Opinion

BC Libs' $200 Million Computer Glitch

Putting kids at risk, ICM system works worse than government admits.

By Claire Trevena , 8 Aug 2012, TheTyee.ca

Claire-Trevena.jpg

Claire Trevena, NDP critic for Children and Family Development: 'ICM wreaking havoc in Ministry of Social Development.'

Related

Following recent criticism of the Integrated Case Management (ICM) system by the Representative for Children and Youth, and concerns raised earlier in the legislature by the New Democrats, the BC Liberal government has finally admitted their multi-million dollar computer system was poorly implemented and may not keep children safe.  Unfortunately they failed to tell British Columbians just how flawed the system really is. 

The Minister for Children and Family Development would have you believe that ICM's problems are limited strictly to child welfare. This is both untrue and misleading. In addition to its incompatibility for child-protection work, reports from workers show that ICM has also been wreaking havoc within the Ministry of Social Development.

Front-line social workers in both ministries need to be able to document a person's story and they need to be able to retrieve information about a child or a family quickly. With the almost $200 million ICM system, neither of these things can happen, and that means that children could be put at risk.

Incompatibility between statistics-based systems and social services has been seen before. A system similar to ICM was implemented in the UK in 2004, but it was quickly recognized to be unsuitable for social work. A scathing report on the system from United Kingdom's Open University called the system "deficient," and in particular noted its disturbing incompatibility to the core values of social work. After spending more than a hundred million dollars, the British government abandoned it.

Where was the planning?

The BC Liberal government clearly did not plan properly before committing $182 million to this system which impacts two of the most sensitive ministries in government. During a 2007 government request for proposal, it was asked if there was a requirement that ICM be previously successful in providing child welfare and income assistance services. The government answered "no." The Liberals believed it was not a necessary requirement for a system that's responsible for providing British Columbians with high priority social services, to have been successful elsewhere in the past.

With the new system, social workers are being left in the dark, sometimes unable to find information on children in unsafe situations. Case workers need specific information to protect children's lives. Experienced social workers have said they're afraid a child will fall through the cracks on their watch due to the inadequacies of the system.

In addition to the $182 million price tag on the faulty system, Minister of Children and Family Development Mary McNeil has said the government has found another $12 million to throw at the problem. At almost $200 million, the increasing cost is not easy to digest, particularly when there has been no increase in the budget for front-line services for children and youth. Just how much the whole system will cost is still unknown, and New Democrats will hold the Liberals to account for the climbing price tag.

One would have hoped the Liberal government would learn from its mistakes given that they spent almost $100 million on BCeSIS, a data system for the Ministry of Education, and later scrapped it because it did not work.

Yet millions of dollars that could be better put towards services that support vulnerable people continue to be funnelled into the fundamentally flawed ICM system. This reflects on a combination of poor Liberal government leadership and an ongoing pattern of mismanagement.  

British Columbians deserve a government they can trust, and one that makes the needs of children and families a priority. The Liberals' ongoing failure to manage projects that support vulnerable people shows their growing inability to lead a vast province with varying needs. 

Providing social programming that supports vulnerable families and the role of front line workers is a priority for Adrian Dix and the New Democrats.

B.C. Liberal Minister for Children and Families Mary McNeil's response published in The Tyee is here.  [Tyee]

17  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Hakuin

    41 weeks ago

    the computer system is merely the sound

    application of basic business principles. Proper and rigorous adherence to it will inevitably result in cost efficiencies by the decreasing of the client load. And I am sure you know what I mean.

  • shepsil

    41 weeks ago

    Thank you Claire for trying to keep the BC Liberal honest!

    In the end over $300 million on computer systems that don't work. Normally, when one buys something that doesn't work, one gets one's money back. Seems this business "friendly" gov't is too friendly with the business that sold them this system on our dime.

    Gordon Campbell, Christy Clark and the BC Liberal gov't may know how to spend our money, but they do not understand what real value for your money consists of. They are spendthrifts.

  • zalm

    41 weeks ago

    ICM works

    ...in residential care for elders, at least now, after nearly a dozen years of continuous improvement. Most of the issues in early implementation were due to inadequate training. Blame whoever you like there, but many of the issues have been worked out as now most nurses, LPNs and even care aides are inputting into the system in a relatively standardized way. I'm not sure costs are falling, but care decisions are now being made according to much more rigorous criteria than before.

