The Hook

The Hook Blog

Political News. Freshly caught. A Tyee Blog

Federal Politics

Budget: More new bathrooms than new social housing

The federal government will spend more money over the next few years helping Canadians renovate bathrooms than it will building new social housing units.

A new tax credit for home renovation unveiled in yesterday’s budget could cost the federal government $2.5 billion in the next fiscal year, while total spending over the next two years for social housing totals just over $2 billion.

The full unveiling of the budget followed a series of well-orchestrated leaks by the Conservative government. Since late last week, the government has spilled the beans on $13 billion worth of stimulus spending plans, including more than $2 billion in additional funding for social housing.

The budget for social housing includes:

• A one-time federal investment of $1 billion over two years for renovations and energy retrofits for up to 200,000 social housing units on a 50-50 cost shared basis with the provinces

• $400 million over two years for housing for low-income seniors

• $75 million over two years for housing for people with disabilities

• $400 million over two years to new and existing housing projects on First Nations reserves

• An additional $200 million over two years for housing in the North

Victoria NDP MP Denise Savoie called the measures “absolutely inadequate.”

“It doesn’t matter if you get all these tax benefits to renovate your house if you’re unemployed,” she told The Tyee.

Savoie added setting funds aside for social housing is one thing, but delivering those funds is quite another.

“These are guys who have had a deathbed conversion on these investments,” she said. “I don’t trust Harper to deliver.”

Although the $2 billion figure comes close to the $2.5 billion most housing advocates say would be a good target to address Canada’s social housing needs, Michael Shapcott of Toronto’s Wellesley Institute told The Tyee the numbers may be deceiving.

For example, Shapcott said the billion-dollar fund for renovations and retrofits may not help as many Canadians as it could. Only five percent of Canadians live in the kind of social housing that would likely get the funding; the rest rent or own their homes and would not qualify, he said.

“What they’re saying is the five percent of Canadians who live in social housing will get a billion dollars and the 95 per cent of Canadians who don’t live in social housing — a number of whom also live in substandard units that are over-crowded, unfit for habitation — will simply be ignored,” he said.

That said, Shapcott acknowledged the “huge” repair backlog and said the money for social housing will be well spent.

“People living in social housing are living in some of the crappiest housing in the country and they desperately need the money. It’s not like they’re pissing away the money on something that isn’t needed,” he told The Tyee.

Shapcott also called for a national housing strategy and investments in social housing projects geared to low- and moderate-income Canadians.

“We have to build new supply and, as far as we can see, there’s not a penny allocated for new supply,” he said.

In the last fiscal year, federal spending on housing on a per capita basis was the lowest it’s been in more than two decades.

For home owners, yesterday’s budget includes:

• A new Home Renovation Tax Credit that will provide up to $1,350 in tax relief, reduce the cost of renovations for an estimated 4.6 million Canadian families, and provide needed stimulus for the economy

• Additional funding of $300 million over two years to the ecoENERGY Retrofit program to support an estimated 200,000 additional home retrofits

• First-time buyers with additional access to their RRSP savings to purchase or build a home by increasing the Home Buyers’ Plan withdrawal limit to $25,000 from $20,000

• First-time buyers up to $750 in tax relief to help with the purchase of a first home

Matthew Pearson is reporting on the federal budget from Ottawa for The Tyee.

6  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Luke Skywalker

    3 years ago

    Forget About New Bathrooms... And Social Housing...!!!

    At least the NDP knows its priorities:

    Quote:
    Cost to renovate to 24 Sussex to exceed $9.7-million

    Quote:
    NDP MP Bill Siksay (Burnaby-Douglas, B.C.), his party's ethics critic, said the Prime Minister and the NCC should "get on with it" and finalize plans to upgrade 24 Sussex.

    http://www.embassymag.ca/page/view/24sussex-1-26-2009

    Damn, at least now the NDP recognizes a national social priority!!!

    Steven Harper's residence!!!

  • Frank

    3 years ago

    Luke

    An article about the release of the federal budget and you attack the NDP, again.

    Must really bother you federal Liberals vote NDP provincially instead of joining you and the other Reform Party voters..

    So what else did the fearless Siksay say about doing the renos now before the price goes up?

    "He added that when the renovations finally do happen the Prime Minister's residence should be the "poster child" for green renovations and retrofits.

    "I think if Canada is going to have official residences for people like the Prime Minister then we need to maintain them and maintain them properly, and I don't think enough attention has been paid to that over the years. Clearly we've reached a turning point with that."

  • Frank

    3 years ago

    Now I get it

    Luke, admit it, you're against doing the renos because the building is in Canada right?

    Campbell has no doubt sent out a memo demanding that Canada's Prime Ministerial digs be built in Germany and then towed on a barge across the Atlantic.

  • Rod Smelser

    3 years ago

    WHAT A JOKE

    Luke Skywalker

    At least the NDP knows its priorities:

    Damn, at least now the NDP recognizes a national social priority!!!

    Steven Harper's residence!!!

  • Skywalker

    3 years ago

    A lesson learned...

    .. is that you should expect nothing from Harper and you will never be disappointed. "Nothing" implies that he will give tax cuts to those who have with taxes from those who have not. It's called socialism for the free enterprisers. A coalition could not have done any worse. Thank you Governor General!

  • realisticman

    3 years ago

    Skywalker

    Too bad you were unable to my reply to you showing that BC population has been growing, yet you say your neighbourhood is becoming less populated. Hard to figure where you are.

    Actually, this budget that will pass now the Coalition is Officially dead (funny how the Tyee hasn't reported that the Budget will pass and the Coalition is dead, maybe everyone left for their annual in Cuba) and in the Budget is tax relief for those that have little.

    "Increasing the basic personal amount and the top of the two lowest personal income tax brackets by 7.5 per cent above their 2008 levels, so that Canadians can earn more income before paying federal income taxes or before being subject to higher tax rates."

    Perhaps you didn't have a chance to read the Budget.

    This too:

    The Canada Skills and Transition Strategy will help Canadian workers and their families through a three-pronged approach:

    * $1.9 billion to strengthen benefits that give workers more time to find the right job and get the training they need, provide companies using work-sharing arrangements more time to restructure and better position themselves to emerge from the economic downturn, and better protect workers’ wages and severance packages in the event of their employer’s bankruptcy.
    * $1.9 billion to enhance the availability of training by providing unprecedented levels of short- and long-term skills upgrading opportunities for workers in all sectors of the Canadian economy, including investments in the long-term potential of under-represented groups.
    * $4.5 billion to freeze Employment Insurance (EI) rates for 2009 and 2010 so that Canadian employers and employees continue to benefit from one of the lowest payroll tax rates in the world.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.

    Democratic Trust

    About The Hook

    As British Columbia and other jurisdictions consider allowing online voting, can it be made secure enough that people will trust it? Will it encourage more people to vote? But if something goes wrong, will it further erode people's confidence in their democracies? And what role is the media likely to play in shaping the debate?

    These are among the issues to be considered at a May 26 discussion that Fair Voting BC and PartyX are hosting at The Hive in Vancouver. I'll be on the panel, along with UBC Law's Fathima Cader and SFU computer scientist Steve Wolfman. The results and recommendations are to inform the two organizations' public positions on online voting.

    Meanwhile join me and other contributors on The Hook as we bring you the latest from B.C. and across Canada.

    -- Andrew MacLeod