- Ms Kaye is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Mary Carlisle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Prem Gill is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nancy Flight is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Justin Everett is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
Wake up and Listen to Occupiers
Their challenge to each of us is not to live in tents, but to resist, remake any way we can.
Occupy Vancouver, October 14, 2011. Photo courtesy of popeye logic from Your BC: The Tyee's Photo Pool.
The amazingly resilient Occupy phenomenon is running up against the same ugly reality that so many social movements have encountered over the past 20 years: There is a world of difference between influence and power.
Governments and the corporations they serve have power -- that is, the power of money (and the law) to make decisions that can immediately and dramatically effect people's lives. Laying off thousands of people with no notice, cancelling or slashing social programs, building mines and oil pipelines, providing subsidies and tax breaks to private companies or refusing to build social housing or provide child care are all things governments and corporations do almost exclusively.
And, most important for the Occupy movement, the power to facilitate the creation of a super-rich class of feudal lords by re-writing rules, making laws, deregulating finance and establishing (and for the state, allowing) corporate practices that pay billions to the one per cent based on nothing more than their elite status.
Those decisions involve power and as the occupiers are discovering anew, that power is entrenched, protected and ruthless, and it will not be denied easily what it has accumulated over the decades.
While there is always reference to people power when new social movements flex their muscles, unless the people in the streets number in the hundreds of thousands or millions (as in Tahrir Square), what we are actually talking about is influence: The capacity to change people's minds, to inspire resistance, to engage a broader public on an issue in a different way, to change the political landscape so that inconvenient truths are put on the table or to legitimize deeply held values otherwise suppressed or denied by the dominant institutions.
What the occupiers have achieved
The occupiers have already made history. They have broken the media and elite-imposed taboo on talking about the destructive impact of inequality on the lives of hundreds of millions of people around the world in developing and developed countries. The new feudalism that has been emerging for over twenty years is now exposed. Everyone can see the elephant in the room.
Compared to the Tea Party movement in the U.S., which is an embarrassment and an affront to rationality (poor and middle class people attacking governments and letting Wall Street continue is rapacious greed), the occupiers have identified the actual source of why Americans (and Canadians) are suffering. It is the first genuine expression of progressive populism literally in decades. And as such it actually targets those at the very top who have benefited from this remaking of Western nations.
But now that the elephant can be seen ,what is the next step in confronting the corporate and state powers that it symbolizes?
The difference between what Occupy is facing and what its predecessors were up against is profound. The last generation of movements which confronted capitalism in the 1960s was facing a state that was relatively benign and was essentially on-side with the postwar social contract. Corporations were still, for the most part, nationally based and subject to national imperatives; in other words, they paid attention to the politics and culture of the countries they operated in and adapted to them.
The fight took place within relatively civilized parameters. The values and broad objectives were agreed upon and the debate was about matters of degree: How much state intervention, what level of equality, what degree of social program universality and entitlement. It is interesting to note that these social and labour movements did not develop in times of extreme poverty or growing inequality. It was just the opposite: They developed at a time when the economy was growing by leaps and bounds, creating rising expectations of what was possible -- of what government could deliver.
Of course that all ended by the late '70s and '80s with the advent of free trade, the rapid growth of transnational corporations and neo-liberal policies. But the movements, institutionalized in part through government grants that kept them going (perhaps past their natural life spans), did not change with the shift in the structure of capitalism and the power of finance capital. The underlying assumption was still that the state would respond to "legitimate demands" and corporations would behave according to established norms.
But increasingly both the state and its client corporations moved on. Nations were passé -- they weren't even called nations anymore, but "economies." Corporations moved from adapting to local culture and social norms to imposing their homogenized products and services on every place on the planet with enough people to buy their stuff. It could be argued that the 1990s was the time for a whole new paradigm of social movements -- an explicitly anti-capitalist movement which recognized the terrible destructiveness of the unfettered "marketplace."
But it didn't happen. With some significant exceptions here and there, the old movements were too bureaucratized and too complacent to see what was coming. They kept doing what they had always done even though, within a few years into the new century, it was obvious that it wasn't working. The notion of speaking truth to power sounds courageous and bold. The problem is that power doesn't care and isn't listening.
The failure of the movements modelled in, and for, the 1960s to come to grips with the mounting crisis for working people is at the root of the Occupy Wall Street rebellion. Tired of waiting for a kind of movement organization that could inspire and mobilize them -- or even speak to their experiences -- the most conscious and passionate of those left behind took up the call.
This isn't a '60s thing
What is the call? Implicitly, that the system is broken beyond repair. Indeed that might just explain why there were no conventional demands: The rebels know that the system is no longer capable of meeting such demands and its utter corruption has taken it far beyond the place where it could be expected to respond in any genuine way to the needs of ordinary people. Young people have been leading Occupy and it is young people who have lived their entire lives with a growing corporatism -- that dangerous amalgam of reactionary state and ruthless corporation that Mussolini himself said was the definition of fascism.
My generation of activists keeps insisting that government -- the state -- is the only possible counterpoint to global corporate power and we just have to take it back. But young people have had such a viscerally negative experience of the hegemony of corporate rule and state complicity -- constantly legitimized by a corrupt and monolithic media – that they aren't buying it. The notion that we can somehow go back to the golden age is delusional and they know it. This is perhaps the most important lesson they are teaching us.
It's not that they lack a vision consisting of all sorts of elements (call them demands if you like -- Occupy Vancouver has pages of them), but they know in their gut that there has to be a whole new economic system and a genuine, radical democracy to go with it, if that vision has any chance of being realized.
But now the question for them and us is how we imagine this transitional explosion of protest and joy, of anger and caring moving to the next stage. No one has any answers because this is something completely different. It's as if the occupiers are saying we are going to sit there and keep saying the same thing until it begins to sink in to the dominant culture and stay there. Maybe it's not their job to define the next phase -- that's too much to ask. They have alerted the world, put crushing inequality -- the social essence of capitalism -- on the map and they are demanding, if anything, that we join with them.
Occupiers are not necessarily asking that we join them in their camps but in their spirit of resistance and cultural rebellion, and in the task of imagining a better world -- realizing that we have been sleep-walking towards the edge of the cliff. They are telling us all to wake up before it's too late.
[Tags: Rights and Justice, Politics.] ![]()




67
Login or register to post comments
mcwar52
26 weeks ago
My generation of activists and the state
I respect Murray Dobbin's views and I think this article is to the point. However, it's not just quibbling to say that only some of his generation of activists thought "taking back the state" was the answer.
An awful lot of people in the sixties understood that we had never had the state and so there was nothing to take back. Rather than take it at all, in fact, what was needed was to overthrow it. And I'm not just talking about Noam Chomsky here. A sense of this necessity also permeated the anti-globalisation movement and certainly informed the behaviour of the Argentinian factory "Occupiers" about whom Naomi Klein wrote.
I think it important to make this point because I don't believe there is any "generation gap". We as a society, provided we are not the 1%, have all experienced the ill effects of growing corporate fascism and we are all capable of seeing that it is leading us to destruction. All of us also have experience we can draw upon which can help us wake up and act before we walk over the cliff.
