British Columbia New Democratic Party leader Carole James' convention speech missed the opportunity to reclaim the green agenda, said former MLA David Cubberley.
“It's what I didn't notice,” he said when asked for his thoughts on James' speech. “It's like the dog that didn't bark in the night. The word 'climate change' was never mentioned. 'Sustainable' was a tack on.”
The speech, he said, “appeared not to be centred in the most paramount issue of our times at all.”
The party in recent years adopted a policy that says every issue will be looked at through a 'sustainability' lens. “I don't think that speech had it as a lens in any way, shape or form,” he said. “For me I would say sustainability has not made it to being a value in this party and if it doesn't the party will become progressively less and less relevant.”
During the last election, James and the NDP made opposition to the Liberal government's carbon tax a major plank of the party's platform, putting the party at odds with much of the province's environmental movement.
“The speech was an opportunity to show [sustainability] is becoming more relevant and I think it showed the opposite,” said Cubberley, who represented Saanich South from 2005 to 2009 and chose not to run in the May election.
Everyone knows the NDP believes in education, health care, social justice and fighting poverty, he said.
“The question really now, especially after the last election campaign, is whether they care about the environment and the sustainability of our economy and whether they see the shift that we have to make moving into a more sustainable economy as something they play a key role in and I didn't get a sense of that from this speech.”
Many members of the party are talking about these issues, though not publicly.
“If the party membership cares, I believe the party membership do care in the majority about it, it has to become a discussion, it has to become an open discussion,” said Cubberley. “It appears to be being suppressed as a discussion, which I don't really get.”
James' speech made vague reference to the environmental achievements of the 1990s, but went into no detail, he said. Cubberley worked as a staff member when the NDP formed the government.
“I'm very proud of what the party did, particularly in the first term, the Harcourt term,” he said. The NDP introduced strong, even visionary, land use planning, progressive forestry measures and product stewardship regulations, he said.
“You would think actually somebody giving a speech like this today would draw on that large reservoir and be able to come up with convincing examples that show the conviction of New Democrats around environmental sustainability and then marry it with the need to be come economically sustainable which is a goldmine for her.
“There wasn't even a concrete image around it,” he said. “If you're not proud of your own history, especially the parts of it that had high integrity, were innovative and groundbreaking you're absolutely not standing on anything. You're floating in the air. It's a very, very good base to speak from and build on.”
Soon after becoming leader James addressed many of the failings of the NDP in the 1990s, especially the era when Glen Clark was premier, he said. “What she appears not to be able to do, and I don't understand the reason for it, is to be proud of the achievements of that era, and they were numerous and groundbreaking, and build on those.”
Dealing with climate change will require more than vague references to green jobs, he said. “Why are we the New Democrats not the party of public transit at this point in time?” he asked. “Public transit advantages everyone in society but especially those at the bottom and it is part of the solution for creating green cities. Why are we not the party of public transit? Why are we not married to it? I like to think that we are, but I don't hear it in speeches.”
This afternoon the convention will debate resolutions related to the environment.
UPDATE: View Carole James' post-speech scrum at Public Eye here, and Liberal Attorney General Mike de Jong's reaction here, and read Tyee columnist Bill Tieleman's disappointed reaction here.
Andrew MacLeod is The Tyee’s Legislative Bureau Chief in Victoria. Reach him here.


13
Login or register to post comments
Skywalker
2 years ago
Let's get a grip
Talk won't reclaim the agenda. It wouldn't matter if she mentioned every cause from equal rights for turkeys to healthcare. Cubberley doesn't know what he's talking about.
Frank
2 years ago
Cubberly
"Everyone knows the NDP believes in education, health care, social justice and fighting poverty, he said. "
Everyone knows the NDP record on the environment is pretty good too. Not perfect, but better than any other elected party.
Adam M
2 years ago
Frank
"Everyone knows the NDP record on the environment is pretty good too. Not perfect, but better than any other elected party."
Yeah, but with the main worries of British Columbians being the economy and fuel costs, I don't think anybody actually cares.
Fuel costs, Frank. Just wait until BC Hydro starts raising rates. I wonder if people will think about the environment then, when all our creeks have been diverted to rip us off, and our electrical bills are putting us into debt, collectively AND individually.
Frank
2 years ago
Adam M
I agree, which is why I disagreed with what Cubberly said.
max von smartt
2 years ago
solar cycles behind climate change
Anthropogenic global warming has been exposed as a hoax. Carbon taxation is a step to global government, among others, for the benefit of elite fascists. Pristine rainforests in Sumatra, Borneo and Papua are being decimated to grow palm oil for biofuels. BC Liberals are going ahead with run of the river dam projects in wilderness to supply California. This CO2 hoax is far from benign.
bakoonin_mik
2 years ago
Carole still lost in the clouds
This should seem like a no-brainer for any current political leader delivering a speech to party faithful, especially a socially conscious party, and especially on the eve of Copenhagen - likely the most important global warming marker in our lifetime. (the science is no longer about if we're fucked, but when and by how much)
Even if Carole is a climate denier (I don't believe she is), it still makes political sense to at least mention the crisis in major speech, yet nothing. I guess all her Ax the Tax backroom advisers are still pulling her strings. Right now, Carole James and Stephen Harper are two peas in a pod when it comes to denying the urgency to address climate change.
Cubberley's bemusement is entirely warranted and justified. He is not alone in his bemusement.
Adam M
2 years ago
Frank
I know. My comment was phrased argumentatively, but I was in fact building on your disagreement with Cubberly in order to make a jab at PPC's. I apologize for the discordant form of my comment - a stand-alone expository comment would have been better.
Dr Alexander
2 years ago
I suppose Carole
read the Haldley CRU emails.
She is just getting ahead of the curve.
Frank
2 years ago
Adam M
Not at all, I misinterpreted.
max von smartt
2 years ago
holy jackals!!!
Could be seeing some trolls/spooks online. For 900 million bucks gotta expect some security. Beyond that is Sodom and Gomorrah on the East Coast.
seth
2 years ago
complex
Climate change like economics is much too complicated for Carole James. Better to ignore the subject.
Dr Alexander
2 years ago
Climate change is indeed like economics!
And, as we have witnessed by those lads at Hadley CRU and their pals, it is akin to economics as parlayed by Bernie Madoff.
Carole James is smart enough to know that you don't buy a dog that isn't going to hunt.
freebear
2 years ago
Climate change missing...
but plenty of hot air!