News

Surrey Goes up Against the Sprawl

Mayor Watts is running on a big vision of a dense downtown, a plan singed by halted projects and bad fire.

By Geoff Dembicki, 11 Nov 2008, TheTyee.ca

Dianne Watts

Watts announces green zone, backed by Transportation Minister Kevin Falcon.

I'm scarcely 30 seconds into my interview with Surrey Mayor Dianne Watts when she decides I have a big city bias.

We've just entered her expansive city hall office and my eyes are fixed on a floor-to-ceiling window that looks onto a small park filled with the bright colours of autumn.

"It's pretty nice here," I remark.

Watts' mouth opens in mock astonishment.

"Pretty nice?!" she exclaims. "What were you expecting?"

I'd been referring not just to the park, but the entire area of South Surrey where city hall is located. Driving into town, I'd passed stands of second growth coniferous forest and open farmlands criss-crossed by narrow streams. It's true what the mayor was suggesting -- not quite the picture of suburban sprawl I'd anticipated.

Watts has bigger goals in mind, though, than pointing out the overlooked beauty of an urban centre that's often viewed as a second tier community on the fringes of Vancouver. With Surrey's population set to meet or surpass Vancouver's by 2040, and a large-scale revitalization of the downtown core in the works, she's intent on turning a Lower Mainland suburb into one of the province's most important cities.

But to be successful, she'll have to face up to some serious growing pains.

Two massive housing developments risk bankruptcy while another burned down last month. And the Gateway project and proposed Skytrain extension threaten to increase sprawl and sideline sustainable development.

Watts toppled former mayor Doug McCallum's decade-long dynasty in the 2005 election, and she's a strong candidate to hold power on Nov. 15. Nobody doubts she's created a new political landscape during her last three years in office. But if she's able to beat Green Party challenger Murray Weisenberger next Saturday, can she reshape an entire city?

Predecessor was 'bullying'

Watts and I sit on comfortable high-backed chairs as the early morning sun begins to light her office. Dressed in bright red pants and jacket, the mayor appears to relish her independence, a political bent that's served her well in office.

Watts entered Surrey politics in 1996 when the Surrey Electors Team (SET), a right-of-centre political party headed by Doug McCallum, broke onto the electoral map. Voted in as a SET councillor, Watts served under McCallum's mandate until 2003, when the former mayor invoked controversy by heavily criticizing the RCMP. He believed the Surrey detachment was hurting the city's image by releasing too many crime statistics to the public.

Watts butted heads with McCallum on the issue and quit SET shortly after.

"McCallum had a style that was very... um... what's the word... bullying," she says.

Two years later, Watts ran as an independent and went head-to-head with McCallum in a municipal race many observers figured was near impossible to win. McCallum had waged a major crime crackdown in the rundown Whalley neighbourhood during his last term and had proven to be a popular -- if controversial -- mayor for the last nine years. But growing opposition over urban sprawl-style development in South Surrey coupled with fallout from a sexual harassment scandal involving a city manager helped turn the tables in Watts' favour.

On election night, the Surrey Now reported that McCallum walked around his headquarters looking relaxed and confident as he shook hands with fellow SET candidates and waited for vote counts to come in.

According to the Now, that mood gave way to "groans and cries of shock and disbelief" from supporters as it became apparent that Watts was steaming ahead of her competitor in almost every polling station. When the night ended, she'd won Surrey mayor by over 10,000 votes and handed McCallum a stunning upset.

Her enthusiasm was short-lived though.

'A gun to my head'

After the results were finalized, SET councillors controlled six out of eight seats on Surrey's council. Resentful about McCallum's departure, the party was looking for political blood.

Only hours before Watts' inaugural council meeting on Dec. 5, 2005, she says she received a phone call from a SET councillor -- who she declined to name -- instructing her to put forward a SET-approved list of nominations for the Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD) board.

"I thought 'no, I will present the list I feel is right,' " she says. "I wasn't going to have a gun put to my head."

