Canada's new environment minister could have acknowledged the facts. Instead, we get slippery spin.
Behind in his oil sands report reading.

-
-
Better to describe Canada's oil sands crude as 'the devil's tears.'
-
As beatings and killings mount in Honduras, President Zelaya's wife joins critics of Canada's approach.
Within hours of being sworn in as Canada's new environment minister, Peter Kent didn't talk about deformed fish, acid rain, disappearing woodland caribou, or large lakes of toxic mining waste.
Oddly enough, the former newscaster mostly avoided any mention of his ministerial mandate including water conservation or enhancing "the quality of the natural environment."
Instead, the Tory politician, sounding like a grossly overpaid oil patch lobbyist, declared bitumen, an extremely dirty hydrocarbon, a gift to morality and economy.
Performing like a late night infomercial host, Kent then pronounced the polluting mining enterprise three things it really is not: ethical, regulated and secure.
Just when the nation needs an informed advocate for freshwater, wildlife and renewable energy, the Harper government has given us another fossil salesman as glib as former BP's Tony Hayward.
Morality sound bites
Appointing a former newscaster with great media savvy to champion a dirty resource in a ministry designed to protect the environment is a stroke of genius. It's also something you'd expect Nigeria, Russia or Venezuela to do. But Canada's descent into the smelly hell of petro politics seems irreversible.
Let's begin with the morality issue first. Calling bitumen "ethical" (which our Prime Minister now has done as well) is about as ridiculous as describing the Kardashian sisters as either virtuous or intellectual.
Kent, of course, has pulled the silly label from the mouth of Conservative propagandist Ezra Levant, a former tobacco lobbyist and a timely master of inaccurate statements.
According to Levant rapid bitumen production is "ethical" because it lessens our dependence on bloody oil from the Middle East.
But the facts tell a different story. After ten years of dirty oil production, half the country (eastern Canada) remains more dependent on blood-soaked stuff from Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Algeria than the United States, bitumen's core market. How ethical is that?
Canada's bitumen miners also look more like the Wild Bunch than Mother Teresa. The forest diggers includes BP, which polluted the Gulf of Mexico; Exxon Mobil, which has funded attacks on climate science; and Total, which supports Burmese dictators. Another investor, PetroChina, is well known for its crude conscience in Africa.
So when the nation's environment minister can't admit that oil is all about making money with often perilous disregard for the social, political and environmental consequences, Canada has once again told the world that it is just another petro state with an unhealthy addiction to oil revenue and bold-faced lies.
Recommended reading for Kent
Kent's misinformed declarations about regulation also won't impress his global peers or ordinary Canadians. Instead of citing Levant's ethically-challenged analysis, Kent should have quoted the 2010 fall report released by the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development.
Unlike Levant, the auditor can only publish 100 per cent verifiable facts. He reported that Environment Canada has "insufficient data to monitor oil sands development" as well as "threats related to population growth and economic development."
Moreover, Environment Canada's only water quality monitoring station downstream of the project had, as of June 2010, "no baseline measures or long-term data to track changes in water quality and aquatic ecosystem health in the river associated with oil sands development."
Futhermore, the Oil Sands Advisory Panel found water monitoring for the project, the only basis for sound regulation, to be neither credible nor trustworthy.
Kent also called the mining dragon, which often erupts in spectacular explosions and fires, "secure." As recent events attest, financial and energy consultants mistake bigness for security. But the truth is this: improbable events often topple big enterprises. In fact Titanic scale engineering projects, from BP's Horizon project to Enron, court incredible insecurity.
Patsy for price shocks
Because of its complexity and scale, the oil sands now produces the world's most expensive crude. Bitumen, in turn, sets the marginal price for oil. As such the project is insanely vulnerable to oil price shocks.
Bitumen's long supply chains (the project relies on some of the world's longest oil pipelines) are also damned brittle. Just two modest leaks on Enbridge-owned pipelines last year created refinery shortages throughout the U.S. Midwest and even upped the price of oil.
Rethink how we use oil sands
Now Canadians, a practical mining people with a ho-hum environmental record at best, don't trust bitumen salesmen anymore than they do green utopians.
