Opinion

A Tyee Series

How We Sawed off Our Forest Industry

Bad policies fuelled the collapse of timber jobs. Rural BC took the big hit. Second of four.

By Kim Pollock, 15 Jul 2009, TheTyee.ca

Logging Truck

Raw logs, and jobs, destined for export.

Related

British Columbia's economy was struggling even before the financial meltdown and economic crash of 2008.

In spite of the federal and provincial governments' and industry's ferocious protestations to the contrary, a big reason for B.C.'s recent lacklustre performance in capital investment is the 2006 Canada-US Softwood Lumber Agreement [SLA] and other policies enacted or supported by the Gordon Campbell government.

Although industry continues to resist any discouraging words about the lumber deal with the Americans, it is not universally admired. "Far from delivering security, the Canada-US softwood pact has seriously undermined B.C.'s lumber producers and hurt rural communities as they struggle through a prolonged economic slump," notes Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives resource policy analyst Ben Parfitt.

Under the Softwood Lumber Agreement, Parfitt reported, in 2008 the U.S. reimbursed approximately $4.3 billion in duties paid by Canadian companies on U.S.-bound lumber shipments during a 54-month trade dispute. The half that went to B.C. forest companies proved of little value to B.C. communities or industry workers, however, because much of it was invested in the U.S.

"In fact, what three B.C. forest companies did with a portion of their rebates was to invest in U.S. mills," Parfitt says. He notes that Canfor Corporation, West Fraser Mills and Interfor altogether spent more than US$620 million to purchase or upgrade U.S. sawmills.

According to Parfitt, the reason lay in the controversial export tax imposed as part of the SLA. The tax, collected by the Canadian government and distributed to the provinces, applies to lumber shipments to the U.S. in the event that lumber prices fall below certain levels or exports exceed certain volumes. In the two years after the SLA was ratified in October 2006, the tax cost B.C. companies more than $540 million. But instead of earmarking those funds for industry upgrading, the B.C. government put it all into general revenue.

Another major source of long-term job loss in manufacturing has been the Campbell government's policy of increasing raw log exports. Although supporters of log exports claim they create employment, the evidence doesn't support their view. Log exports kill jobs. While exports grew from a tiny fraction of the province's total timber harvest in the late 1990s to an average of over four million cubic meters a year from 2004 to 2007, forest sector employment fell from 94,800 in 1999 to 69,400 in 2008, a decline of 26.7 per cent. Logging employment fell by over 40 per cent.

Parfitt notes that had the number of logs exported in 2008 been milled domestically, "another 2800 manufacturing jobs per year would have been generated in B.C."

Exports

"Many of British Columbia's lumber mills sit idle", the Globe and Mail reported earlier this month. "Coal exports are down 40 per cent. The price of natural gas, one of its key commodities, has collapsed."

The decline in exports is not a recent development. B.C.'s exports actually peaked in 2006 and have fallen since; steadily in the past two years. This is of major concern to British Columbians, of course, because exports make up a huge proportion of total GDP. Export earnings are crucial to employment creation, wages and other incomes, as well as the government revenue available for spending on social programs. About half the province's output is exported. When exports fall, there is no question that the province will lose employment and revenues and there will be pressure on governments to cut services to people.

In the past five years, notes BC Stats, B.C.'s imports have continued to rise while exports stagnated. British Columbia's combined trade deficit in 2008 stood at $24.2 billion -- in other words, the province imported $24.2 billion worth of goods and services more than it exported. "This is the largest trade deficit British Columbia has ever had," notes, the provincial statistical agency. "The last time B.C. had a trade surplus was 20 years ago, in 1988. Over the next 15 years, the deficit was fairly stable at between about $4 billion and $8 billion; however, over the last five years the deficit has ballooned, tripling from 2003 to 2008."

Simply put, as an international player B.C. is increasingly living beyond its means. But there seems to be little government attention to the problem.

