Oceans of Challenges
How BC's enviro groups are working to save sea life.
On World Oceans Day, a daunting agenda.
Last week 70 international academies of science predicted dire consequences for global food production and "dramatic changes in the makeup of ocean biodiversity" unless carbon dioxide emissions -- the cause of ocean acidification -- are cut in half within the next four decades.
But acidification is just one of the problems plaguing the world's oceans. Melting glaciers. Overfishing. Pollution. A fast-growing gyre of plastic debris twice the size of Texas.
And here in British Columbia, we've got our own troubles. In honour of World Oceans Day today, June 8, The Tyee asked several environmental groups to highlight the threats to our coastal ecosystems, and what they are doing to address them.
Voyage to the bottom of the sea
It takes a lot of work to organize a voyage to the bottom of the sea, and Jennifer Lash is awash in last-minute preparations.
The executive director of the Living Oceans Society has been "crazy busy" lately, she says, but any fatigue she might be feeling doesn't dampen her enthusiasm.
On Monday, a team of experts will embark on the first of up to six dives over the next three weeks to find and document deep sea coral off British Columbia's coast. The expedition is funded and organized by Living Oceans.
It's also part of a larger project that Living Oceans and other organizations have been working on for the last three years, known as PNCIMA (pen-SEE-ma) or the Pacific North Coast integrated management area. The area, which stretches from Campbell River to Prince Rupert, is one of the most biodiverse on the planet, and the goal of PNCIMA is to create a conservation plan for the region.
"To me, the plan does two things," says Lash. "It looks at the region and says what activities are appropriate for what areas. We have done this, to some degree on land. We need to take a similar approach on the oceans. We can't allow fishing, tourism, wind farms just anywhere. At the same time, we need to find out where those things might be okay to take place."
The key, says Lash, is getting commitment from all the stakeholders (like the fishing and tourism industries, First Nations) and securing funding from the federal government that will make the planning process worthwhile.
"That process isn't clear yet," she says. "They [the Department of Fisheries and Oceans] committed to doing it, but it's still a bit of an empty shell.
"For the past three years, the Living Oceans Society with partners in the conservation sector has been working hard to get the government to live up to its promise."
Coastal region threatened by oil pipeline, tankers
Even if the process does continue, its objectives could be thwarted by oil and gas development. Charles Campbell, communications director for the Dogwood Initiative, says his organization is focused on stopping the Northern Gateway pipeline project.
The project would transport oil from the Alberta tar sands to Kitimat, on B.C.'s northern coast. It's one piece of a larger system -- including a tanker port in Kitimat -- to move Alberta oil to Asian markets, right through PNCIMA waters. Previous reports on the possibility of a tanker port in Kitimat have suggested that oil spills would be inevitable.
"For the environmental movement in general, a victory against big oil in the tar sands is really what we need right now to show that we can make a difference," said Campbell.
"We feel... the Enbridge project is probably the most winnable, from an environmental point of view, of all the projects currently proposed with the tar sands."
Campell said that Dogwood's strategy for securing a win on this project was "a bit of a secret."
He did assert that "the pipeline can be blocked by a lot of First Nations' opposition. They are coming more and more onside to voice their opposition."
Some First Nations in the region have already taken a stand against the project, and because these groups have legal rights and title, their opposition is risky for investors.
"That notified the oil community, both in Alberta and the purchasers in Asia that this possibly isn't where they want to be putting their money," Campbell says.
The future of salmon
Globally, ocean biodiversity is threatened by overfishing, and here it's no different.
Lash March, Pacific Salmon Forum -- which was commissioned by the provincial government to research ways to enhance sustainability of aquaculture, and to protect and enhance viability of wild salmon stocks -- released its final report and recommendations.
"We're solidly in favour of those recommendations being implemented, and our objective is to try and make sure that government will do that," says John Werring, a marine and freshwater conservation specialist with the David Suzuki Foundation.
The foundation's approach is two-way conversations with government and industry.
"We're trying to talk to the industry, to convince them it's in their best environmental interest to change their practices, and trying to convince government that it's in their best interest to change the way fish farming is done in B.C.," says Werring.
But the provincial government has not yet moved on two of the Pacific Salmon Forum's key recommendations: limiting production and moving towards inland fish farms.
"What the government and industry are doing instead is proposing, or at least industry is requesting, to increase [fish farm] production. And government is seriously considering it... either to double or triple current levels," said Werring.
The desire to expand is "extremely problematic" because it means the possibility of replacing open-net fish farms with closed containment systems is more and more unlikely.
"Industry is saying we can't move to closed containment because there are no known technologies that would produce fish at the current levels," he says. "In the meantime, they want to expand production... That loop will never be closed."
Protests might ramp up
When asked if the two-way dialogue approach could be effective, given the fact that fish farms can't agree on this key issue, Werring says it's possible that more direct action in the form of protests or civil disobedience might be needed.
"We will have to wait and see and cross the bridge when we get to it," he says. "We're trying to take a reasoned, middle-ground approach, recognizing that the industry is here and it creates jobs and stimulates the economy."
"If they do expand by two or three times," adds Werring, "You can basically kiss every wild salmon on this coast goodbye."
Related Tyee stories:
- Save Our Oceans, Eat Like a Pig
Let's stop wasting tasty fish on animal feed. - Earth's Eighth Continent
It swirls. It grows. It's a massive, floating 'garbage patch.' - A Whale of a Love Affai
r (photo essay) The irresistible, but blinding, charm of cetaceans.