At the end of the day, Alberta's junk crude, a screaming signature of peak oil, remains a strategic resource that should serve as a continental bridge to a low carbon economy. Furthermore, energy transitions take decades not years. This reality alone makes superior environmental performance in the oil sands not a rhetorical luxury or propaganda item, but an issue of critical national importance.
But until a Canadian environment minister seriously reduces CO2 pollution in real time with a national carbon tax, or defends freshwater with a verifiable federal monitoring program, or champions the health of people and wildlife downstream of the oilsands by upholding federal laws, the project will remain a national embarrassment.
Thanks to a decade of well-documented federal negligence the world's largest energy project has already become a stark global mirror of how ugly and dishonest Canadians can be.
It now looks like things will get much worse. ![[Tyee]](http://thetyee.cachefly.net/ui/img/ico_fishie.png)
28
Login or register to post comments
Skywalker
2 years ago
Integrity for sale?
I noticed that with his appointment they talked about how he was one of the first to draw attention to climate change. He sure has changed his tune but then "He who pays the piper calls the tune."
G West
2 years ago
In this government
That's what he is.
'A grossly overpaid oil patch lobbyist.'
What else would you expect from this facile excuse for a prime minister?
Observationalist
2 years ago
Sounds like Andrew Nikiforuk
Sounds like Andrew Nikiforuk is a die-hard radical subversive who has no genuine interest in Canada's welfare. His article is very slanted from beginning to end, and is delibertly misleading, but then goes over the edge into outright fraud. The more of this...the less folk will bother to read the Tyee.
[OBSERVATIONALIST, IF YOU HAVE SPECIFIC ISSUES WITH ANY PART OF THE ARTICLE, PRESENT THOSE HERE. WITHOUT DETAILING SPECIFIC PROBLEMS, YOUR COMMENT READS AS NOTHING MORE THAN AN ATTEMPT TO SMEAR A TYEE WRITER, WHICH WILL NOT BE ALLOWED IN THIS FORUM. -MODERATOR]
sdgreen
2 years ago
Nonsense
Once again we see radicalist prose, without balance and one dimensional thinking from this author.
The reality is that Canada and other nations will be using petroleum products for some time to come. Alternatives like nuclear energy will take a considerable time to construct, and solar or wind generation is basically a bust. The only other option is to try geo thermal or increase water based hydro generation.
Power has to come from somewhere so far the alternatives are not yet ready for prime time.
seth
2 years ago
Nuke the tar sands.
All Candu builds in the last twenty years have been done in 4 years on time and on budget at $2B/Gw . Clean green energy cheaper than any alternative.
With 8 of the new model ACR-1000's replacing natural gas in the tar sands, tar sands crude would be a clean as Saudi light. Payback would be under 5 years on that investment.
Unfortunately Big Oil is also terrified that folks will find out that it is feasible to replace their sickening pollution spewing economy wrecking product with mass produced nuclear power with a payback period on the investment of only three years.
They've hired Stevey "Brimstone's" Harper's fascist government to sell off AECL and sell out our country for campaign donations and promises of lucrative Jim Prentice type post political job offers. Canada's energy and industrial future depends on giving them the boot.
The Fiberals believe in nuclear power and a clean energy future for Canada. They deserve your vote.
dashwood
2 years ago
was the peter principle
was the peter principle named for kent?
past time to dump harper and all of his propaganda spouting, lying, incompetent appointees.
jacksonupnorth
2 years ago
So Typical
I'm sure when Peter Kent was appointed he was told how to act and what was expected of him by Harper. I really believe that when Jim Prentice turned down the application for Fish Lake that he knew he was defying his own government. It was his parting gift to Canada before he accepted his new job. It is obvious that the Federal Government and the Oil and Gas industry are a very powerful team. We will have to do everything we can to save this country from them.
realisticman
2 years ago
Argue about Semantics
That's fine. That's what academics love to do. Enjoy yourself and sanitize or demonize as you wish. Meanwhile, just up the road, business is booming.
"CALGARY - Investment in Alberta's oilsands is set to reach a whopping $180 billion over the next decade, peaking at 20 per cent more than was spent during the height of the last boom, according to Peters & Co.
Strong and sustained oil prices in the $75 to $90 US per barrel range and increased interest from deep-pocketed foreign investors such as state-owned PetroChina and France's Total are leading the charge in renewed interest in the resource, the Calgary-based investment house said. ...
