- Ms Kaye is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Mary Carlisle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Prem Gill is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nancy Flight is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Justin Everett is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
What Activists Must Learn
Lasting solutions depend on abandoning language of conflict, says author.
- Carry Tiger to Mountain
- Arsenal Pulp Press (2005)
- Bookstore Finder
Stephen Legault's first experience with activism came as a teenager living in Burlington, Ontario. To make room for a highway, the government decided to clear a patch of woods Legault used as a refuge from a turbulent adolescence. Enraged, he pulled up all of the survey stakes one night to try and stop the construction. They were replaced the following day. After repeating his futile protest a few more times, he was finally defeated when the survey team abandoned their stakes and made their markings directly on the trees.
Soon after, Legault channelled his energy into starting a high school environmental club, and later a university group. The rage he felt over losing his refuge fuelled him. "I was the portrait of the angry young activist," he writes. "These emotions made me want only one thing: to win, at any cost."
The importance of not being angry
The Tao has just three lessons restraint, compassion, and love These are the three treasures
With love you can be courageous With compassion you can accept all things With restraint you can lead
-- from Stephen Legault's Carry Tiger to Mountain
Legault's first exposure to the Tao Te Ching occurred at the same time in his life. Through his lifelong relationship with it, he says he gradually saw how anger was not an effective method of protecting what was important to him. The energy he had spent sabotaging the highway crew as a teen could have been used more wisely.
Legault says he's consistently turned to the Tao Te Ching during his 18 years of activism. Written in China around the sixth century BCE, this central text of the Taoist philosophy inspired Legault to write his own book, Carry Tiger to Mountain: The Tao of Activism and Leadership. Legault's book contains his commentary on the Tao Te Ching as well as an interpretation of its 81 verses, both aimed at providing guidance to the activist community.
"The reason we're angry at something is because we love something else," Legault says in a phone interview. In Carry Tiger to Mountain, he writes about how activists need to replace their vocabulary of conflict -- always struggling, wrestling, opposing, clashing and fighting -- with one of compassion.
Many social activists need to make some fundamental changes to the way they approach their work, Legault says. Rather than wasting energy raging against the machine or worrying the sky might be falling, he suggests activists look to a motivation they may have forgotten about: love.
"As activists, we feel that we don't have time to spend on the inner world because we're spending all of our time on the outer world," Legault says. "But if all we're doing is working on the outer world without addressing what's going on inside of us and what is guiding our action in the world, we will continue to fail as activists. And we are failing as activists right now."
Throughout his book, Legault's passion for activism is evident. And so is his frustration with the mistakes he says activists keep repeating -- mistakes he believes the wisdom of the Tao Te Ching may prevent. Specifically, he advises readers to trade their anger and fear for love and compassion, their egos for selflessness, and their fixation on complexity for simplicity.
Always attacking, always attacked
The sage leader knows that force and conflict always lead to defeat Even the most effective campaign leaves bitter feelings and a desire for retribution in the hearts of the defeated Lasting victories are not won this way
As an example of aggressive activism gone wrong, Legault discusses the fight to stop grizzly-bear hunting in B.C. in 2000. Activists, led by the Raincoast Conservation Society, waged a media war in the last days of Ujjal Dosanjh's premiership and won a three-year moratorium.
However, the heated debate they created allowed the B.C. Liberals to make grizzly hunting an election issue, Legault says. When Gordon Campbell became premier, the moratorium was eliminated. The result was a good example of Legault's Taoist philosophy: "To win by perpetuating conflict will almost certainly mean that our victory is short-lived."
Legault is conscious such advice will be hard to accept for some. Any book mixing Eastern philosophy with activism risks being labelled what he calls "West Coast, crystal-gazing woo-woo." His book also veers dangerously close to the growing genre of spirituality-based self-help books, which usually boasts titles and premises -- What Would Buddha Do at Work? or The Corporate Sufi -- that verge on parody.
But Legault's book avoids the "hippie, new age" label by being practical. The lessons the 35-year-old Legault gleans from the Tao Te Ching are backed up with examples from his ample activist experience.
