Opinion

Will Canada Last?

Not if we surrender our energy lifeblood to the US.

By Murray Dobbin, 27 Jun 2008, TheTyee.ca

Uncle Sam Harper

Harper: the big sellout?

What will it take persuade Canadians that if they do not act soon to reverse the course of their nation, there will be nothing left to save? I am talking, of course, about so-called "deep integration" and its official expression, the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP).

The SPP, moving inexorably on many fronts, is nothing less than a blueprint for the gradual dismantling of one of the most successful nations of the twentieth century, and its piecemeal distribution to the decaying empire to the south. Yet there seems to be, even amongst those who have heard of it and believe it is a threat, a surreal acceptance of it. It's like a meteor hurtling towards us: there's nothing we can do so we might as well go shopping while we can.

What this country needs is a little outrage -- stirred by something from the package of outrages, treasonous policies and breathtaking giveaways of our country that make up the plan to append Canada to the U.S. What will it be? The militarization of the country and an industrial policy of selling arms to the world? A foreign policy determined almost exclusively by the interests of big business, from peddling asbestos, to opposing bio-diversity, to forcing Europeans to accept GMO food? The mimicking of a paranoid United States and the adoption of its crusade against the Muslim world?

Each worthy of a good dollop of outrage. But some believe that unless you get to people where it actually has an impact on their daily lives, sustained outrage of the kind that influences elections, is too much to expect. I have never been convinced by this theory but accepting it for the sake of argument, perhaps the sell-out of our energy to the U.S. under NAFTA's energy provisions would fill the bill.

Betrayed from above

No other policy, either standing alone or as part of a larger scheme, demonstrates the extent to which the economic and political elite of this country has betrayed us. Even in the age of corporate globalization in which the transnational corporation has become the dominant institution of our time, there is simply no other example of such duplicitous behaviour on the part of a national leadership. No other country in the world has or would consider voluntarily signing a treaty that guaranteed the other party an ever-increasing proportion of its energy resource.

The perverse beauty of what is tediously called the "proportionality clause" of NAFTA is that it’s virtually guaranteed to get worse. It would have been bad enough if we had agreed to sell half of our energy production to the U.S. But the NAFTA deal says we cannot ever decrease the actual proportion of gas and oil we sell to the U.S. So, each time the proportion of our oil and gas exports to the U.S. increases (virtually every year), we are presented with the new floor. And we no longer even maintain a strategic reserve -- a 20-year supply that is ensured before any oil is exported.

There is no limit to this madness. Right now we export two thirds of our oil and 60 per cent of our gas to the U.S. Under NAFTA this means we can never reduce that proportion, even if our actual production dropped by half and we began freezing in the dark. In NAFTA there is no ceiling on what we can sell, just a floor. And each year that passes, the floor looks more like a ceiling. What makes it even worse, of course, is the new determination of the US to secure dependable supplies of oil and gas -- and that means Canadian supplies.

Harper's radicals

While the U.S. is preoccupied with its national interest and a secure energy supply, the federal government under both the Liberals and the Radicals (Harper's party is anything but conservative) trades our natural energy security for America's insecurity. We now import 49 percent of the oil we use, almost half of it from the same insecure sources from which the U.S. is trying to wean itself. Almost all of Eastern Canada is dependent on foreign oil.

The catastrophe of global climate change is upon us. Even if we started to seriously address it tomorrow it would take a generation to even begin to create a post-carbon economy. With secure supplies of oil and gas and careful government regulation of how quickly they are depleted, and who gets to purchase them, Canada's future as an environmentally and economically sustainable country would be virtually guaranteed. But our Quisling elites, for all the talk of being an energy super power and the need to be internationally competitive, has been eagerly selling off our energy heritage for twenty years while the rest of us whistle in the dark.

Time is running out

A recent study by the Parkland Institute of Alberta and the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA) examined the NAFTA proportionality provisions to see if there was any policy flexibility at all in this bizarre agreement. The conclusion of "Over a Barrel: Exiting from NAFTA's Proportionality Clause" is a resounding No.

The study looked at three policy areas that are increasingly critical to Canada's future: conservation and the environment, using natural gas increasingly for value-added industries and substituting Canadian oil for the foreign oil we now import. The co-authors, Gord Laxer and John Dillon, conclude that we can do none of these things without violating NAFTA and triggering American use of the proportionality clause. The only possible solution involves either the abrogation of NAFTA or the renegotiation of the energy provisions, with the aim of taking back control.

This stunning situation begs the question: At what point does a nation cease to be viable? While there is a legitimate debate about the role energy security plays in the answer, there is no debate about the role of the economic and political elite. In a market economy, once that elite has abandoned its commitment to the nation, it is just a matter of time. And time, like our oil and gas, is running out.

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

61  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • doggone

    3 years ago

    Ignorant Greedy Aggression

    Works like a charm in the current "economic" system given that you happen to imagine you control military might, law making and major portions of popular media. (See Robert Mugabe)

    I don't expect the Yanks to be any more (or less) compassionate than Robert when it comes to adjusting to coming change.
    Their survival as a species (odd thing that it is) is very much threatened.
    The fact that the rest of us are also under serious threat means less as the crisis worsens.
    I agree that it is unfortunate that our elected functionaries behave (and pass legislation) as if there still existed something in the form of "Gentleman's Agreement or Business as Usual". Could it be they are more informed than we are?
    W.B. Yeats: "Sailing to Byzantium"
    "O sages..."
    "Consume my heart away; sick with desire
    And fastened to a dying animal
    It knows not what it is"

  • ME2

    3 years ago

    Will misery love company, Murray?

    If you've been listening carefully to Canadian stock market analysts, Canada is in the same boat as the Americans re the impending market collapse brought on by the sub-prime derivatives scam.

    This has been reported by our media of course, but in a carefully guarded manner so as not to create the general alarm we see in the US.

    If one thinks about it, however, why should we escape the predicament the US market finds itself in? Our stock market is fully integrated with that of the US, and we have even LESS requirements for transparency in Corporate dealings.

    We have huge sub-prime losses in pension and other mutual funds, and Canadian banks are barely holding their own (but putting a brave face on it), while CIBC posts a $2.5 billion loss, necessitating a bailout by the Bank of Canada.