Dan the socialist
26 weeks ago
Funny how people cheer when
Funny how people cheer when Egyptians were protesting etc yet when done here people scoff (especially the greedy selfish war babies that had it all and after bankrupting the country do not want to pay or think generations after them should have the same.. the war baby aka baby boomer generation will go down in history in a very poor light).. Pretty pathetic. We are truly a nation of sheep. The Tyee should do an article on why people are sheep, what made them sheep and what can be done... Personally I think it is too late.
Ramone
26 weeks ago
I would ask Dobbin to clarify
I would ask Dobbin to clarify a few points.
"My generation of activists keeps insisting that government -- the state -- is the only possible counterpoint to global corporate power and we just have to take it back. But young people have had such a viscerally negative experience of the hegemony of corporate rule and state complicity -- constantly legitimized by a corrupt and monolithic media – that they aren't buying it. The notion that we can somehow go back to the golden age is delusional and they know it. This is perhaps the most important lesson they are teaching us."
Dobbin's statement that "The notion that we can somehow go back to the golden age is delusional and they know it" seems to suggest that he believes government is beyond reform and the people will never be able to hold government to account like in "the golden age" when the state wasn't bought and paid for by oligarchs and plutocrats.
If that is the case and government is forever ruled out as an effective counterpoint to corporate rule how does he foresee the power of the 1% being reined in? Taking the state out of the equation leaves a pretty big void to be filled.
"Occupiers are not necessarily asking that we join them in their camps but in their spirit of resistance and cultural rebellion, and in the task of imagining a better world -- realizing that we have been sleep-walking towards the edge of the cliff. They are telling us all to wake up before it's too late."
Okay, so we're awake and realise "we've been sleep-walking towards the edge of the cliff". While we're awake and busy fuming about how we're being screwed the march towards total corporatocracy continues.
Pointing out problems is easy - coming up with viable solutions to these problems takes a bit more effort.
carfreecity
26 weeks ago
tents
tenting worked in Clayoquot but it just doesn't come off well in the cities
I support Occupy but not tenting.
Keep the food/medic tents, maintain the GAs but, tenting just becomes camping and makes people there vulnerable to attacks and other not so good energy and the public generally frowns upon it.
It was ok for a few days, but should have quit the game before the problems arose.
reallife
26 weeks ago
Not uncomfortable enough
Working class Canadians are not uncomfortable enough to rebel against the current system. People are focussed on getting a bigger SUV, moving from a condo to a single family dwelling, taking a Mexican vacation, maybe buying a summer cottage. Until these dreams become impossible for the majority, you will not seem them joining the protesters.
Cynic
26 weeks ago
I'd like to see the occupy
I'd like to see the occupy movement, and everyone actually, just start asking the simple question, where does money come from? We need to see this question on posters and protest signs and we need to ask it of every economist and pundit and politician on every call-in show.
There is hope out there. Joe Schlesinger's latest column is typical superficial "analysis" and I found three comments that challenge him and point out the money scam. So it looks like more and more of us are becoming aware of it. Should be, there's no shortage of online resources exposing it.
seth
26 weeks ago
Enough of the tents
I don't get why organizers, who shouldn't be as dumb as the mad a hell but haven't learned to read types that haunt the Occupy and Tea Party movements, don't just organize all these protesters to buy Fascist party memberships on mass. Take away the current Fascist movement in Canada's main vehicle the former PROGRESSIVE Conservation Party away from it, and unseat the odious Harper.. Do under Harper and his Fascist horde what he did to Joe Clark and the relatively benign Progressive Conservative Party.
Without mass membership buy by environmentalists in our recent BCLiberal convention, the province would still be under the fascist yoke of Gordo's premier designate, Falcon. When compared to Falcon, Christy Clark, could be called a communist.
Similarly the recent success of progressives in Alberta in removing the fascist's there, returning the Progressive Conservative party back to its Progressive roots.
As useful as the occupy movement it is, it needs to focus on getting its members organized into the existing party system as basis for change, and as a vehicle for rebuilding from the ground up.
Then force the 1%'ers to disgorge giving them manual labor jobs working in the fields.
VivianLea Doubt
26 weeks ago
power vs influence...
The power to influence has always been the greatest power in the world, think about it. Entrenched 'power', whether in governments or corporations, is always the power of the current cultural paradigm, which is why it is difficult to change. Difficult, but not unduly so: look to the local food movement for an example of dismantling decades of corporate power over food.
Every citizen has the power to make or break the corporations: they need simply not buy. In larger and larger numbers they are doing so; some as a conscious choice, and others because the money is no longer in their pockets. Either way, the current accepted cultural paradigm cannot continue, and will not...for the simple reason that the majority of people do not get up and face the day with joy and purpose.
This does not neccesarily mean that people are unhappy: just that they have come to see that they are in servitude to an idea (ideas) who time has come and gone.
Feverish
26 weeks ago
Precisely
"Working class Canadians are not uncomfortable enough to rebel against the current system."
Many years of outright oppression, overt, systemic corruption and poverty spurred citizens in the eastern bloc and northern Africa to act. We have been fed a splendid diet of kool-aid and cake, keeping us on our couches.
We are not much different from any other society (apart from the massive over-consumption) so we too will probably wait for the pain levels to rise before we rise up.
funshoe
26 weeks ago
great article!
great article!
Perry
26 weeks ago
What George Carlin said
"I sort of gave up on this whole human adventure a long time ago. Divorced myself from it emotionally. I think the human race has squandered its gift, and I think this country has squandered its promise. I think people in America sold out very cheaply, for sneakers and cheeseburgers. And I don't think it's fixable."
Jerry Munro
26 weeks ago
And You Did It To Yourselves....
"Their challenge to each of us is not to live in tents, but to resist, remake any way we can." Murray.
Well, Murray certainly gets it better and to greater depth than does say... Tieleman, for example. Who can't get beyond a, in my view, "Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition" view of this Occupy phenomena.
The point is, capitalism, it's entire economic model, State and thoroughly bourgeois democratic structure is beyond reform, and it is going to take one hell of an ongoing struggle, centred on the streets and in the workplaces, to change it. Right now, it has emerged on the streets. Soon, as the economic crisis deepens and the repression being now formulated and put in place by the Conservative/fascist State here, as across capitalism, comes full to bear, it will be extended into the workplace enterprises of corporate capitalism. When this occurs, "the system" will begin to be struck deep into its very heart/wallet. That's when it will get really serious, and likely really ugly, for a time... in my view.
For in the end, while "the street" can apply and maintain the political pressure, and begin the process of encircling and fencing in the State system, and begin the process of creating a "direct democratic" alternative to the ruling class State, it only really begins to be transformed into something entirely different when ruling class power is rooted out and shut out of the economy and its major enterprises.
My advise, unwanted as it may be, to the ruling system, is be very afraid. It is you yourselves that have launched this moment, but it is going to be finished by those who were to have been your victims, to have borne the blows of your greed driven economic manipulations and corruption. The usurpers are already in the process of being usurped themselves. It's just not obvious to you yet. :-)
morechatter
26 weeks ago
no "money" no "voice"
Governments are lobbied by big business to push their own agenda and the press is there to dum down the public to get their own way.