At the meeting, the SET dominated council voted down Watts' nominations and approved an alternate list that shut the new mayor out of the GVRD. Watts said it was a humiliating rebuke of her authority.

"I had my children sitting there," she said. "So the inaugural meeting should have been a very celebrative time, but it wasn't."

Gradually though, what began as a tumultuous power struggle between the mayor and council subsided over the next year. Thanks to a huge public backlash against the GVRD showdown, council reconsidered and then approved Watts' nomination to the board, a decision that took effect in December 2006.

An even bigger political shift took place next April, when three SET councillors allied with Watts to create the Surrey First party, a loose coalition formed mostly to help raise funds.

"We made the conscious decision of putting politics aside and moving forward with the business of the city," Watts says.

More importantly, Surrey First marked the official unravelling of the once mighty Surrey Electors Team and the beginning of a new political era.

A new party is born

So why did Watts' former opponents become her staunchest allies in less than a year and a half?

Tom Gill, a former SET councillor who joined Surrey First in October 2007, says he was reluctant to change teams at first, but decided to support Watts after she'd shown impressive leadership on crime.

"I didn't want to be considered a flopper," he says. "But I liked the direction she was going in."

Under Watts' urging, council approved the Crime Reduction Strategy, a holistic approach to criminal activity that stressed partnerships between community groups and all levels of government. According to city statistics, property crime declined 25 per cent between 2003 and 2007, a trend Watts credits to the initiative.

James Bennett, outgoing executive director of the South Fraser Community Services Society, says Watts brought a social conscience to Surrey politics that was absent during the McCallum era. An outspoken advocate for Surrey's homeless for the past 18 years, Bennett can barely control his temper when Watts' predecessor is mentioned. He claims McCallum let the city's homelessness problem fester while ignoring urgent appeals for help.

Watts, on the other hand, openly sought his group's support and invested millions in the newly created Homelessness and Housing Foundation, Bennett says. During the last three years, council approved the province's first whistleblower legislation, revived Surrey's transportation plan and drafted a liveability accord for major Lower Mainland urban centres to manage population growth.

"You couldn't ask for a greater paradigm shift between mayors," Bennett says.

Critics see 'business as usual'

While few people doubt that considerable changes have occurred during Watts' inaugural term, she isn't without her critics.

Bob Bose, a three-term mayor before McCallum and current councillor with the left-leaning Surrey Civic Coalition, says Watts hasn't marked a significant departure from her predecessor. With McCallum at the helm, Bose says urban sprawl intensified as the SET council approved development projects without any regard for sustainable planning.

"McCallum never saw a development he couldn't support," Bose says.

Watts has kept that legacy intact, he adds, by supporting truck-dependant industrial growth in South Surrey instead of redeveloping neglected commercial land in the city's core.

"I just see business going on as usual," he says.

Asked if Watts is a shoe-in to win another term as mayor on Nov. 15, Bose says she'll face serious competition from Green candidate Weisenberger. Watts' sole challenger may lack political experience, but he garnered 27 per cent of the vote when he ran against McCallum in 2002. Bose says he thinks Weisenberger's environmental credentials will resonate with voters fed up with Watts' failure to make sustainable development a reality.

The councillor's criticism merits consideration, given that a rapidly expanding population is creating more pressure than ever to deal with issues of urban sprawl.

According to estimates from the province and Metro Vancouver, Surrey's current population -- which Watts places at 463,000 -- is set to meet or surpass Vancouver's by 2040. (The mayor predicts it will happen in the next 10 to 15 years). Mirroring trends across the Lower Mainland, Surrey's population grew by 13.6 per cent -- or roughly 1,000 faces a month -- between 2001 and 2006, according to national Census data.

Such rapid growth has the potential to create serious headaches for civic planners if it's not managed wisely. But it also presents Surrey with a unique opportunity to ascend from second tier suburbia to one of B.C.'s most important cities.