    And in Canada the housing bubble is just beginning its inevitable slide, while some analysts predict other Canadian banks will soon be knocking at the Bank of Canada's door.

  • Skookum1

    3 years ago

    The brutal truth about annexation

    I've said it here before and will say it again: the grim reality is that we'd fare better control over our affairs if we didn't have a proxy, excuse-making and deal-making government; direct participation in the United States political process. "BC nationalist" though I am, in terms of procedural and constitutional challenges to deals like the one's we're seeing, we'd have more luck as US citizens; and as a gaggle of several new states, eahc with two shiny senators. We'd also have a hope of American media coverage with all its investigative zeal. Canada's separateness as a post-colonialist fiefdom has been used to undermine it, thanks to the near-absolute authority of sitting governments and the even longer-sitting mandarins of the bureaucracy. The interests of the smaller and less-populated states have often been overridden with matter like water and energy, true; but states have powers to cut deals directly with otehr states; NAFTA perpetrated the protection of the sysstem of corruption and giveaway that has been t he essence of Canadian resource economics since day one. if the border's going to be open, open it, there's no point in further pretense.

    An integrated security sphere was an inevitable consequence of 9/11. And core among security needs is a lockdown on a secure energy supply. Continental security, and continental energy security, are inseparable. Nice to oppose it in principle; but who's going to tell Washington different? Especially if it means breaking a treaty (if either McCain or Abama doesn't strike it first).

  • ME2

    3 years ago

    I'm not so sure, Skookum1

    Yes, come to think of it, Skookum1, it was an American, Mark Twain, who said, "Patriotism is the last refuge of the poltroon".

    In many ways we are but a carbon copy of the US. but what about our Social Safety Net? Do we just give in to our colluding politicians, like some Third-World country? Are we willing to embrace their "might is right" foreign policies?

    Is it impossible to overcome this scourge the neocons have unleashed upon us?

  • Skookum1

    3 years ago

    Patriotism has nothing to do with it

    Quote:
    Is it impossible to overcome this scourge the neocons have unleashed upon us?

    Not immediately with annexation - and I don't mean a "roll over and take it" deal but one where environmental/resource issues and things like native claims aall get reckoned into the constitutionalities, and we don't join as "one big state from the Gulf of Georgia to the Atlantic", but rather as at least five or six states (I don't think they'd go for making PEI a full state, for instance). Ten/twelve senators and a new whack of Congressional seats and electoral college votes - and the imbalance in the American polity, which would never be the same. Even right-wing voters up here hafve a sense of entitlement for social services; there would be severe and lasting effects on the US than there would be on the former Canada. Alberta might be a "red state" but nobody else would be.

    I actually think that the rightist/GOP/corporatist agenda probably doesn't like the idea of outright annexation; it's too much to their advantage to have a pet government in Ottawa and no accountability to the Canadian public, and they're well of the pinko mentality prevalent in Canuckistan. It's the Democratic forces in the US, ironically, that would have the most to gain from our joining the Union...

  • Jeffrey J.

    3 years ago

    Democracy Highjacked

    Murray Dobbin is correct. Our previously functioning democratic systems have failed by being hijacked by the same techniques perfected by the Republicans. Canadians are trusting, law abiding, deferential and generous. This is why Canada was so civilized in the past 50 years (vs the USA's aggression).

    That pacifism is being exploited by the dishonest, manipulative neocons now running Ottawa. And BC. And Alberta...

    Our institutions were not designed to work with this new breed of neocons. It's that simple.

    How to address this deeply destructive movement will take every ounce of hard work and brilliant thought possible. That's of course very frustrating because no-one thought we would have to reinvent democracy all over again. But apparently we were wrong.

    Roll up your sleeves and let's get started.

    Great article.

  • Grumpy

    3 years ago

    Tick, Tick, tick........

    .......Canada's time is running down, another two generations at most. Causes? Lack of interest.

    Our Federal and provincial politicians are more patriotic to the USA, rather than Canada. Our media has been dumbed down to such an extent that all but useless. Emigration has created a compliant class, where recent emigrants, just wanting to get on with life, ignore major and fundamental questions about Canada and Canada's future.

    Quebec is ready to split; the Maritimes are on life support; and Ontario soon is to become a 'have-not' province; all adding up to a Canadian collapse.

    And Quisling Campbell and the sellout Liberals, are just rubbing their hands with glee, waiting for their American rewards for their Canadian sellout!

    We should hang traitors publicly and show that we are not wimps; but no, we are more worried about censoring Comedians insulting Lesbians!

  • misterbill

    3 years ago

    I am an American

    I am old enough to remember WW2. I am old enough to remember the great friendship between America and Canada despite our differences. (You are quite dotty up there!) But I look at you and England as America's greatest friends. And as with my best friend here in America, we are not always in agreement. I agree,though, with Murray Dobbin's assessment of the natural resources of Canada. They are yours and should not be shared without the involvement and approval of the Canadian citizenry. In future years, long after I am gone, you should be one of the earth's richest, self-supporting countries of the world. I may sound unpatriotic, (I am not), but the involvement of NAFTA agreements and the "floor" that is discussed allows the USA to drag its feet on its own needs for energy sources.
    That said, Mr Dobbin's statement:
    "The mimicking of a paranoid United States and the adoption of its crusade against the Muslim world?, frightens me. It shows a naive view of the threat of the infiltration of the Muslim word and its impact on our democratic systems. I may, of course, have interpreted his sentence incorrectly, but uncontrolled immigration and a too liberal attitude regarding changing our laws to accomodate theses other folks will most surely destroy both countries before the SPP/NAU ever comes to full enactment.
    I should prefer that you remain our friends to the north, managing your own country, maintaining your own national pride, rather than becoming additional states in the USA.

  • southdeltawalker

    3 years ago

    Happy Canada Day.....

    ...how much longer will we be celebrating this?

  • Peter Dimitrov

    3 years ago

    Peter Dimitrov

    Unless we use the revocation clauses in NAFTA - Canada is finished as an independent nation. As it is, it is essentially a colony- the energy (oil, gas, next hydroelectricity) supplier, as well as other commodities. What are some of the causes for this slide of continental integration - a multitude? But here is my list:

    1) institutiional design of our governance structure - that places far too much authority in the Executive Branch of power to sign treaties, make appointments, authorize Order in Council's, a lack of checks & balances, no inclusion within the political system of balancing concepts such as 'subsidiarity' and proportional harmonization. What the Prime Minister or Premier says/wants happens, and cities, regions, other levels of government not recognized as having rights within the constitution - are out of lucl in the power game.

