Candidates Gregor Robertson and Peter Ladner tried to wrestle the Vancouver mayoral campaign back to a discussion about homelessness on Monday, but the latest wrinkle in the Olympic Village bailout scandal – along with a few particularly vocal Downtown Eastside hecklers – continued to overwhelm them both.
Vision Vancouver candidate Robertson promised “90 days of taking action” on homelessness, and praised the Housing First approach being applied in Toronto and Calgary.
“I’d like to see Housing First be more prevalent in Vancouver,” Robertson said. “There has to be a balance between finding Housing First solutions for persons [who] simply need a roof over their head. We also have to be sure that those who need treatment get it.”
Non-Partisan Association candidate Peter Ladner reversed his earlier position against homeless shelters, and – with only five days to go to the Nov. 15 election – introduced a major new idea: The erection of prefabricated housing modules to house Vancouver’s homeless until permanent housing can be built.
“The NPA has been as active on this file as anything else we’ve been doing, and we are very much in tune with the Homeless Action Plan that the city developed in 2005,” Ladner said.
Robertson calls for ’90 days of action’
“On the issue of homelessness, Peter Ladner and I could not be more different,” Robertson told a late-morning press conference. “It is my top priority. Peter Ladner has had a different priority every week.”
Vision Vancouver has committed to sheltering the city’s homeless within one year, and to ending street homelessness by 2015.
“On my first day as mayor, I will strike an emergency task force on homelessness as part of 90 days of taking action,” Robertson said. “We need to kick-start the process… The Mayor’s Emergency Task Force is not a study. It will provide clear, immediate actions that as mayor and council we can take to deal with homelessness.”
Robertson offered a few examples of the sort of initiative his task force would undertake immediately, including working to find a new location for United We Can and championing the city’s soon-to-be-launched Street to Home Foundation.
Robertson specifically attacked Ladner’s longstanding argument against the creation of more homeless shelters.
“Peter Ladner has said that he’s opposed to shelters. In effect, he’s telling people who are living on the street, and who care about homelessness, to keep waiting, to stay there living on the streets,” Robertson said. “I believe that shelters and temporary housing are part of the solution when combined with building permanent long-term housing.”
Ladner reverses position on shelters
“We don’t need another task force,” said Ladner, at a Hastings Street news conference a half hour later. “We need action.”
Ladner repeated his claim that the city is creating 3,800 units of social housing, then turned the microphone over to NPA council candidate Michael Geller.
“Vancouver does have a housing action plan,” Geller said. “It focuses on income, housing and support services. But like any good plan, it has to be adapted over time. Indeed, many of the people working in this community now think the solutions need to change.”
Geller introduced “The NPA’s comprehensive six-point strategy to address homelessness in the Downtown Eastside,” which includes:
-- Taking credit for the 3,813 units of non-market and supportive housing being constructed, converted or planned by B.C. Housing;
-- Continuing homeless outreach services;
-- Enforcing standards of maintenance bylaws to retain low-income housing;
-- Lobbying the provincial government to increase welfare’s $375 shelter allowance;
-- Creating additional shelter beds in Vancouver; and
-- Erecting villages of factory-built housing for the homeless, on vacant land throughout Vancouver.
Geller acknowledged that the NPA was reversing course on its earlier position against shelters.
“Building more shelters to solve homelessness is like building wider roads to solve traffic congestion. It just doesn’t work,” Geller said. “But the reality is that we have a real problem right now, and this problem has to be addressed. So we do agree that there is a need for some shelter beds to be built, and we will work to do that.”
Hecklers cut short NPA news conference
Geller, a longtime advocate of factory-built housing, was particularly interested in discussing the last item on the NPA’s new list.
“The NPA will undertake an innovative program to create a stock of factory produced relocatable housing modules that can be set up, on an interim basis, on vacant lands in the Downtown Eastside and elsewhere," Geller said. "The owners of these sites will be offered a property tax holiday, and units will be kept in place for no more than three years. The housing can be constructed and be in place within eight months, and serve a need while other permanent housing is created."
But Geller’s ideas were drown out by a pair of particularly vocal Hastings Street hecklers.