In order for our country to succeed and prosper, the democratic process requires a well-informed electorate and it is anything but.
How better to express homelessness than with a tent? And for those who are at home snuggled in their beds dreaming of a long walk in the park on a cold, dark, and damp winter day may be put off by the homelessness but no where near the plight of those forced to live on their feet.
Tankenka
26 weeks ago
'consumer' choice
Articles and posts like these are just like my thoughts- all sorts of problems identified, lots of anger, and no real answers. It's kind of comforting to see so many like-minded people as us, but frustrating that none of us who see these significant social & global problems has any cure. Starting small and personally is good.
VivianLea Doubt beat me to the punch- stop buying!!
I sure hope that if people cease to feed the corporations, the bad media, etc., they will wither up and die. I don't think it'll happen, because too many people value the bullshit that our '1%' dishes out to the public. People enjoy their bluerays, their mobile phones, their 'bling,' their sickening polluting, consuming vehicles- as a cynic I'm convinced a lot more for status than functionality, otherwise car companies would be perfecting and cranking out electric wheels.
I'm sure it feels like not making an impact, but it's all one can do as an individual- stop buying the things that you disagree with. Cut your cable, buy from farm markets, outfit your home and life with products build by craftsfolk.
A big problem with what I preach, and I'm victim to it as well, is that resentment builds up so fast when considering that you, as a likely responsible, minimal consumer, has to make sacrifices (either having to spend more money on expensive artisan products or just don't acquire any toys, entertainment or comforts at all), and you know the majority of the so-called '99%' that you are apparently part of is still lapping up the frivolous, decadent products and services and the '1%' is still getting richer and richer for it.
Tough to reconcile one's own place in both efficacious social change and enjoying a comfortable life that includes some enjoyable, if not necessary for survival, distractions as a reward for being a decent, hard working person.
It's a start, though. Especially as we are inundated with Christmas ads at this time, keep your will strong and DON'T BUY.
Christophe
26 weeks ago
Is that Sharbat Gula holding the poster?
Now if it were, I would support her, but it isn't, is it? Nobody in BC can really complain about their lot in life compared to the people of the Third World. Some of those poor people live in tents their whole lives; they are not doing it as a college art project.
The problem I have with the Occupy movement is that it is just not possible to have sex in a tent without everyone else knowing about it. You can pretend everyone else is asleep but you know it isn't true. Otherwise I would be with them, in the tent, on the sidewalk.
Otherwise, the Occupy people have made their point; we need a reality check on our financial markets and we need to go back to government by the people for the people and of the people, instead of being ruled by a computerised stock-trading program.
morechatter
26 weeks ago
Solidarity
Just because Canadians aren't in the park freezing their asses doesn't mean they don't want change as BC voters take to the polls and vote Robertson in to help solve the homeless problem on Vancouver streets. I had the opportunity to talk to others who voted Robertson in and the first thing out of their mouths was how media was full of dirty tricks. They felt media was making much to do about a few chickens and bike lanes and its message was filled with biases was corrupt.
coop
26 weeks ago
If only the 99% could agree to end the corruption
Thanks for the interesting analysis. I was part of the 60s movement when I was at Berkeley, but like many others I put my vision into reality when I moved to Canada to avoid the draft and join the organic country life. We opposed the Vietnam War and segregation, along with the then corrupt system. But what happened? How many of us sold out? Nothing much changed other than cultural norms and now thanks to greed and corruption, the U.S. is becoming a third world, police state and life is not much better here or anywhere else. When the environmental collapse joins with the economic collapse, there will be no way out.
Here is a good summary from Bill Maher about the OCCUPY movement:
"So they want to know what Occupy is about?
Is it socialism? No.
Is it communism? Not that either.
It's about corruption.
We aren't against wealth like the naysayers say.
We're against wealth through corruption.
We aren't against government, we're against the corruption of our government.
We aren't against capitalism, we are against corrupt capitalism that tears down society.
What ever the problem, it probably started with corruption.
If you agree, re-post and use the word corruption in your conversations.
It's the root of the problem and it's darn hard to argue with."
But what now? How can the Occupy anger result in change, especially when the future is only looking worse under Harper? If only the Occupy movement could result in a re-alignment of the political spectrum, so that instead of liberals versus conservatives it becomes the one percent versus the rest of us.
pianosaurus rex
26 weeks ago
solutions? someone mentioned solutions?
Lots of excellent comments here that reveal many understand and have a vision of what the future should look like…..but doesn’t at the moment.
These statements in para 13;
“They kept doing what they had always done even though, within a few years into the new century, it was obvious that it wasn't working. The notion of speaking truth to power sounds courageous and bold. The problem is that power doesn't care and isn't listening.”
Is this not the quintessential summary overview of the entire history of humans on this planet?
One only has to read some of history to see the identical mistakes play out over and over again.
Some solutions to start with;
Move your money from the bank to another place. Ditch the cards because one million flyer points will get you a free flight from Richmond to Abbottsford. Stop spending money on frivolities and begin to barter as many services and goods as you can. I know it is not possible with everything but a little at a time will begin to show…..Put up a close line and make a veggie garden. Just these two have saved almost 3-4k in one year here….really, and the food is damn healthy food.
Buy direct. Go to the fish dock and buy from the fishermen. Go to the farmers and buy from them. lots of them sell direct.
Think practically; if you can’t purchase it with money you have already in your hand then you don’t need the item. Pretty good book to read by Barry Broadfoot titled Ten Lost Years.
Colleen Fuller
26 weeks ago
Listen to the Occupiers
I thought this was quite a moving call to all of us to act and think in solidarity with the Occupiers. However, one of the mistakes of the Sixties student movement was to push the line that there was a "generation gap" and that anyone over 30 was a Neanderthal. It's true that the youth movement was exciting and that young people led the fight against war, but if you look at other movements, it was an inter-generational struggle for civil rights (which didn't get the velvet glove of the state, by the way), for the right to union representation, and so on. I think we have to point to the real gaps that exist in society, and I'm not sure that age is one of them.
chinook
26 weeks ago
keep it up.
After reading last weeks issue of The Tyee, including the articles on the drugs at Occupy, and the article about the girl who died there of the drug overdose, I wanted to write something to the editor. If The Tyee isn't writing articles like this one, where the Occupy movement is taken seriously, who is going to write them? Canwest? Keep it up, Tyee, your paper can be a spokesman for change.
dj in victoria
26 weeks ago
Dobbin - Remake or Revolt
I see the OWS and general worldwide dissatisfaction with the political and economic scene, as similar to the black rebellion in the South although it hasn't reached the same solidarity and single minded argument yet.
At least they had a sympathetic government and white support. We are simply the havenots against the (haves plus authority.)
Our arguments must be centred on the immoral concentration of power through access to money and the return of money power to people's representatives.
We need charismatic and articulate speakers like Martin Luther King to rally protest groups in the millions in one place on one theme.
Without such leverage the protests, currently labelled by the media as tent cities of losers, will be taken off the radar until we reach the next and more desperate uprising which may not be peaceful.
Christophe
26 weeks ago
Not only was he a born protestor...