    2) the capture of the Executive branch by the corporate sector, such that the legislative agenda is set to primarily benefit large publicly trading corporations and the majority shareholders.

    3) insitutional investment funds, particularly pensions funds of some of the biggest unions in the country, who due to a lack of pension governance reform law, are not able to democratically control the investments of their monies.

    4) corportions have all the "rights" of a natural person - which gives them the same human rights in the Charter that natural persons have: ie. freedom of expression, freedom of association, rights to privacy, rights to security of the 'person' - which makes it extremely difficult to have transparency and accountability.

    5) monopoly capitialist control of the media, makes it very difficult, to counter the b.s. and propaganda constantly directed to the populace.

    6) the internal dynamics of the dominant political parties...I am not even going to go there.

    7) a largely new immigrant population, who are for the most party too busy getting settled in Canada, getting work, kids to school, learning some language skills, learning functional literacy skills to survive and do well in Canada, and political literacy for most is not high up on the list of priorities. - that is just the way it is - no fault here - but it takes a certain number of years to gain that political literacy - and with the media monopoly and b.s. that doesn't help

    8) too much apathy, distraction, too much stress on the working people, and also on those living in poverty, and close to the poverty line.

  • Peter Dimitrov

    3 years ago

    Peter Dimitrov -Part 11

    9) as to oil - if we were as bold as Norway, after we rescind NAFTA, we would nationalize ownership the entire energy sector...and make it provision of the constitution. As for reparation to the oil companies, consideration will have to be given to decades of tax breaks and the windfall profits they have been making - to reduce that sum to as close to zero as possible.

    10) as for the world price of oil, I ask, why are Canadians and the entire world being compelled to pay the increased costs on oil resultant from: commodity speculators, and secondly due to the substantially weaking US$ - caused by Bush's trillions of dollars of debt - caused by his military adventures in Iraq, and thirdly, the windfall profits of the oil companies all the way along their vertical ownership of that sector - allowing them to take profits at each stage: profits at the production stage, refining stage, transport, marketing and retailing stage...resulting in such excesses as: last Q of 2007 Exxon's profit was 11.7 billion..for a year end profit of 40.6 billion. Now, at the end of 1st Q. 2008, profits were up 17% (on less production) totally 10.96 billion. What is happening world wide is unnecessary suffering imposed on all but the super-rich, for how long will Canadians put up with this inaction by pro-business ruling parties in Canada?

  • clubofrome

    3 years ago

    Tipping Point

    Globalization has softened the borders everywhere to smooth the way for corporate domination. This is an illegal take over of resources for wealth creation now, at the expense of the public and our own future. Your not going to stop the wheels of global economics by re writing NAFTA or SPP but scrapping them would be a good start to realization that we're headed for disaster of unequalled proportions. When all life support systems are teetering in intensive care, it's only a matter of time for collapse. The math is simple, constant growth rates equals mass extinction. Have a real close look at what's lining up behind this global warming/carbon footprint facade. Besides Monsanto and Cargil taking over food production and distribution. Just behind the toxicity level, depleted fish stocks, loss of biodiverstiy and the ever increasing demand for more Dinsney and Big Macs. China and India comming on to the grid. The pharma lies about HIV and AIDS, and what is good for us and what is not. As if the herding of humans into urban feedlots wasn't enough of a clue, no wonder people will buy tickets to the hockey game and bobsled events of 2010. Anything but reality please, we're just not prepared for it.
    Every day the tension builds. Behaviour is deteriorating daily, as stress sets in undetected, like the frog in the pot of water set to boil.... just have a look around you, it's pathetic. Go Dolphins! Please rise up and take your place as heirs to what's left of this fragile planet.

  • Tired of the Li...

    3 years ago

    Did you vote for them to do this?

    The citizens are outraged at the way the country is being given away. I did not vote for this to happen, my friends and family did not vote for it, my neighbours did not vote for it to happen. They tell me I live in a democracy. I always thought a basic principal of a democracy was the government did as the people wished.
    What happened to Canada

  • Fiat lux

    3 years ago

    What happened to Canada is

    What happened to Canada is that the universities, the politicians and the people have swallowed Milton Friedman's fraudulent neoclassical market economic theory and now we, and the whole world, is committing suicide to fulfill the insatiable blackmail demands of the biggest legalized crime wave in human history.

    Absolutely nothing can be done until this curse is removed from over humanity's heads.

    When economic efficiency is defined as "The biggest profits for the lowest monetary inputs", and this is taught in our universities as a "science", while our politicians are selling us and our resources to fill the demands of this criminal idiocy, what else can we expect ?

    So, stop crying over the effects and start going after the causes !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Ed Deak, Big Lake.

  • Frank

    3 years ago

    misterbill

    Thank you for posting here, very nice, well said.

  • doggone

    3 years ago

    We have seen the enemy

    "and "he" is us!"
    Oh Darn! that could easily be misinterpreted. No pun intended. In fact I can not blame the Yanks nor the Canuck neocons. As pointed out above (or below, depending on how you happen to arrange your "comments") most folks have been educated to deal with 1950's economic theory - which had little bearing in reality even then! 'Course a few zingers have come down the pike since then:
    1) Media control and manipulation - perfected more or less during the World wars but suddenly given access to television and now the Internet
    2) "Silent Spring" and all that entails
    3) "peak Oil"
    4) Meltdown of the "House of Cards" - world wide "Stock Exchanges" as we speak
    5) in the meantime the government, labouring under their outdated training, blunders forward dragging us (again no pun) along
    Well! As far as I'm concerned this could not happen to a nicer bunch of people

  • pender paul

    3 years ago

    shut off the taps, all of them

    The solution is simple--serve the United States of America with a generous 90 days notice that ALL energy originating in Canada will cease to flow south. Additionally, terminate our partnership in NORAD, tear up the NAFTA and begin the nationalization of all US corporations operating branch plants in Canada. Bring the Army home from Afghanistan and pull the Navy out of the Persian Gulf. And that's just for starters. Let us remember that the biggest threat to Canada comes not from over the seas but from our so-called neighbour to the south.

