Opinion

Why Striking Postal Workers Deserve Support

This is about a crucial, wider fight for income equality and collective bargaining rights.

By Murray Dobbin, 6 Jun 2011, TheTyee.ca

Postal working walking in snow, postman

Delivering the mail, whatever the weather, and meriting basic democratic rights.

Related

Members of the Canadian Union of Postal Workers are on strike -- beginning with rotating strikes in selected cities but quite possibly escalating into a full scale shutdown if the corporation remains intransigent. It has been a long time since there has been a national strike and this one could turn out to be one of the most important in decades.

Labour has been largely absent from the political scene for five years of Harper minorities. Now that the Conservatives have a majority, labour simply has to get its act together and play the key role it has played in the past. But it is not just labour that needs to get behind CUPW, so does anyone who committed to defending Canadian democracy.

The strike -- with a 95 per cent mandate from union members -- is important because it is on the front line in the fight for income equality and collective bargaining rights. Post office management has as one its key demands the implementation of a two-tier wage system. New hires would be paid 30 per cent less than existing employees, literally wiping out decades of collective agreements establishing livable wage levels. Workers doing identical work, working side by side, would be paid dramatically different wages. This issue alone justifies the strike for if it is allowed to pass, you can be certain that it will serve as a precedent for other employers.

The immediate danger is at the federal level where, thankfully, only 10 per cent of Canadian workers come under federal legislation. Federal employees and those in federal agencies, along with private unions in a handful of sectors, like transportation, banks and telecommunications, are vulnerable to whatever Harper's labour agenda turns out to be.

To date, Harper has not picked major fights with labour simply to please his right-wing base. But that will likely change very soon as his promise to get rid of the deficit will come first at the expense of federal employees. While Canada Post is arm's length from the government a successful rollback of contract items (retiree benefits and sick leave are also under attack) will almost certainly put similar efforts on Harper's agenda. Laying off even thousands of federal employees will actually do little to get rid of the deficit. Harper could up the ante by arguing that rolling back pensions, salary terms and other contract items are essential to the long term control of the deficit.

Harper will have to decide how to deal with the postal strike if it develops into a prolonged, nation-wide stoppage. He could impose a contract or go the route of binding arbitration. But he would have trouble simply tearing up an existing contract. The B.C. government did that and the action was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Canada.

Radical anti-unionists emboldened

The election of a Harper majority seems to have emboldened at least some of the more reactionary business voices in Canada who have always been anti-union. Catherine Swift, head of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB), let loose an anti-union tirade recently that seemed inspired by the radical anti-unionism practiced by the governor of Wisconsin and other U.S. states. Perhaps it was intended as an informal mandate from business for governments to go after public service unions.

Swift first attacked public-pension plans warning of a "tsunami" of public employee retirements and a "crushing" blow to taxpayers. Her irresponsible worker-bashing was enhanced by some good old fashioned fear-mongering: "Do we have to hit the wall like Greece?" It is hard to tell whether this is just rhetoric or incompetence on Swift's part. But her final shot left little to the imagination: "What would be ideal is getting rid of public-sector unions entirely."

Swift, of course, is supposed to represent the interests of small and medium businesses. I wonder who she thinks spends money at her members' establishments: people on welfare or earning minimum wage or those with decent wages and salaries -- like those in unionized jobs. Even the IMF has been warning countries lately that if they want to have sustained, stable economic growth they had better pay attention to inequality. According to a recent IMF study: "...attention to inequality can bring significant longer-run benefits for growth. Over longer horizons, reduced inequality and sustained growth may thus be two sides of the same coin."

Postal workers on strike, Winnipeg

Winnipeg, first city to be struck by postal workers, looms large in wider debate over whether widening income inequality is good for Canada.

Getting rid of unions as Swift suggests would dramatically increase inequality and undermine the growth her members presumably want her to promote.

But don't hold your breath for business, small or large, to abandon its dedication to ideology any time soon. Economic growth during the 25-year period of neo-liberalism we are now in has been much slower and less stable than it was in the previous period of activist government. But the ideology still trumps common sense

Defending democracy

But defending postal workers from the ravages of roll-back bargaining is not the only reason to actively support this strike. CUPW has been amongst the most progressive practitioners of social unionism in Canadian history. It has a long history of fighting for women's rights, human rights, peace and social justice, played a major role in the fight against free trade and has been in the forefront of international solidarity movements. Maternity leave is now taken for granted in Canada but without the historic 1981 CUPW strike -- lasting 42 days -- we might not have it at all.

Virtually every progressive piece of legislation in the country from Medicare, to unemployment insurance, from public education and labour standards, were brought about in large part because unions and their members fought hard to make them happen. This historic role of unions is one that the majority of Canadians know very little about. To a large extent unions have no one but themselves to blame. Over the past 25 years, they -- especially public service unions -- allowed themselves to be framed by the right as greedy, over-paid, under-worked and privileged. That message has played into the race-to-the-bottom mentality of many non-union workers who too often attack their unionized counterparts for the job security and rights they can only dream of.

I often try to imagine how different the situation might be if unions had dedicated resources to educating the public over the past two decades about their role in making Canada one of the best places in the world to live. Because they didn't, they will now be asking support from a public that has been subjected to years of anti-union propaganda. And that means that they -- starting with the postal workers -- will need our help even more.  [Tyee]

62  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • konnectthedots

    50 weeks ago

    Finally, some non con-bot pr material

    Thank you, Thank you, Thank you. I am so glad to read this well written opinion piece. All of the major papers write editorials as if emotion and ideology trump facts every-time. How about some Canadian history, or is that too deep for a Canadian reader these days. I am sick of conservative pr drivel.
    I agree with the author's thoughts, in that, the cons and capitalist business types have had their pr machines working overtime, with no union objections. Unions need to remember that they have a voice in the media, and in Canada. And, more importantly, that voice is sorely missing these days!

  • CDNJoe2

    50 weeks ago

    CUPW

    Thank you Murray Dobbin for a well written piece. The middle and upper middle classes would not exist today if not for the labour movement. Basics like medical coverage, womens rights, child labour laws, etc. would be pipe dreams.
    As you pointed out, unions are on the verge of extinction and they only have themselves to blame. I've worked both union and nonunion jobs for 30 years and for the last 20 years the unions have been unresponsive and silent. I'm convinced that they have become nothing more than a bunch of office workers looking out for their own asses while selling out the members on the front lines.
    During the economic meltdown in 2008-2009 I got fancy high gloss mailings from my union but never once saw them on the job site while 250 members were randomly laid off. (If the boss didn't like you it didn't matter what your qualifications were).
    I sincerely hope that the labour movement won't be allowed to die. But we need to get rid of those currently behind it and get some balls back into it.