A jewel in the rough

Patrick Condon, a professor of landscape architecture at the University of British Columbia, says Surrey has more assets than most suburban municipalities. Located strategically between the Fraser Valley, Richmond and Vancouver and the American border, the city is well placed to become a major urban centre.

Surrey's total land area is two to three times the size of Vancouver and operates within a protected agricultural land preserve, providing ample opportunities for green-minded development. And whereas Surrey was historically a haven for blue collar workers, a national shift away from manufacturing has created a growing class of local business owners, eager to invest in their city, Condon says.

Such opportunities are not lost on the current mayor. During the last three years, Watts has pushed for careful neighbourhood planning, sidelined ecologically-sensitive development in Campbell Heights and put a halt to single-family houses.

But the central plank of her strategy to transform Surrey into a major city is a massive revitalization of the downtown core. Asked to describe her vision for a revamped city centre, Watts' face brightens up. She describes a civic utopia where a newly located city hall sits beside vibrant cultural centres and the streets teem with pedestrians walking to work and eating in local restaurants.

There are just a few problems.

Flameouts and a fire

Last month, two major downtown housing projects -- Infinity and Skytowers -- were put on hold when tightened credit lines forced the developer to file for bankruptcy protection. Those setbacks followed on the heels of the spectacular Quattro fire, which gutted one of the biggest condominium projects in the city's centre.

Watts answers quickly and directly when asked whether the setbacks threaten her vision. The financial crisis is a global issue, Quattro is being rebuilt and the developer behind the Infinity and Skytowers projects will find refinancing in the next few weeks, she says. In fact, she views the global credit crunch as an opportunity to sideline rampant speculation in Surrey's housing market.

"We've seen buildings in the downtown core sell out in 52 minutes," she says. "That market is not sustainable."

Perhaps a more serious setback for Watts' vision, though, is a major lack of public transit options.

Watts says Surrey residents have only 25 per cent the level of public transit that Vancouver residents enjoy, a trend that supports urban sprawl.

Such figures don't surprise Gordon Price, director of the City Program at Simon Fraser University. "You have an urban form that's pretty much established on the idea that everybody will drive everywhere for everything," Price says.

Escape from Commuterville?

Price traces Surrey's transportation model back to an outdated assumption from the 1950s that people would live in suburban Surrey, and commute to metropolitan Vancouver. Price is concerned that provincial planners still view transit options through that lens, even though a booming job sector in the Lower Mainland means less people than ever are travelling long distances to work.

At the moment, the province is proposing a $1.1 billion Skytrain extension and the Gateway freeway expansion as the solution to Surrey's transportation woes. By encouraging commuters to leave the city, Price warns the projects could "suck the oxygen" out of any plans for a new downtown core.

Mayor Watts has been lobbying for an integrated system of light rail transit in Surrey instead of a Skytrain extension, but she says the transportation minister has been unresponsive. She's also concerned that Gateway hasn't been properly integrated into a provincial plan that looks at all the transportation options for the municipality.

Though Watts acknowledges the setbacks, she still maintains a firmly optimistic position. And she seems determined to make it succeed. "In Surrey, we're building a major city," she says. "It's not without its challenges but certainly there's some amazing opportunities."

A distance to travel

After spending close to an hour with Mayor Watts, it's hard not to get wrapped up in her enthusiasm. I walk out her office door convinced that Surrey is not only capable of being a great city -- it's headed there right now.

But as I drive into the city centre along King George Highway, one of the city's main thoroughfares, it's difficult to match Watts' vision to reality. Outside my car window, I glimpse a horizon of strip malls and fast food chains, punctuated by the odd housing tower. Automobiles whizz past city blocks oddly devoid of pedestrians. I leave my car to explore the area on foot and bow my head against a blustery wind.

To my right lies a sprawling shopping mall and behind me, the chain link fence of a car dealership. A purple banner reading "Downtown Surrey" flaps furiously in the breeze.

When Surrey resident Briana Sumodi passes me on the street, I question her about her city's centre. "It's just horrible," she says. "It has no personality."