“One hundred million dollars for waterfront condos, but moveable boxes for the homeless," one man yelled, his voice dripping with irony. "No one saw that coming."
The hecklers grew bolder, until finally one warned Ladner to “watch his back." Ladner and Geller aborted the news conference a few moments later.
Monte Paulsen reports on housing and politics for The Tyee.


3
Login or register to post comments
not your wife
3 years ago
Top Priority
How interesting.
Gregor states his top priority is homelessness. Just not this last few days, when he used Karl Rove-like tactics (not my words alas, though I wish I'd thought of it first!) to wage a smear campaign.
Since the Tyee won't run it, and in the name of transparency, that Phillip Owen statement in full:
Philip Owen weighs in on Olympic Village
Dear Friends,
It was an honour and a privilege to serve the citizens of Vancouver for 18 years in elected office.
Gregor Robertson is not being honest and truthful with Vancouver citizens. All his left leaning political colleagues for over 35 years, going back to Harry Rankin, have supported the Property Endowment Fund policies. These policies were followed during the recent Olympic Village issue.
The City has title to the Olympic Village land plus other guarantees from the developer. All lands and buildings used for City purposes (City Hall, Fire Halls, Parks etc) are in the Capital Fund. All others are in the Property Endowment Fund.
As a Councillor and Mayor, I participated in numerous "in-camera" or confidential council meetings concerning the City's Property Endowment Fund. This fund was established to generate income for the City through land investments and through sound management and has grown to more than $2.7 Billion in assets. The largest landowner in the City is the City.
Confidentiality in all real estate transactions is essential until the completion date, which is after all the lawyers sign off on the transaction. When and if this is done, all the details about the Olympic Village will be made public.
It has required considerable courage for Peter Ladner and the NPA to stand by the City's commitment considering the misleading partisan rhetoric we are hearing from Mr. Robertson. It is also unfortunate that for political gain Vision and Cope are now publicly reneging on their unanimous council vote.
The New York Bond rating agencies give Vancouver a triple AAA credit rating, the highest, primarily because of the Property Endowment Fund.
Vancouver needs proven leadership to deliver a successful 2010 Winter Olympic Games and to capitalize on the associated opportunities. Recent events have confirmed in my mind that Peter Ladner and the NPA will provide Vancouver the leadership it needs at this decisive moment in our City's history.
Sincerely,
Philip Owen
Former Mayor of Vancouver 1993-2002
realisticman
3 years ago
VISION plays Politics
It's quite sad to see Vision playing negative erroneous spin, when there was so much condemnation of the same kind of negative campaigning against Dion in the Federal election. It makes one wonder and realise that all those criticisms are really quite hollow.
Sun, Nov 8-08
" the original concept to engage in the athletes village development deal, which was brought forward to council in early 2005, was signed off by a council presided over by none other than Vision Vancouver founder Sen. Larry Campbell. (One of the more vociferous critics of the Millennium deal is Vision Vancouver co-founder and present council candidate Geoff Meggs, who was executive assistant to Campbell while he was mayor.)
Contacted in Ottawa, Campbell pointed out that while it was his council that okayed the concept of the deal, it was the next council under Mayor Sam Sullivan that signed up Millennium. Still, Campbell said, and I quote:
"I think it's a helluva deal for the city, quite frankly. . . . And I don't think they [the city] cut a bad deal. I'm not critical of it at all. I believe -- and I say this with the proviso that I don't know all of the details -- there'll be a good return on this.""
Pete McMartin
clavio
3 years ago
words from the source
I'd like to see the candidates talking to folks who have experience in fighting homelessness. And maybe a news outlet or two (hint, hint).
Having worked on a Homeless Outreach Team, been a DTES landlord and now an advocate, I would strongly argue against the effectiveness of these teams. And increasing shelter allowance, while very very important for families and low-income people outside the downtown core, is pretty useless for the DTES. The only result will be higher rents, which go into the pockets of (a) slumlords or (b) BC Housing, who are basically slumlords, too.
The answer is clear to those of us who work down there: more and more and more good-quality homes. Thousands of rooms with bathrooms, kitchens and accountable staff. The teams can't work unless they have somewhere to place people.