Employment creation and opportunities

Although B.C. had, on the whole, relatively high rates of employment through the recent economic boom, the high aggregate levels masked persistently high unemployment rates outside of Metro Vancouver and Victoria.

The collapse of the forest industry in summer and fall of 2007 created even larger pockets of regional unemployment, particularly in resource-based communities. In the recession, unemployment rates are up significantly in most regions of the province. In April, the Cariboo recorded the highest unemployment rate in the province at 12.9 per cent, reports BC Stats (all these figures represent three-month moving averages, unadjusted), followed by North Coast/Nechako at 10.6 per cent. Much of the urban southwest of the province has been shielded from the worst of the recession, partly due to Olympics-related construction.

Among municipalities, Kamloops (9.7 per cent), Chilliwack (10.7 per cent), Kelowna (11.5 per cent), Prince George (11.6 per cent), and Dawson Creek (15.2 per cent) all had unemployment rates above the provincial average. But workers in Victoria (6.6 per cent, seasonally adjusted) and Vancouver (6.7 per cent) Census Metropolitan Areas were less likely to be unemployed than those in other parts of the province.

The Liberal government's much-touted "Heartlands" economic strategy did virtually nothing to change the rural-urban employment gap. When B.C. was just climbing out of the recession in 2003, unemployment in the provinceÕs six rural development districts averaged 10.3 per cent, while Vancouver's was 7.3 per cent and Victoria's 6.3 per cent. In January as the recession began to hit, the six rural districts averaged 6.7 per cent, while Vancouver had 4.9 per cent unemployment and Victoria just 3.9 per cent. Employment rose; the gap remained. Now employment is plummeting.

It is significant to note as well that a disproportionate amount of recent employment loss has occurred in the relatively high paid goods-producing sectors, where employment fell by 2.4 per cent. Although there was a slight increase in agriculture (+3.3 per cent), this was not enough to offset significant declines in manufacturing (-5.9 per cent), forestry, fishing & mining (-5.1 per cent) and utilities (-2.3 per cent).

The fall in investment and innovation of course contributes substantially to job loss, especially in resource-based industries and manufacturing. And with the closure of so many operations across the province, we need to ask important questions about the likelihood that many of those mills and plants will never reopen. With the government continuing to refuse to invest or encourage investment to offset the recession in resource-based communities, governments and citizens need to seriously think about what the residents of those communities will do next.

Tomorrow: The growing income gap between rich and poor and the stagnation of real wages is behind many of the mounting social problems we face in our communities.  [Tyee]

23  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • ME2

    2 years ago

    Time for change, the old way is resulting in disaster.

    It is a complete impossibility to hold an opinion re BC's Forest Industry without resorting to comparisons between managing this PUBLIC resource with a prioity for it's social benefits, or managing it with only priorities for investors uppermost

    WAC Bennet tried to cut it down the middle. He thought the continuous Boom and Bust cycles in the industry could be broken by giving management of the public forests to private industry, offering various subsidies in return for sustainable management and promises to maintain the most modern processing equipment.

    Well, "sustainable management" has turned out to be mythical, with the majors selling out once they've used up all the best and most easily acessible timber, and having found that the vaunted "green-up" is proving to be incapable of providing the requisite high profit margins.

    Now we see buyers of those TFLs maneuvering to extract the last of the valuable old-growth by prioritising access to the stands containing the last of the old-growth Red and Yellow Cedar,and Douglas Fir, for example, and by by-passing sustainable management altogether through high-grading stands using heli-logging.

    As the author notes, they've added insult to injury by investing in milling capacity in the US and then shippimg OUR logs to be milled there.

    And now, Mr Campbell is feeling sorry for them and wants us to allow them to further break their contract with us by allowing them to sell forest land for ranchettes and subdivision developments.

    The ONLY way we can put the Forest Industy back on its feet will be with local management such as Community Tree Farms and small, privately-managed Woodlots.

