Opinion

A Tyee Series

Let's Pave Streets Green

Would you give up your extra parking spot for a garden plot?

By Ruben Anderson, 26 Mar 2008, TheTyee.ca

Garden (Mole Hill)

Mole Hill community garden, Vancouver

[Editor's note: This is the second of Steal This Idea!, an occasional series focusing on practical green solutions.]

The asphalt will crack and erupt, and green plants and vines will sprout forth.

No, this isn't my end of the world prophecy, this is about parking. Or gardening. Or both.

The street I live on has several apartment buildings and five houses. In other words, every person who lives on my street has underground parking or their own spot off the back lane. Yet the street is lined --choked -- with parked cars. What's the problem here? Or rather, what's the solution?

I am not usually one to advocate for another law -- in fact, I have considered running for office on a "One Bylaw Repealed Every Day" ticket. But, an easy way to free up space in our cities would simply be to require that if you have a parking spot on your property, you use it. Leave the public space for public use.

Mapping it out

So how much space is there, and what could we do with it? Google Maps shows my block is 850 feet long and a little quality time with a tape measure finds the distance between sidewalks is 41 feet, so in just one block we have 34,850 square feet to play with.

First, let's make it a one-way street, one lane wide, with a couple of pullouts. This maintains access for emergency vehicles, taxis and mini-buses for wheelchairs. We could also throw four spots for visitors into each block. At one end we can put a half-court for basketball, street hockey, skateboarding or rollerblading so once again shouts of "Car!" will mean the players get a short break. For the rest of the block, I propose gardens. We have enough space left for 150 very nice garden plots, each about 3 by 4 metres, plus walkways.

Or, we could continue to enjoy the heat rising off the asphalt, with the rich visual stimulus of dented bumpers and the sound of car alarms.

Volunteers anyone?

Cleveland, Ohio is a hub of Asphalt Gardening, where planter boxes are put right on top of parking lots, separated from the polluted soil and oily road by a layer of wood chips. This would be a great way to try Garden Streets -- do a block or two, then a couple of years later rip up the asphalt and put roots down.

I happen to live in Vancouver, where the city council passed a motion to have 2010 new garden plots by 2010. A handy graph on the linked page shows there is not even a dream of actually achieving it, even though it is a pittance by some standards. (The city-state of Singapore, for example, produces 25 per cent of its own vegetables.)

So call me the answer to Vancouver City Hall's prayers because 2010 new garden plots is only 14 blocks of Garden Streets.

Could we start street gardening without a controversial bylaw to eliminate street parking? Sure. The city could run a newspaper ad explaining the idea and asking blocks to volunteer. Let the citizens do all the legwork of convincing their neighbours. Using bio-intensive gardening methods, my block could provide all the vegetables needed for 22 people, plus all the plant material needed to keep the soil productive -- no need for chemical fertilizers here.

Tasty numbers

Arable Acres found that Vancouver could grow all its own produce by farming the existing front and back yards. Times have changed since the study was done in 1980 -- there are more people living in the city, and development has eaten up space. But other things have changed too. That study suggested those gardens could produce $100 million worth of produce. That is $265,000,000 in today's dollars. The possibilities make your head spin -- 70 hectares of farm in Burnaby produce 10 per cent of the vegetables grown in the Fraser Valley. Arable Acres estimates Vancouver has about 3,000 hectares in streets and another 3,000 hectares in yards. Putting this into practice, the Edible Estates project is farming front yards in six cities across the United States, from Lakewood, California to Maplewood, New Jersey.

All of these delicious statistics beg the question whether the current trend in zoning experiments -- reduced on-site parking so drivers have to fight for spots on the street -- is entirely a good idea.

The idea has been: remove parking and you will remove cars, thus helping build more great places like the pedestrian-scale streetcar neighbourhoods that are being or have been gentrified all over North America. And yes, this appears to be at least a mossy shade of green.

But why should we let private cars be pushed onto the public street in the first place? Why should the taxpayers, including the pedestrians, cyclists and transit riders, pay for the real estate and the asphalt underneath other people's cars?

True cost of cars

Land in urban centres is at such a premium that each street parking spot in front of my building is worth $25,000. Add to that the fact that each car actually has three to four parking spots scattered around the city, just waiting for it (otherwise you wouldn't be able to find a spot at the end of your trip and would be forced to drive back home, spinning like a hamster in a wheel). The total subsidy to drivers is at least $100,000. If drivers had to mortgage their street parking, they would be paying $600 per month. And to think I can't find bike racks.