  • Skookum1

    3 years ago

    The other shoe is a jackboot

    Quote:
    The solution is simple--serve the United States of America with a generous 90 days notice that ALL energy originating in Canada will cease to flow south. Additionally, terminate our partnership in NORAD, tear up the NAFTA and begin the nationalization of all US corporations operating branch plants in Canada. Bring the Army home from Afghanistan and pull the Navy out of the Persian Gulf. And that's just for starters. Let us remember that the biggest threat to Canada comes not from over the seas but from our so-called neighbour to the south.

    The cupidity of such a notion is breathtaking; add in your observation at the end of that paragraph and tell me what's going to happen if we pull the 90-day ultimatum that you start the paragraph off with.

    Who's going to stop them from marching across the border and securing their national security interests? Our old patron, Britain? Our new imperial power, China? (who'll be able to still buy our resources once the US owns them, and won't care). Mexico might back us up, for a few days but once the US military is done locking down Canada the full brunt of continental military/police power would be turned south.

    You were thinking maybe Denmark was gonna help out if we told the Yanks to kiss it?

    Kinda like Holland saying "Hey, Hitler, we can take you, c'mon, just try! What are you, chicken?"

  • Bailey

    3 years ago

    Dear misterbill

    I too am old enough to remember things.

    I remember the 1950s in your great country. Even though your Constitution, one of the great founding documents of democracy in the world, absolutely guaranteed everyone freedom of political association, you were brought to so fear Communism that you persecuted your own people. You abandoned that freedom in fear of a system that, as it turned out, was on the verge of collapse.

    I think somebody was lying to you, and you bought it, and freedom suffered.

    Quote:
    Mr Dobbin's statement:
    "The mimicking of a paranoid United States and the adoption of its crusade against the Muslim world?, frightens me. It shows a naive view of the threat of the infiltration of the Muslim word and its impact on our democratic systems.

    Substitute "Communism" for "Muslim" in your statement, and it might have proceeded directly from the pen of one of those liars who stole your freedoms then.

    Your Constitution still guarantees freedom of Religion, if I remember rightly, but the fear reflected in your statement convinces me that it's maybe no longer all that true.

    A great tragedy, this attack on freedom. Greater since it comes from its greatest hope.

    Do you think maybe somebody is lying to you again?

    Cui bono, sir. I recommend you apply Occam's razor to that fear.

  • RickW

    3 years ago

    Outrage?

    Quote:
    But some believe that unless you get to people where it actually has an impact on their daily lives, sustained outrage of the kind that influences elections, is too much to expect. I have never been convinced by this theory but accepting it for the sake of argument, perhaps the sell-out of our energy to the U.S. under NAFTA's energy provisions would fill the bill.

    You'd better believe it, Mr. Dobbin. When we go to the pumps, only to find there is no gas, because the US needs the oil, or when we have to ration electricity, and heating fuel for much the same reasons, only then will the abstracts we call NAFTA and SPP hit home.

    We are not a population that readily acts in advance of disaster. That is what we expect our governments to do, as our representatives. That our political parties have all been highjacked is yet another abstract we have not yet come to grips with. The most common phrase any one person in this country of ours is more apt to utter, would be: "Well, the government should ......... (fill in the blank)."

    We do not form militias with the intent to overthrow our own government (or to at least keep some kind of check on the unlimited power it can and does, gather unto itself). We do not have in our history a Jefferson, who posited that "a little rebellion now and then is a good thing".

    Yet, what you are advocating, Mr. Dobbin, can be nothing less than rebellion. Rebellions are fomented by a small number of the population, as opposed to mass protests which require the cooperation of great numbers of the general population. We would only arrive at the latter when some common deprivation pushes us together.

    We are simply not prepared to support or reject something we can't yet see on the horizon.

  • mopled

    3 years ago

    NAFTA disengagement

    We give notice and 6 months later we are out of it...except for the energy sector. It will take 19 more years to get that control back.

    Laurence Solomon's speech to the Petroleum Club is worth a read.
    http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=619148
    Excerpt
    "As many of you know, I and Energy Probe, my organization, have long been critics of the energy industry. We have opposed Arctic pipelines and tar sands that we considered to be ill-advised. We have opposed nuclear plants and big dams.

    We favour conservation and renewable energy. We like clean and economic energy, something we have had too little of in Canada. For this, some of you in this room bear some responsibility.

    But on the global warming issues, based on the evidence to date, you have nothing to feel guilty about. Albertans have nothing to feel guilty about either. No crime has been committed. No known harm has occurred.

    You've been had.

    The fears of cataclysm over global warming are unfounded. There is no consensus on climate change, despite what Al Gore and the UN's Panel on Climate Change would have you believe.

    Let me tell you why most people think that global warming is a serious problem. It comes down to one number: 2500. That's the
    number of scientists associated with the UN's Panel on Climate Change that the press reports has endorsed the UN Panel's conclusions. These are the conclusions that get released in the UN's mammoth reports every six years or so, and that then dominate the media airwaves for weeks.

    "2500 scientists can't be wrong," the press always says, explicitly or implicitly. Without that number, it would have no basis for the claim that they repeat over and over again -- that there's a consensus on climate change.

    2500 is an impressive number of scientists. To find out who, exactly, they were, I contacted the Secretariat of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and asked for their names. The Secretariat replied that the names were not public, so I couldn't have them. And I learned that the 2500 scientists were reviewers, not endorsers.

    Those scientists hadn't endorsed anything. They had merely reviewed one or more of the literally hundreds of background studies, some important and some not, that were part of this immense United Nations bureaucratic process. They did not review the final report or endorse it."

    "Betrayed by our leaders" doesn't do justice to it at all. We're being scammed by all of them.

  • Fiat lux

    3 years ago

    One of the most amazing

    One of the most amazing facts of the human mind is its bottomless gullibility, dismissing unwelcome news. Like people who still maintain that there's no global warming, because to admit it, would hinder their scewball economic theories.

    Here we have the North Pole opening up, huge areas of Antarctica melting and breaking off, the interior of BC is devastated by the pine beetle, because we didn't have -40 since 1995, but there's no global warming, because the Fraser Inst. says so.

    I happen to be in daily contact with top scientists in the field, who have been aware of and warning about the disastrous consequences for many years. Even the Pentagon admitted it years ago, warning what damage the stopping of the Gulf Stream could cause.

