VANCOUVER - Women will not ski jump at the 2010 Winter Olympics, a British Columbia Supreme Court judge decided on Friday.
Justice Lauri Ann Fenlon wrote that the 2006 International Olympic Committee decision against adding a women's division was discriminatory, but it did not breach Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms' gender equality guarantees.
"There will be little solace to the plaintiffs in my finding that they have been discriminated against; there is no remedy available to them in this Court," Fenlon wrote. "But this is the outcome I must reach because the discrimination that the plaintiffs are experiencing is the result of the actions of a non-party (IOC) which is neither subject to the jurisdiction of this Court nor governed by the Charter."
Fenlon presided over a five-day hearing in B.C. Supreme Court that ended April 24.
George Macintosh, lawyer for the Vancouver 2010 Olympic Winter Games' Organizing Committee, successfully argued the IOC controls the Games and VANOC has no right to ask the IOC to add a women’s ski jumping medal event. In 2006, the IOC opted to only add ski cross, which was popularized in the ESPN X-Games.
Ross Clark, the lawyer for 15 international female ski jumpers, sought a declaration that VANOC is government-controlled and all aspects of the Games should be subject to the Charter.
Fenlon found that VANOC is subject to the Charter when it carries out the planning, organizing, financing and staging of the 2010 Games, but it is not government-controlled.
"While the governments are kept informed about financial matters and some have direct involvement with the venue contracts and significant budget decisions, they do not have routine daily control over VANOC's finances," Fenlon found.
She also disagreed that the IOC intentionally discriminated against the women. The Olympic Charter, she wrote, encourages and supports the "promotion of women in sport at all levels."
Calgary's Jan Willis, the mother of Canadian ski jumper Katie Willis, complained to the Canadian Human Rights Commission in early 2007. The Canadian government agreed in a 2008 settlement that it would lobby the IOC on the ski jumpers’ behalf. Then-minister of state for sport Helena Guergis never met with IOC president Jacques Rogge.
Women’s Ski Jumping USA, a group led by former Salt Lake City Mayor Deedee Corradini, filed a lawsuit against VANOC in May 2008. Active Canadian ski jumpers joined the lawsuit last fall and winter.
A men's ski jumping preliminary is the first sporting event of the Games on Feb. 12, 2010 at the $122.4 million, taxpayer-funded Whistler Olympic Park in the Callaghan Valley.
Bob Mackin reports for Vancouver 24 hours.


5
Login or register to post comments
southdeltawalker
2 years ago
The Destruction of the Callaghan Valley
The Callaghan Valley where the ski jumping will be held-is adjacent to Whistler. This valley is home to many species and an important watershed. It is being destroyed for the Olympics.
Link to article:
http://www.rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/word-rings/%E2%80%9Cgreenest-games-ever%E2%80%9D-lack-environmental-legacy
dorothy
2 years ago
SO what does it take
to sail into Canada and do your thing on Canadian soil, and breaking the rules of our charter? Enough money in the balance? Enough bully-power? What? If our Constituiton and its Charter cannot be employed so as to result in lawful outcomes for Canadians in Canada, do we have a country, a nation, or just a franchise of something-or-other 'out there', complete with a big brother who can set terms for us on our own turf? How is any outfit operating wholly inside our country 'not subject to the jurisdiction of this Court nor governed by the Charter.'? The mind boggles. Is the mob subject to our criminal code, seeing it is an international organization? As for the goody-two-shoes stuff in the Olympic Charter, the IOC is obviously not putting its money where its mouth is. Of course the discrimination is deliberate, or are we supposed to think they're all on crack and don't know what they're doing?
I hope the wimmen appeal. This is too crummy.
mcgregory
2 years ago
You gotta love this.
Here we go, lets pay more bills to disallow a perfectly legitimate group of people from competing in the games in their own country. I wonder how much the bill was for Vanoc to fight against the charter of rights? I bet the tax payer is on the hook for this. How is not allowing the sport of woman's ski jumping going to make the Olympics something for Canadians to be proud of? I can't believe the way our government sits back and gets walked all over by this group.
DPL
2 years ago
When we finally finish
When we finally finish paying for the upcoming circus, ths country should not bid on another one unless the IOC gang signs on the dotted line saying they will abide by all Canadian Legislation. Why are we so excited about watching highly paid professionals playing their favourite game
Dr Alexander
2 years ago
VANOC and the IOC do not discriminate
Both organizations seem to embrace stupid ideas with as much enthusiasm as they do good ones.