  • Kreditanstalt

    50 weeks ago

    A completely disingenuous

    A completely disingenuous piece of propaganda!

    The Post Office is a dinosaur, an expensive remnant of the nineteenth century. How many of us atually send "letters" anymore, anyway? In this age of e-mail, skype, iPads and smartphones - let alone the fax or home telephone?

    And it is no good simply to say "Catherine Swift is wrong." Why is she wrong? Is she fudging the numbers? Lying? Similarly, why was Scott Walker wrong? What little he DID get through may contribute to reducing costs. And this is math, pure and simple. Numbers don't lie.

    "...with a 95 per cent mandate from union members..."? OF COURSE they'd vote "yes"! They have a vested interest. Did you ask other stakeholders? The taxpaying public? Did you ask non-union workers? Did you ask all those who would like a job at the Post Office but who have been priced out by the existing high wages/pensions/benefits?

    What Murray Dobbin et. al. really want is an even greater forced exaction from the private sector taxpayer. It is the private sector which generates all wealth in the first place, yet this latest exaction is somehow needed in spite of the fact that the antiquated white elephant in question faces no competition.

    There is an easier way to solve this coming budgetary tsunami than by "getting rid of public unions". You just make them compete. End their monopoly privileges.

  • kootenay

    50 weeks ago

    Ever since Gov Scott Walker

    Ever since Gov Scott Walker staged his attack on public sector employees, every employer now seems to thing they have the god given right to attack workers wages, benefits and pensions. They don't feel they even have to justify their position, they just want it and we should just give it up.

    We've all stood by and watched the right wing dissmantle our country for the past two decades and have done nothing about it. There is no easy stuff to give away any more, nobody is left unaffected.

    I suggest it is well past time to for a national strike to rid ourselves of corporate friendly governments, but we just elected a majority Harper governement, the peoples will has spoken...

  • DPL

    50 weeks ago

    I was a member of a postal

    I was a member of a postal union when Lyin Brian scabbed the place. The PO brought in a few Hong Kong cops to follow us around. They were not interested in collective bargaining, they were out to crush people.IT's no fun having a senior cop read an injunction to me, but they did and we still eventually got a settlement.A lot of the problems are caused by untrained junior supervisors, who do exactly what they are told, or the lose their position. We did a health and safety tour, with Labour Canada on the plant. It took a week, and the result was over 170 safety violations. Asbestos falling from a ceiling, PCB stored illegally in the lower level of the building. Not a pleasant group to work with but everyone wants a job. Similar issues at the other many buildings ran by Canada Post in that city. The workers need all the support of citizens it can muster. "The struggle continues" is and was the rally cry of the unions.

  • Ramona777

    50 weeks ago

    Important Info. Missing

    When will someone report exactly what postal workers earn?
    And what do these workers do? Sort mail? Deliver it?
    There's been lots of gaps in the reporting of this story. Before making it about Harper, et. al, fill in the blanks please.

  • Van Isle

    50 weeks ago

    Don't forget Michael

    Don't forget Michael Campbell is spueing the same verbal garbage as Catherine Swift. I heard her on one of Michael's programmes about a month ago and they were bouncing off of each other on how terrible unions are. (Unions hates business) They also commenting that pensions are far to rich for Canada and they should be done away with. What do they want? People not to retire and drop dead at their work site? I would love to see Ken Gorgetti or Jim Sinclair 'wade into' those two and give them a verbal thrashing.

  • Jeffrey J.

    50 weeks ago

    Power of Collective Action

    The real irony is that labour groups are simply trying to do what corporate monopolies do: band together to have more influence on public policies.

    And the hypocrisy of the corporate oligarchs couldn't be worse. THEY get to work together secretly behind closed doors, but working people don't. THEY get to take more and more stuff from others; working people don't. THEY get to pretend they are the majority; working people are.

    So the hypocrisy goes on, and working people are beaten into the ground, and the minority elites take what they want.

    Great coverage from one of Canada's tireless authors. We are privileged to read Mr. Dobbin's clarion voice.

  • Cynic

    50 weeks ago

    When Harper invokes the

    When Harper invokes the "deficit" to justify his attacks on the financial dignity of the people, the best response would be to challenge him on why he continues to allow our money supply to be printed and controlled by private banks. Challenge him on why he allows the government's bonds to be purchased by private banks with newly printed money, rather than bought by our own Bank of Canada, a move that would be truly democratic. If our masters invoke "inflation", challenge them on why they allow the private banks to charge such exorbitant interest, since interest is the principal cause of inflation.

    We are under attack and we should fight back with the truth about money and banking.

  • Fish-counter

    50 weeks ago

    It is hard to support the postal workers

    They do great work and we depend on them but the fact is that postal traffic is declining and the Post Office has to reduce the level of services. Just look at the Tyee if you need a reason why we are buying fewer stamps. Running a very small business, I invoice exclusively by e-mail these days, never by snail-mail.

    Postal workers - like teachers - must accept change. Sorry but the reality is that we can't afford to provide lifelong careers in a shrinking market.

    It has very little to do with politics and everything to do with change. Just because things are changing, that does not make the people who have to manage it evil.

    If you haven't heard yet, the newspaper industry is going through the wringer, too. I blame myself for that one. We get two free thrice-weeklies that add up to hundreds of kilos of paper every year. We can't stop them from coming, but we sure don't need to add to the load. There are only so many trees.

  • Barryeng

    50 weeks ago

    To Kreditanstalt

    here we go again. If the Postal Service is such a dinosaur, then why do we get so upset whever it is disrupted, for any reason including inclement weather? The Postal service is just that, a "SERVICE" and as such is provided to supply a need, often in places that it would not be supplied by a private sector company. Can you imagine a private company providing delivery at a reasonable cost to places as remote as Telegraph Creek BC, or Goose Harbour Nfld? It would not happen. Would Sun TV even think about replacing CBC in Nunavit, unless there was a lot of money to be made? Should all the teachers in Canada be privatized? A service should be just that, a service, and should not be subject to the the vagrancies of the competitive market place. Such services can, and should be monopolies, and run by governments either directly or with crown corporations.