    By the way, did you know that the Germans were winning WW2 even on May 4, 1945? I heard the broadcasts. But then something happened..........

    Here's an article, one of many, every day from all over the world from Britain:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/jun/26/climatechange.scienceofclimatechange

    Ed Deak, Big Lake.

  • RickW

    3 years ago

    Quote:By the way, did you

    Quote:
    By the way, did you know that the Germans were winning WW2 even on May 4, 1945? I heard the broadcasts. But then something happened..........

    The dish ran away with the spoon.....?

    Have a good Canada Day, Ed!

  • Skywalker

    3 years ago

    They were!

    Not to get sidetracked but on "By the way, did you know that the Germans were winning WW2 even on May 4, 1945?" They were! What happened was that Hitler invaded Russia and Stalin became an ally of the U.S. out of convenience. If it had not been for the slaughter on the eastern front by both Hitler and Stalin the outcome would have been different. The world stamped out Nazism but Communism under the Stalinists got another 60 years. I sometimes wonder which option had or would have had the greatest body count.

    Canada will survive if we elect a truly nationalist party to govern us.

  • mopled

    3 years ago

    Ed, you missed something...

    Lawrence Solomon has real credentials as a enviromentalist. Your "I happen to be in contact with top scientists in the field", got me thinking. I don't suppose there would be any names you recognize on this list. You might like to correspond with one of them.
    http://web.archive.org/web/20060529122738/www.envirotruth.org/myth_experts.cfm

    You are being hoodwinked. We have been cooling for the last 6-8 years (depending on who is doing the counting.) The warming was nothing extraordinary and it happens in 70 year cycles according to Russian scientists....nothing to do with the Frazer institute or even Exxon. In 1919, it occured suddenly and explosively and by 1922 they were wondering where all the seals and bears went, but happy about the influx of fish from further south. Now we are told that it is terrible and a sign of ultimate doom. We must become ice fetishists for the sake of the Polar bears, which somehow managed to survive the 1920-1940 period.

    And oh yes, unless the US military has some nuclear strikes planned, the Gulf stream is perfectly fine.

    As one wag said, it's Gullible Warming. Believing the Guardian on this one is a big mistake.

    It's politicians pushing a taxation plan.
    Dion never bothered to even acknowlege the letter sent to him when he was Minister of the Environment. 100 scientists advised him he would be making a mistake supporting Kyoto, so that's what he named his dog.
    Kyoto is a dog all right.

    The carbon trading scam was invented by Ken Lay of Enron who presented it to Clinton/Gore and Gore liked it so much he went into the business himself with Generation Investment with a guy named, I kid you not, Jack Blood..

    So did a former business associate of his, Maurice Strong the old time Liberal Party, Power Corp,Rockefeller,U.N., ultimate bureaucrat. It is his Chicago Climate Exchange that will have some official capacity at the McGinty/Charet Montreal Climate Exchange.
    I'm not sure how all of that is going to work, but don't worry, your going to get the Green Shaft.

    And remember as you turn on the spit, what Maurice Strong said:
    "Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring about?"

    http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/1201/1201strong.htm#cooliris

    Can Canada survive? Not if we can't recognize a scam when we see one.

    BTW I vote Canadian Action Pary.

  • Fiat lux

    3 years ago

    I happen to be 81 and can't

    I happen to be 81 and can't remember any warming when I was 10, or any of my grandparents, born about 1860-70, talking of any, but my grandfather was talking about skating on the frozen over Danube.

    In fact, the world was much colder. There are all kinds of pictures of people skating on the Thames at London, back in the 19th century.

    I climbed some glaciers, like Dachstein, in the Alps in the late 1940s, now all gone, and even then, already covered with soot from the pollution of the West European industries.

    Now add the pollution from several times the number and size of industries and tens of millions of cars that didn't exist then.

    We could run around and work outside without shirts all summer even 40 years ago, but now people are warned not to stay for longer than 10 mins.

    And the North Pole wasn't open water. Incidentally, Global TV, Vancouver, was showing some satellite photos of the melting Pole, just last night and the Asper family is not known for their environmentalism.

    By the way, where did the cancer and diabetic epidemics come from? They didn't exist 50 years ago, the rate was 2% of the population, and there were no bald headed little kids in the hospitals, none of our schoolmates died of anything, but were playing outside without shirts all summer.

    I happen to know Connie Fogal's work very well, had a lot of correspondence with and have the highest respect for her. Do you want to tell me that she doesn't believe in global warming either and supports more and bigger pollution as a "wealth creating" instrument?

    Ed Deak.

  • mopled

    3 years ago

    This sent from CAP

    "Just to help with the understanding that the industries created around this topic are completely fraudulent...don't fall for it.

    No kidding! Climate change spreads to Jupiter, Mars

    Turbulent storms leaving spots on big planet, ice caps retreating on red planet"

    comments on a story about NASA finding warming on both Jupiter and Mars sent out June 6,2008.

    Because she doesn't support the global warming scam doesn't mean she supports rape of the planet either. She's a lawyer, she doesn't believe. She's trained to deal with evidence.

    Check with her.

  • Fiat lux

    3 years ago

    I have a much larger,

    I have a much larger, greater variety and longer life experience than just about anybody, and haven't "believed" in anything for the past 60 years, only in solid evidence.

    This is why I'm fighting the fraudulent theories of miseducated economists and the bought and paid for politicians on the payroll of the corporate mafia.

    I am looking at solid evidence, not from an office window, or reading reaports cut off from the world in some concrete jungle, but living out in the boondocks and watching how things are changing.

    We've owned properties in the Cariboo for 40 years and have been living in the forest, continuously, never leaving even for holidays, for 29. Our land has a number of different microclimates. The changes we have seen and can see every day, even in our own garden, are frightening.

    Have you heard of the great tent caterpillar infestation of 1993 and 94? With everything covered by a thick layer of billions of worms, not a single leaf on the deciduous trees for miles and miles. They were wiped out by a few days of -40C weather in 95.

    If the same infestation would happen today, there wouldn't be a single deciduous tree left in BC, because we haven't had a -40 winter since then. This is why we see the dead pine devastation , but this could only be the beginning of things to come.

    Do you know where Big Lake is? About halfway between 150 Mile House and Likely.

    Ed Deak. Big Lake.