In 2005, Legault founded HighWater Mark Strategy and Communications, a consulting firm for non-profits, charities, and ethically conscious businesses. Previously, he was a co-founder of the national conservation organization Wildcanada.net, where he was executive director for six years. He's also worked with numerous conservation groups in Alberta and Ontario, where he was born and raised.
On inaction and the right action
Can you accept that even for the most vital matters the way of the Tao is to let events run their course
Taoism may seem a strange source of inspiration for activism. The Tao Te Ching teaches inaction as the proper response for most situations. The word tao is usually translated as "the way" and interpreted to mean the natural order or flow of the universe.
Legault says the Tao Te Ching teaches that true strength comes from recognizing this flow and working with it, rather than trying to resist or control it. Legault doesn't preach inaction, though. Instead, he writes that activists should wait for the right action. "We in civil society are very good at doing things -- at inserting ourselves, sometimes aggressively, into the debate at every point. I'm suggesting that we are capable of acting more strategically, more effectively, if first we step back."
Legault says stepping back requires holding our egos in check. He warns activists and their organizations too often put self-interest ahead of the greater good. Legault admits that he did it.
"Environmental groups are fiercely competitive with each other," he says. "I would say we're even more competitive with each other than the business community."
In Carry Tiger to Mountain, he is very critical of the professionalization of activism. Legault warns that activist turf wars and institutionalization are major turn-offs for the general public. He writes that professional activists need to remember that "our members don't serve us, we serve them."
The Tao Te Ching advises readers to surrender their ego by flowing with the patterns of the tao. Legault recommends activists step back from a situation to see how they can best serve it, rather than thinking of ways it can serve them.
"In a natural system healthy, functioning relationships exist based on the right balance of cooperation and competition," Legault says. "We need to mimic that more in civil society as a whole, and in the environmental movement in particular."
Tao and the KISS principle
The more complex your rules the less likely people will follow them
Another manifestation of ego Legault cautions against is a much more forgivable one. He warns activists not to burn themselves out by taking on workloads that are too heavy or making strategies that are too complicated.
Legault points out that the activist community is filled with people -- including himself during one period -- who "have once been on fire and are now simply fried." In Carry Tiger to Mountain he writes that burnout springs largely from activists not trusting others to help carry the load. Activists need to let go of the idea that only they can do what must be done.
A similar problem, Legault says, is the belief that a winning strategy must be a complex one. "Part of our tendency as activists is we see the complexities of an issue," he says. "We become overwhelmed. We try to think about all of the elements that might possibly be at play here, and we end up creating some plan of such complexity that we can't even get started with it."
Again drawing from personal experience and the teachings of the Tao Te Ching, Legault encourages activists to show restraint and to search for simple solutions to begin with. Grandiose plans that satisfy the ego by making oneself or one's organization seem important should be avoided, Legault advises. Complexity can come once a simple base has been built.
Look out by looking in
Be an advocate with love, and you will wield a great sword Defend the earth and all its creatures with love and you will be a mighty shield
While critical of activism, Legault's book radiates a hope that it can improve. His simple, focused advice will challenge readers to become better advocates for the things they love by forcing them to take a closer look at their methods and motivations.
"We have to do a lot of work on ourselves to make sure that the people who are making change in the world are making that change from a place of strength rather than weakness," Legault says. "And that strength is comprised of a strong spiritual grounding -- whatever spiritual grounding that is -- and that we act from love and compassion rather than fear, hatred and anger."



7
Login or register to post comments
Michelle Hoar
5 years ago
Comments on "What Activists Must Learn"
Sounds like an interesting read. I'll look out for it.
Truman Green
5 years ago
Ugh. More "turn the other cheek stuff." Works well if your're opposing municipal governments in a democratic country, but not so well if you've got a Timorese gang trying to rip strips of flesh off your body--all while giggling.
masalaman
5 years ago
Yes indeed sounds like an interesting read and concept. After 9/11 I was quite angry at the US-led attack, backlash and media propaganda. I am still angry (esp from the new developments here at home with the arrest and detaining of 17 muslims in Toronto w/o cause for now 10 days).
Most of us are angry when we are not getting what we want - it would be great if we could channel the angry to positivity and compassion. A hard task nonetheless when say it involves land claims, political/religious sovereignty and freedom and losing loved ones in activism.