    That was the first point. Next, it has been proven over and over again that workers wages are never the culprit in exhorbitant deficits. The average worker in British Columbia, even if unionized earns less than
    fifty thousand dollars a year. The average executive salaries are from twice that, to hundreds of times that. David Hahn negotiated a salary of over a million dollars per year, plus benefits to run BC Ferries, and we all know what a schmozzle he has made of that. Oil Company and Bank execs routinely earn that much and more. The present recession was certainly not caused by postal workers making too much money.

    Unions do not exist just to provide wages to workers. Negotiations are done to provide decent safety and working conditions, job security, and specific rules for how the workers are to be treated. Favouritism and nepotism are limited when everyone has to be treated fairly. Working conditions that are now the norm throughout the world did not come about without an enormous struggle by workers who banded together to fight for their right to be treated fairly. Wages themselves had little to do with that struggle, despite everything that the opponents of unionism try to tell us. Contracts for wages and working conditions are negotiated every two, or three years, or longer, but the workers through the unions are always active on a day to day basis, dealing with issues that most often have very little to do with money.

    Finally, if you are so enamoured with cyberspace, then you are quite welcome to trust all of your banking and personal information to the internet hackers. Personally, I will trust my information to my postal delivery person.

  • Jerry Munro

    50 weeks ago

    Working Class Watchword for The Time...

    We are living through another "special time" within Casino Capitalism, a fragile, greed driven ruling class Beast at the best of times, when the entire working class needs to trust the judgement of each other (groups), and support each other acting in their own defence against "the system". This is the simple fact.

    The real estate and hedging bubble has finally burst on capitalism, or in some places is still in the process of bursting... over attempts to rebuild the bubble still going on... and as is always the case in such a time, the ruling class has turned especially viciously upon the working class, and expects it to pay for the crimes of Casino Capitalism. (Just like the major capitalist powers expect the Palestinians to pay for the WW2 crimes of European Fascism against the Jews.) To them, it's always the "other guys" fault. The other guy always being the working class, or somebody/some group weaker and poorer.

    To them it is a time for bogeymen and scapegoat creation. (As they squirrel their fortunes away or still "hedge" their bets protectively in gold etc., in the hopes that capitalism will yet rise again like the Phoenix from the ashes of its own self-created destruction path across the planet. As it has successfully been able to do across its 200+ year history to here.) Its scapegoats were once the Jews and Communists of course, now it is still a more amorphous "terrorism" and Al Qaeda bogeyman... though the times are still evolving and closer to home bogeymen will likely yet be created. Like striking workers.

    In any case, capitalism has fallen back to its baseline instinct, to explain away the economic and planetary devastation it has created, and it is everyone's fault but their's. Which means a new Solidarity Time for all the working class stratas is again emerging... starting here with Postal Workers. Keeping in mind, that a victory for one group of workers sets in motion the forces and socio-political climate from which all, even the weakest elements of the working class, can wind up making gains, organized or unorganized.

    Solidarity is the watchword of the time... in my view.

    And this time, we may just hit it lucky, and find the means and wherewithal to finally end capitalism... and create a more truly "democratic" and "co-operative" economic and social order. :-)

  • Sooke

    50 weeks ago

    I'm delighted that there is a strike

    It will remind people of the bad old days when people actually depended on "snail mail", and we were held hostage by these bozos on a regular basis.

    If my prayers are answered, the Harper government will notice people's anger, and use the occasion to end Canada Post's monopoly on first class mail.

    Then we can let them sink or swim in the free market, and welcome Canada Post employees back to the real world.

  • Karen D.

    50 weeks ago

    In response to Ramona777

    Postal employee rates are easily obtained on the web.

    Postal Service Mail Carrier - $23.85/hr.
    Customer Service Representative - $21.64/hr.
    Postal Service Clerk - $23.94/hr.
    Maintenance Technician - $26.68/hr.
    Millwright - $28.63/hr.
    Operations Supervisor - $27.86/hr.

    My understanding is that supervisory positions are supported by a different union than CUPW.

    I worked for a short time as a postal carrier starting at $22.46/hr.. I earned every cent in my opinion as the job was physically and sometimes mentally challenging with heavy time constraints.

    Unfortunately I had to quit as I didn't get enough hours to live on and it was clear that it could take many years before I could get on as a permanent employee.

  • zalm

    50 weeks ago

    An opportunity

    "While Canada Post is arm's length from the government a successful rollback of contract items (retiree benefits and sick leave are also under attack)..."

    This is one of the keys to a more appropriate bargaining structure for everyone. Retiree benefits are something funded by the national government, but costs are entirely under provincial control. This makes it impossible for either the business to estimate costs, or the union to manage a shared allotment of the benefits. It's long past time that retiree benefits were abandoned in favour of more income in the general pension fund, and that individual locals negotiate heatlh insurance with local (read: provincial) health care insurers such as Blue Cross, which is a worker-cooperative-style health insurer. It's not the best, but it provides maximum benefits at low cost, with any profits going to reduce future costs, not shareholder profits.

    The advantage to this is that the responsibility for cutting health care benefits for everyone - worker, retiree, student, whoever - then rests entirely with the province, and the worker, the retiree, the student and the union can bring the appropriate pressure to bear on the party responsible. Here in BC, retiree benefits are being cut in defined-benefit pension plans despite having all kinds of money in the account, simply because the provincial governments are de-listing more and more services formerly covered, such as eye exams and physiotherapy.

    Unfortunately, retirees and students are suffering the most, and you know who gets the shortest stick there....

    This way, not only can Canada Post allocate a resonable sum for benefits for retirees, but the private corporations responsible for administering retiree benefits will now lose a source of exportable profits to their head offices domiciled wherever. I'm not against them, but competition in insurance makes no sense if everyone is using the same set of actuarial tables. The only difference could possibly be.... profit. Anything else is merely a Ponzi scheme.

    Sick leave is yet another thing that could be put over to the union's control. Let the corporation allocate a suitable, negotiated sum for sick leave (based on statistical averages for business) to the union's good and welfare fund and let the union's fund take care of those who need more from it. The brotherhood has a closer connection to the actual needs of its workers and knows better how to administrate sick funds based on actual need. The union also has the ability to grow those funds like a pension account by investing in union-owned and operated enterprises, which, for the most part, are remarkably successful. And, contrary to popular belief, there is considerable financial acumen and ability in the ranks of the brotherhood of all workers - and not just for popsicle stands.

  • zalm

    50 weeks ago

    contracting out?

    "Laying off even thousands of federal employees will actually do little to get rid of the deficit."

    And the work still has to be done. As provincial health care employers are finding out, paying private companies to do it results in only minimal savings, as a lot of extra tasks formerly done by the "nearest employee" are now not done, or done at extra (contracted) cost.