    While their objective will also be profit, it will be secondary to providing the local jobs and commuity stability we've lost and are now losing - big time.

  • Hughes

    2 years ago

    Hey Gordo...

    taking notes?

  • Fiat lux

    2 years ago

    First of all, we had no

    First of all, we had no "economic boom", it was a lie from the addled brains of economists and bought politicians.

    The deregulated money creation powers of the banks flooded the world with imaginary money, licencing the takeover and exploitation of the world's resources by the multinational corporate mafia with worthless nothing. But any racket can only last for so long.

    The same money creation powers also permitted the overcapitalization of many industries, including the forest industry, resulting in unnecessary automation, demanding huge energy and resource inputs, while sidelining and eliminating human labour.

    Contrary to claims, it didn't lower, but inflated costs and prices, as we can witness in our stores.

    30 years ago the local mills were booming with twice the labour force, plus there were hundreds of contractors and small mills all over. Now the forest industry is in the hands of a half dozen mega corporations and real private enterprise is dead.

    A couple of guys can make a good living with a small, relatively inexpensive mill and about 50 loads of lumber per year.

    The old economic calculations maintained that a job shouldn't have more than one wage year of investment.

    In the automated mills, each job now requires up to 50 or more age years of investment, plus 400 loads of timber per job. This is not economics, but economic suicide that feeds only the banks and the corporate mafia, taking income from real people.

    Last, but not least, economies built on exports must and will collapse sooner or later. As we're now finding out and so will the Chinese one day. And as world poverty grows, the future doesn't look very good.

    Ed Deak.

  • freebear

    2 years ago

    What good is an economy if no one works in it!

    As Ed said, a sustainable local forest industry is possible if only we lower our expectations on profit and increase our expectations and value of the social benefit; and the scale of logging would also ensure an environment that may grow trees and provide livlihoods for generations.

  • Skywalker

    2 years ago

    Excellent work Kim!

    I couldn't help but remember Hank Ketchum's endorsement of Gordon Campbell after reading:

    "In fact, what three B.C. forest companies did with a portion of their rebates was to invest in U.S. mills," Parfitt says. He notes that Canfor Corporation, West Fraser Mills and Interfor altogether spent more than US$620 million to purchase or upgrade U.S. sawmills.

    It all made sense. West Fraser has been exporting to their mills across the border since the liberals came to power. The Softwood Lumber Deal made it all possible for us to get screwed. The Heartland strategy was one of the biggest farces in BC's political history.

  • Powell river pe...

    2 years ago

    Campbell couldn`t run a lemonade stand

    The race to the bottom,first the logs and jobs get out-sourced to USA, then to China,I can`t believe how stupid the voters are in BC,the forestry/mill jobs "Will never recover" if we don`t stop shipping the raw logs,value added here,if the companies the countries had another source for raw logs they would get them from already........
    My Fu...... god man,if we can`t have the advantage when we own the resource,oil n gas doesn`t employ the people does,if forestry doesn`t recover the lower mainland will choke on itself for lack of funding,the building boom is over,all that is left is debt...........
    Campbell couldn`t run a lemonade stand.

  • lary waldman

    2 years ago

    Raw Log Exports

    I live and operate a small business in Qualicum Beach. I have to travel on the inter Island Highway a lot, going to Nanaimo at least three or four times a week. It is a rare trip that I don't see a number of Lumber Truck hauling raw logs. I do not know where they are going, but I have never seen a Highway Inspection of these off road trucks, often traveling well over the speed limit endangering all who travel there.