...but he was conceived at Occupy Vancouver.
When you look at the world as a probability function, with a soupcon of Organisational Behaviour thrown in for flavour, you can predict, a priori, the emergence of income tax and rice pudding.
Douglas Adams got it right in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy". The Vogons will always be in charge and the interstellar expressway will always be built, even if the Improbability Drive is, de facto, working.
We are doomed to live in a world that makes no sense at all to the average person and the best we can do is to get out at the end.
The Occupy people are the offspring of the 1960's Peace Marchers, without the focus of the draft cards and the Vietnam War.
There are those who own homes, and those who don't. I doubt they will ever see eye to eye on property ownership, shopping malls or the benefits of union membership.
The only glimmer of hope I see is that he human race is not all that important, and the way we sort ourselves out is important only to us.
By the way, the girl who died at the Occupy Vancouver site was Ashlie Gough and she had a lot more going for her than Sharbat Gula. She died of a drug overdose of her own volition, a victim of her own willful behaviour, not from violence at the hand of a friend or stranger. It was just plain sad, like the fate of the protest itself.
KWD
26 weeks ago
Corruption
Bill Maher is right about “corruption” lying at the root of the problem. But Maher’s view seems to be confined to moral and economic reasons.
There’s no doubt that fraud, bribery, embezelment, influence peddaling and patronage are systemic in political and corporate worlds. And that may be what the Occupations are all about, but it doesn’t end or start there.
Corruption or corruptive forces (in the broadest sense) are found at all levels of society. Corruption that wants to deceive, mislead and defraud gets it first foot in the door at home and from there it finds continual reinforcement in social interaction, the educational system and the work environment.
Our thinking becomes corrupted because we are unaware that corruption is taking place; we think and behave the way we are trained. To step outside socially accepted norms creates conflict. Deviance is viewed as unacceptable and every effort is employed to remove it.
Pepper spray, batons, water cannons, negative media representation, societal and economic sanctions, and political exclusion are the removal tools.
There’s no hope for a society that narrows its focus on 1% of the problem. It’s much, much larger than that, which may be why the 99% are having so much trouble articulating workable demands.
Sockeye
26 weeks ago
Agreed Dan
What we have here is a generation of spoiled baby boomers who were all sold and bought into the freedom 55 notion and who were willing to mortgage my future, my kids future and grand kids future to live high off the hog for their life time. But that's what the 60's protests were all about. Lifestyles choices and hedonism, is it any wonder we're at the point we are at now with these types of ideas steering the ship. No we live in a society where the main goal is to consume and people are stuck in perpetual adolescence. The boomers made peace with the system, a system that does nothing but visits normalized violence upon people and the natural world.
And they were paid off with table scraps.
Jerry Munro
26 weeks ago
What's happening & Where does it go from here...
First, I think it is or should be clear by now, that Occupy as constituted is not in and of itself going to be able to force through any major change in this society. It has launched a movement of questioning, even challenging some status quo assumptions, but really I think, it is largely made up of the wrong people to make any serious, in depth changes in society or the economy. (And that is not meant to insult anybody, for they are good people no less, simply an objective observation.) Clearly, their role has been extremely useful, and they ARE challenging "normal" politics and beginning the process of posing hard questions to the rich and powerful. But in part, precisely because it is "young" and inexperienced as a movement, poorly positioned in the economy, I think, it is lacking in a hard understanding of the nature of the status quo system. And as a consequence of that, also lacking in a hard understanding of what needs to be done, concretely within the political and economic institutions and enterprises of "the system" to improve their living prospects, and those of majority society.
Idealism, even resentments, are fine as initial motivators, but if you ARE also on the margins and outside merely looking in, it is not enough. It is not enough because if you are really going to change anything you also need to have a concrete understanding of how the economic and political order work, and how the class and power lines run. And flowing from that, be prepared to effect them, AND be joined by forces especially WITHIN the economy that ARE positioned to strike where it counts and hurts (the status quo order)... Where there is real power to grab. It is the working masses who need to be in that special place, onside and ready to act. (And which is going to take more than trade union leaders bringing dubious allegiances with them, carrying placards alongside you.)
So, while I think Occupy is a valuable movement experience and I fully support it, it is going to take more than a kind of youthful hippy reminiscent sensibility, wanting a vague love, peace and quasi-cultural change. We've been there and saw that fall on its ass already, and drift into hippy mercantile capitalism. :-)
Still, anything that rocks and causes questioning to begin WITHIN the system is a positive for me... and demonstrates what masses of people can do and effect, and the general line of travel we all need to take.
continued next post...
Jerry Munro
26 weeks ago
What's Happening Here II...
From precious post...
But what is not enough for my type, and we are there in and around Occupy too, working to help it develop its understanding and a workable democracy, grow and succeed, is an aimless, airy fairy, one more unclear, undisciplined love and peace movement. (As important as love and peace are.;-) But, as this economic and political crisis of capitalism spreads and deepens, and it is everywhere, everyday, it needs to connect with the lives of masses of ordinary working people... especially in their work places. For its these folks, whatever the difficulties connecting with them, linked up with those in the universities and other streams of society, who are positioned to effect and enforce real change in the economy... which is the throat of the ruling class order.
We are still early into this. Occupy, though hopefully not, may yet wither and die of its shortcomings. We shall see. Meanwhile, even if it does, simple paying attention to the social, political and economic order around us and around the world, and what is happening to global capitalism, tells you that this is not going away anytime soon. Whatever issues working people have that are right now getting in the way of their being motivated to take "the system" on, if this collapsing economic order continues, is all destined to change. (And if you don't know that even our working class in this country is suffering right now, and growing increasingly "concerned", even anxious, then you are on another class planet and don't know jack shit.)
The main value of Occupy already has been, that it demonstrates "politics as usual" in this country, only marginally less than Greece or anywhere else in the advanced capitalist countries, is already being questioned and challenged. And from here on, whatever happens to Occupy. and I wish it further success, the fight is already on and begun. Even if it's still a largely circling and feinting movements, with neither side fully committed to the fray yet. This too will change.
Lawrence
26 weeks ago
What?
The 60s were about the same thing the occupy movement is about, basically fairness to other living beings.
My crowd didn't invent woman's rights but it flourished in our time.
We invented the environmental movement, the anti war movement, healthy food and many other things.
The MSM knocked us, and mocked us, at every opportunity.
Our movement is still strong in many parts of the world especially the north west.
Yes the world is getting less fair, but you can see that's changing.
If the establishment had followed the path we suggested in the 60s it would be a far better world today, but they didn't, and now we have the occupy movement.
So go for it guys, now we have computers and that may make all the difference
Lawrence
26 weeks ago
And while I'm ...
on a rant the boomer's invented your computer, conceived, financed, and designed The Tyee.
And what has your crowed done lately?
Jeffrey J.
26 weeks ago
Bang On, Mr. Dobbin
In Canada, we have our own Noam Chomsky and Chris Hedges, and his name is Murray Dobbin. Clear, concise, eloquent, Dobbin sets out the truth like few others.