  • Karen D.

    50 weeks ago

    Average wage in Canada

    For those who continue to believe that this strike is wage directed I would like to point out that the average hourly wage in Canada is $24.81, above that of the majority of Canada Postal workers.

    Sadly, right-wing propoganda has convinced many Canadians that unions are a drain on our economy but they fail to acknowledge that without unions all private sector worker incomes would be at the mercy of corporate management and workers rights would be non-existent. There must be a balance between corporate profit and the ability of employees to have job security, a living wage, and respect in the workplace. Unions have brought about these minimal requirements not only for union members but for employees as a whole.

    Unfortunately, corporate greed and business friendly governments have eroded unions over in the recent past which partly explains why families require two incomes to support a household, why a smaller and smaller number of people earn a larger and larger portion of income and why income levels have been falling further behind the cost of living in this country.

    When will the public recognize that those in charge rarely conduct business to favour the average Canadian employee?

  • zalm

    50 weeks ago

    kreditanstalt

    "he Post Office is a dinosaur, an expensive remnant of the nineteenth century. How many of us atually send "letters" anymore, anyway? In this age of e-mail, skype, iPads and smartphones - let alone the fax or home telephone?"

    I'm surprised at you! Surely you know the only things that are sent through insecure, unverifiable channesl such as e-mail etc., are documents that don't really matter in the grand scheme of things?

    My parents will never learn to properly use e-mail, never mind store records of it for themselves properly, even though I set up a computer for them years ago. How will dad read his magazine? Mom her pension from a foreign country? Keep records of their bills?

    If you want to talk about alternative service delivery methods, esepcially when we're all moving to big cities which should lower the average cost of item delivery, not to mention making neighbourhood mail stations more acceptable, then we've something to talk about. But, a dinosaur? Hardly. Direct marketing, a $300 million business with $6 billion in impact would die overnight as costs doubled or more.

  • zalm

    50 weeks ago

    fish-counter

    "Sorry but the reality is that we can't afford to provide lifelong careers in a shrinking market."

    Your evidence of this is....?

  • Jerry Munro

    50 weeks ago

    Sooke Is The Dogpatch Mentality...

    "Then we can let them sink or swim in the free market, and welcome Canada Post employees back to the real world." Sooke

    Only in your version, or more accurately, capitalism's version of the "real world". (Your extreme reactionary views supporting the ruling status quo are very familiar here, Sooke, from you and your kind.)

    The reality for "working people " is, if you are not making "at least" $25/hr right now, you are barely living at all... if your ambition is to enjoy life in addition to work, have a home, leisure to enjoy and access to a "reasonable" standard of living.

    These "free marketers" of Casino Capitalism keep saying they can make it on their own, but in reality take all the government hand-outs, tax breaks, research grants and other freebies made available to them by the Conservative Capitalist State. Then you all whine interminably if anyone in the working class gets anything other than minimum wage... which minimum wage laws the supporters of the so-called "free market" are even against.

    Sooke's views are everywhere of course, in the prevailing capitalist free "media market". It's part of the attack against the working class going on. To which there is only one "real" response... Kick ass and shut the fuggers down. Defend yourselves and organize against the "free market system". We need a "people's market" in its place, that will meet the needs of working folks over those of the ruling elites and their stooges.

  • crh

    50 weeks ago

    a perfect example

    The opinion of Kreditanstaldt above is a perfect example of corporate thinking of today. The big greedy managers simply hate people and the cost of labour. It is never cheap enough and they are always trying to undermine everyone in order to cut their wages and benefits. Squeezing more blood. That is why so many jobs have gone overseas where exploiting the poor is more profitable. Getting rid of unions helps exploit labour so much easier.

    The post office may have cited a reduction of 17% per household use of letter mail, it also said that there is an increase in parcels (internet shopping) and bulk mailouts. There is still a big need for a post office and to say that it is a dinosaur is just factually wrong. The private sector by way of courier companies are already competing with the post office and seem to be thriving quite well. Rural delivery has been done by private contracts for years, and the pay is really bad. I believe it would be a big mistake to throw away our Canadian postal service and wholeheartedly support those workers.

  • Fii

    50 weeks ago

    I was wondering what their

    I was wondering what their wages are too, but if it's in the $22-28/hr range as noted above, that's not a lot these days. Especially if you live in a city as expensive as Vancouver!

  • Fish-counter

    50 weeks ago

    Thanks for the rates Karen

    The one who is most underpaid is the operations supervisor. Otherwise, those pay scales ain't that bad.

  • Fish-counter

    50 weeks ago

    Zalm: the evidence is everywhere

    How can we pay teachers when there are no kids to teach? How can the Post Office expand when the volume is down? Stop being obtuse. You must live on a different planet from the rest of us.

    The Teacher-on call list in Nanaimo was closed last time I heard. I am sure the Post Office has a hiring list too. If you want to pretend it is still 1970, go ahead. For the rest of us, it is 2011.

  • Lauri - LetterC...

    50 weeks ago

    I am proud of my union!

    I am closing in on my 12th year of being a Postie. Currently I am a letter carrier in Burnaby, but I have held many positions in CPC, including driving the Step-Vans, and right up to 5 ton. I have also worked on the plant floor. In my opinion, as humble as it may be, is that the hardest job at Canada Post is being a letter carrier.

    I am hearing the majority of media reports as stating that money is the issue. Please believe me when I tell you that it is not. $24.00 dollars per hour may sound like a lot, but when you look at it annually, we are shoulder to shoulder with the rest of average Canada. One of the major issues concerns health and safety. CPC is already online with a machine that will come damn close to sequencing our routes by address. Letter Carriers do sort their on mail, so to have a machine to do it for you sounds great right?? Wrong! CPC is going to a two bundle method of delivering mail. Dividing out letter mail, with oversize items. CPC says because the USPS has been doing it for years, that it is successful and a good thing. If you live around Metro-Town, or in the Westend, then you know about how many different flyers you get every day. So now we have more than 2 bundles. By the way, all that paper is extremely heavy. Now throw in some keys, your scanner for bar coded mail items, and a bottle of water. Feel like a pack mule yet? We suffer from many aliments. We live with knee pain, back issues, sore shoulders, planter faciatis. Of and before I forget, lets add in all sorts of weather. Monsoon season? Tough. People depend on us. This new system Canada Post is ramming down our throats, means more time on the street, and because the machine sorts my mail for me, I have now lost the control on HOW or WHAT order to deliver my route. Making it easier to alleviate my physical load. I may ok money for what I do, but I am far more concerned in being able to use my body for the next 40 years. Inside workers also suffer. Lack of rotations, doing same job all the time. Standing in place on rubber mats that lay on concrete. Repetitive motions leading to long term injury. There are joint CPC-Union health and safety committees, and all of these concerns are well documented. So for CPC to pretend that these issues are not-negotiable is insulting.

