News

Save the Sea that Touches BC

That's the bold agenda of Jennifer Lash and her Living Oceans Society.

By Crawford Kilian, 17 Aug 2009, TheTyee.ca

lash.jpg

Lash with coral: "Change wasn't fast enough."

Related

While Vancouver and national media are expressing shock and horror about this month's collapse of the Fraser River sockeye run, an organization up the coast is quietly working to prevent future disasters like this one.

Based in an old house on the main street of Sointula, on Malcolm Island, the Living Oceans Society is promoting an ambitious, made-in-B.C. solution to the problems that beset our coastal waters.

LOS is the creation of its executive director Jennifer Lash, who has been working since 1992 on ocean conservation in British Columbia. In an interview with the Tyee, Lash said that when she arrived here in 1992, most environmental groups were concerned with land issues, especially trees. As a result, she founded LOS in 1998.

In its early years, the society lobbied for 'no-take' marine refuges, but its goals and ambitions have evolved since then. LOS has four major programs: marine protected areas, energy, aquaculture and sustainable fisheries. All of them are involved in promoting a project covering 88,000 square kilometers of coastal and offshore waters: the Pacific North Coast Integrated Management Area.

PNCIMA (pronounced pin-SEE-ma) started in 2002 as a federal Ocean Strategy that called for an integrated management area for the coast. "But 'integrated management' wasn't defined," Lash says. "So it was an opportunity for us to develop a made-in-B.C. solution."

Integrated management now means, in effect, that the people living in the region should decide what happens to it -- whether oil tankers can travel the coast, whether offshore oil and gas drilling will be allowed, how fish farms should operate, and how other industries can prosper within the ecosystem.

Where science and politics meet

Recently, says Lash, the process has made "huge steps." The Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the local First Nations signed an agreement in December 2008. At the first PNCIMA Forum, held in Richmond in March, 300 stakeholders committed to the concept. "The stakeholder engagement process is next," Lash says. This will include community-level meetings and the development of a marine transportation working group.

By the time of the next forum, in the fall of 2010, PNCIMA should have built up a considerable infrastructure of involved and informed coastal communities.

Meanwhile, the Living Oceans Society is active both politically and scientifically. LOS works with a number of other organizations in the Coastal Alliance for Aquaculture Reform. It's also joined the International Union for Conservation of Nature, and endorses programs like SeaChoice, which promotes sustainable seafood production.

New findings on health of coral

In doing its own science, LOS has also made news. In June, the Finding Coral Expedition surveyed the coast by submersible, looking for sites that need to be protected from trawling.

"We're gaining a growing awareness of the role of corals in the health of the ocean," Lash says. "Trawling produces coral as a by-catch. Cold-water corals need to be protected. Change wasn't coming fast enough, so we chose to do the research ourselves."

The expedition returned with good data, she says, and saw some "truly spectacular" sites. It also found some trawl tracks -- areas where the sea bottom was visibly changed.

Fighting for whales and against a fish farm

Armed with such information, the communities and industries in PNCIMA should be able to make wise long-term decisions based on an understanding of the region's ecosystem. "By 2010 we'll have made a start on developing a planning process," Lash says. "By 2012 the process should be established."

In the meantime, Lash and the LOS are working to stop the Gunner Point fish farm, suing to prevent seismic testing that threatens whales, and lobbying against a tar sands pipeline that will put a tanker port on the north coast.

Will LOS get involved in other, land-based environmental issues? Lash says no: "Our commitment runs to the high-tide line."  [Tyee]

10  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • RickW

    2 years ago

    Integrated Management....

    Quote:
    Integrated management now means, in effect, that the people living in the region should decide what happens to it -- whether oil tankers can travel the coast, whether offshore oil and gas drilling will be allowed, how fish farms should operate, and how other industries can prosper within the ecosystem.

    ....should extend as well to land issues, which means, in effect, whether ROR and conventional hydro should go ahead; whether, gas & oil development should proceed; whether mining should occur.

    These issues as well as issues of the sea are far too important to be left to the "absentee landlords" in Victoria.

  • Fish-counter

    2 years ago

    Here we go again...