It would be easy to turn my block, with all its underground parking, into a Garden Street, but why stop there? Imagine your own block stuffed with flowers and vegetables. Big sprays of lupins, colourful mats of marigolds, nodding rows of poppies. The big white blossoms of pumpkin changing to the shiny orange of jack-o'-lanterns-to-be. Fat, red Early Girl tomatoes alongside the sweet Gold Nugget grape tomatoes.

Speaking of grapes, why not trellis a few up for summer shade and delicious juice? And, instead of the "decorative" street trees, you can have fruit and nut trees -- with no cars for fruit to fall upon there is really no reason not to do it.

If what I've said here makes sense to you, please feel free to practice this rallying cry: A garden plot -- not a parking spot -- for every citizen!

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

7  Comments:

  • ME2

    25-03-2008

    Re "practicality"

    If this is indeed a "practical" idea, as the header to the story asserts, then a far more practical idea would be to seek ways to make our farmland more economically productive - while we still have it.

  • dorothy

    26-03-2008

    Who's being subsidized again?

    "The street I live on has several apartment buildings and five houses. In other words, every person who lives on my street has underground parking or their own spot off the back lane. Yet the street is lined --choked -- with parked cars. What's the problem here?"

    I don't know if you live anywhere near a street where bizness is being conducted, but if you do, the problem could easily be, that each of the entrepreneurs on the street one or two blocks away has one or two parking spaces for their clients, nothing in the back (just like a huldre), and there is your choking. These people are relying on the subsidy of their customers being able to park for free on your street. I know. I live on one of those streets. And my yard is used for growing stuff to eat. And most of the time, I walk more than half the block from car to home at the end of my work-day, since only the ends of the block on either side has the resident-only thing. And I 'happen to' live in the middle. The signs creep further out every time roadwork is being done. They think we don't notice. But we do. Outright commercial vehicles can only sit in front of a residential property for three hours, but an endless succession of cars representing commercial activity can get it gratis. Go figure.

    We cannot, says the Bible, serve both God and Mammon. I think we have come down pretty squarely on one side. Give it up. Sit down on a fallen log, and wait for the crash, just like the indian in the train story.

  • UrbanWorkbench

    26-03-2008

    Urban Agriculture is key to sustainbility

    @ ME2: Already our farm land is overworked and the soil is being degraded by fertilizer, herbicide and pesticide use.

    Distributing food production nearer to where it is consumed will lessen our reliance on food that travels thousands of kilometres to get to our table.

    Every bit helps, and urban agriculture produces immediate and tangible benefits to neighbourhoods, increasing greenspace, fresh produce, pleasant to look at, reducing impermeable surfaces and stormwater runoff, reducing heat-island effect. Why should farms get all these benefits, when the city residents can too!

    Mike @ Urbanworkbench

  • MichelleK

    26-03-2008

    love it!

    This is a fantastic idea! I would love to see this happen on my street. It's not what you'd call choked with cars, but I'd like to see traffic slow down for all the kids going to the nearby schools, and this would certainly do that!

    Also, there is a company farming people's yards in Oak Bay. They give the landowner a share of fresh veggies year-round, and sell the bulk of the crop at a local farmer's market. So great!

  • greengreen

    26-03-2008

    roofs not roads

    How many more "ambassadors" would we need to protect these gardens from hungry street people? Not meant as a negative comment. As kids, we raided gardens just for the fun of it.
    I think it would be more feasible to use the roofs of buildings and covered car garages for gardens. As I look west out of my friend's apt window on Chilco, I see this unbelievable large roof that covers one huge parking lot. Enough produce could be grown there to feed the whole west end....or all the homeless/hungry souls.

  • rangergord

    26-03-2008

    Lets Pave Streets Green

    Use the $100,000 parking spaces for modern caravans (RV's) to provide affordable mobile housing for the homeless and low income residents. Then grow food gardens in the yards. A bit premature to tear up streets for gardens at this stage.

  • ME2

    27-03-2008

    Mike @ Urbanworkbench

    It's a question of priorities, Mike. In a previous post I extolled the back-yard, front-yard, boulevard "Victory Gardens" of my youth, and so I agree with your concept, but do not agree that it is practical as a solution, if only for today's legal problems.

    And I question your assumption that there will be less use of herbicides, fertilisers, and pesticides. My guess is that the urbanite will use more of these, as well as gas to give the surplus food to friends.

    Re the "thousands of kilometers" veggies travel, it is only 100 Miles (166K) to Hope at the head of the lower Fraser Valley, and this fits in nicely with the idea that we should find all or most of our food within that range. The chemicals problem is solved in demanding organic.

    Now THAT would truly revolutionary, and save our farmland in the bargain.

  • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.