The Hook

The Hook Blog

Political News. Freshly caught. A Tyee Blog

Environment

Suzuki biologist praises Watts' Surrey leadership

A biologist from the David Suzuki Foundation gave Surrey Mayor Dianne Watts a thumbs up for her “progressive” leadership on the city’s controversial Campbell Heights development.

“At this point, the way she is approaching things, it’s very progressive,” said salmon conservation biologist John Werring.

Campbell Heights is an environmentally fragile area in South Surrey that was approved for large-scale industrial development under former mayor Doug McCallum in 2003.

At the time, the area had evolved from an aging gravel pit into an important wildlife refuge and rich breeding ground for trout and salmon.

But work on Phase One of the development – which encompassed sensitive wetlands, water channels and forests – proved environmentally disastrous, Werring said.

“It was one of the worst examples of fish habitat destruction that I have ever witnessed,” he said.

In addition to decimating fish stocks and driving out wildlife, the project resulted in the drainage of Latimer Lake, a popular local fishing spot. Citizen outrage, coupled with a scathing Suzuki Foundation report, put heavy pressure on Surrey’s municipal government to reconsider plans to develop Phase Two of the Campbell Heights business park.

Werring said the city should have collected more ecological information before it signed off on Phase One. But he said he thinks Watts has learned from past mistakes and now seems to be moving in the right direction.

Under her leadership, the city recently purchased 123 hectares of provincial land near Campbell Heights for $104.5 million. According to the city’s plan, revenues collected from development there will finance the cost over five years and defray pressure to build on Phase Two lands.

In the meantime, a team of biologists has free reign to study the Campbell Heights area and will report back to an experts review panel that includes Werring himself. The panel will then provide advice to Surrey council.

Asked if Watts’ plan was sound, Werring said, “Yes, absolutely it was a good decision.”

Veteran councillor Bob Bose – a long time critic of Watts and a council hopeful under the Surrey Civic Coalition mantle – said the best solution for Campbell Heights is to leave it alone.

If the SCC wins a majority, Bose said he will push legislation to protect the Phase Two lands and move industrial development to a more central location.

“In the long term that offers the greatest opportunity to protect the area,” Bose said.

The South Surrey region -- which includes Campbell Heights and the former provincial land -- sits on a high plateau inaccessible to rail lines, making the SCC plan is economically sound, he said. Surrey should be redeveloping central industrial areas in Newton and Port Kells instead of putting money into the city’s outskirts, he added.

“It makes no sense to develop a truck dependent industrial area, miles away from everything,” Bose said.

Geoff Dembicki is a staff reporter for the Hook.

1  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Luke Skywalker

    3 years ago

    Campbell Heights and Watts

    Quote:
    The South Surrey region -- which includes Campbell Heights and the former provincial land -- sits on a high plateau inaccessible to rail lines,

    Campbell Heights is a long-term industrial park development and strategically lies along the future "Southern Freeway" corridor between Hwy 1 and Hwy 99. That freeway corridor is even contained in the City of Surrey's longer-term "Master Transportation Plan".

    As for Surrey Mayor Dianne Watts... I'm quite impressed with her and she's even managed to attract long-time Surrey New Democrat (and incumbent civic independent councillor) Judy Villeneuve into Watt's civic party ranks.

    Mark my words, Dianne Watts will be the next leader of the BC Liberal Party post-2010 and post-Campbell.

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.

    Democratic Trust

    About The Hook

    As British Columbia and other jurisdictions consider allowing online voting, can it be made secure enough that people will trust it? Will it encourage more people to vote? But if something goes wrong, will it further erode people's confidence in their democracies? And what role is the media likely to play in shaping the debate?

    These are among the issues to be considered at a May 26 discussion that Fair Voting BC and PartyX are hosting at The Hive in Vancouver. I'll be on the panel, along with UBC Law's Fathima Cader and SFU computer scientist Steve Wolfman. The results and recommendations are to inform the two organizations' public positions on online voting.

    Meanwhile join me and other contributors on The Hook as we bring you the latest from B.C. and across Canada.

    -- Andrew MacLeod