    As a result, I hear fewer stories of "My mother is wayyy sicker than Mrs. So-and-so, but Mrs. So-and-so gets 6 more hours of care a day than my mother!" The health authority tried to use ICM to push down per-diems paid for residiential care, but the organizations pushed right back with additional supporting documentation. It's a two-way street.

    Heaven only knows how it'll work out in child and family care, but lord knows the existing system is rife with inappropriate decisions, inequitable resources and assignments, and clients and workers who game the system. I'd still be willing to take a flyer on ICM, given the alternative seems to be to do nothing....

  • Van Isle

    41 weeks ago

    Further more, maybe someone

    Further more, maybe someone should dig a little bit into the contract that the BC Government signed with IBM about 10 years ago. I've been told that if that info started to get out, bodies would suddenly appear.

  • rantnic

    41 weeks ago

    CAVEAT EMPTOR

    At least when you buy a new car it comes with a warranty. Perhaps I should not question these anti-union managers running our government who know so much about business. They, after all, have been bright enough to purchase, on our behalf, a lemon, that comes without warranty.

    One wonders what our pillars of capitalism will buy next, perhaps the Brooklyn Bridge. New Yorkers may not like foreign ownership of their bridge, but if the right palms are greased, who knows.

  • Umslopogaas

    41 weeks ago

    BCESIS

    Another expensive computer mistake by the government has been BCESIS.

    It is slow, poorly designed and and popularly referred to as BCFECES by the teachers who have to use it to do report cards and keep school records. A first year computer programming class could design a much better interface.

    Once again, millions have been spent on a product that didn't work in places where it was previously used and rejected.

  • Vox.Pop

    41 weeks ago

    One computer disaster after another

    The BC government is notorious amongst the BC high-tech community for blowing millions on failed computer systems. These relatively simple systems end up costing a fortune when they are implemented by the 'efficient' private sector IT consulting firms, such as IBM, who make their unseemly profits from these naive bureaucrats.

    When I was in the systems development business, I always gave my clients a fixed-price contract upfront - if I went over, it was my problem; that's how I hire plumbers etc, don't you?

  • anne cameron

    41 weeks ago

    try to remember

    the ones most heavily and negatively impacted are children. Little kids. Vulnerable kids. A couple of dozen of whom have died while in the care of the provincial government...with NO in-depth investigation as to why or how.

    If parents treated their children the way the BC Government treats children-in-care, the kids would be apprehended for their protection. Unfortunately, there's nobody and no system to apprehend the foster kids being neglected by the provincial government.

    Almost as poorly treated are the foster parents.

    This is a good article, as far as it goes, but it is much too soft spoken, much too polite, and nowhere near passionate enough.

    For chrissakes, they are children! At risk children who, through no fault of their own, are in the care of a government which all too obviously couldn't find its arse with both hands, let alone wipe it clean.

    But, boy, do they have jammy pensions!!

  • Perry

    41 weeks ago

    wasted $200 million could have provided so much for children

    I don't think the NDP is anymore competent or any less corrupt than the Liberals. I have no confidence that the NDP would do any better on this file. I remember the NDP slashing welfare rates in the 1990s.

    from wikipedia:

    Whereas Harcourt's first two years in government were characterized by a notably social democratic policy agenda, the government took a dramatic turn to the right in 1993 with Harcourt's famous province-wide televised address in which he lashed out against "welfare cheats, deadbeats and varmints". This speech inaugurated a set of draconian welfare reforms enacted between 1993 and 1995 similar to those adopted by new Progressive Conservative provincial governments elected in Alberta and Ontario in the same time period. These cutbacks were, in part, a reaction to a dramatic reduction in federal transfer payments by the federal Liberal government of Prime Minister Jean Chrétien and concommitant repeal of the Canada Assistance Plan bill of rights which included a right to food and a right to shelter. Unlike the reforms of the Harris and Klein governments, the BC Benefits package of cutbacks and restrictions in social assistance eligibility was bundled with a childcare bonus paid to low- and medium-income families, similar to that recently enacted by the Harper government. While unpopular with the province's anti-poverty movement and the then-marginal BC Green Party, Harcourt's reforms were well received by the vast majority of British Columbians.

    ***
    These political parties are basically all the same, but "the vast majority of British Columbians" seem to be idiots who just don't get it.

    That wasted $200 million could have provided so much for children in need if it was spent directly on their well fare instead of on systems, processes and incompetent bureaucrat salaries.