  • bilgladstone

    3 years ago

    Canada voted these fellows into office

    Oh all you misery-mes. Did voters who put Martin and Campbell, etc. in their chairs really not think that they would trade away Canada?

    Now that they are busy dismantling our great Country like we knew they would, why do you think you have a right to complain?

    These neo-cons haven't changed their spots, you know. This was their colour long before you elected them. But you fell for all that law-and-order posturing and that "family values" tripe, and the business model paradigm for how a country should be run.

    But how can anyone blame you? You have dumbly succumbed to the world view that the manipulated media have beamed into your homes for the last few decades. The view that Canada's cooperative and (hush!) socialist and caring society is weak and inefficient.

    You have happily handed the reigns of power to the fear-monger profiteers. And now you worry that they are only concerned about profit? Ha! I laugh in your general direction!

    We regret that Canadians aren't built for revolution. For short of a swelling public movement to oust this cohort of despots, we are stuck with 'em.

    Better pray for Electoral Reform - some flavour of Proportional Representation - because unless this comes to pass, you have been bilked and cheated forever of what we once took as our Canadian Birthright!

  • doggone

    3 years ago

    After being promoted

    To the "Best Comments" section I beleive I prefer it here in the "All Comments".
    Ed: I was feeling old at 60. To know that you are still (more or less) coherent at 81 gives me hope. In fact I have spent some time in your "neck of the woods" just a bit west in the Ootsa muskeg. Mining exploration so we often used float planes and helicopters. I still imagine we were actually tasked with finding nuclear fuel though that was never mentioned to the boots on the ground.

  • ME2

    3 years ago

    You write re a tent

    You write re a tent caterpillar infestation, Ed :

    "If the same infestation would happen today, there wouldn't be a single deciduous tree left in BC, because we haven't had a -40 winter since then. This is why we see the dead pine devastation , but this could only be the beginning of things to come."

    Ed, the forest has evolved over millions of years to successfully cope with wide variations in climatic conditions.

    One of its coping strategies is to destroy monocultures when they occur with species that that have evolved to exist in a multi-species environment Such is the case with the Lodgepole Pine(Pl) and the Mountain Pine Beetle(MPB), which arose purely as the result of huge monocultures of Lodgepole Pine being created through intense meddling by humans over the last hundred years.

    One of the forest's methods is through infestation, and insects such the MPB have the ability to quickly evolve to take advantage of ideal conditions, such as seen with their broadening of attack to the young Pine which it normally leaves alone.

    It is normal to see infestations such as the tent-caterpillar one you mention. They come and go, usually collapsing as the result of an increase in predator species - which is not possible in monocultures, particularly even-age ones.

    IMO. the -40C scenario is a forest industry scapegoat for their refusal to recognise the stupidity of planting Pl monocultures, since the MPB is endemic in ALL Pl stands, and to remain so, has had to be able to overwinter in such temperatures and lower.

    Any time most professional foresters open their mouths, Ed, it's only to cover up the lie

  • ME2

    3 years ago

    Ed Deak

    My effing machine didn't let me finish, which was...... "to cover up the lie they've just told you"

  • RickW

    3 years ago

    bilgladstone

    Quote:
    Better pray for Electoral Reform - some flavour of Proportional Representation

    And there is that "government should do......." again. It isn't in our government's interest to bring about electoral reform, because (as you rightly pointed out) things are working just fine with them.

    The only way to effect reform on an elemental level is through rebellion, plain and simple. I have yet to see a petition work, except on peripheral matters (peripheral that is, to the government's agenda, as demonstrated by what they do, and not by what they say).

    I suppose a Gandhi-like non-violent protest would be effective, but just how do we get two Canadians to agree on anything -- then to commit themselves to action on that agreement?

    Ed, I happen to side with your assessment of a warming climate. The debate over whether it is man-caused, or merely man-exacerbated, is moot. And the polar ice sheet doesn't melt if it is cooling; nor does the permafrost. Nor do glaciers disappear (unless of course the overall precipitation that feeds them has been affected)
    http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0160412005000553

  • RickW

    3 years ago

    Perhaps something like this is what it takes......

    .....to begin to get peoples' attention:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/09/business/09gas.html?_r=2&th=&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&emc=th&adxnnlx=1214751703-1fQwUYPUg1oxWR0P7l8ZMA

  • RickW

    3 years ago

    In the meantime..........

    ......let's enjopy our summer!

    http://travelingalberta.com:80/vacation_ideas.php

  • Fiat lux

    3 years ago

    One of the biggest causes of

    One of the biggest causes of the destruction of self determination, including the planned sale of Canada and the dictatorship of the EU, is the fraudulent economic theory forced on us by miseducated economists, universities and bought politicians.

    With locally based, truly private enterprise economies, and local decision making powers, goods can be produced at much lower energy inputs. I grew up in such system and have been doing it all my life as a manufacturer and farm owner, so I can prove this.

    We can cut back on the incredible waste of commuting and the transfer of goods from one continent to another, only to make the middlemen filthy rich by impoverishing everybody else, but giving people a false sense of euphoria, while enslaving them and destroying the Earth.

    The NAFTA, WTO, EU, IMF, etc. etc. are criminal attempts and organizations to destroy democracy and enslave the world with the power of imaginary capital created from the air by some bank.

    Things we're flooded with, imported from China, are not "cheap", the real costs are only transferred on the ecology and future generations, killing them with pollution, hunger and illnesses we have yet to see.

    Ed Deak.

  • RickW

    3 years ago

    The breakup of cities as we know them....

    You realize Ed, that cities as we know them would no longer exist, should we "go local". Cities are helpless organisms, and I would posit that they are the "offspring" of long-distance trade, being the physical embodiment of the "middlemen" you refer to.

  • Jeaness

    3 years ago

    Deep integration

    Murray Dobbin and posters have effectively summarized the problems that face us as Canadians. Now the question is: what can we do to stop our slide into the economic and social disaster that is the American nation today? It is useless to rely on our governments to protect our sovereignty because they are actively involved in integrating our resources and our security with a country that is in steep decline.

    The American national debt now stands at $ 9.37 trillion, increasing at the rate of $1.33 billion every day since last September, according to the nation debt clock at http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/

    Their citizens have seen a constant erosion of their Constitution, drastically reducing their rights and subjecting them to surveillance and arrest on suspicion, with no rights of habeas corpus. Read the Military Commissions Act to see what rights they have lost - it is deeply disturbing.