    So I am proud to be a Union Member, and I am especially proud to be a member of CUPW. It ain't perfect, and I may not agree with all of our policies.

    Ask some of the elderly, or the lower income earners in your communities if they want to see Canada Post abolished. Sometimes seeing us is the highlight of their day, or the only way the can receive communication. Not everyone has a computer.

    End polite rant here.

  • Fish-counter

    50 weeks ago

    Lauri: thanks for the reality check

    Thank you for your hard work in providing a vital service and I hope the union manages to win useful concessions but I think the strike mechanism is the wrong way to go to win public support.

    My biggest beef with the postal service is the amount of junk mail you have to deliver. Most of it goes into the fire. Sorry about that.

  • rlbolin

    50 weeks ago

    Right Sentiments, Wrong Example

    Protection of Labour cannot long extend to maintaining functions which are no longer economically feasible. How much support should be given to railway firemen or buggy upholsterers? Life moves on and occupations move with it.
    At the same time, it would appear to me to be the better part of reason during a transition period to let attrition handle the matter and that the delivery schedule be gradually reduced. What harm would be done to the public if mail were delivered only every other day? Or later, once a week. Perpetuating a service which is moribund due to the availability of better alternatives by continuing to hire folks but pay them less seems to me to be bad business.

  • Postiegrrrl

    50 weeks ago

    Bang On!

    Thank you Murray Dobbin for gathering the facts and seeing the bigger picture - that this is about democracy and the power of unions to uphold the right to collective bargaining in order to ensure high standards in the workplace when it comes to wages, benefits, employment security and health and safety, and for recognizing that this benefits all Canadians - workers, unionized and non-unionized, business owners, and our communities.

    This is the kind of balanced and objective journalism we can count on from The Tyee, and in this way you are in a class of your own. Other mainstream media publications make a mockery of themselves by their biased and unfair reporting, particularly when it comes to the Canada Post/CUPW story.

    Thank you for the support!

  • zalm

    50 weeks ago

    Fish-counter

    No kids to teach? Every district I know has an on-call list for sick calls - my sister's on one. They may not be accepting any more new hires, but that's because so many schools have just laid off a whole bunch of teachers - Vancouver has laid off permanently more than 100. And I'd be very surprised if there was a classroom in the province that had the recommended number of kids in it, except for the one-roomers in Kispiox or something. My sister relieved for a week in a class with 31 Grade 4s in it. Perhaps you can tell me how that equals "no kids to teach"?

    What you're talking about "the post office expanding" for I don't know. Nothing at all in the article makes any reference ot that. It's all about roll-backs, lower starting wages, management oversight and safety committees. It's the easiest thing in the world to get rid of employees when you have too many - layoff notices take place effective within 2 weeks, and then they're someone else's problem. No company or government department I know keeps employees one week longer than absolutely necessary unless they think they might need them again in the near future, and might have a hard time finding and training a replacement. People are let go at the hospitals I work at all the time as needs change. I've seen positions not filled by attrition and the balance of the work covered off by contractors and lower-paid workers as managers try to stay ahead of the employement curve. And some of them have some very sophisticated tools for doing so.

    When you're ready to argue facts instead of insults, c'mon back. Til then, this has been a waste of time.

  • alive

    50 weeks ago

    Effeciency?

    As I understand it, if I mail a letter from my town on Vancouver Island to the guy next door, it is re-routed to either Victoria or Vancouver.
    The idea being that those centres have expensive machinery that can sort the mail and "save" man hours.

    That is typical management thinking!

    So now my letter travels for 2-3 days and I am lucky to get it delivered next door within the week!

  • Kreditanstalt

    50 weeks ago

    @Barryeng...just one

    @Barryeng...just one thing...

    Why should I, as a B.C. taxpayer living hundreds of miles away, be forced at gunpoint to pay for (inefficient) postal service to Telegraph Creek or Goose Harbour?

  • OneOpinion

    50 weeks ago

    Information, please

    I agree with Ramona777. Let's have some real data on how much postal workers make, how much they want to make, etc. etc. Enough with the rhetoric.

  • DPL

    50 weeks ago

    somebody asked what postal

    somebody asked what postal workers do?
    MSE's are truck drivers from step vans up to semi trailers. They also deliver parcels, Priority Post and haul the bags of sorted mail picked up from stations after the carries have sorted it each day.
    Inside workers manually sort over size mail and parcels, each working from a case showing addresses in their area. They forward mail to other cities towns and countries plus of course Rural Routes.

    Maintenance workers maintain the equipment including the electronic equipment
    Letter carriers do the final sort from their station, then carry it door to door. They carry a bag or bag with weight to 35 pounds and on their route pick up small bags with the mail they have sorted earlier, in a number of relay boxes, that was dropped there by the MSE Drivers.

    The supervisors belong to APOC and like to claim they are not a union. They call it an association. without it, many of those supervisors couldn't hold down the job. It's a lot more complicated than some folks thing. I support the union as they do collective bargaining with an employer who wants to get rid of most of them. Time and motion studies have existed for years which affect all outside workers.

  • Worrywart

    50 weeks ago

    Pensions

    Michael Campbell and Catherine Swift are corporate lackeys, who deal in truthiness and nothing else. For example, have you ever heard either of these twits discuss the $35B taken from the federal employee pension plan by the federal government? Have you ever heard either of them discuss the detriment to Canada of shipping raw crude and logs out of Canada. No way, only corporate tax cuts will work in their small minds. Have either ever pondered why unions were created in the first? I guess not, since it was to protect workers from corporate mouthpieces like them.

  • OhCanada

    50 weeks ago

    Safety and integrity

    To all of you who are bitching about postal workers and how much money they make or don't make - let me remind you of couple of things airheads....
    1. You can't send everything over the internet.
    2. Not everyone in this world use computers - thus they send letters
    3. What do you do if your family send you a letter from another country that you never receive?
    4. What happens you send something to someone that is important and you have a choice to pay $100 by UPS or pay $25 by Canada Post? Which option you choose?

    The integrity and the security of the mail system is at stake here. Got it? It must stay in public hands! And for that I support every postal worker and I strongly hope that they will prevail. For the sake of order, democracy and sanity.