Asked whether Surrey is capable of supporting a vibrant downtown akin to that of a major city, she replies cautiously.

"There's evidence that it's starting," she says, gesturing to two half-completed Infinity towers in the distance. "But I think it's going to be a very slow going process."

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

16  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Grumpy

    3 years ago

    SkyTrain, this bizarre love affair..........

    .........with this obsolete light metro system is most baffling. The total cost to date of this obsolete light metro system is now close approaching $6 billion and this is not including RAV!

    Despite the cost, the percentage of the population using the light metro is only a little over 11%, a figure which has remained unchanged for about a decade and a half.

    Yet we go on!

    The proposed $1.1 billion 10 km SkyTrain expansion will do little for Surrey, except create more traffic gridlock as money for the metro will come at the expense of new buses. For the same cost, we could build up wards of 60 km. to 100 km. of light rail! Now which would be better for surrey 10 km. of metro or 60 km. to 100 km. of LRT!

    American transit expert Gerald Fox, shredded TransLink's vaunted Evergreen Line business case, which should (if our police were on the ball) catch the attention of the RCMP's commercial crime unit.

    According to Fox; "I found several instances where the analysis had made assumptions that were inaccurate, or had been manipulated to make the case for SkyTrain. If the underlying assumptions are inaccurate, the conclusions may be so too."

    He continues; "But, eventually, Vancouver will need to adopt lower-cost LRT in its lesser corridors, or else limit the extent
    of its rail system. And that seems to make some TransLink people very nervous.

    It is interesting how TransLink has used this cunning method of manipulating analysis to justify SkyTrain in corridor
    after corridor, and has thus succeeded in keeping its proprietary rail system expanding. In the US, all new transit
    projects that seek federal support are now subjected to scrutiny by a panel of transit peers, selected and monitored
    by the federal government, to ensure that projects are analyzed honestly, and the taxpayers' interests are protected.
    No SkyTrain project has ever passed this scrutiny in the US."

    Interesting, considering Kevin Falcon and Gordon Campbell keep forcing light metro on the region.

  • gordon

    3 years ago

    Diane Watts, some call her MaCallum in a skirt

    I call her team the Nature Nazis. (minus Judy Villeneuve)

    Watts has done little to protect nature out here in Surrey, developers still roll over everything in sight to build, and the city just allows it to happen, with no real vision or strategy for building community, just building buildings at any pace.

    It would be nice if we had a building permits dept that actually had a plan that developers had to adhere to, but no, Surrey is for sale at any price.

    Look at Holland Park across from the King George Stn, the city mowed down 98% of the trees there, took out every bush and flower bed where critters live, then erected a half dozen ungodly grey metal sculptures of trees and flowers. YEP you heard right, they gave use metal trees and flowers as a lasting legacy of nature for the long term. Oh of course they poured a few thousand meters of concrete and planted a few rows of bushes about 12" high amoungst a couple more flower beds, but Holland Park was clearcut in the fashion that saw Bambi and all the wildlife scrambling out of the forest. Its a dead sterile and RCMP approved park with great flat sight lines for sniper fire should anyone be caught having wine with their picnic on public property.

    Oh and I went over the Bear Creek Park last week to see the salmon returning, I saw one dead salmon. Usually I see hundreds of live and dead salmon.

    Dianne Watts is no friend of nature in Surrey, altho they know all the latest catch phrases like sustainability and stuff, but when the rubber hits the road its develop whatever you want, we have no vision that you must adhere to, were just desperate for building permits with no guidelines for community based living.

    No bike infrastructure, stupid ass road designs with pretty trees and bushes in extra wide boulevards that steal from cycling lanes and cost taxpayers a mint as the city contracts out the services for cleaning, watering and pruning the boulevards.

    Campbell Heights, Stokes Pitt, the destruction of the Serpentine river, Burns Bog and the SFPR... don't get me started.