    What can ordinary citizens do? Does anyone have suggestions for effective actions we concerned Canadians can take in the face of the disasters that face us? How can we stop the moves to hitch our wagon to a falling star?

  • RickW

    3 years ago

    Considering that both countries.......

    .....are being run by klepocracies, what is there that we can do (without resorting to "extralegal" means)?

  • bilgladstone

    3 years ago

    Ed says...

    "Things we're flooded with, imported from China, are not "cheap", the real costs are only transferred on the ecology and future generations, killing them with pollution, hunger and illnesses we have yet to see."

    Once a price is put on carbon, this will change. Imports from "dirty" economies will have to have carbon tariffs added in order to protect "greener" economies.

    The model of dirty foreign production for export to our consumer marketplace will have to change.

    This is one area in which the "free" enterprise system may actually accelerate a good thing.

    No wonder conservative, oil-based Premieres don't want to monetize carbon emissions.

  • North of Hope

    3 years ago

    Amazingly there was an

    Amazingly there was an interesting article in the Vancouver Sun on this topic and beyond. It's titled "Civilization's Golden Era Is Teetering on Collapse" by Hans Tammemagi and can be viewed at

    http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=2eeece50-285f-4c4b-bb37-2d053d04d4e8

    He looks at the depletion of oil and the dangers our global society faces.
    I find it amazing that our provincial gov't has just allowed a pipeline to be built to export natural gas out of the country. I wonder if the exporting companies will pay the new gas tax.

  • Fiat lux

    3 years ago

    Rick, there was a

    Rick, there was a relatively healthy distribution between cities and rural in the 50s, but then came the criminal, Chicago School Neoclassical Market Economic Theory, topped up by US bank deregulation in the 80s, and in Canada's case in 1991, giving the multinational corporate mafia the necessary scriptural weapons for world colonization with the power of imaginary toy money.

    Called "wealth creating foreign direct investment", and "globalization", the biggest crime waves in human history. Still being taught in our universities. The Chicago School is now planning a $200. million Milton Friedman department to further even more the forcing on of this criminal theory on the already self destructing world.

    I started reading economics in 1982 and by 1985 discovered that the whole thing was pure BS and monumental crime, based on the fraudulent accounting system and definitions of Economic Efficiency, the GDP, Growth and Productivity figures.

    Until the teaching of this crap remains unquestioned and unchallenged, we can scream blue murder about the loss of our sovereignty,country, democracy, food and oil supplies, nothing can, or will be done.

    This is why I developed and copyrighted my
    Principle for the Application of Physical Efficiency to Economics in 1991, only to establish the date. I have no financial interest in it. As a matter of fact, Murray Dobbin had one of the earliest copies of it, as I was contributing to his Reform Watch magazine at the time.

    With the application of physical efficiency to economics we can see that the lowest resource and energy inputs into products and services will always be the lowest costs which prevents their misuse by false theories.

    The present monetary figures used in economic calculations are not realities, but forcibly induced temporary perceptions, leading from one disaster to another, the total loss of democracy, decision making powers and enslavement.

    Now tell this to our politicians on either side of the nut ladder and they'll faint.

    I don't even mention economists as the vast majority of them are a lost case of mental warp.

    Ed Deak.

  • Skywalker

    3 years ago

    Does anyone know...

    ...if American tourists will be able to get a rebate on the Campbell tax paid in BC when they go back across the border as they do with PST and GST?

  • RickW

    3 years ago

    skywalker

    I would think not. After all, this is an environmental tax, and as Red Green opined: "We're all in this together"

    Our American neighbours would likely be only too happy to help out saving the planet.

  • Fiat lux

    3 years ago

    .....while their 40 year old

    .....while their 40 year old B 52s are all over us, every day, wasting oil and poisoning the environment, practicing to bomb the hell out of Iran and spread radiation all over the world.

    Ed Deak.

  • RickW

    3 years ago

    True Enough, Ed!

    So I guess we may as well refund them the Carbon Tax after all...........

  • Bailey

    3 years ago

    kleptocracy

    I'm starting a collection of The Tyee's Greatest Made Up Terms.

    I laughed at Meritlessocracy. Kleptocracy is even funnier.

    Good stuff, on this Tyee here.

  • Skookum1

    3 years ago

    The Holocene ends, the Anthropocene has been declared....

    http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/174949

    scroll down to "The End of the Holocene"

  • Fiat lux

    3 years ago

    Of course, these dire

    Of course, these dire predictions will never be permitted to happen by our university economics departments, the stockmarkets and the Fraser Inst. as they would seriously cut into the GDP, and the ultimate economic efficiency of unlimited wealth creation.

    Ask our friend mopled. He'll tell you that all this is nothing more than a left wing hoax to deprive investors of well deserved "earnings", preventing them to go and buy condos in Dubai.

    Ed Deak.

  • BC Mary

    3 years ago

    Hear ye, hear ye ... ya hear me??

    Tired of the Li said:

    They tell me I live in a democracy. I always thought a basic principal of a democracy was the government did as the people wished.
    What happened to Canada

    In my view, there's a basic answer to what's going wrong not just in Canada but throughout the world. In my view, it's the job of the press to keep the citizens fully informed of the issues of the day. And the media are not doing that. They're turning into propaganda machines.

    Conrad Black, Lord Black in the Cross-Hairs, is a good example. His aggressive media empire served his own purposes. And he's not the only media baron who wanted Canadians to take a sharp right turn, as Lord Black did with National Post. This isn't democratic. This isn't even fair or smart or enlightened. It's the fulfillment of the Law of Unintended Consequences until the population divides into FOR or AGAINST and spend their careers squabbling.

    But it remains every leader's secret dream (if they can't buy their own media outlets) to have a corporate press so compliant that it obligingly turns against its own citizens, keeping them in thrall to the strong man's agenda. Berlusconi in Italy who, like CanWest in Canada, owns almost every news outlet, seems to have no trouble getting re-elected. Canada which once had a Tommy Douglas now keeps electing Mulroneys and Harpers and we wonder how that happened.

    If Canada is to survive as a fair-minded nation, I believe that citizens will have to become much more vocal and visible.

