Our Journalism is supported by Tyee Builders like you, thank you !
Independent.
Fearless.
Reader funded.
Analysis
Environment

Human Speech Follows the Same Patterns as Birdsong

New research reveals many similarities in ways that birds and people vocalize.

Logan S. James, Jon Sakata and Kendra Oudyk TodayThe Conversation

Logan S. James is a post-doctoral researcher in biology at McGill University, where Jon Sakata is a professor in its department of biology and integrated program in neuroscience. Kendra Oudyk is a master of library and information studies student and a graduate academic assistant in digital scholarship at the University of British Columbia. This article was originally published by the Conversation.

In every culture, humans speak and sing to each other. We have created an astounding array of languages and musical structures across the globe. And yet, within this diversity, some fundamental sequence patterns are repeated. These are often referred to as “universal” patterns in human vocalization.

Our new research, published recently in Science, reveals that many of these acoustic patterns in human song and speech are also shared with birdsong.

The study compared the songs of 367 bird species with examples of song and speech from 52 human languages.

How we gathered the data

As researchers in animal behaviour and neuroscience and music, we (Logan and Jon) spent 10 years documenting the prevalence of universal human acoustic patterns in the songs of zebra finches.

When Kendra joined our lab during her PhD, she proposed we investigate whether these patterns are shared across other bird species as well.

To research this, we needed a large number of birdsong recordings. Luckily, many people around the world are fascinated by the sounds of birds and upload their recordings to public repositories. We collected and manually annotated individual syllables in the songs of over 360 bird species, generating more than 70,000 birdsong syllables for analysis.

We then compared these to data sets of human speech and song from a variety of languages and cultures around the world.

Fortunately, some of these data sets contain annotated recordings of the same individual producing both speech and song, which was perfect for our comparisons to bird vocalizations.

Regular, predictable rhythms

Overall, we found numerous similarities in the acoustic patterns of birdsongs and human vocalizations. For example, humans and birds both tend to end their phrases with longer syllables.

LISTEN: The song of a fox sparrow. Audio by Patrik Aberg, Creative Commons licensed.

They also organize their syllables in a way that minimizes changes of pitch across adjacent syllables. And they tend to produce their songs with regular and predictable rhythms.

In some cases, birdsong appeared more similar to human song than human speech.

In other cases, we found birds tended to have songs that were more similar to human speech than human song.

Vocal learning: A nuanced space

We designed this study to ask an important question: Does vocal learning ability shape sequence patterning? Humans learn the structure of their vocalizations from others, particularly as they grow up.

It turns out many birds also learn their vocalizations as they grow up. We looked at two separate groups of these vocal learning birds: songbirds (oscines) and hummingbirds. We compared them to two closely related bird groups that are not vocal learners: suboscines and nightjars.

Because humans, songbirds and hummingbirds are all vocal learners, we thought some patterns may be similar within these species and distinct from those within suboscines and nightjars. Surprisingly, we found very little evidence for this. The degree of variation across bird species did not appear to be related to vocal learning.

How humans and birds make sound

What then might drive the similarities in sequence patterning across so many species? We will need more studies to determine the answer, but we hypothesize that similarities in how humans and birds produce sounds could shape some vocal sequence patterns.

For example, the shared need to co-ordinate breathing with vocal musculature could contribute to shared acoustic patterning across birds and humans. Specifically, precise movement of muscles that control the vocal tract are timed with airflow from the lungs across all birds and humans.

If this is true, it’s possible these patterns may be found in many other species.

Songbirds first evolved about 50 million years ago, long before the first lines of humans split from the other great apes. This means that birds have decorated our soundscapes throughout human evolution.

The songs of birds have inspired music throughout time and cultures. Might these natural sounds have influenced the earliest humans as they began experimenting with making sounds themselves, discovering the joy of music to their ears?

These are some of the big ideas we are excited to explore in future studies.The Conversation  [Tyee]

Read more: Environment

  • Share:

Get The Tyee's Daily Catch, our free daily newsletter.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Please note that email notifications for replies are not currently working due to a software issue which may be resolved in a future update.

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion and be patient with moderators. Comments are reviewed regularly but not in real time.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Keep comments under 250 words
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others or justify violence
  • Personally attack authors, contributors or members of the general public
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

Most Popular

Most Commented

Most Emailed

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Will the US Midterm Election Results Help Canada?

Take this week's poll