The Hook

The Hook Blog

Political News. Freshly caught. A Tyee Blog

Environment

BC's 'gateway' for Alberta oil

Conservation groups celebrated news this week that Enbridge Inc. shelved a pipeline expansion in Ontario -- and attention has now shifted to a project still in the works for British Columbia.

The Northern Gateway Pipelines project consists of two pipes, 1,170 kilometers long, linking Alberta to the northern B.C. coast.

One pipe would carry tar sands-produced petroleum from Edmonton to Kitimat, where it would then be transported to tankers. The other would carry condensate, a compound used to thin petroleum, from Kitimat back to Edmonton.

Both pipelines and a new marine terminal would be owned and operated by Enbridge.

Forest Ethics is one of the groups opposed to the project. Climate change director Merran Smith said northern communities need to understand the risks of oil pipelines and tanker traffic to ocean and salmon stream eco-systems.

"The pipeline in and of itself will be crossing hundreds of salmon streams. If it were to break…that would have severe impacts on wild salmon," she said.

"There's a very strong economy in the northwest based on the health of wild salmon."

Kitimat mayor Joanne Monaghan said a series of public consultations were already held in December, and the community is looking to Enbridge to hire up to 4,000 construction workers for the project.

"We have to keep our people busy, keep them off welfare. People need to feed their families," she said.

Monaghan said she is not concerned about the potential of oil spills because tanker technology has improved.

But some of Enbridge's shareholders are concerned. In December, five of them partnered with the Dogwood Initiative to request that Enbridge’s board investigate the liabilities and risks associated with the Gateway.

According to Enbridge's 2008 Corporate Social Responsibility Report, the company had 65 reportable spills in 2007, with an average of 67.4 spills per year from 2003 to 2007.

This month, one of its oil storage facilities in Alberta spewed out 4,000 barrels of oil, and Enbridge also settled a $1.1 million prosecution brought by the state of Wisconsin for violating wetland and waterway permits there.

Steven Greenaway, vice-president of Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines, said he met with Dogwood representatives recently and a quantitative risk analysis would be part of its National Energy Board application -- which is expected to be filed in mid-2009.

He said ten pumping stations along the pipelines will be designed to fully contain spills, and said previous spills should be considered in context: 5,560 barrels spilled from more than 750 million barrels of petroleum piped by his firm in 2006.

Colleen Kimmett is a regular contributor to the Hook.

Filed in

8  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Luke Skywalker

    3 years ago

    Great Project...

    Quote:
    "The pipeline in and of itself will be crossing hundreds of salmon streams. If it were to break…that would have severe impacts on wild salmon," she said.

    But isn't that also the case with the Trans-Mountain Pipeline from Edmonton to Vancouver constructed in 1953???

    Why doesn't the Dogwood Initiative just focus its efforts in shutting down that pipeline???

    Enbridge - Pipelines, terminals, 1,000's of jobs, ~$5 billions to be invested...

    Nothin' to sneeze at in terms of northern economic/employment opportunities.

  • Wilfred Laurier

    3 years ago

    Northern Development

    This project will be a great catalyst for Northern development, especially when combined the new container port at Prince Rupert.

    I wonder what the reaction of the residents of the area will be when white yuppies from Vancouver try to stop it?

  • alive

    3 years ago

    typical

    That Kitimat mayor sound typical Chamber of Commerce, anything for business!
    Way to go! to heck with concerns as long as we "get on the map!"

  • jimmy_laroux

    3 years ago

    ???

    Luke Skywalker:

    Quote:
    But isn't that also the case with the Trans-Mountain Pipeline from Edmonton to Vancouver constructed in 1953???

    Isn't that the one that burst a year or two ago, spilling oil into Burrard inlet?

    Quote:
    Why doesn't the Dogwood Initiative just focus its efforts in shutting down that pipeline???

    Seriously? Do you think it's easier to shut down an existing pipeline (while ignoring the construction of a new one), or to prevent the construction of a proposed one? And of course if they focused on shutting an existing pipeline, no doubt you'd complain that they're ignoring this newly proposed pipeline.

    ???

  • quarry bay

    3 years ago

    Nothing but a pipe dream

    Sorry boys and girls,this one is not going to happen and it has nothing to do with the enviroment.
    Here are just three reasons.

    http://stephenrees.wordpress.com/2008/12/19/bc-port-expansion-delayed/

    http://www.cnbc.com/id/28781414

    http://stephenrees.wordpress.com/2009/01/16/shipping-rates-hit-zero-as-trade-stinks/

  • quarry bay

    3 years ago

    oops,I try that last link again

    http://stephenrees.wordpress.com/2009/01/16/shipping-rates-hit-zero-as-trade-sinks/

    We are looking at a 5 year recession

  • G West

    3 years ago

    The Gateway pipeline would

    The Gateway pipeline would be the largest petroleum pipeline project undertaken in North America in more than 50 years. In B.C. alone, the underground pipeline will be engineered to cross at least 1000 streams, rivers and lakes.

    Do you suppose Enbridge could get the Federal environmental authorities to consider each river crossing as a separate project?

    Keep it under $10 million and you won't even need a review....

  • Luke Skywalker

    3 years ago

    Sarcasm...

    Quote:
    Seriously? Do you think it's easier to shut down an existing pipeline (while ignoring the construction of a new one), or to prevent the construction of a proposed one?

    Just being sarcastic. ;)

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.

    Democratic Trust

    About The Hook

    As British Columbia and other jurisdictions consider allowing online voting, can it be made secure enough that people will trust it? Will it encourage more people to vote? But if something goes wrong, will it further erode people's confidence in their democracies? And what role is the media likely to play in shaping the debate?

    These are among the issues to be considered at a May 26 discussion that Fair Voting BC and PartyX are hosting at The Hive in Vancouver. I'll be on the panel, along with UBC Law's Fathima Cader and SFU computer scientist Steve Wolfman. The results and recommendations are to inform the two organizations' public positions on online voting.

    Meanwhile join me and other contributors on The Hook as we bring you the latest from B.C. and across Canada.

    -- Andrew MacLeod