  • RickW

    3 years ago

    BC Mary

    Quote:
    In my view, it's the job of the press to keep the citizens fully informed of the issues of the day. And the media are not doing that.

    The scenario is something like this:

    - Remove any joie de vive from the general populace (best achieved by maintaining a constant state of tension and uncertainty);

    - Turn the media into one giant "Entertainment Tonite" to replace the naggingly empty feeling a lack of purpose imbues in the citizenry;

    - foster the impression of dependency on centrally-controlled infrastructure, and of a helplessness in attempting to circumvent "big brother" in a futile attempt at some independence;

    - promote thorugh endless repetition the new truisms:
    WAR IS PEACE
    FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
    IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

    and that bring sus to the presnt time.

  • Syaoran

    3 years ago

    Possible Solutions.

    While I agree with much of what is being said here, I believe that we the citizens must stand up as well. And loudly.

    We need to organize protests and speak of our outrage of the actions made on our behalf by this corrupt government. It's really the only way. To just post possible solutions such as the dissolution of NAFTA and the prevention of energy flowing south is not going to do anything. We have all grown too complacent towards this government. It's time we did something.

    The key part of the way a democracy should be run is to have the voice of the people heard by those in power. The government exists to serve the people. The government does NOT exist to sell us out like this to the U.S. It's disgusting.

  • Des Emery

    3 years ago

    Will Canada Last?

    I'm glad that Murray Dobbin at least made the comment as a question. Though the answer may be found in the Monroe Doctrine from the turn of the former century by which the U.S. claimed hegemony over the entire western hemisphere.

    One way or another, by hook or by crook, by Milton Friedman or the World Bank, by coercion or persuasion, the aim remains the same. Misterbill's letter reflects the ordinary American's attitude toward us and the world, but that doesn't negate the underlying antagonism toward that which is too different to comprehend "the American Way." Canada may or may not last as a completely separate entity, but then hope springs eternal.

    I have a suggestion for Ed Deak. Ed, give up arguing with Global Warming deniers. They'll never be convinced by "proof." I've quoted every statistic, looked at every picture, projected every trend, all to no avail in opening their minds. They are afraid of the reality which would impel them to make changes in their own lives, or they are paid to be apologists for those who make money from the status quo. Either way, they are not worth the effort from people like you who are in touch with reality. But don't quit posting, your experience and wisdom counts.

  • SharingIsGood

    3 years ago

    Canada already gone

    Since the days of Mulroney, Reagan, Thatcher and the NAFTA agreements, Canada has slipped out of Canadian hands. Rather than question can it be saved, ask can you get it back.

    Every town over 10,000 people has a McDonald's, Dairy Queen, Walmart, Starbucks, Canadian Tire (now American owned), Burger King, Kentucky Fried Chicken, Chevron, Exxon...the list goes on and on. The print and TV news media is but in a few hands and televison (cable or Internet) is dominated by American channels and programs. So sit back have a Coke and enjoy...or get active, get very very active.

  • Skookum1

    3 years ago

    The Deluge and Dubai

    Perhaps it's not accidental that where the first urban civilizations were regularly wiped out by floods, indeed the region where the myth of the Great Flood in the western tradition is believed to have its very roots, is going to be where the newest and most moderne of all cities of all time will be the ones swallowed by the sea as a consequence of the very wealth that build those towers.

    Those who have read Kafka's Parables and Paradoxes will recognize that theme.

    How many floors of the al-Burj will be flooded out in a hundred years (if human civilization 'as we know it" makes it that far)? As for the low-lying tract condo housing, with all those nice lagoons - what're they gonna do, build a sea wall and gates at the Strait of Hormuz to keep the rise in the oceans out? Or what?

    Rather poetic justice and like I said not all that accidental when you think about it....well, at least it's symmetrical beyond being simply ironic....

    Rather like the Rocky Mountain rivers drying up (and the aquifers too), and thereby hurting the water-supply for the oil-producing province/states....

    Maybe God does have a plan for neoconservatives.....

  • siamdave

    3 years ago

    Green Island

    We try democracy of, by and for We the People (rather than pseudo-democracy of, by and for They the Corps as currently practiced in Canada) on Green Island http://www.rudemacedon.ca/greenisland.html - they the corps etc are, of course, somewhat unhappy with this, and a small regime change operation is attempted, with surprising results .... great summer reading ....

  • spark.1234

    3 years ago

    jeez

    Great article. Refreshing to actually read about an important subject in the news.

    Quote:
    What will it take persuade Canadians that if they do not act soon to reverse the course of their nation, there will be nothing left to save?

    It will take mainstream newspapers and TV shows to educate the public on the subject which they are fully failing at right now, with a few exceptions.

  • SharingIsGood

    3 years ago

    deluded by media

    When I read the comments to this and similar articles, I am continually gobsmacked by how Canadians use American phrases as though they are part of Canda's heritage.

    "We the People" comes from the US Constitution:

    "We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

    "Of, by, and for the people" comes from from Lincoln's Gettysburg Address.

    "To Serve and Protect" is a motto universally used by police forces in USA and Canada: First appeared in Toronto in 1812. Made into popular idiom through American TV shows: Dragnet and Adam 12. This motto may have actually begun in Canada!

    "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses" is an inscription on the bottom of the Statue of Liberty.

    "No Taxation without Representation" unifying proclamation of the Thirteen Colonies first used by Reverend Jonathan Mayhew in a sermon in Boston in 1750.

    "These are the times that try men's souls." Thomas Paine

    "What you get by achieving your goals is not as important as what you become by achieving your goals." Zig Ziglar

  • spark.1234

    3 years ago

    Action groups

    Can anyone suggest a pro-active group in or around Vancouver that is actively working against the 'deep integration' of Canada and the US?

  • Fiat lux

    3 years ago

    My server was down since

    My server was down since last night, so I couldn't start the day with this hearty, wealth creating, greeting:

    "WELCOME TO "CANADA FOR SALE" DAY"

    Ed Deak.

  • ME2

    3 years ago

    a faint hope

    It is sure interesting that while our neocon gov'ts sell our country out from under our feet, chip away at out Social Safety Net, buddy up to Bush and all the while lay increasingly restrictive laws upon us, the issue of the day becomes an inconsequential gas tax.

    Oh well, perhaps there's a hope that's only a stand-in focus for all the other garbage.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.