Other analysts anticipate even larger investments, with BMO Capital Markets forecasting $20-billion worth of investment in the oilsands this year.
The financial house estimates investment in Alberta's oilsands will peak at $29.9 billion by 2015.
"The peak keeps getting pushing out, but there could be a new peak, assuming we get the continued strength in oil prices," analyst Mike Mazar said. ..."
Read more: http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/Report+predicts+180B+oilsands+spending/4073630/story.html#ixzz1ASZK0s55
That's what some people call Peak Oil.
YCSTS
2 years ago
The Natural Energy of the Universe
Great article, Andrew. But in order to not be labeled a hypocrite, you need to support viable alternatives to the Tar Sands.
Here is your opportunity to hit the Oilies hard, right where it hurts the most, by embracing the ONLY viable alternative to Oil - Nuclear Energy. Do it Andrew. Join James Cameron and James Lovelock. DO THE RIGHT THING.
James Lovelock, the World's Foremost Environmentalist, calls Nuclear Energy "The Natural Energy of the Universe":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOaDY13bI84&feature=player_embedded
realisticman
2 years ago
Natural Energy
Don't forget to include Stewart Brand, one of the original environmentalists. Recently he gave a presentation at the new Woodwards theatre.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whole_Earth_Discipline
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stewart_Brand
Bob Wiley
2 years ago
Geothermal, catch the wave of the future.
Canada has the world's largest tar sands deposits, Venezuela is second. These two countries and the extraction methods they allow will dictate the size of the human carbon foot print upon the planet in the future. Canada, because of its oil industry friendly laws, is ahead of Venezuela on the tar sands extraction curve and far ahead of the yanks who come #3 in the bitumen blessing lottery.
Canadians are some world's best at advanced exploration and drilling technologies, members of the Canadian Geothermal Energy Association (CanGEA) also produce more than 20 per cent of the world's geothermal energy. They just don't do it in Canada...yet. Canada can and must lead the way by investing public money in geothermal energy production in Alberta's tar sands. If they do, the Orinoco in Venezuela will follow, so to will Utah.
Real wealth, real social justice requires ecological sustainability to better our and our family's well being into the future, and isn't that our only real job, bettering the world for those from whom we are borrowing it. Geothermal's got the right stuff, its energy is constantly and evenly available 24/7/365, it's power can just as easily converted to electricity as steam heat, it can crack the water molecule to provide hydrogen for future trains, buses and trucks. Geothermal, catch the wave of the future.
G West
2 years ago
Simple stuff really.
Canada needs to stop exporing oil. Husband our own resources for our own needs and to encourage a self-sufficient market here at home.
For the good of the country and to sustain the future of the planet.
Turning thousands of hectares of land into garbage, rivers and lakes into sewers and cesspools does the 'world' NO GOOD.
All for the profit of a tiny elite.
Give your heads a shake - the Tar Sands and the way they are being exploited is an ethical and moral black hole in the center of the country.
realisticman
2 years ago
Let's face it.
You've a better chance of bumping into Elvis at the Thrifty Foods you shop in than for Canada to stop exporting oil. Even Iggy is nowhere near that bonkers. Bounce it off Tommy Chong, you might get a taker there.
Van Isle
2 years ago
Our Governments behave like
Our Governments behave like a Banana Republic, just without the bananas. They've got their noses so far up corporations asses they'll need a surgeon to be removed. People should be reminded on how Mr. Kent behaved (like an American puppet) over the military coup in Honduras.
seth
2 years ago
Geothermal
Current geothermal plant are the low hanging fruit like Geysers in Ca. that have been working for years or remote locations where a hot spring exists and diesel is the only alternative. Also super expensive but common is geothermal enhanced heat pumps (powered with nuclear).
Mass large scale gigawatt level geothermal energy requires drilling deep into the earth injecting water and pumping supercritical steam to the surface with not yet invented high temperature/pressure pumps driving generators. Injecting water into superheated rock causes fracturing which seems to cause earthquakes. The cost to date is enormous many times that of nuclear, hydro, solar, or wind. In fact BCHydro (google again) has a list of only only 8 sites that may eventually produce some geothermal power, this in an area with lots of volcanoes. They tried one them and the costs were enormous.
