The Hook

The Hook Blog

Political News. Freshly caught. A Tyee Blog

2010 Olympics

Vancouver taxpayers could foot bill if Olympic Village overruns grow to 'doomsday' proportion

The 2010 Olympics athlete's village could pose "significant" problems for the city because of rising costs and the US credit crisis, said developer Michael Geller, who's also an NPA candidate for Vancouver city council.

City officials assert no taxpayer money will be needed to finance the project. But a local advocacy group said the city is prepared both to bill its citizens and to cut up to 250 social housing units to help recoup escalating costs.

The athlete's village is a $1 billion project that will encompass seven city blocks on the southeast shore of False Creek. After the 2010 Winter Games finish, the development is expected to be converted to 850 private residences and 250 social housing units.

Millennium Development paid the city $198 million for the land two and half years ago. In doing so, the company agreed to honour the city's agreement with the Vancouver Organizing Committee (VANOC) to have the village ready by late 2009.

But last week, city council held an emergency in-camera meeting to discuss what action the city would take if that didn't happen. Council was worried that rising construction costs and tightened credit lines from the US could impede Millennium Development's ability to complete the project on time.

"Ultimately, it's the city that's responsible for delivering the village," said Michael Flanigan, director of real estate services for Vancouver.

Local developer and Non-Partisan Association council candidate Michael Geller said he's not certain of the severity of the overrun costs, but he thinks the project could face troubles. A city-wide shortage of trades people and building supplies combined with a "fast-tracked" building schedule is a formula for escalating costs, he said.

Because Millennium Development is financed by the New York-based Fortress Investment Group, the financial crisis down south might restrict the availability of funds to cover such additional costs

"This could potentially be a very, very significant problem for Vancouver," Geller said.

Flanigan said Millennium Development is currently meeting with its financier to make sure the project receives all the funding it needs. He added that though the company is facing overrun costs of up to six and a half per cent of its budget, the challenge isn't unique.

"Those are costs that any developer in Vancouver faces," Flanigan said.

Recent media reports have explored the possibility of cost overruns as high as $100 million. Flanigan said that number was a worst-case scenario.

"I think it will be much less than that," he said.

In the event that Fortress Investment can't finance the overruns, Millennium Development would absorb the costs, according to Flanigan. He said it would have to be a "doomsday scenario" before Vancouver taxpayers were asked to foot the bill.

However, Chris Shaw, of the local advocacy group 2010 Watch, said the city has agreed to pay for extra workers and equipment if the project is behind schedule.

"Basically the city signed a blank cheque with this deal," Shaw said. "I would suggest that Vancouver's taxpayers have been dealt a pretty lousy hand."

Shaw said the city has already agreed to pay $159.4 million to build infrastructure such as sewers on the site and up to $82.5 million more to help construct the 250 social housing units.

When potential cost overruns are factored in, Shaw said the city could lose a significant amount of money on the athlete's village unless the affordable housing plan is scrapped.

"I don't think there will be social housing at all," he said. "I think there will be market housing."

Geoff Dembicki is a staff reporter for The Hook.

1  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • egmont rapids

    3 years ago

    who ever believed

    The social housing is toast,the books are cooked,another broken Vanoc promise,another broken Campbell promise!

    I don`t expect to see any line ups to buy 1 million dollar plus one bedroom and den units during a housing crash!

    Everyone knows this story will be kept down and un-addressed until after the municipal elections!

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.

    Democratic Trust

    About The Hook

    As British Columbia and other jurisdictions consider allowing online voting, can it be made secure enough that people will trust it? Will it encourage more people to vote? But if something goes wrong, will it further erode people's confidence in their democracies? And what role is the media likely to play in shaping the debate?

    These are among the issues to be considered at a May 26 discussion that Fair Voting BC and PartyX are hosting at The Hive in Vancouver. I'll be on the panel, along with UBC Law's Fathima Cader and SFU computer scientist Steve Wolfman. The results and recommendations are to inform the two organizations' public positions on online voting.

    Meanwhile join me and other contributors on The Hook as we bring you the latest from B.C. and across Canada.

    -- Andrew MacLeod