Every thing Dobbin describes has the clarion ring of truth. The 1960's were so different than now. Things indeed were bad, but nothing like what has transpired since. We now live under the heavy boot of a plutocracy, so rich and wealthy that they consider themselves above the rest of us (the 99%).
In addition, corporate rule has been so successful, with the mainstream media cheerleading alongside, that we do indeed face a crisis.
It is not clear how we will break the chains of this new form of enslavement. But one day, we shall. That is a certainty.
Thank you Tyee for continuing to cover the Occupy Movement, which the ruling elite impatiently wish would just go away.
anarcho
26 weeks ago
A bunch of thoughts
Thank you for this article, such an improvement over Bill T's Vancouver Sun-like attack. I agree with several others that the generation thing should not be stressed. Many of the people at the Occupy sites are 60's people - we never gave up. Nor did we all have faith in the state. That said I think the movement is preparing the way for the real movement of social change that will arrive when the other economic shoe drops. The global economy is collapsing and Canada will not be immune. When we have 20% unemployment look for an Occupy 2 happening. Consider that in 1983 we had 110,000 people in the street opposed to the cruise missiles. Imagine that number occupying down town. Couple that with general strikes aka Oakland. Then have the whole movement run via direct democratic assemblies, another lesson from OWS. Then we are in shape to really kick greed creep ass! Of course the parasitic class know this which is why they have been slandering the movement. But here they are doing our work for us. To paraphrase Abbie Hoffman, "The enemy is our leader". Every new person in the struggle confronted by the lies and filth showered on the movement, becomes angered by this mendacity and thus radicalized. Thank you MSM and all the bigots and haters out there!
lynn
26 weeks ago
Refuse to serve under a corporate flag.
First, I would like to give a long and noisy Bronx cheer to those precious so-called human beings in Victoria...those who called for the removal of the Occupiers from the town square because their tents would be in the way of the upcoming 'Christmas' fair! How's that for the saddest of ironies?
Good insights in this article by Murray Dobbin.
A sign one of the NYC Occupiers held up days ago as he was about to be removed, said it wonderfully:
"What happens next is up to you."
A good start would be what Vivianlea and Tankenka advocated - stop buying from the Big shops.
My suggestion to accomplish this would be a call for an increasing series of rotating "no buy" days.
For example, on one specified day a week...let's say Thursdays.... no one shops from or patronizes the Big stores. If you must shop, shop small and local.
This can then be increased to two specified days a week and so on....we continually up the pressure of not playing their game. (The internet could come in very handy in providing lists and updating information.)
Since the state, and the corporations they now serve, have demoted citizens into mere corporate clients.....our power lies in our rejection of this role/definition and in our refusal to act as 'a client' (in any form) of the corporate state.....our refusal to buy their things or their ideas eg, their demeaning co-option of government and their demeaning idea of citizenship and human rights.
We must become undependable, unpredictable, and unwilling customers of the corporate state....and redefine ourselves and the kind of world we want to live in..
igbymac
26 weeks ago
Murray Dobbin is getting to the root
... of our dilemma far more than most voices in here. I'd quibble about the details regarding corporate development over the ages, but it would be tangential to the thrust of this good article.
First, as Jerry Munro points out, the OWS movement is bringing issues to the forefront, making more and more people aware of the global, systemic problem of capitalism and its stranglehold on government through corporations.
Many say there are no solutions offered, but I think the real problem is that the solutions do not want to be accepted. The cost of behaving in a manner conducive to effecting change is seen as too big at this juncture, and far too foreign from our understanding of how things operate.
Most folks likely sense, but do not believe, the jig is up, that they have been bought off with dreams of the good life; but worse yet, most refuse to accept that they have been deeply brainwashed by a perpetual onslaught of state propaganda, and thus do little or nothing to correct that reality.
To some, at this juncture it's clear; and with the passing of time it will become increasingly obvious to most, that our sovereign nation and pseudo-democracy/republic have been lost to the corporations. We've been blindsided, though largely through our chosen lack of awareness to life beyond what we are fed.
Once the vast majority come to realize we have been hoodwinked through distraction and self-aggrandizing rhetoric of person and country, then we will work together in solving this. That's premised on there being time left, ecologically speaking, to bother with such things beyond mere bodily survival.
The solutions will remain as they are now, in large part: Stop supporting the state by turning peacefully away from this fraudulent power regime (and that's not to say it isnt dangerous) that manipulates us through money first, but ultimately the sword.
Things do not need to continue as is, despite Christophe's wisdom that they will because that's whats always been. We are free to change our minds, to act differently, and to demand something else for ourselves.
But spending your money at Costco or Starbucks, or lining up in queue to validate the crumbling system with your vote, or remitting Federal taxes, or 'hating your global neighbours while making sure you don't forget to say grace', only perpetuates the beast.
When your house is being eaten out from under you by termites, voting to change a window pane is not going to solve the problem. Desperation may have you believe it is all you can do, but its likely because the alternative is seen as too threatening to your comfort.
Sockeye
26 weeks ago
Lawrence
And yet here we are. With the world on the edge of an ecological disaster only rivaled by past extinctions, growing inequality and resource depletion on mass scale. Listen I'm not going to generalize and paint a generation with the same brush, but your generation as been at the helm and things have only got worse. By the way the computer was invented in World War 2.
Christophe
26 weeks ago
I don't know if we are on the edge of an ecological disaster
We are very close, but still in an excellent position to FIX IT. The baby boomers were the cutting edge of change in their youth, and they still are. Trouble is, you need a loud voice and a big stick to get them off their arses. Back in the day, there was a generation gap, and it was very real. It was bit like - today actually.
Today's generation gap is about the environment. My generation (age 62) is a lost cause but their kids are not. You can get to the boomers through their kids. Recruit the boomer's kids and you co-op Mom and Dad's money. Get the kids in high school to startworking on real day-to-day issues and they will surprise you.
Just make sure yo have an actual OBJECTIVES with achievable GOALS and you might ACCOMPLISH something. Otherwise, join the Occupiers and stew in your own juice.
igbymac
26 weeks ago
In general terms, the baby-boomers
...are far more optimistic of your establishment's ways that are mine, the Generation Joneses.
What appears to your faithful eyes as folks stewing in their own juices is, in fact, a slow-burning fire which will torch this systemic charade the Boomers prostrate themselves to. And why wouldn't they? Life has never been easier for a generation in the history of the planet. Thankfully there are still a number who 'get it'.
You, Christophe, may find it disconcerting that there is no papered outline for you to follow along with, but that is the movement's global strength. You seem to have a difficult time playing anything other than the establishment's game, whereas OWS sees the game as the problem.
Your real fictions (political, economic, monetary) are not going to suffice the mob, not this time.
blujaycan
26 weeks ago
good article and a warning to us
Good article.
I am surprised at how easily most comments have strayed from the actual movement. The article is correct as it underlines the concept of the movement. Regardless of appearance of some of those representing ( which in principle is the main reason for most of the prejudiced commentators declining to agree with them) their movement and understanding of those that have become the wave riders of political and monetary issues under the scheme or plans of improvement of our lives and of the society we participate in, as well as live.