    I would also like to point out, that after all the excavation is complete, and only buffer trees remain, people will likely fill up the central section of Vancouver Island, at least as many as the potable water will sustain. I have walked around some of these logged out areas and they are suitable for flat unattractive development, examples of which can be found in the dozens North of Nanaimo and west of the coast. The circumstances that will be made available to developers, will likely be cheap to develope, but will not provide residence with a quality of life that I would appreciate. This of course says nothing of the displaced wildlife.A lot of imagination could have been used and at the same time the raw resource could be supplying a value added circumstance. But there seems to be no patience for such things. The coast of Vancouver Island is loaded up with resorts and fabulous homes, but like in Florida, the Central area will likely house those the service the few. This is a prescription for an unhealthy circumstance. Gordon Campbell may be able to win over people, but his legacy going forward will be one of embarasment for him and his family. He has raped this Island, I hope he is proud of himself.

    Lary Waldman

  • onthebay

    2 years ago

    grim picture

    If the unemployment figures quoted in this article do not include the substantial number of forest based contractors who are currently out of work then the 'unemployment' statistics for this industry are much grimmer than shown. Since these contractors don't qualify for EI benefits, the economic picture of their households and the small communities they live in is pretty bleak.

  • Fiat lux

    2 years ago

    The so called "free trade

    The so called "free trade agreements" are international treaties giving away the democratic decision making powers of peoples, to the free movement of capital by the multinational mafia to search and destroy.

    Raw log exports can not be stopped according NAFTA and WTO rules, that specify that once a "commodity" starts crossing borders, the volume must be maintained, or increased, but not cut back even to save the lives of citizens. This includes our natural gas, even if Canadians freeze to death, it must be kept flowing to the last drop.

    Campbell always sells chunks of BC and public properties to foreigners, i.e. BC Rail, so they can not be retaken and it gives them the right to unlimited profits into eternity, or else they can sue to kangaroo "free trade" courts, sitting and making their binding decisions in secret.

    In short, the main question is, can any form and degree of democracy survive the "free trade" fraud ?

    And now another secret SPP conference is coming up, giving more of Canada away .

    What's the point having any armed forces, when the country is for sale ? Who would be crazy to attack, when they can buy us, with our governments handing us over to them on a platter ?

    Ed Deak, Big Lake.

  • snert

    2 years ago

    Raw Log Export

    We used to see freighters tied up to one dock or another with rafts of logs beside them. Not so much any more. There is a log sort in Port Coquitlam that grades an bucks the logs so they will fit in 40' containers. I have no idea where they go but I betcha it's out of the country.

  • Powell river pe...

    2 years ago

    @Snert

    They go to China and Korea......

    Since they were sending back thousands of empty containers,they decided to fill them with logs,and that is why the logging(milling,value added) will....."Never Recover".......

    They can ship them to China/Korea,have them millied,ship them back cheaper than we can mill them,the reason........

    Because we BCers don`t work for 2.00$ per day....

    Same thing with all the manufactoring in the USA,it will never come back,we in north America,the middle class,the wannabe middle class,must make a stand........
    I know it would be difficult for the people cutting the trees but...........

    We BCers have to go on strike,no raw logs shipped period,short term pain for long-term gain,because in this world depression,the next move will be slaves shipped into Canada to cut and truck the logs,it will happen.....
    It happened on the Golden ears bridge,the Canada line,it`s happening in agriculture,resorts.....

    The new "Global economy" is not lifting up the world,it`s dragging the middle class down to their level.......
    And that won`t work for us,we can`t even eat for 2.00$ per day.

    Cheers-Eyes Wide Open

  • Powell river pe...

    2 years ago

    Kim Pollock

    Thanks for making some noise on CKNW today (John Macolm,the world today show)

    and thanks for your series from the Powell river persuader

    Cheers-Eyes Wide Open

  • ME2

    2 years ago

    So much mythology to overcome.........

    Thanks to the deliberate, purely self-seving lies promoted by the IWA / COFI cabal at the time of our first serious exporting of logs in the late 80s ans early 90s, misconceptions re that situation remain and confuse analysis of today's situation.

    The main effect of log exports at the time, when exports NEVER exceeded 3.7 % of BC's Coastal production, was that the Japanese - and others - were paying up to 100% more for our premium logs in the Coastal market, and then perhaps 30% more in getting them to Japan and marketing them there.

