The Hook

The Hook Blog

Political News. Freshly caught. A Tyee Blog

2010 Olympics

VANOC wins BC Supreme Court case over Women's ski jump

VANCOUVER - Women will not ski jump at the 2010 Winter Olympics, a British Columbia Supreme Court judge decided on Friday.

Justice Lauri Ann Fenlon wrote that the 2006 International Olympic Committee decision against adding a women's division was discriminatory, but it did not breach Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms' gender equality guarantees.

"There will be little solace to the plaintiffs in my finding that they have been discriminated against; there is no remedy available to them in this Court," Fenlon wrote. "But this is the outcome I must reach because the discrimination that the plaintiffs are experiencing is the result of the actions of a non-party (IOC) which is neither subject to the jurisdiction of this Court nor governed by the Charter."

Fenlon presided over a five-day hearing in B.C. Supreme Court that ended April 24.

George Macintosh, lawyer for the Vancouver 2010 Olympic Winter Games' Organizing Committee, successfully argued the IOC controls the Games and VANOC has no right to ask the IOC to add a women’s ski jumping medal event. In 2006, the IOC opted to only add ski cross, which was popularized in the ESPN X-Games.

Ross Clark, the lawyer for 15 international female ski jumpers, sought a declaration that VANOC is government-controlled and all aspects of the Games should be subject to the Charter.

Fenlon found that VANOC is subject to the Charter when it carries out the planning, organizing, financing and staging of the 2010 Games, but it is not government-controlled.

"While the governments are kept informed about financial matters and some have direct involvement with the venue contracts and significant budget decisions, they do not have routine daily control over VANOC's finances," Fenlon found.

She also disagreed that the IOC intentionally discriminated against the women. The Olympic Charter, she wrote, encourages and supports the "promotion of women in sport at all levels."

Calgary's Jan Willis, the mother of Canadian ski jumper Katie Willis, complained to the Canadian Human Rights Commission in early 2007. The Canadian government agreed in a 2008 settlement that it would lobby the IOC on the ski jumpers’ behalf. Then-minister of state for sport Helena Guergis never met with IOC president Jacques Rogge.

Women’s Ski Jumping USA, a group led by former Salt Lake City Mayor Deedee Corradini, filed a lawsuit against VANOC in May 2008. Active Canadian ski jumpers joined the lawsuit last fall and winter.

A men's ski jumping preliminary is the first sporting event of the Games on Feb. 12, 2010 at the $122.4 million, taxpayer-funded Whistler Olympic Park in the Callaghan Valley.

Bob Mackin reports for Vancouver 24 hours.

5  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • southdeltawalker

    2 years ago

    The Destruction of the Callaghan Valley

    The Callaghan Valley where the ski jumping will be held-is adjacent to Whistler. This valley is home to many species and an important watershed. It is being destroyed for the Olympics.
    Link to article:

    http://www.rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/word-rings/%E2%80%9Cgreenest-games-ever%E2%80%9D-lack-environmental-legacy

  • dorothy

    2 years ago

    SO what does it take

    to sail into Canada and do your thing on Canadian soil, and breaking the rules of our charter? Enough money in the balance? Enough bully-power? What? If our Constituiton and its Charter cannot be employed so as to result in lawful outcomes for Canadians in Canada, do we have a country, a nation, or just a franchise of something-or-other 'out there', complete with a big brother who can set terms for us on our own turf? How is any outfit operating wholly inside our country 'not subject to the jurisdiction of this Court nor governed by the Charter.'? The mind boggles. Is the mob subject to our criminal code, seeing it is an international organization? As for the goody-two-shoes stuff in the Olympic Charter, the IOC is obviously not putting its money where its mouth is. Of course the discrimination is deliberate, or are we supposed to think they're all on crack and don't know what they're doing?

    I hope the wimmen appeal. This is too crummy.

  • mcgregory

    2 years ago

    You gotta love this.

    Here we go, lets pay more bills to disallow a perfectly legitimate group of people from competing in the games in their own country. I wonder how much the bill was for Vanoc to fight against the charter of rights? I bet the tax payer is on the hook for this. How is not allowing the sport of woman's ski jumping going to make the Olympics something for Canadians to be proud of? I can't believe the way our government sits back and gets walked all over by this group.

  • DPL

    2 years ago

    When we finally finish

    When we finally finish paying for the upcoming circus, ths country should not bid on another one unless the IOC gang signs on the dotted line saying they will abide by all Canadian Legislation. Why are we so excited about watching highly paid professionals playing their favourite game

  • Dr Alexander

    2 years ago

    VANOC and the IOC do not discriminate

    Both organizations seem to embrace stupid ideas with as much enthusiasm as they do good ones.

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.

    Democratic Trust

    About The Hook

    As British Columbia and other jurisdictions consider allowing online voting, can it be made secure enough that people will trust it? Will it encourage more people to vote? But if something goes wrong, will it further erode people's confidence in their democracies? And what role is the media likely to play in shaping the debate?

    These are among the issues to be considered at a May 26 discussion that Fair Voting BC and PartyX are hosting at The Hive in Vancouver. I'll be on the panel, along with UBC Law's Fathima Cader and SFU computer scientist Steve Wolfman. The results and recommendations are to inform the two organizations' public positions on online voting.

    Meanwhile join me and other contributors on The Hook as we bring you the latest from B.C. and across Canada.

    -- Andrew MacLeod