  • dave49

    50 weeks ago

    The reality - less mail volume

    The reality is that mail volume is dropping. I saw a story a few months back about how lettermail volume is down some 15% and Canada Post is restructuring (i.e. shrinking to adapt). It was inevitable considering what the growth of the Internet and online services is doing to newspapers, television and retailing. We just have not been hearing numbers before.

    My wife is with the feds and she said lots of eyebrows were raised when the Harper government said it would trim the federal public service by a third through ATTRITION.

    If you think the postal strike is a battle, I predict you ain't seen nothing yet!!

  • RickW

    50 weeks ago

    Kreditanstalt

    Quote:
    The Post Office is a dinosaur, an expensive remnant of the nineteenth century

    So is the school system.........
    But I suppose you are one of those who "thinks" schools and postal systems should turn a profit. Then, using your "logic", the same could be said of the military. Demand that organization to turn a profit, to "justify" it's existence.

    As for you "paying" for mail service to the "Telegraph Creeks" of this country, well then, why should I pay when you get sick? Why should I pay when you use a road or sidewalk?

    [SNIDE COMMENT DIRECTED AT ANOTHER COMMENTER REMOVED. -MODERATOR.]

  • socstudent

    50 weeks ago

    @Kreditanstalt

    Canada Post is has been self-sufficient and profitable for the last 16 years. In its last reported year, 2009, CPC registered a net profit of 281 million dollars from a total revenue of 3.1 billion dollars.

  • Fii

    50 weeks ago

    Zalm and Fish Counter

    I can only speak for Vancouver, but for the past two yrs I've made a decent living strictly tutoring students (some esl, some born here, most to Chinese parents) between the ages of 10-18. One-on-one, these kids are getting the kind of attention I only wish I could have had as a child- and I went to an elementary school with only 14 students in a class! There is probably a glut of teachers in the urban areas because that's where many young teachers want to live, but there are plenty of kids out there with the growing immigrant population throughout the lower Mainland.

    Teaching is incredibly rewarding but also very draining. I can work 20 hrs a week with one student at a time (granted, no benefits) or 40+ hrs with 20-30 students in a class... hmmm... and public school teachers should take a pay cut?? Really? So then what, only the rich kids who can afford private tutoring forge ahead because the teaching profession doesn't pay well? Not anyone can be a good teacher, it's a highly underrated profession.

  • Kreditanstalt

    50 weeks ago

    @socstudent, it's a hidden subsidy we all pay

    Canada Post has a monopoly over the domestic letter-mail market - a massive subsidy.

    This has resulted in unnecessarily high mailing costs for the public and has enabled the corporation to continue in an expensive & inefficient way.

    Competition makes the world go round: it would give Canada Post some impetus to improve service, make heavy or remote users pay more instead of the letter-writer in general AND would lower costs and wage bills.

    @Rick W...you are not obligated to pay anything for me. I'd LOVE to be able to pay for my own health care, education for my kids, etc., but those too are government-enforced monopolies.

  • ShortSummer

    50 weeks ago

    The value of unions

    Without unions, we'd likely have no weekends, no maternity leave (teachers: remember when women had to resign their job when they were pregnant?), no health and safety regulations, employment insurance, pensions (of any kind), minimum wages, child labour laws (ok, BC is a tad backwards) and more. What do you think will happen as the unions in Canada/USA shrink?

    All you business owners, who spends money in your businesses? How many of them make a 'middle class wage' either directly or indirectly because of a union?

    Without organized labour, we'll all suffer.

    "First they came for the ....." When will we stand up? Will it be too late??

    Don't give up CUPW!

  • onthebay

    50 weeks ago

    Kreditanstalt

    So, you want remote, rural areas to pay more for their use of the mail system? It isn’t Vancouver revenues supporting BC - it’s all the rural areas revenues supporting Vancouver. How much more do you want from the sweat off our backs? We hicks already pay through the nose to support downtown highway, skytrain, convention centre, etc. infrastructure we will never use, and of course there was the big “O” that we couldn’t even dream of attending. We even pay through the nose on HST because we happen to live where the base costs are astronomical compared to “downtown.” And then you begrudge us a level playing field cost for mail delivery, which is vital to our existence (not just a 24-7 psychological addiction to some electronic device that you MUST have in order to “feel real” or to feel you are “really doing something!”)?

  • nic

    50 weeks ago

    Nice..........

    What we are led to believe is that the Canadian Postal Service is a money losing corporation. Actually, it is a money making business! It owns Purolator, it has a thriving internet devision and product selling base. Why do you think boxes & wrapping cost so much?
    What is wrong with people making a fair wage anymore? It costs more than half of your salary to pay for rent (let alone afford a morgage!) It is hard enough to afford to live - forget about saving for a retirement.
    Want to take the tax payer for a real ride? Have huge businesses pay little tax in the guise of creating lots of jobs!!! (Not!)Let politicians leave office with healthy golden parachutes. But let a worker earn a fair wage and a few holidays....... absolutely satanic! Bad for the economy! Bad for our country!

  • tobeornottobe

    50 weeks ago

    Junk Mail

    In response to Karen D's letter("Average wage in Canada") indicating that letter carriers are often physically and mentally challenged. This is in great part due to the huge amount of junk mail which letter carriers are required to carry and distribute. Junk mail has no place in a letter carrier's portfolio. Over the past few years my family and neighbors have been the recipients of misdirected personal mail(goodness knows how much of my mail has been misdirected to other addresses and not come to our attention) due, in the main, to the letter carrier being incumbered with delivering junk mail. It is time to get rid of the junk mail and assign it to private carriers.

  • Asif

    50 weeks ago

    Classic

    Classic straw-man argument from a unionist. Avoid the issue, call people radicals because they have a different opinion, and meander off into unionist philosophy. And for all the people touting $25 as the average hourly wage, thats an average, not a mean, the majority of Canadians doing service jobs make much less.

  • Jerry Munro

    50 weeks ago

    More on Bullshit "Free Markets"... That Cost Big Time.

    I'm not going to get into the actual figures, because the evidence has been so much around us of recent late crises prone Casino Capitalism, but no institution in society gets more subsidies and government assistance as a kind of "welfare" in a multitude of forms and models than... yup, the proverbial so-called, but bullshit "Free Market" and the enterprises of capitalism. And the bigger they are, the more their faces are pushed deep into the public trough, just sucking it up.