    The immediate result was that BC mills could not afford to mill premium logs, and so prices for the rest rose comparably. As I've written here before, I saw what were formerly pulp logs being diverted to the sawlog sorts, and logs formerly left in the bush becoming salable as pulp logs.

    Clearly, our traditionally subsidised mills were faced with having to pay the going world price for their logs, and so the exporting was shut down (except for the North Coast). This, despite the fact that not one job was lost. In fact jobs were actually gained, as was revenue to the Crown

    The real reason was very different, as Peter Pearse reported in his scathing report of Nov 2001 (I've forgotten it's name and you can only get a highly watered-down, inoffensive version of it on the Web now anyway)

    He painted a picture of a milling system that converted 50% of the log volume fed into it, into chips for pulp!! He stated that the mills made the same money in chip sales as in lumber sales!! Anyone, other than a blind follower of Jack Munro would recognise that only a grossly subsidised industry could get away with such grossly outdated mills and such gross uncaring for real value in its raw material.

    The underlying reason for gov't allowing this to happen was, as the 1985 Woodbridge Reed Report pointed out, that BC's Coastal thermo-chemical pulp mills had to be subsidised, since while they were faced with competitors having dirt-cheap raw materials like bagasse, the fibrous waste from sugar mills, they depended upon expensive wood fibre and only recovered 60% of that, as compared to 99% from Interior thermo-mechanical mills. Let the pulp mills go down and communities like Powell River, Campbell River, Nanaimo and Port Alberni are in the soup.

    So the only accurate story about our Coastal wood industry that can written has to document the criminal lack of reinvestment, and the equally criminal waste of resources and corrupt subsidisation.

    More follows

  • ME2

    2 years ago

    mythology con't

    Above, Snert declares that $2.00 a day wages for millworkers in China and Korea render our workers too expensive. I'm not familiar with the wage rates in those countries, but I do know that in the days I refer to above, Japanese labour costs mirrored ours and that they could pay double for their logs only because they employed the most modern technology, like high-tension thin-kerf bandsaws. They then recovered ALL the lumber value inherent in the log by making the required specialty cuts as they broke the log down.

    That is directly opposite to our methodology, which depends for profitability upon volume throughput and minimum labour.

    So the Japanese could pay double for the raw log not because they halved the labour input, but because they ADDED labour and greatly increased the time needed to mill it. At the time, the Japanese were the biggest producers of lumber in the world, and maybe they still are.

    I suspect the Koreans and Chinese are following the Japanese model - and likely under their supevision - rather than ours.

    Howcome the Swedes, with labour costs higher than ours, could produce IKEA, the largest furniture maker in the world? This is of particular inteest because IKEA made its mark using Alder, which until very recently our industry has been paying people to kill.LOL

    So go figure.

  • ME2

    2 years ago

    Ooops

    Geez, did it again. It was Powell River pe, not Snert who mentioned the $2.00 / hr wages.

    No big deal, just forestalling someone jumping on it :-)

  • Powell river pe...

    2 years ago

    @Me2

    A couple of points,first off with Japan.......

    They are in a financial SUNAMI...in the last decade their debt has risen from 99% of GDP to 170% of GDP....

    Here is a link that explains how Japan is,well to say the least,COOKED

    http://www.frontlinethoughts.com/pdfmwo07109.pdf

    Secondly,and this is wear it gets really scary,some economies are recovering but.....