    If you want to see aquatic protection in force, go to Saskatchewan's provincial parks. I just spent a couple of days fishing in Meadow Lake Provincial Park. It cost a few bucks, but the angling was like something out of the 1950's. And yes, most of the fish caught were released. The ones retained tasted delicious. I am talking Northern pike, Jackfish, aka Esox lucius. Most people throw them all back in disgust.

    Folks in BC need less talk and more action. I have lived here for 15 years and the lack of progress in marine protection is sickening. I would dearly like to live somewhere where people actually mean what they say and where they do at least half of that.

  • Eugene Hunt

    2 years ago

    Living Oceans

    You know, while you had access to Living Oceans, I would think you could have asked some questions that would have de-puffed this piece a little.

    For example, what ever happened to CAAR's salmon farming campaign? Why did Alexandra Morton leave that coalition? Are they still hoping to move some farms to closed containment and consider that victory? Does Living Oceans oppose open-net cage fish farms operating in coastal waters, and if so, why don't they say anything about that anymore?

  • atom1

    2 years ago

    And what about LOS relationship with Marine Harvest?

    Does Living Oceans accept money from Marine Harvest, the world's largest producer of farmed salmon? Is that why we don't hear much from them on Open-net fish farms any more?

  • ShizzleCreek

    2 years ago

    Living Oceans & Sockeye

    Good points on LOS and corporate money.

    I find it amazing that LOS has raised no questions about the potential role of salmon sea lice farms in the collapse of this year's Fraser River sockeye run.

    An astute observer would have slapped down the DFO Canada lame excuse of "poor ocean survival conditions." Funny how ocean conditions had little affect on the record sockeye runs in Alaska this year.

    Is that because Alaska bans open-pen salmon farms? I have to wonder about LOS and their funding.

  • RickW

    2 years ago

    ShizzleCreek

    Quote:
    An astute observer would have slapped down the DFO Canada lame excuse of "poor ocean survival conditions." Funny how ocean conditions had little affect on the record sockeye runs in Alaska this year.

    http://www.harpers.org/archive/2009/05/0082490
    Fast fish, loose fish:
    Who will own Alaska's disappearing salmon?

  • HermanMelville

    2 years ago

    Jennifer Lash LOS

    Fantastic article about this amazing individual and her organisation. Lash walks the walk, not just talks the talk. I look forward to continuing to support LOS and their very important work. Saving the coral beds, stopping seismic blasts that endanger whales and shutting down fish farms are all projects that everyone in Canada should be behind. Way to go Jennifer! Must be that brigantine in your past.

  • ShizzleCreek

    2 years ago

    Back on you, RickW

    RickW, Sorry, but that's a Fail if we are talking 2009 sockeye

    Your Harper's article refers to LAST year's 2008 Yukon River run, not 2009. Moreover, the Yukon River is mainly a chinook, chum and coho fishery, with no significant sockeye harvest.

    Regardless, in 2009 (the relevant year comparison at least), even these Yukon River fisheries showed no sign of 2008 collapse; the data show that harvest and escapement targets were met or exceeded.

    In the case of Fraser River sockeye, the relevant Alaska comparison is the Bristol Bay sockeye harvest (ie the catch) and escapement (i.e., fish that made it to the spawning beds).

    While the Fraser run, has yet to materialize, the main part of the Bristol Bay Sockeye fishery last month, resulted in the harvest of nearly 28 million salmon, by far exceeding the 20-year harvest average of 25 million reds in the world's largest sockeye salmon fishery.

    Moreover, targets for sockeye escapement to spawning grounds were also met or exceeded. See below.

    http://www.alaskajournal.com/stories/071709/fis_img1_001.shtml

    http://www.cf.adfg.state.ak.us/geninfo/finfish/salmon/catchval/blusheet/summary/summary.php

    http://www.cbc.ca/canada/north/story/2009/07/22/yukon-salmon-run.html

    I trust that you are a well-meaning person, but regardless, you are spreading misinformation. Shizzle.

  • atom1

    2 years ago

    To Shizzle...

    Don't get me wrong - LOS seems to be doing a great job.

    But as a look into this, I am a little weirded-out that they seem to be associated Marine Harvest, one of the largest multinational salmon farming companies in the world.

  • news

    2 years ago

    Great work

    Lets all fight to save the seas!

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.