    First, there is no evidence that the public postal service is a money loser... even after opening up courier competition and privatizing those parts that were amongst the most profitable. First evidence is, the so-called "free market" media wouldn't send up such a whining howl every time it looks like the system might go down, crying inconvenience and money losses. Which itself should clue us all into the real story.

    No. What is really at work here is... the "free market" wants an "additional subsidy" in the form of the whole business being privatized or broken up and contracted out piecemeal to it... As a public gift that will wind up costing the working class public more, once "free enterprise" winds up getting their greedy hooks into it, and proceeds to make it a "private wealth" generator for themselves.

    If one hasn't learned yet from the recent economic crises history of late capitalism, what it is really all about, and just how "free" it isn't, then you've been walking around the whole time with your head up that place where the sun never shines.

    "The System" of capitalism, even on a global scale, wants to do to the public Postal Corp what it has been doing to all the hard won and built publicly owned and financed assets of societies, from medical, through postal and ALL other public services upon which society as a whole is dependant: They want to make them addition "private" wealth generators for global corporate capitalism.

    And as Deak says and I echo all the time here, the only real way that wealth is secured is by stealing share from others, one's own people, the working class, and creating poverty in its wake, or by stealing it as excessive and obscene resource theft from nature, and the peoples of weaker and poorer foreign lands as cheap labour and resource theft as well.

    Of course the system is economic crises and war prone. It works hard to create and maintain the conditions of social and economic instability out of which both arise.

    And then it builds bigger and more prisons and armies to control it all.

    I think I'll have a cup of that coffee I smell percolating. Maybe one or two of you should as well. :-)

  • Jerry Munro

    50 weeks ago

    The Rugged Individualist of "Free Market" Capitalism...

    If you are in business, start your search for State Welfare here... and each province has their own "welfare programmes" for the "free market" rugged individualists... all at "public" expense, of course.

    http://www.canadabusiness.ca/eng/search/sof/

    Then wander through here to feed at this trough... again, just for a feast starter.

    http://www.trra.ca/en/reports/BusinessProgramsFed.asp

  • socstudent

    50 weeks ago

    @Kreditanstalt

    Canada post is the dominant letter carrier but that does not mean that it is subsidized. Monopoly does not equal subsidized. There is no connection between the two. The reality is that as a profitable crown corporation, the CPC pays dividends and we, Canada, actually make money from Canada Post.

    At 59 cent a stamp, how can you even argue
    "This has resulted in unnecessarily high mailing costs for the public".

  • socstudent

    50 weeks ago

    @Kreditanstalt

    Just did a quick comparison between Canada Post and Fedex rates from NS to downtown Ottawa with exact same parameters (size and weight). Both guarantee 2 day delivery
    Fedex 109.93
    Canada Post 64.24
    how again is Canada Post expensive??

  • G West

    50 weeks ago

    Kreditanstalt... 21 hours ago

    "...forced at gunpoint..."

    You must be joking man!

    If you don't want to use the post office - DON'T.

    No one is stopping you - at gunpoint or in any other way.

    Your comment is offensive hyperbole.

    The fact is, Canada Post is a profitable semi-autonomous corporation.

    If you don`t believe me, look at the facts:
    http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/20/cashing-in-on-mail/

    Why should not the employees who make that profitability possible have a share of those profits through a rise in wages...

    Please explain...

  • Jerry Munro

    50 weeks ago

    Private vs Public Carrier Costs...

    I do some serious backcountry horseback riding, and from time to time buy horse tack for that pursuit which is difficult to impossible to get here at all... in small town, known to me. And I always try to buy Canadian first. But periodically I buy stuff online out of the US. Which if it is being shipped USPS and Canada Post, is invariably as quick or quicker, and considerable cheaper over especially UPS, whom I'm more familiar with,... who always tacks on additional "brokerage and handling fees" of no small amount. Indeed, after having been burned a few time by these "private" carriers, I now invariably back out of a purchase where they are the shipper, and the seller can't or won't send it by USPS/ Canada Post.

    Indeed, I just did that with an online business called Backcountry Outfitters Supply in the US... who changed their shipper to USPS/ Canada Post for this shipment, to suit me.

    The reality is, public postal services nearly everywhere known to me, all again known to me, are in fact money generators for the public purse, and are invariably cheaper and a better service... while still providing decent wages and conditions to their workers. (And being a retired worker myself, I like that.)

    The notion that capitalist enterprises are better and cheaper is one of the system's own self-created and enduring myths, even with the public purse/ welfare available to them. And that's with more typically than not, the cheaper labour, very often minimum wage labour of their employees with little or no choice in the matter. And we again, the Public, pickup and pay for the social costs of that cheap and minimum wage poor labour... another subsidy to the bullshit mythology of capitalism.

    You rwingers are living, or would have us workers live at least, in a fantasy land of your creation... bearing no resemblance at all to the actual lived reality.

  • RickW

    50 weeks ago

    Kreditanstalt

    Quote:
    Canada Post has a monopoly over the domestic letter-mail market - a massive subsidy

    Not much different than any monopoly patent enjoyed by Big Pharma. And you neglected to give your opinion on a privatized military.....

    If you want free enterprise, then by all means let it be free. But please, none of this "picky/choosy" stuff.

  • RickW

    50 weeks ago

    sooke

    Quote:
    Then we can let them sink or swim in the free market, and welcome Canada Post employees back to the real world

    I will posit the same question I have of Kreditanstalt, namely can you tell me why the military and police services should not be subject to the same conditions you would like to see of the postal service?

    Or are you one of those people who like to pick and choose what you want as free enterprise, and what you want as monopolies? And if so, I would appreciate if you could tell me why some should be monopolies and some shouldn't.

  • Kreditanstalt

    50 weeks ago

    sooke got it right...

    Short answer: ALL these involuntary and inefficient "services" should be put out to tender!

    And I'd like to add a few more, too: garbage collection, fire, medical, private education, road maintenance, ferries, the works...

    What are you afraid of? Paying your own way? Having a choice of services and prices? A choice of whether or not to use them at all?

    We sure as hell don't have anything even remotely like "unfettered capitalism" in this country, do we? But that's the beauty of the system - everyone thinks they get more out of it than they put in...and the endless creeping redistribution of other peoples' money just goes on and on and on - until either the currency's purchasing power collapses or the entire private sector just throws up its hands and retires while unemployment soars...

    So let's introduce some freedom into this mess. Then we'd know who can pay their own way and who's been swimming naked...