    For the first time in history(well it`s rare) -What we have going on is a "JOBLESS RECOVERY"

    I will try and be brief,banks,industrials,tech,even wall street recovering,at least to the point of making money,but without hiring people,this is a seismac shift,tens of millions tossed out of work with no one intending or needing to hire them,the outsourcing to slave labour countries is on the rise,or should I say,still on the rise,so this recession/depression has literaly created, here in north America a sub-section of tens of million with no purpose in life,nothing for them to do,well at least nothing for them to be paid to do.
    And it`s happening in Canada as well,can you imagine,tens of millions with no support,so either we have that many people become street dwellers/homeless or if they get supported by goverment will mean that between the young,the old,the new homeless plus the usual group that dis-engages from society your talking 50% of the people being a drain on the remaining corporations....
    Now add the outsourcing,tax loop-holes and the pure unadulterated greed by the few and there is a recipe for either a military state or unprecedented public anarchy........

    And on a fundamental basis,and Ed Deak up at Big Lake says it best,how man power capitol,not robotic technocracy is the only way it will work....
    What advantage to the citizens,not the corporation to the citizens would there be if a once 500 manpower saw mill needs but 10 employees,great for the corporation but a death blow to mankind......
    In my opinion,the world isn`t flat, Thomas Freidman can go Fock himself,the global economy isn`t working,it`s creating the "Global Peasent Syndrome"
    By the way,that`s going to be the title of my next book.
    Either we,the people make a stand now,before it`s to late,the forestry won`t recover,even is the housing market takes off down south it won`t recover,the neo-con will give our land away(as private lands) and every log will leave the province,this has nothing to do with technology or efficeincy.
    Salmon gone/rivers gone/forests gone/logs gone/our souls gone......
    Lastly,there will always be tens of thousands of empty containers going back to Asia,and under neo-con rule they will always be filled with logs,their going back anyways so there is no cost in putting logs in them,so we,the new "Global Peasent" we be left out on this end,and the other end,remember,there are 2 billion slave workers available to do all the work,I don`t intend to join that group.

    Cheers-Eyes Wide Open

  • Powell river pe...

    2 years ago

    @Me2

    Messed up that link,I will try again

    http://www.frontlinethoughts.com/pdf/mwo07109.pdf

  • Powell river pe...

    2 years ago

    Sorry about that link

    I found my error,here`s the link

    http://www.frontlinethoughts.com/pdf/mwo071009.pdf

    Japans pending disaster,enjoy the read

  • KD Brown

    2 years ago

    Jobless Recoveries and the Global Timber Market

    Great posts - gets the mind remembering...

    The "recession" of the '80's I do remember, and when it started to "end" the press was full of news of the "jobless recovery." It has happened before. Yet the scale is different, with so much more of our manufacturing headed overseas, and that which is left behind woefully undercapitalized, unimproved, subsidized way past its usefulness in today's world. Our manufacturing industries in Canada are truly moribund, aside from rare bright spots in wind power, medical technology and etc.

    Don't forget the wholesale change in the world's timber supply. We used to be able to depend on huge, old growth trees, Douglas fir, Sitka spruce, Western red cedar, that were unmatched in the world. They were accessible, and could be sold, whole, in cants or as lumber, for great profit.

    Now we have logged most of them, the remains ought not to ever be logged since they are so valuable biologically. What we are left with is stands of poor quality, quick-grown, second and third growth timber that competes poorly, or at least evenly, with Siberian timber, Japanese trees planted since the war, SE US trees planted when everyone quit smoking in the '70's, Baltic trees that actually have been sustainably managed, and Brazilian lumber from plantations. Patricia Marchak of UBC wrote a book called "Logging the Globe" in 1995, and her book forecast exactly what is happening today.

    The cure? It lies within every Canadian. Every forest community has a small mill or two, a couple of folks struggling away with small planing operations, and many, many skilled woodworkers.

    Look them up, quit buying furniture made in the Far East, buying flooring made in the US, and shipping everything in, using what remains on the credit cards to pay for it. Employ your neighbour. Make sure that the local folks who build houses, furniture, cabinets and etc. are sourcing their logs from local tree farms.

    Ignore the price - pay attention to the costs. Leave Walmart in the dust, and the low-paying jobs too.

