who is kind of a hero of alternative agriculture. He is radical. Beyond organic. Really uncompromising. In fact he hates organic, thinks it's already sold out. So I asked him: 'Are you going to blow up this food system?' He said, 'No, this isn't a revolution, this is a reformation.' And that's a good metaphor.

"It's like once upon a time there was one way to feed yourself spiritually as a Christian. It was the Catholic Church. And you had to go through those doors to have any relationship with God. And then Luther came along and suddenly you have many denominations. And that's where we are now. Luther is like the organic pioneers, maybe Wendell Berry, I don't know. And these alternatives are thriving, and everyone is very excited about the possibilities. But the Catholic Church didn't go away. It just got smaller, you know? And I think realistically that's what’s going to happen. There still will be supermarket food. There still will be food that travels around the world. I just hope there is less of it and more good alternatives."

On the communal pleasures and benefits of 'locavore' eating:

"It's a part of the food movement that people don't pay enough attention to. Actually I met Agriculture Secretary Vilsack and at some point, apropos of nothing, he went into this incredibly eloquent riff about farmers' markets. He just loves farmers' markets. He said, 'You know, this isn't about food, this is about community. People are starved for community.' And he's absolutely right. And I'm amazed that the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture has that insight.

"At my farmer's market, people go whether they are going to be cooking or not. They go to hang out. They go because they're going to see their friends. They go because there's politicking and music and massages and all these other things happening. And it's just as important."

On how food insecurity can unravel an empire:

"That's what brought down Soviet communism, you know. By the end of the Soviet Union, 50 per cent of the food was being grown outside the official system. And people just realized, okay, supermarkets aren't working, we're going to set up this other economy. We're going to grow it ourselves, we're going to tend small allotment farms. And I think it was the crisis of legitimacy of the whole system. Again, it was another reformation. The collective farms were still there, still producing large amounts of bread or whatever. But you had this alternative that just rose up."

 [Tyee]

19  Comments:

  • G West

    11-06-2009

    Nice interview David

    One of the best I've seen at Tyee - you should scribble more often. And thanks for dishing out big unadulterated dollops of Pollan.

    But, did he 'really' say the 100-mile diet was a pedantic exercise?

  • nightbloom

    11-06-2009

    Good article, but it needs

    Good article, but it needs more historical perspective. Diets of changed radically over time, especially over recent history. The "sensory overload" thesis (white food, black clothes) is simplistic. 'Food Discipline' is a profound impulse tied up with not just with commonplace anxieties, but profound displaced sexual and spiritual yearnings (dieting with religious before it was bourgeois). The critique of food distribution systems is also underdeveloped here. And the reference to Luther and Catholicism are peculiar and inaccurante. Like this: "But the Catholic Church didn't go away. It just got smaller, you know?" Not true. Both Catholicism and Islam have never been bigger in their entire histories, actually. Only western neo-Calvinist liberal urban white folk imagine otherwise. But good article, and great topic.

  • G West

    11-06-2009

    nightbloom

    The Catholic Church in the west is certainly 'smaller' although you're probably correct in the broadest context - but, in a world with close to 7 billion people that's not such a surprise is it? After all, there's 'more' of everything except space and time!

    I suspect what Pollan meant was that its influence has become smaller - almost to the point of irrelevance in the western context...

    I'm just finishing 'The Omnivore's Dilemma' just now and he does deal with distribution and sourcing critically and in detail.

    But, he's a popular writer - not an academic - and both books are meant to be read - not studied. He's trying to get people to think for themselves about eating and where food comes from - and that's a very good thing.

  • Fiat lux

    12-06-2009

    People should read the

    People should read the labels of cans and packages in the stores. Enough chemicals in them to start a war.

    The meats are full of growth hormones, steroids and antibiotics for no logical reasons, except for the profit demands of the agribiz corporate mafia.

    Then everybody's surprised and scream that we have epidemics of obesity, cancers and diabetics that didn't exist before this crime wave was forced on humanity by big business, government, and universities.

    When we're forced to try store bought junk we can feel and taste the chemicals. The eggs and meat, even the most expensive cuts, are disgusting and harmful to human health. Usually end up in the garbage. We can't eat them.

    Ed Deak, Big Lake.

  • Fiat lux

    12-06-2009

    The people of the world have

    The people of the world have always been governed, ruled, screwd up and destroyed by faith based theories.

    Never more than right now, by fraudulent neoclassical economics and financial manipulations that wreck the real economy, feed and kill people with garbage on their tables.

    Yet, people still put up with it after thousands of years of historical evidence and precedents.

    Ed Deak.

  • dave49

    12-06-2009

    Why are kids hitting puberty earlier?

    I'm am still wondering what is is about modern diet and food additives that have children hitting puberty younger and younger.

    For me, it started when I was 13. Forty years later, my son is experiencing it at 11. When I ask around, I find out this is the norm. What has caused the onset of puberty to drop by two years in two generations? Where is Health Canada, the CMA, Ag. Can., etc. on this??

