The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.

Lawyer Offers to Help Media Fight Harper Gov't Copyright Changes

Ottawa moves to legalize use of news footage in attack ads without permission.

By Jeremy J. Nuttall 18 Oct 2014 |

Jeremy J. Nuttall is The Tyee's Parliament Hill reporter in Ottawa. Find his previous stories here. This coverage of Canadian national issues is made possible because of generous financial support from our Tyee Builders.

image atom
Constitutional law expert Errol Mendes says legislation the Harper gov't wants to pass would be an 'abuse of power.'

A prominent law professor says he considers a Conservative plan to allow political parties to expropriate news footage for advertising to be such an abuse of power, he's willing to offer his services to media pro bono to fight any attempts to pass such legislation.

Earlier this month, documents leaked to the media showed the Conservative party is considering adding legislation to an omnibus bill that would enable political parties -- and only political parties -- to use news footage in partisan ads without permission or financial compensation to the producers.

As well, election advertising legislation prevents media from being able to refuse to run the ads after an election writ is dropped, unless there are legal concerns.

Errol Mendes is a professor and expert on constitutional law at the University of Ottawa and editor of the National Journal of Constitutional Law.

He said that if tabled and passed, such legislation would be an "abuse of power" by the federal government and an attack on press freedom, and that he hopes media organizations fight it in court if it is ever introduced. "If they do, I'll be willing to offer my service pro-bono," he said.

It can be argued that forcing a news outlet to run ads using its own footage violates freedom of association and expression, he added.

Parties are powerless: Mendes

According to Mendes, political parties in Canada have no more legal standing than any business or association, and giving them the privilege to expropriate material has no basis in the constitution.

"[They're] just like any other organization, but here's the problem; [politicians] are the only entity which can pass laws and can say, 'We're protected by the law,'" he said. "It's an abuse of their democratic power."

Mendes also argues the use of such material in attacks would not fall in line with "fair dealing" rules, which determine the legal use of copyrighted material for education or satire.

Media organizations spoke out against the plans detailed in the leaked documents this week, insisting such legislation would be an attack on their integrity. CTV news host Don Martin went so far as to say the government is "flirting with fascism."

Bell Media and Shaw, owners of CTV and Global, did not respond to interview requests and CBC would only reiterate its previous statement that such legislation could compromise the integrity of news programs.

Politically, Liberal Ralph Goodale pointed out in the House last week that artists and musicians must wait until 2017 for copyright changes they've been seeking, but the government is giving itself what it wants now.

Goodale called it expropriation without compensation.

Use is fair dealing, says copyright lawyer

The Conservatives have argued the ability to use such material already exists, and that what the documents revealed would only add certainty to existing copyright laws.

Copyright lawyer Howard Knopf agreed the matter isn't a copyright issue, because taking small bits of news footage for political ads is nothing new. But he said there are limits to how it can be used.

He said the use of news material does fall under fair dealing, provided it meets the conditions to qualify.

"If it's distorted or mutilated to any significant degree so that the meaning is changed or it's taken violently out of context, there may well be relief under other doctrines of the law, such as defamation or what's called 'moral rights' under the Copyright Act," Knopf said.

He said attack ads that hit below the belt can cost votes, pointing to a famous Progressive Conservative ad that made fun of Jean Chretien's face in 1993 before the Tories were wiped out in the election.

Though it's hard to tell for certain because no formal legislation has been tabled, Knopf said it appears as though the Conservatives want clarification of existing copyright laws.

But Mendes said the Conservatives only wish to suit their own needs as an election approaches, not the needs of the public overall.

"It's one of the worst examples of abuse of democratic power that this country has seen in a long, long time," he said.  [Tyee]

Read more: Federal Politics,

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: What Coverage Would You Like to See More of This Year?

Take this week's poll