    It's similar to the medical system where doctors and administrators get regular raises paid by citizens, even though many citizens have no doctor and no access to that system. Or where Health Authorities provide large amounts of money for committees and studies, but not actual health care for those suffering with out. And trust me, there a lot of citizens who have no access to the medical care system at all except through emergency wards, which is not a suitable substitute for the quality health care promised to all citizens by law.

    There always seems to be money for programs and the people involved with providing those programs, but never money for the people those programs are supposed to help but fail to.

    I think there is something far more sinister than mere incompetence going on here.

  • hg

    41 weeks ago

    Management

    The free enterprise hordes bankrupting BC, while at the same time lining the pockets of their friends. Just like BC Hydro, BC Rail, BC Gas, etc., etc.

  • paisley

    40 weeks ago

    Accountability

    Can't wait for the list of persons fired for this mess. Oh that's right nobody in the bureaucracy is accountable, I forgot. I will have to agree with "Perry" I don't see any indication of accountability in the near future.

  • alive

    40 weeks ago

    How it goes!

    Have you ever tried to follow an instruction manual?
    Whether assembling lawnfurniture or installling the latest gadget on your computer, you are victim to the geeks, who do not think like anyone else!

    Yes Zalm, indeed after years of trying, no doubt staff has learned to cope with interfaces that are more like a mystery than a help!

    It is not amart, when the people who order these programs, themselves most likely never worked "on the floor" and only can guess at what to specify.

    Same old story: we live in a top-heavy world where overpaid pre-occupied people make decisions based on how to not get in trouble, meaning rely on so-called specialists --- again usually from firms that either contributed to the party, or spend millions on advertising themselves.

    Never, ever, would it occur to solicit input from the hired help -- after all they are on a much lower payscale so must be sort of stupid, eh?

  • Vox.Pop

    40 weeks ago

    Systems Building

    The only effective way (based on 30 years experience) when building information systems is to work 100% with the people on the front-line rarely supervisors (unless they were promoted after many years on the front-line) & never managers. Senior managers are the worst sources.

  • freewilly

    40 weeks ago

    Thanks Claire

    Someone is listening ! I sent a heads up months ago to the Tyee and Im sure others have as well. This story has legs and will plague the Liberals through the next election cycle. Claires office has been well aware of constituents issues with social services and has responded. Good on you!

    I love gadgets and technology, I'd love to have robots pick up my cloths, do the washing, and clean the house. I'd like a computer to read my mind and fill it up with information, its all possible, and I trust machines to poke around and do their job, if the software works.

    Look at what has happened recently, computers landed a freaking car on Mars, it worked. No room for errors, billions were on the line.
    In our case lives are on the line, little kids, the poor, and the software is hooped.
    BC taxpayers spent 200 million for software, it should work beyond our expectations. Software worth that amount of doe should solve all our whoes, and wash our clothes.

    I bet British Columbian's have spent more on critical software than NASA has on their lander's software that may make a paradyme shift in our understanding of life.
    For 200 million we should expect the best.

  • J. Enns

    40 weeks ago

    Always Question

    It is important to always question your government, and for there always to be accountability, and to press government for accountability.

    And yes we must first and fore most remember the children, and those who are vulnerable in our society. But, I would like to add, let's not attack our front line workers, who day after day work to do the best that they can for the children, and families that are in need. Until you have worked a day in their shoes, and take the time to recognize the stingy pay is not worth the twenty-five years of services needed for the handsome pension...I assure you, almost every worker feels that things can be done much better...and change is always needed....These workers do the best they can within government policy, following the legislation that was likely put out by the government they did not vote for...and to remember, it is important to vote, to put a voice to our concerns, to attend meetings, to be involved, whether it be one person at a time, through community, or through a political platform.

  • Markerbuoy

    40 weeks ago

    Bureaucrats In Action...

    With respect to Perry, above...

    “Bureaucracy is that dreadful state of when more emphasis is placed on the process than the actual resolution of a problem.” William Powell (I don't know who this guy is, but he is dead on)

    ...and if I may add: "Any given bureaucracy places self preservation (of the bureau) above all else." Markerbuoy

  • Markerbuoy

    40 weeks ago

    Bureaucrats In Action...

    With respect to Perry, above...

    “Bureaucracy is that dreadful state of when more emphasis is placed on the process than the actual resolution of a problem.” William Powell (I don't know who this guy is, but he is dead on)

    ...and if I may add: "Any given bureaucracy places self preservation (of the bureau) above all else." Markerbuoy

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.