  • socstudent

    50 weeks ago

    How is the postal service

    How is the postal service 'inefficient' and what would you describe 'efficiency' as? If you mean providing a cheap service then that perfectly describes Canada Post. From my personal experience and from all of my research Canada post is in most situations the cheapest option.
    You seem to love the buzz words: efficiency, freedom. How does what you are suggesting in any way reflect or create freedom? Maybe if by freedom you mean choice and even that is a stretch. The kind of system you envision is prone to unregulated monopolies. Canada Post has a monopoly on letter mail but as it is regulated their stamps cost a measly 59 cents. So in the end of your scenario there really would be no choice and there goes your beloved efficiency.

  • zalm

    50 weeks ago

    Jerry

    Yer finest words:
    "The notion that capitalist enterprises are better and cheaper is one of the system's own self-created and enduring myths, even with the public purse/ welfare available to them."

    It isn't always true that government can do it better or cheaper either, but the tools are certainly there if the ability is. And we're certainly not paying the going rate for strong ability in government these days, as I can well attest....

  • G West

    50 weeks ago

    Thank God

    Thank God we don't have 'unfettered capitalism' in this country - the 'fettered' kind is bad enough.

    IN fact what's really WRONG with this country is that capitalists expect, and get, the benefits of socialism WITHOUT paying their own way AND, when things get tough they can count that a compliant government will show up and bail out their lazy asses.

    IT's only the working classes which pay their own way - the capitalists get pretty much a free ride.

    And that notion that raising minimum wages will result in failed businesses and fewer jobs isn't supported with any real evidence either.

    You might want to do a little reading Kreditanstalt.

    You could start here:
    http://epi.3cdn.net/69f6625aa0868c59ab_1rm6bnk93.pdf

  • zalm

    50 weeks ago

    Economists the world over note

    ... that there are lots of cases where competition, especially in the private market, does not result in driving prices down, or improving service. Most of those cases involve services such as civil security (police and justice), where duplication and competition only diminishes the effectiveness of the results and increases costs, as each case must be attended to individually, and economies of scale don't work.

    Other cases include situations where installed infrastructure required to provide the service is so prohibitively expensive that the only entities capable of doing so are national ones, such as wireline service (telephone companies). Our compromise has been to have private business provide that service under monopoly licence with federal oversight. It hasn't worked very well, but I submit (and economists like Sopher and Ferguson agree) that it's better than two or more competing monsters gobbling up resources and leaving some distant areas un-serviced while profitable urban areas get overserved. That's the Afghanistan solution.

    The jury's out on the medical service - we seem to be able to paper over the inequities in the current system by allowing some competition to provide better service, and letting donations and fundraising make up the difference in access for the truly tragic cases. But it's certainly not equitable, not anywhere in the country.

    The legal system? Fuggeddaboutit. Private competition for representation, single-payer judgement - a hopeless case. Shoulda been the other way around. Allow representation to stand on the facts instead of the theatrical talents of the lawyer, and let the most talented judges craft the finest solutions.

    RickW brings up a very good point. How can competition benefit the military? Only in procurement, as already occurs. In service delivery? Not at all.

    Over and over again, you find that where national standards are set, that often the service delivery portion can only be effectively delivered by a single entity with proper oversight, and in cases like that, no competition is possible.

    Not to put too fine a point on it, but for large enterprises, competition doesn't work very well anyway, as most corporate energy is directed toward monopoly behaviour. This is the purpose of marketing and patent law. This is not at odds with corporate governance, which demands the most profit be earned for the least input of resources, and it's only because corporate governance has not been able to totally subsume the energies of government to its own agenda that we, the people, still retain a scant dollop of freedom doled out with our meager rations of daily drudgery. Let us not mistake, though, that the fix is in. The corporation, as a person, has more rights than we humans do. The corporation can never die. That's why it must be killed off.

  • zalm

    50 weeks ago

    Fii

    Teaching is another one of those services where competition doesn't naturally help. The inspiration for good instruction or tutoring comes naturally out of the individual, not out of the paycheque or the employer.

    While we search for the proper solution to that debacle, enjoy your tutoring, and I bow to you for continuing your choice of profession. I know from trying to teach aspiring engineers how truly difficult the education process is. How much easier simply to grab the tool and do it myself....

  • sheppy

    50 weeks ago

    Thanks

    Thank You for your support Murray Dobbin.

    Canadian Postal workers Thank You and keep up the good work.

  • Jerry Munro

    50 weeks ago

    The Failed Private Corporate and State Capitalism Models...

    "It isn't always true that government can do it better or cheaper either, but the tools are certainly there if the ability is. And we're certainly not paying the going rate for strong ability in government these days, as I can well attest...." Zalm.

    Your point is well taken also. What we currently call "public", or more accurately in my view, "State Enterprises", have their problems too... An over tendency, not entirely unlike the so-called "private sector" to rely on "the public purse" to bail it out and "top heavy bureaucratism". This latter which personnel and cash starves the actual delivery of service and efficiency at the bottom "production" end.

    In any case which is why, while I "generally" favour current "public" over "private", especially in the social services sector, I really think that in the final analysis, the contradictions of the current socio-economic "capitalist" model will only be resolved by "democratizing" both parts of it. Which better "self-enforces" efficiencies of resources and "the people" working and managing economic affairs in their own/collective interest... for which consequences they pay as a result of any failure to do so. Which is now only imposed on them from the "outside", when the greed systems of "private wealth accumulation" built into capitalism fail... as they are currently.

    Rather than "nationalization" in the old "socialist/communist" sense, OR currently failing capitalism, it is my view we need a quite different and "democratic" arrangement of ownership, management and direction of the economy, as a starting point for the improved "democratization" of all the other social and political levels of society. Which would "tend" to squeeze out the current damaging inequities that result from "private wealth accumulation" preoccupation and at least better create a sense of "shared" responsibility.

    Both "private corporate" and "State ownership and direction" of the economy maintain the same alienated and alienating features of the economy, isolated from and isolating any sense of real "ownership" for both positive and negative consequences
    of economic decisions and actions on the part of the working class masses. This is now not working already, again, for the umpteenth time in capitalist history, and will less so in the already environmentally failing future.

    If there is a solution to current economic, social, environmental and political problem realities of both Private Corporate and State Capitalism (often describe mistakenly as "socialism"), in my view, it lies not in trying to re-inflate the already bursting bubble of capitalism, but through a radical "democratization" of economic as well as socio-political life.

  • RickW

    50 weeks ago

    Kreditanstalt

    Quote:
    So let's introduce some freedom into this mess. Then we'd know who can pay their own way and who's been swimming naked...

    Can you point to any nation that does this? Or have you been into Ayn Rand again?

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.