As it appears, we have become and always will be a product of our environment. You can agree or disagree, but if you truly understand, then you cannot possibly disagree. However, whatever your view, no point arguing it, as you can’t see the obvious, as we have become followers of balance sheets for profit or loss without logic, rationale based on compassion, analogy and commitment. What? Nonsense you say? Think about it, if you will by using few ridiculous examples that will shine a light on the thinking process of those whom are riding the WAVE!!!!!
Wars are definitely to defend our freedom. Lives lost are gracious sacrifice of those whom belief in ….. what? Don’t answer that. Ask about how well they did after committing their lives for their believes. We make money on waste, arms that is, not on lost lives. So that is one example.
We make money of resale of polluting materials, and don’t care if they hurt, disease, or destroy. How does it show what is important. Money, our environment, or your neighbours/fellow citizens? So, that is example two.
We spend money on exploration of space, so we can move there? Who?
Why spend money of more expensive transport, energy, instead of less costly choices. Or if more expensive, at least longer lasting! So, that is example three.
So, the simple rationale, which is not really that simple for its underlying causes, should make one understand that we have become followers of topic for profit oriented bunch of hoodlums without conscience. There is nothing wrong with profiting, but there is definitely something wrong with accepting profits for “damaged goods.” How do you determine a damage goods? Pharmaceutical, armament, resources, environment, offering service without exploring damage to humanity first and foremost!
Those whom cannot determine what these fundamental mean are not meant to serve.
And the argument here is not about how we have progressed, as much as how we have mishandled what we have achieved.
Is it LATE?
Not, if everyone makes effort to understand what we are doing, and that even if occupying our property with deliberate disregard for laws, is actually making a statement that we are fooling ourselves in our simple minded following the progress we have made to reach THIS POINT!
blujaycan
26 weeks ago
good article,
and I agree, corruption is the root of all our problems, along with greed.
happy
26 weeks ago
I agree with lynn. Screw the shareholders of big corporations
Only possible problem there is that some of the biggest corporate shareholders are government worker pension plans and they go hand in hand.
But if we are going to talk the talk then we better be prepared to walk the walk.
Which would mean higher contributions from the worker to compensate lower earnings from the corporations.
I'm sure all progresive public sector workers would be prepared to that. Don't you lynn?
Lawrence
26 weeks ago
Salmonid
Alan Turing's little two room darling was based on technology that was a hundred years old when he got the idea of using radio valves as 'zeros and ones'.
So I guess you're right that really was the start of the digital computer.
Fiat lux
26 weeks ago
There won't be any change, or
There won't be any change, or improvement, as long as the crap of neoclassical economics is being taught in our universities and until people realize that:
Wealth can not be created, only taken from others, the environment and future generations.
That simple.
Ed Deak.
Jerry Munro
26 weeks ago
the Music Plays On...
"That said I think the movement is preparing the way for the real movement of social change that will arrive when the other economic shoe drops." wrote Anarcho
Bang on, anarcho! I support Occupy, but at the same time, realize there is a whole lot more to come yet. And the assumption we make most times is, that it will be slow... because typically that is our "normal" experience with it, relative to our lives.
But which is NOT always the case, and the times we are in right now is anything but day to day "normal", along the full front of human experience from the environment, to the growing danger of world war, to a potentially everything shattering of global capitalist economies across the world, to a growing mass dissatisfaction with what has passed for "normal" democracy to here. It is all in historic turmoil and an advanced state of agitation and flux.
And in such times as this, events and people's attitudes can suddenly change at an unexpected accelerated rate. Indeed, who can seriously deny that this is already going on, from the Middle East, to China, to the OWS streets of the US Empire heartland. There is a growing realization such as can ONLY increase, that it is all coming unglued and SOMETHING has to change.
And the human species did not get to here across such a long, complex and risk fraught history, by not doing or enduring what simply HAD to be done to survive and advance. Yes, we are still primitive in many ways, and will avoid what can be avoided, but we have also learned, made selfless sacrifices when it was the only way, and stormed countless barricades put in our way by sundry ruling classes defending old orders, to make those desired changes for ourselves that seemed and were real at the time.
I am an old man, and I am not in the least pessimistic (overall) about what people can and will do, as they come to understand what simply must be done... at least a "critical mass" of us. :-) (Whether I personally get there or not.:-)
And though I was born "pre-war", I was there and stood with the boomers in the 60s too, and have stood on picket lines with my class.. As I will stand with "regular folks" in this time too, come what is to be .
The gramophone needle is not stuck yet sonny Jim, (cackle, cackle) and the music rocks on. :-) lol
Jerry Munro
26 weeks ago
Lynn...
Good comments above me here.
There are many new and diverse fronts that are going to have to be opened up over the coming time, to confront and undermine "the system". Not the least what you suggest here as one of those fronts. (Which would put pressure on working folks WITHIN those big corporations and malls etc, to come to grips with their own work places in a challenging and new way, to be part of the solution struggling to emerge. Big Capital needs to be challenged and yes, usurped, in these pivotal resource supply, manufacturing and consumer distribution places in the economy, from whence "its" money is made and flows up to the ruling class coffers. And only working people can really do it... whatever the problems in the way of that.)
Imagination, organization, interconnection between groups of workers/consumers/intellectuals, and along with democracy, finally determination, is going to be the key to a more secure future for ourselves and our kin.
Sockeye
26 weeks ago
Christopher
"We are very close, but still in an excellent position to FIX IT."
We are not very close to an ecological disaster we ARE the ecological disaster. This idea that we can "fix" the environment is the exact anthropocentric hubris that needs to dispelled. But I agree with the majority of what your saying, but the hour is late and I think my generation is beginning to realize this. It may get more militant and violent unfortunately.
Christophe
26 weeks ago
I hope you are wrong, Sockeye
I think we still have time to fix our problems. Perhaps that is because I work with kids - from kindergarten to Grade 12 - and I cannot abandon hope while they are willing to work.
We cannot abandon hope in any case. Even when the Titanic went down, parents were trying to keep a brave face on it for their kids.
If you don't get my drift, walk into your nearest high school when their Ecology Club is holding a lunchtime meeting. Stand up in front of the 30-40 members and tell them were are lost and beyond hope and that our generation stuck it to them.
I have grandchildren, and while I have serious doubts about their future, I am also optimistic that they can fix what we nixed. Look at it that way Sockeye, then tell me again that we are lost. We are only lost if you and I and our friends quit. We may not have the legs to do the work, but we have money, experience and education enough to get the kids started.
Stop preaching doom and gloom and pick up a shovel.
mopled
26 weeks ago
Every +- 30 years the Elite go too far and people rebel
The elite know this and got everyone to do something groovy but inconvenient.
Now the challenge is to re-start and make sure that we don't get "Directed History".
The first thing to be addressed is the takeover by the Vampire Squid, Goldman Sachs of the majority of the worlds Central Banks, including our own Bank of Canada.
The Capitalist/Socialist memes are those of yesteryear. Now we know that the Global Elite control both sides of the debate to hide the truth spoken by the founding Rothschild:
"Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws."
Mayer Amschel Rothschild
The movement had a false start, but the understanding that something is terribly wrong is increasing in the 99% even if they haven't felt the pinch yet themselves.