8
Login or register to post comments
seth
2 years ago
David "DaGucci" Suzuki Foundation
I noticed a quote from a member of Gordo's environmental wing - the Da Gucci foundation.
If these groups expect any support from their progressive supporters in the general public, they had best make sure odious dark side organizations like DaGucci's and Pembina are excluded from the process.
DaGucci's active support of Gordon Campbell was a big factor in reelecting a fascist government dedicated to fish farm expansion and a tanker port in Kitimat. They are plainly a fascist BCLiberal party front designed to sow dissent and confusion into the environmental movement. It is ridiculous to include them as an "green" organization.
Luke Skywalker
2 years ago
Economic Development and the Environment...
Firstly, Enbridge's $multi-billion$ Northern Gateway pipeline project would provide economic stimulus to the north. I'm all for it. So are the New Democrat Dan Millers of the world.
We already have an oil pipeline traversing BC from Edmonton to Vancouver. No complaints ever heard regarding same.
Well, over the past 25 years, 1,500 tankers carrying petrochemicals entered Kitimat.
In 2008, the Port of Vancouver itself handled more than 250 tankers carrying oil, jet fuel and gasoline.
Nobody seems to complain about those facts.
As for the Living Ocean Society, I would continue to focus on these environmental impacts and ways to mitigate same:
http://www.calgaryherald.com/Technology/Expedition+study+forests+coral/1672499/story.html
VivianLea Doubt
2 years ago
"a reasoned, middle ground approach"?
In the link to Colleen's earlier Tyee article, John Fraser of the Pacific Salmon Forum is quoted:
"If we don't make significant changes in watershed management the long term prognosis is grim. The province cannot afford not to make the changes we propose."
Indeed.
A watershed is an ecosystem: a group of biotic and abiotic components interacting together. The basic “work” of the watershed is to transport sediment, water, and energy, and to generate “products” – form new physical structures (flood plains, channels), biological communities, and new energy outputs. The systems concept is key: it is the sum of all components that generates the work and products of the watershed. The system has a natural organization and order, but also experiences change and disturbance at varying levels. It is hypothesized that systems with intermediate levels of disturbance are highest in diversity: few species can successfully colonize areas of frequent or intense disturbances (floods or other phenomenon), while areas of low disturbance appear to be dominated by a few very successful species.
The basic structure of the watershed is flowing rivers and streams, and still wetlands and lakes; lotic and lentic waters. Energy is fixed primarily within still waters themselves, but in flowing water energy is fixed primarily in the watershed. The flow of energy and nutrients are cyclic: in watersheds the matter does not return to the spot where it came from, but it is an open-ended system none the less. Nutrients “spiral” back and forth from the water, to aquatic and terrestrial organisms, and the soil in the flow corridor: movement downstream as well as laterally. Energy is cycled through trophic levels – a very complex food web – with typically 10% of the energy being converted from level to level. Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus form the most important biogeochemical cycles.
The importance of recognizing the watershed as an ecosystem is first, to acknowledge its hugely complex web of interrelationships, and second, to apply the ecosystem approach to its management. Some salient features of the ecosystem approach are noted:
A watershed is managed for all of its resources, not any single one;
A watershed is managed as a whole entity; recognizing its boundaries are naturally defined, not human created;
A watershed is managed for the long term at a variety of scales and time dimensions;
A watershed is managed with the input of all people affected; social/economic/environmental information is integrated;
A watershed is managed to maintain or increase its productive capacity for the future.
There are few examples of this kind of watershed management, unfortunately.
So what good does the reasoned, middle gound approach do if we protect jobs and destroy the very underpinning of those jobs - the entirety of vast resources of BC (including the oceans)that depend on the watersheds of BC?
Chris H
2 years ago
Suzuki Foundation
It sure looked like the Suzuki Foundation was supporting the BC Liberals during the provincial election. What did they think was going to happen? That Gordon Campbell was going to throw some of his bigger donaters, the farmed fish industry, under the bus? How dare they bother to bring this up now ... after the election! Sorry, but I don't see the Suzuki Foundation having a lot of credibility anymore when it comes to "protesting" moves by the BC Liberals.
NicS
2 years ago
Privatizing the MOE
Actually, (pardon the sarcasim) DSF is now Campbell's new MOE. As we all know, the Ministry of Environment has had its' budgets devastated over the years, so privatizing the MOE by replacing it with the David Suzuki Foundation seems to fit perfectly with Campbell's plan to privatize our province. It's brilliant, Gordo gets rid of a formally or potential thorn in his side and Suzuki gets to pretend he has the best and only ideas on how to save the province of BC.
Some things never change!
oceanjames
2 years ago
Coral Finders
Folks might be interested in this compelling start to the Finding coral expedition:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ua0_KhRugzk
ME2
2 years ago
Forestry 101, 2009 edition.
In his / her excellent post above, VivianLea asks:
"So what good does the middle ground, reasoned approach do if we protect jobs and destroy the very underpinning of those jobs...."
Glad you asked, Vivian. Clearly you haven't been listening to Campbell's Forestco good buddies.
Why, privatise the forests, of course, since "government" can't manage them properly.
See? You haven't been listening, have you?
And who's gonna be first? I hear the Nisgaa have some ideas about that.....
morechatter
2 years ago
Oil Spills
Do the respective agencies have what it takes to respond before anymore serious damage can be done to wild life and fish when there is a spill?
I understand every when the necessary measures are put into place things still happen. I remember an article in the Tyee where that very thing happened. Its worthy of any additional efforts to make it as spill proof as possible or you would think given the hazards of such a spill on the environment.