Paul Martin does nothing to mask his frustration on the other end of a telephone line.
The former prime minister and architect of the scuttled Kelowna Accord tried to find something to salvage in the historic talks between First Nations chiefs and Stephen Harper. Instead, what he saw was the federal government wasting more time and sending the chiefs home empty handed.
"The government has nothing concrete to say," Martin told The Canadian Press. "They wasted six years."
The joint statement between Harper and the chiefs released Tuesday committed to a task force on economic development and a working group on the structure of government financing of First Nations.
It also committed to reviewing a report on education, as well as processes to improve governance and the implementation of treaties.
But all that work has already been done many times over, Martin said.
"All of this preliminary work that they're now talking about doing has been done. It's there. It's on the record."
Martin, who is now 73, and aboriginal leaders negotiated a pact in 2005 that would have pumped $5-billion over five years into native health care, education, housing and clean water. The Kelowna Accord was shelved by Stephen Harper soon after his Conservative government defeated the Martin-led Liberals six years ago this week.
With no clear time lines or goals included for the processes they've set up, Martin says his successor is proving the Conservative government "has no sense of urgency."
At the very least, the government should have committed to ending discrimination in education funding for First Nations children, he added.
"How difficult is it for a government to say 'we're going to end discrimination'," Martin said.
The Prime Minister's Office was asked for reaction to Martin's remarks and declined to offer any comment.
First Nations have long complained that money spent on education per student is several thousand dollars less for on-reserve children than for children just a kilometre away off-reserve.
In court, the federal government has argued that it's not fair to compare provincial funding of off-reserve schools to federal funding of on-reserve schools.
Equal funding would likely cost the government billions. But money is no excuse for discrimination, Martin said.
"Are they going to eliminate the deficit on the backs of six-year-olds who can't read?" he said. "There is no doubt that you're not going to get economic development unless you have an education."
The federal government has a moral obligation to make sure each child is funded equally, he added.
"There is no moral argument stronger than condemning an act of discrimination against the most vulnerable in your society," he said.
Martin remains involved in First Nations affairs, heading up a foundation that invests in aboriginal education and entrepreneurship. He is flabbergasted by the emphasis Harper is putting on "building a relationship" with First Nations, saying the Conservatives have had six years to do that and "it's unbelievable" that they seem to be starting from the beginning only now.
"If you need to establish a relationship, go to a reserve and read to a six-year-old," Martin said. "Set up a literacy program."
Harper has made a point of doing things differently than Martin. Upon taking office six years ago, the Conservatives let the Kelowna Accord sink unfunded, and dismissed it as flimsy — despite 18 months of negotiations with First Nations, Inuit, Metis and the provinces.
Harper has also stressed that he prefers an incremental approach that takes small, practical steps rather than the comprehensive approach favoured by his predecessor.
But Martin says the Kelowna Accord was not his idea. Rather, it was the collective idea of aboriginal groups who set their own agenda and brought it to him.
"The reason it's the best approach is because the government didn't dictate it."
Martin says Harper, by contrast, is imposing his own will and ways upon First Nations — an approach the former prime minister insists won't produce results.
Still, Martin has nothing but praise for the Assembly of First Nations for entering into talks with the Harper government while pushing for fundamental changes.
They can't give up now, though, Martin added.
"Their next step is to hold the government accountable."
Harper needs to demonstrate his commitment in the upcoming budget, Martin said.
Sources suggest the budget may contain something for First Nations education, perhaps a pilot project. But as yet, there is no plan in place for how the government wants to handle education reform and the budget is fast approaching.
First Nations leaders are also desperate for more funding for housing, health care and child welfare services. The recent housing crisis in Attawapiskat, Ont., and on the Ontario side of James Bay, are examples of raging poverty and substandard housing conditions undercutting reserves in many areas, they say.
Some chiefs have threatened retaliation if Harper allows those conditions to persist.
But Martin believes First Nations communities won't let the summit's lack of concrete action get them down.
"I believe that in the First Nations right across the country, there is an enormous amount of hope, a huge amount of hope for their children," he said. "What they're looking for is for Canada and Canadians to respond to that. The Canadian people have to get behind them."
For more from the Canadian Press scroll down The Tyee's main page or click here.


5
Login or register to post comments
snert
17 weeks ago
First Nations have to get behind themselves first.
"The Canadian people have to get behind them."
Come up with reasonable solutions instead of the all-or-nothing ones that crop up so often.
Fiat lux
17 weeks ago
Martin also enthusiastically
Martin also enthusiastically endorsed the Tobin tax, that would have gone a long way to help with the financial problems overall, getting the few bucks from the money market parasites.
It was accepted by the Parliament, but Martin never implemented , or talked about it again.
But then this is politics all over in every part of the world and on every page of history books.
Ed Deak.
Sask Resident
17 weeks ago
Go to local schools?
If the provincially run school is only a kilometre away and has a better education system, then why not send the children on the reserve to the provincial school? Or do the chiefs prefer their version of "separate but equal" like the leaders of the Bantu lands? Reserve only schools are simply racist.
DPL
17 weeks ago
During treaty talks, we the
During treaty talks, we the taxpayers living on reserve, asked if our kids would be going to the band schools? The answer was short, and remember we were the only ones paying taxes to the band. NO. The bands used the federal self taxation system to exclude all band members from paying taxes, so we covered the total cost, unless DIAND came up with some cash. When one band decided to buy a sewer treatment plant from the municipality, DIAND would only pay a percent because the band members were only using part of it. There were more non Indian occupiers than band members, and that's fairly common in the interior, lower mainland and on the Island
dorothy
17 weeks ago
Looking for enlightenment here...
"the federal government has argued that it's not fair to compare provincial funding of off-reserve schools to federal funding of on-reserve schools."
And why is that not fair? does federal money have a different 'density' or purchasing power or something like that?
I believe that the dumb approach we are using now, making vague or 'flimsy' grand plans that are all words and no action, will perpetuate this sense a lot of people obviously have of being constantly pick-pocketed by the local FN people. It is because they know how flimsy everything we tell them is, that they get into creative economics in order to make ends meet.
The solution, in my book, is that we get deals and treaties and funding in place for these people, which are clearly defined and reliable and will actually make it possible for them to see progress, and then we can perhaps hope for a civil relationship some time in the future.