Sockeye
26 weeks ago
Christopher 2
"Stop preaching doom and gloom and pick up a shovel."
How about Sledge hammer?
So what exactly are we teaching our kids? Is it a modified utilitarian worldview? sustainable development? Conservation? Stewardship? What is being taught? That if we just switch to solar power Industrialism can keep humming along? That they'll have the same standard of living as their parents and grand parents under this new system. I'm just curious.
I would just like to throw it out there cause I'm not sure if anyone has brought the point up. If it looks like we are headed for a complete disaster in regards to the environment and society and it looks like the future of life on the planet is at stake, which you could make a strong argument that it is, when is it appropriate to use violence to bring it all down? I'm not advocating that we do that but at some point I can see people getting fed up with these no go solutions and decide to use force to change the system. Someone has started doing this up in Dawson Creek, I just see it becoming more wide spread.
Christophe
26 weeks ago
I don't teach anything about climate change
I simply offer youth a chance to do real work on a local creek, planting trees and shrubs, and removing invasive plants. It isn't much, but it empowers them to learn more and it is much better than preaching apathy, anger and cynicism.
There are some problems that are just too big for us to deal with on a personal level, but there are some projects we can and should tackle.
By the way, kids today don't need to be taught anything about climate change; they have their minds made up already. As one young girl put it, "Most old people don't care about climate change because they will be dead before it really happens." It is hard to argue with such blunt honesty.
Violence is not the answer. That was tried last century and it is still being applied today, but it never works. War is the biggest waste of energy we ever invented and it does irreparable harm.
Gavrilo Princip probably thought, "One bullet could change the world", as he shot Archduke Ferdinand and precipitated WWI.
Sockeye
26 weeks ago
The question of Violence
"Violence is not the answer. That was tried last century and it is still being applied today, but it never works. War is the biggest waste of energy we ever invented and it does irreparable harm."
Ask the native cultures of North America weather violence works. You can' t paint all violence with the same brush. All I'm saying is that people will tire with the moral war attrition against people in power who frankly couldn't give a shit about weather or not life on the planet is going extinct, they don't feel like normal people (The Tyee just had an article about this). At some point people are going physically try and take down the system.
Jerry Munro
26 weeks ago
Brothers, Sisters and Comrades...
Some good comments by many still being made. Sockeye... outstanding. These nicey nicey folks, hands in the air of hopelessness, yet be nice. Yecch! I thought you handled it well.
Mopled:
"The movement had a false start, but the understanding that something is terribly wrong is increasing in the 99% even if they haven't felt the pinch yet themselves."
Every once in awhile, you nail it. Though many are feeling it... But even if you aren't yet, you gotta have your head where the sun never, but never shines, not to see what's coming up over the horizon here, coming at us like a friggin' mile long runaway freight train.
I see tonight that Occupy has vacated the VAG. But if you think its over, and limp-wrist Robertson has won, in his final act of bending over and touching his toes for the ruling class, you too have your head out of sight and sound of reality.
Hang in there brothers, sisters and comrades. This ain't over 'til the fat, balding guys in suits sing.
Remember Tahrir Square. It ain't over 'til the Generals and the ruling class they defend are gone.
Christophe
26 weeks ago
Sockeye: I hear you on the violence issue
It has already come to violence. The Arab Spring was catalysed by the increasing price of food. It is all part of the same picture.
igbymac
26 weeks ago
Viooence is not going to solve our problems
...it will only move the final resolution to a later date.
We must teach ourselves and those around us that violence and warfare are completely off the table. They are not tools to ever turn to or options available to anyone including state.
This is fundamental to our survival, and is one ever-present under-pinning to our failing system: when reason fails to get us our way, we shoot them. Its a policy of our economic heist.
Of course it may be human nature at some reptilian level to fight back violently. But we also have a brain and can learn to behave intelligently. And without intelligent behavior, what are we left with?
Fiat lux
26 weeks ago
Violence is perfectly legit
Violence is perfectly legit when sanctioned by religions, ideologies and banks with the use of imaginary money as weapons.
Murder is not only legit, but heroic action when the other guy wears different clothing.
We were killing each other in the war, not because we hated, or may have had anything against each other, but simply because we wore different uniforms.
Ed Deak.
Sockeye
26 weeks ago
It'll come to it
"We must teach ourselves and those around us that violence and warfare are completely off the table. They are not tools to ever turn to or options available to anyone including state."
You'll never be able to "teach" the state not to use force, the state is force. Its perfectly "legit" for the people at the top of the hierarchy to visit systematic and normalized violence on other human beings and the natural world, but the moment the violence flows up the hierarchy, it's morally reprehensible.
Look at the people who live in DTES. Since they have no utility within the current economic system, they have systematic violence visited upon them daily in the form of poverty. Take Blue Fin Tuna its now at the point of extinction because an abstract economic system has visited violence upon it through the Industrial fishing system. Look at all the wars in the Middle East to secure oil to keep this machine running.
There are thousands upon thousands of km's of unguarded, exposed, insecure industrial infrastructure on this continent to think that at someone point some people aren't going to perceive this and attack these points is naive at best. You guys are talking about reforming psychopaths, making them see the errors in the ways by setting a moral example through lifestyle choices and ineffective non-violent symbolic action. Do you think these people care weather or not you show up with your signs, drum circles and chants? These are psychopaths we are talking about here, at the helm of a psychopathological system, they are only going to respond to force.
I would like to see non-violent force used to shut the system down but you need critical mass in that case and as this system chugs along I see people taking matters into their own hands. They'll be brand terrorists cause the violence flowed the wrong way. Its going to happen. Too many fence sitters in our society benefit from the system.
igbymac
26 weeks ago
force is not necessarily violence or murder
...which was my point: violence and murder.
And I think it should be clear I am not talking about our depth of understanding getting to that level in a generation or two. But if we cannot even allow the notion into our skull, it surely will never take root.
How come 99% of us (pulling a number out of my butt for illustrative purposes) never have the gumption and desire to go murder someone? Yet give a person enough stupid information, and it all seems so legit. Its called whitewashing propaganda, and our corrupt system thrives on it. We make select murders noble and hand out ribbons. We call its participants heroes. We say they are protecting us all. But we should be asking, from whom?
Remove murder and warfare from the puzzle, and what do we get? Is it a better world or is it a worse world? Remove any other single act, aside from the underpinnings of most all our woes, deception, and does it come even close to rivaling 'no murder's' positive result?
The state is not some behemoth from Hades. It is a legal shell operated by actual people. People have to be educated. People have to be held to account. That is the only way. They cannot be allowed to hide behind the veil of legal fictions. That means, to start, an end to the private corporate world as it now stands, and an end to Party politics. Is that still too much to ask us to figure out?
firefox007
26 weeks ago
People As Sheep?
Dan The Socialist:
"The Tyee should do an article on why people are sheep, what made them sheep and what can be done... Personally I think it is too late."
It's so funny to watch folks always define someone OTHER than themselves as automatic *sheep.* Dan's just so enlightened by Karl Marx that he knows somebody else is a sheep.
But he himself follows anywhere some book written 160 years ago orders him. If its socialism its automatically cool. Who's the sheep here, Dan...? Hypnotized by Marx.