The big geothermal boom will come at enormous cost sometime too late way in the future when they can drill fracture and pump and without causing earthquakes.
Your car will be powered by a Mr. Fusion device long before large scale geothermal becomes viable.
samuidave (not verified)
2 years ago
Another double-talking politician ....
serving his Party masters command, believing all the propaganda we are all feed? Oh, no, say it isn't true!
G West actually makes the point very well:
RickW
2 years ago
I said it before..........
.......and I'll say it again:
If we are exporting the oil from the tar sands, we should also be exporting the tailing ponds.
But seriously G. West, do you think our "best friends, trading partners, neighbours, etc, yada, yada, yada" would LET US turn off the tap?
Also, merely as an observation, our beloved PM doesn't give a rat's ass about Canada's export industry, preferring to see it ground into the dirt due to a rising petro dollar, rather than contain the price of oil - which is (contrary to the rightista "free marketeers" insistence) immune to market forces.
albert
2 years ago
Kent
"Oddly enough, the former newscaster mostly avoided any mention of his ministerial mandate including water conservation or enhancing "the quality of the natural environment."...
Good God, Andrew! There isn't the slightest thing odd about the fact Kent, 'avoided', mention of his mandate. He's there to do precisely that - avoid mention, discussion, debate, responsibility. Kent is a poster droid whose job is to regurgitate Harperisms.
freebear
2 years ago
Politicians-Avoidance experts
Next-water boarding now uses oil instead of water-its ethical eh!
G West
2 years ago
Actually - Rick W -
Yes I do. I think we could turn off the tap AND make the point that it was the environmentally right thing to do at the same time.
The US has never been weaker - the Chinese never stronger and the climate for real change never better.
There are mainstream ads in the USA right now urging Americans to change their behavior and their tourist destinations because of the effects of TAR SANDS oil.
We should use what resources we have to stimulate our own industrial economy - not to subsidize that of other nations at the expense of both local jobs and the environment.
BC Blue
2 years ago
Nikiforuk and Greenpeace
I just read that Nikiforuk is paid to lobby for Greenpeace. Why isn't this mentioned by the Tyee in a disclaimer so its readers have an idea where this "journalist's" bias and allegiances are?
Conductor274
2 years ago
Harper's residence
So Harper and his new environment minister Kent say the oil sands are ethical. Then they should be able to accept a challenge to prove their sincerity and honesty. Let's see both of them live downstream from the tar sands in a community that has to drink the water that comes from those tailing ponds and drink that water for 2-3 weeks. If they can't do this because their jobs require them to be in Ottawa then send their immediate families. Put this challenge to them and watch the rats squirm.
whatthe
2 years ago
nikiforuk and Greenpeace
Is this true?
Greenpeace's lable and brand is so pathetic they now act like Green venture capitalists. Scouring around for anything or anyone that gets any attention or traction then slide in behind the scenes with petro dollars to mute and manipulate.
If Nikiforuk is taking bucks from them it explains his weak kneed mealy mouthed "please slow down" approach.
Why cant someone say it like it is and start clawing back the subsidies and intitiate policies like we say in Kuwait where oil pays government not the other way around.
Talon
2 years ago
Roots
Thanks G West for your comments. I do agree with you with enthusiasm.
As long as private ownership and maximizing profits are the driving forces of our economy what chance has the planet of sending us gently into our oblivion.
Albertans may make their bed but the rest of us have to sleep in it.
plebe
2 years ago
A small correction:
Peter Kent is the new Minister of Environmental Propaganda. The position of Environment Minister has been abolished by order of Our Fearless Leader.
For a better world
2 years ago
BC Blue your souce
BC Blue you may read that Nikiforuk is paid to lobby for Greenpeace.
Please provide a legitimate souce and an appropriate context.
G West
2 years ago
Nikiforuk is not a paid lobbyist.
He is a paid WRITER and researcher.
Greenpeace commissioned him to write the following report:
http://www.greenpeace.org/canada/Global/canada/report/2009/9/tar_sands_report.pdf
You might want to read it.
For a better world
2 years ago
Thanks for the link G West
Thanks for the link G West, I hope BC Blue reads it. Andrew Nikiforuk's message in this report is no different than all of the other articles he has written on the Tar Sands.
The Key Findings that he has specified remain relevant.