Let's just hope that its not just the activists that use compassion and its the other side that does as well.
Colin
5 years ago
Well what Truman wrote is correct, there is a time and place for this strategy and one for conflict.
What amazed me about the environmentalist here, is that they rarely bothered to try to enlist forest workers or hunters into their cause, instead treated them as the enemy, when in fact they could (and in many are) the frontline of defence of the environment.
Will put this book on the to read list as it will be interesting to see how he incorporates Chinese thinking into modern western practices.
Skookum1
5 years ago
The late Robert Fontana of Fernie, who was killed by a Cape buffalo two summers ago while big-game hunting in southern Africa, was such a man. I knew Bob at SFU and learned of his passion for the upper Flathead country, which had been his family's guide-outfitting turf for three generations. Among our strongest common interests were a shared loved of the beauty and power of the wilderness, and an awareness of the political and economic forces which saw it only as money in the bank.
Bob became president (I think; or executive something) of the Fish and Wildlife Association and the big-game hunting association, but never stopped being an environmentalist in the truest sense of the word. Not the "truest sense of the word" as interpreted by, say, an eco-feminist ideologue or a post-Marxian vegetarian recycling maven, but an honest-to-god man of the bush out to protect his home country from unwarranted and destructive coal mining development. Bob wasn't a big fan of logging, either, despite living in a timber town, but got respect for his position - despite living in a timber town.
And he cared just as much about the Stikine or Tatshenshini as he did his own turf; he was also astute enough to know that the pocket-bush battles being fought by the Wc2 and others were red herrings, that the bigger cause lay in trying to win over the big money, or the heirs of the big money, because change could only come from their willing participation and investment. And I remember long, hazy summer afternoons where we discussed what has since become politically fashionable as "global warming", but which the environmental movement hadn't really cottoned on to yet (I'm talking 1980-1981 here), and wondered if it wasn't already "too late".
What I remember of "mainstream" environmentalists in this period is that they were all corporate-paranoid, decidedly leftist in ideology, and hostile to even ''talking'' to someone dressed the wrong way, i.e. like a Socred or a redneck.
What I found while door-knocking during two Green Party campaigns in 1983 (Mission-Port Moody and the provincial campaign) is that the common public had as strong or stronger appreciation of environmental issues than the Green Party membership as a whole did. The Green Party membership, to boot, was full of people for whom obsessive-compulsive fetishes about recycling and so on became the main expression of their "think globally, act locally" ethic; as if recycling was the be-all end-all; and those same people were hostile to "middle Canada" and despised them for their traditional clothes and houses and lifestyles, writing them off politically instead of ''asking them what they thought''. And if they'd asked them like I asked them, and made a point of speaking to them in their own language instead of presuming that only those who could be converted to the Gaian cause or eco-feminism were worth rescuing; all others were the enemy. And so while those people ''wanted'' to vote Green, they weren't encouraged to; and often were insulted by Green spokespeople, or by the environmental movement at large.
For me this has roots in the '60s and '70s when environmental theory was born out of the thigh of the Democrats and New Democrats and so associated with a socialistic set of values. In reality, as we're learning, the problems of the environment are inherently economic and technological and no Luddite solution can be applied without even greater disaster; in other words, winning over the money crowd should have been on the agenda since day one, instead of carrying placards denouncing them and burning them in effigy etc. Not a way to make the friends you need; but if you want enemies, they're easy to create.
Skookum1
5 years ago
(cont.)
And so was born the denial movements that have counter-propagandized "fibre farms" (formerly known as forests and wilderness) and the global warming debunkers and worse. The reason they exist is not so much because of the venality and greed of their backers, but because of the alienation instilled by the rabid shriekiness of the early environmental movement and the residual anti-mainstream element in the self-anointed "green movement", which takes the high moral ground without (in my view) deserving it.
Colin
5 years ago
I find the some of the strongest and most effective environmental groups are the quietest, how many people think about Ducks Unlimited? I found something that surprised me, there is an excise tax on gun sales in the US which goes to environmental restoration programs, so far this program has collected 5 billion dollars. It was a surprise to me.