  • lynn

    2 years ago

    marketing the lie

    "The Liberal government's much-touted "Heartlands" economic strategy did virtually nothing to change the rural-urban employment gap. "

    There was no real economic strategy, only a marketing strategy of the word "Heartlands" - as a means of pretending that they cared - when they really didn't give a damn.

  • KD Brown

    2 years ago

    ...And further...

    Jobless recovery? Hah! Stop feeding the machine, and hire a neighbour. Make decisions that count for your community, and quit acting like lemmings. It is what we are being forced to do anyways by this depression, we just need to make it count.

    Meantime, hopefully enough people will wake up and smell the erstatz economy that is being shoved down our throats, and vote for the actual interest of our neighbours, rather than simply the industries which rip it out and ship it out the fastest.

    As for our trade deficit, it is about time that we quit thinking that an export economy is our only option. In order to have a resilient economy - as well as a resilient ecosystem - we need to slow down exports, and milk imports for whatever energy we can get from them. Eventually we need to replace imports wherever possible with our own goods. Witness the changes in food processing, its growth now more and more local, as people are conscious with their shopping decisions and try for a 100 mile diet. See: Jane Jacobs, The Nature of Economies, for a wise and surprisingly thorough discussion of the true nature of economic development...

    Cheers.

  • ME2

    2 years ago

    Is there hope?

    For more than a Century now, the neocons have been pushing their thesis that "The Market" is self- correcting and that "government intervention" is "Communism", AKA Socialism.

    However, unregulated, unethical practices in The Market led directly to collapse of that Market in the Great Depression, and it was only through Roosevelt's Socialistic New Deal make-work programs that many people were able to eat.

    Imposition of restrictive legislation, notably the Glass-Stegall Act, and later the occurence of WW2, was needed to get the productive engine underway again.

    Beginning in the 70s and culminating with repeal of the last provisions of the Glass-Stegall Act in the late 90s, deregulation set the stage for today's Meltdown, which so far, and because of social programs, hasn't seen many of us go hungry - yet.

    So again we hear talk of Keynesisn "priming the pump", but not this time of getting people back to work, as was Keynes' core strategy, but instead we see a bailing out of banks, the investment agencies, and companies like GM that are so big, and employing so many people, "we can't allow them to fail"

    But posters above have pointed out that while the huge economic interests are recovering, employment is not. If the elites are making money again with their offshore investments, which don't employ local labour, and the only local employers we see worthy of help are the mega-industries, will this methodology restore our previous prosperity?

    I think not. All I can see is a restoration of our previous flawed economic climate which was seeing a constantly widening gap between the rich and the poor, the ongoing destruction of our social safety net, and the stagnation of technological innovation, as our system is bled for ever-increasing profits. The bleeding is accomplished through various monopolistic methods which discourage competition and reward only giantism.

    Obviously, the old Henry Ford mythology which posed the worker and the employer in a mutually profitable relationship is passe. Now the Fascist, Freidmanesque vision in which government and business are "partners" has replaced it and is called The New World Order.

    And that is why the new recovery recipe has to be tailor made for our times, suiting the economic elites first.

    More below.

  • ME2

    2 years ago

    Hope con't

    Consider that when recovery happened in the Thirties, it was when tens of thousands small farmers produced almost all of our food, and before today’s huge agribusinesses became the norm. It was when we shopped at department stores for the variety but were willing to pay the small premium in local shops for quality of goods and service. Now local shops are becoming too expensive for the low-income consumer, and are being put out of business by the Malls and Big-Box stores anyway. Our factories have become "vertically integrated" as Mega-Corporations buy up all the means of production from the smallest to the largest.

    And the final nail in the coffin for "Free Enterprise" has been the politicising of the Media, which began with the propaganda techniques developed by the "Military Industrial Complex" during WW2 and is now a science of its own.

    Is there hope? Only if this house of cards collapses first, though we’re more likely to become slaves in all but the name before then.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.