  • lynn

    12-06-2009

    planting seeds

    I loved that Michelle Obama planted an organic vegetable garden at the White House.

    It was a simple and powerful gesture but highly significant as Pollan notes.

    Also interesting to read of Kathleen Merrigan in this interview.

  • Fiat lux

    12-06-2009

    Dave, Do your children love

    Dave,

    Do your children love hamburgers and chicken?
    Look up the growth chemicals, hormones and steroids put into them in the feedyards and factory farms. Athletes are banned for taking the same crap, but our fastfood joints and supermarkets are selling it by the thousands of tons, ruining people's lives.

    But it is "efficient" in the warped minds of economists and politicians, and drives up the GDP.

    Back in the 80s I saw a piece on the Knowledge Network about Puerto Rico, where children were eating a lot of "cheap" chicken, coming from a local factory farm.

    They showed what it did to them:4 year old girl with breasts, pubic hair and menstruating, 6 year old boy with breasts, etc.

    Those chicken are pumped up to full, fat size in a few weeks.

    Look at the walking pigs on our streets...

    Yet, people put up with it and governments of all political leanings endorse it.

    Ed Deak.

  • asher

    12-06-2009

    italian communist party

    So, this is going to be another story about the slow food movement etc that doesn't give credit to the creators of the movement - the Italian Communist Party. Look it up.

    Instead we get an author. Wow. Great guys. Professional capitalism propagandists screw us again.

  • dave49

    12-06-2009

    Ed

    Ed,

    This is not just my son, who does not even like hamburgers. This is a widespread trend. I've talked to many parents and this is a consistent pattern. Why?

  • Fiat lux

    13-06-2009

    Dave, part of it could be

    Dave, part of it could be genetic changes. Children have been getting taller and larger ever since I can remember.

    But, I believe the main cause today are chemicals in our foods, we don't even know about. They're in the milk and all dairy products, all meats, oils etc. etc. When we look behind the scenes, the corruption is unbelievable.

    This is why and how people who live the healthiest lives still have dozens of deadly chemicals in their blood.

    We also have absolutely no idea of the effects of GM foods we're forced to buy and eat. I've never seen any studies of their health effects, the companies stop any examination under the "intellectual property rights" clause and scientists who have tried to analyze them have been ruined.

    The world's food supply is now in the hands and controlled by a small handful of multinational corporations and we have no idea of what they're doing ? The capitalist agribiz corporations are the typical example, refined version of the communist Soviet kolkhozes . Stalin's dream come true.

    One of the main purposes of so called "globalization" is the long range separation of producers from the users, making both sides impotent, ignorant, incompatent and captive, paying through the nose into the pockets of the corporate mafia.

    Ed Deak.

  • nightbloom

    14-06-2009

    Dave & Ed - chemicals in our

    Dave & Ed - chemicals in our food & water seems to be the culprit, although the reported effects seem to be an increased incidence of premature puberty in girls and pre-natal malformation in boys (esp. malformation or incomplete formation of the genitals). A boy starting puberty at 11 falls within the norm; a girl starting her menses at age 6 does not.

    The most common scientific explanation seem to be use of synthetic female hormones by the dairy & poultry industries, combined with saturation of the water supply and environemtn with detergents and trace plastics (which mimic estrogen when absorbed by the body), as well as saturation of the water supply with synthetic female hormones as a result of widespread use of artificial birth control (i.e. 'The Pill', which is the most common form of artificial hormone therapy, and which is shed in urine). This is the most common explanation. Moreover, if this is the cause for the increased incidence of congenital malformation in boys, we can also infer that saturation of the environment with synthetic estrogens is also discretely effecting male fetal brain development as well.

  • Fiat lux

    14-06-2009

    Thanks nightbloom, I fully

    Thanks nightbloom, I fully agree.

    My question for many years has been, why do governments permit this outrage?

    There are some 200,000 chemicals in use, but only about 15,000 of them have been thoroughly tested for long term effects and none of the GM products in our food system.

    In my opinion, this, once again, shows the deadly influence of miseducated economists. Asking questions would interfere with their fraudulent GDP etc. figures.

    Ed Deak.

  • canary

    14-06-2009

    Great,encouraging article

    Thank-you,David! We need to hear the positive,local steps that are being made towards the brave,new(actually my grandparents had a big self sustaining garden)world.
    Yes! it's so good to hear that Michelle Obama put in an organic garden. What a great example. I have 4 "bucket "gardens in my small back yard.Lots and lots of carrots!Everyone can start in their own paradym shift way.Farmer's markets are a great way to meet up with like minded individuals.We do need to return to our ROOTS!

    Seeing the repeat program on CBC Newsworld last night about the high load of chemical toxins(plastics) in our pre and post birth boys..."The Disappearing Male" reminded me that we as a species, are on a path to extinction.
    No more synthetic food and packaging for me and those in my care!
    Thanks to Michael Pollan, James MacKinnon and Alisa Smith and you too, David Beer for continuing to highlight this vital issue.

  • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.