And as Pete Townshend said of them, "I know the Hypnotized never lie."
Fiat lux
26 weeks ago
There isn't much difference
There isn't much difference between having been hypnotized by Marx 160 , or by the Iron Law of wages of David Ricardo 190, or by the distorted "self interest" idea of Adam Smith 220 years ago.
Yet people have been killing each other and forcing their way outdated idiocies on humanity ever since.
The last thing we need, to make the world even crazier, are quotations from long dead prophets as justifications for more criminal actions against humanity and the ecology.
Ed Deak.
Sockeye
26 weeks ago
Ed and igbymac
I think there is a huge difference between killing over ideology, economics and religion or whatever abstract system you want to invoke then using violence to resist an occupying force. Like the French Resistance or The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising.
Industrialism which is legitimized by Neoclassical economics and Capitalism which is fueled by Consumerism is occupying every facet of life on this planet. This system is ecocide. So I don't view a violent act towards it as a form of ideology, but simply an act of resistance to an anti-life system. Its a human beings natural born right to defensive aggression.
If I'm attacked by someone who has the intend to kill me don't I have the right to defend myself? Don't I have a right use what ever force I deem necessary to stop this person from harming me?. The system is killing people, in an abstract way, but as a human being don't we all have the right to use force to defend ourselves from a system and a set of people that are trying destroy the very foundations of life?.
There are too many fence sitters that benefit from the system ever to get on side with some critical mass demonstration and when they do, it will be to late. The hour is late. I think waiting around for the next generation hoping that they will be enlightened enough to see the folly in our ways is hedging your bets on something that can't be put back together again. By the time we hand the keys over to future generations the house will most likely be burnt down. One way or another.
The Truthinator
26 weeks ago
In the meantime, the 1%
are passing laws to censor the internet (in the name of protecting intellectual property - google "great firewall of america") and further monitor and ultimately restrict our movements (disguised as tolls for "rebuilding infrastructure").
We've already seen examples of authorities hobbling or shutting down social media, cellphone networks, and transit systems to stifle protests, and not just in "totalitarian" countries.
It seems to me that the window of opportunity for using our new technologies to spread the truth is closing as governments learn to take control of technology, often in ways that are completely invisible to the less than fully engaged techie.
Christophe
26 weeks ago
The next generation will take the keys from us, Sockeye
if they have any courage at all. I see it happening already. The AGW deniers will probably get a slap in the face and the rest of us will realise it is time to STFU.
In some countries it may come as a Chinese-style Red Revolution. Just look at the wave of change in the arab world. Who would have thought that so many oppressed people would finally shrug their shoulders say, "Enough!" at the same time?
We can expect the same here. All it would take is for a few dozen people to start puting oil or sugar in the gas tanks of every Hummer they find, for example. Now tat is a revolutionary thought, isn't it? By the time the owners found out, the perps would be long gone, with no proof possible. It would do very little harm, and it would be a very effective way to stop the Hummer.
I am not advocating that anyone sabotage other people's cars, but it will happen. As long as they leave my Jeep alone...
igbymac
26 weeks ago
Sockeye
Stop right there in the bold type. What else is there? Why else are people killing one another if not for wanting to uphold their point of view?
Remove the idea itself of 'murdering another to solve a problem' from our collective minds and there is not need to defend oneself from being murdered.
This is not to say it may not happen, but society at large would shun the act so severely the perpetrator would be removed from society through a joint effort of all.
Now would that be a better world to live in or not? If so, then why don't you support it?
Sockeye
26 weeks ago
You miss my point.
"Stop right there in the bold type. What else is there? Why else are people killing one another if not for wanting to uphold their point of view?"
There is a difference you are using violence against an occupying force not for an abstract set of ideas, against a system that is already trying to kill you that was my point. There are numerous examples of this, I'm not going to paint all acts of violence, collectively or individually with the same brush, it's intellectually dishonest. You use violence in a defensive manner, that's what I'm getting against.
igbymac
26 weeks ago
And I learned just today, the law is onside
Kellogg-Briand Pact 1928, at least in terms of warfare which accounts for a substantial percentage of all murders.
Sockeye
26 weeks ago
The reality
And if the Nuremberg laws were applied every post war president would have been hung but what's your point?
igbymac
26 weeks ago
I am not sure I follow, Sockeye
The occupying force -- I presume you mean the state?
If correct, then it is the state system which is trying to kill you. The state has an abstract set of ideas which allow murder to be on the table. Thus, it resorts to murder as one of its tools of 'negotiation'. It initiates violent murder to resolve various conflicts it perceives.
'Defence' is not a violent act. People die all the time, but they should not be dying due to the intentional violent acts of others. There is nothing dishonest about it.
igbymac
26 weeks ago
My point was and remains
My point was and remains the necessity of taking warfare and murder off the table as a tool of negotiation.
It is possible. The Kellogg-Briand Pact of 1928 proves this has been on the collective radar, so to speak. It just never panned out.
But that doesn't mean we should stop trying to attain that level of intelligence. We have choices available, and we make choices all the time if only tacitly. So why choose warfare? Why choose murdering one another?
Or do you honestly believe it is just our enemies out trying to slaughter us innocents?
Sockeye
26 weeks ago
Not the state, Industrialism.
"Gandhi remained committed to nonviolence; I followed the Gandhian strategy for as long as I could, but then there came a point in our struggle when the brute force of the oppressor could no longer be countered through passive resistance alone. We founded Umkhonto we Sizwe and added a military dimension to our struggle. Even then, we chose sabotage because it did not involve the loss of life, and it offered the best hope for future race relations. Militant action became part of the African agenda officially supported by the Organization of African Unity (O.A.U.) following my address to the Pan-African Freedom Movement of East and Central Africa (PAFMECA) in 1962, in which I stated, "Force is the only language the imperialists can hear, and no country became free without some sort of violence."
(Nelson Mandela)
Industrialism as a process is occupying every facet of life on the planet right now and is killing it. This is what I'm getting at. I'm not talking about murdering someone, I'm talking about people using violence to shut down the Industrial process, the very process that is destroying the foundations of life. If you read into the history of resistance movements they all have an element of violence to them. I'm not talking about killing people here I'm talking about destroying the tools that are being used to kill us and non-human life, right now.
igbymac
26 weeks ago
And after that, then what?
After we have killed the killing forces, have we not set ourselves up to be killed in turn by others whom disagree?
Mandela was also, in part, behind the selling out of South Africa to the conservatism movement that swept his land recently. Now the problems are bigger than ever. Perhaps he is also wrong about the need to destroy the tools with violent force.
History need not be repeated. I cannot stop emotionally agreeing with you at some reptilian level. As HL Mencken said, "Every man must be tempted, at times, to roll up his sleeves, spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats".
You know, we have the numbers, We have the general universal consensus that this warring and murdering is wrong. We know it would be better if wiped from our consciousness. And yet it goes on. And I may be a dreamer for desiring it not to, and for thinking that a world without war remains possible.
So be it.
It is what is right, and that cannot be changed regardless of law or desire or history. Thanks for the sane discussion.