Protest during the 2010 Games won't be led by a large group with broad appeal, a Vancouver city councillor suggested.
"To be honest, I don't see a big anti-Olympics movement," Geoff Meggs told reporters yesterday. His comments came as the city announced new changes to its contentious signage bylaws.
The ability of people to express political messages critical of the Olympics has been a huge issue in recent months.
Many Games critics have legitimate concerns about whether provincial money would be better spent in areas such as healthcare, Meggs said. And people should fight for their civil liberties whenever they see potential restrictions, he added.
But the Vision Vancouver councillor isn't convinced critics such as Chris Shaw have roused the city to action.
"I've not found a large group of people who are making an argument that I think would draw a big crowd about the Olympics," he said.
Those comments would appear to dispute the position of the Vancouver Integrated Security Unit. Last July, Olympics security boss Bud Mercer told city council he's worried about a potential 2010 convergence.
“Locally, provincially, nationally and internationally,” Mercer said at the time, “there are groups which are considering and planning to engage in criminal protesting during the 2010 Games.”
Mercer produced internet images of the official mascots wielding Molotov cocktails -- among others -- to bolster his case.
The ISU has no qualms with lawful protest, Mercer has often stated. But he's warned any actions that damage property or endanger safety will be dealt with swiftly.
Geoff Dembicki reports for the Tyee.


7
Login or register to post comments
smedley marshall
2 years ago
No Grass Grows on Geoff
Geoff Meggs doesn't see an anti-olympics movement? Considering the degree of unconstitutional police intimidation, unconstitutional bylaws curtailing freedom of speech (with penalties of 10k, 6 months in jail), journalists being held and interrogated at the border on suspicion of possibly mentioning something about the olympics (Amy Goodman), the IOC's failure to rule out using Agents Provocateurs (a la montebello quebec SPP summit), the IOC charter superseding our own, pepper spray a la APEC, getting yourself your own CSIS file.
It's very safe to say that many people who would otherwise resist the olympics would not dare do so for fear of retribution by the state and its monopoly on violence.
If it weren't DE FACTO against the law to protest these miserable games I'm pretty sure many more would be protesting.
Dan the socialist
2 years ago
I am sure there will be many
I am sure there will be many protests.
I have not been able to find those images, but I did find ones of the mascots from Beijing olympics carrying Molotov Cocktails. That councilor probably got confused as the Vancouver 2010 mascots look like they were ripped off from the Beijing games...
sunshine coast girl
2 years ago
I think that..
Geoff needs new glasses.
PeteL
2 years ago
Games
What are the games mascots names? I think they are Scratchy, Itchy and Quasie?
Resistance is futile. The only ones breaking the law will be agents dressed up in macinaws and heavy boots.
Skywalker
2 years ago
You probably won't "see" it.
I for one will be as far from the place as I can. I just don't like watching how people fritter away my hard earned dollars.
max von smartt
2 years ago
heineken house
sure bring on the olympic games without the korporate logos decking the airport bridges. the netherlands will be hosting a giant beerfest in richmond probably worth drowning sorrows...
DPL
2 years ago
Just about 90 days till the
Just about 90 days till the circus is over, and then watch out as the bills pile up. What was supposed to be a bunch of sports folks doing their best has turned into what the Liberals call' Business opportunities. The clows running the ship of BC wouldn't know a business opportunity if it hit them on the side of the head