  • Baxman

    3 years ago

    The Developement First Surrey Later Coalition

    Dianne Watts has not changed anything in Surrey. She just happened to be in right place at the right time. Everyone in Surrey was getting tired of the arrogance of Doug McCallum and she was there to fill the void. Dianne loves Kevin Falcon and Gordon Campbell. When they say jump she asks “how high?”. She sticks up for Surrey on their terms. The new “Surrey First” party, oops, I mean coalition is just a rehash of the same old, supported by developers. Dianne will not run for the Provincial Liberal party this election but you will see her running in the next. When I drive the roads of Surrey and see her campaign signs I cringe. The party name Surrey First is a farce. First for what, clear cut? The party name should be “The Development First, Surrey Later Coalition”.

  • leftofcentre

    3 years ago

    Watts Is Leading The Way For Surrey...

    As someone who actually lives here (unlike the previous two posters who show an obvious ignorance of the City), I can say Surrey could use a few dozen Dianne Watts in government. She's done more to establish Surrey's sovereignty as a city than the last 30 councils combined.

    For once, development is no longer piecemeal...it's being done with a vision towards what the area will be like in 50 years and what the development will bring to the area. That's NEVER happened in this city.

    She's also the first mayor in ANY municipality to finally question the sick cult of Skytrain that keeps being inflicted on every municipality, even though it's billions of dollars more than LRT. We need to concentrate on how to move people WITHIN Surrey...not a few people out of Surrey towards Vancouver.

    The only people here whining about Dianne Watts are the ones who used to have Surrey as their private little fiefdom, and now they don't. If they're trying to import their old-fogey outdated old boys club ideas here, then get lost. Go back to a place that will better welcome you...like Vancouver.

  • monty

    3 years ago

    Surrey is next to Richmond?

    Excuse me, Professor, perhaps you should escape that ivory tower and take a drive, over the Oak Street bridge, turn off at highway 91 and head east. You'll see the beautiful farmland of Delta, which happens to be next to Surrey. Here's to the geographically impaired.

  • monty

    3 years ago

    monty

    I have to tell you that whenever I drive over to Cloverdale I cannot believe what I see. Rows and rows of look-alike houses,
    a gigantic grocery store that doesn't pay union wages, and all the charm that used to be hidden or gone forever.
    Same as Number 2 Road in Richmond. Another travesty of what happens when the developers take control of a Council (as they are trying desperately hard to do in Vancouver) but that's another story,

  • Luke Skywalker

    3 years ago

    Dianne Watts...

    Very astute, likeable and popular mayor.

    Quote:
    James Bennett, outgoing executive director of the South Fraser Community Services Society, says Watts brought a social conscience to Surrey politics that was absent during the McCallum era.

    And that's just another feather in her cap. Long-time independent New Democrat councillor Judy Villeneuve has also joined Watts' Surrey First municipal team.

    Watts is able to work with people of all political persuasions.

    Likley another sweep Surrey First sweep with incumbent Bose as the lone SCC councillor.

    I'll say it again, look to Watts as the next leader of the BC Liberal party post-Campbell/post-2010.

  • G West

    3 years ago

    you keep telling us this luke

    Nothing that I've heard about Watts and her gang leads me to believe you know what you're talking about...I happen to know somebody who spent most of his career working in the engineering department of the place...he's not impressed either.

    Still, she couldn't be any worse than our current Premier and by 2010, if Campbell gets another mandate, there won't be a single thing worth spit in either the municipality or the province.

    So keep hoping.

  • Falstaff

    3 years ago

    Watts Also New

    Congrats to Diane Watts. Sure knows how to handle the media. For your information, Her Honour is doing nothing whatsoever to limit urban sprawl. She'll serve the developers just like her predecessor did. And instead of being non-partisan, as she likes to style herself, she's kept Bob Bose off the GVRD even though Bose is by far the most knowledgeable counsellor when it comes to land use.

  • zalm

    3 years ago

    What the hell does this mean?

    "Surrey's total land area is two to three times the size of Vancouver and operates within a protected agricultural land preserve, providing ample opportunities for green-minded development."

    Surrey operates within a protected ALR? Surrey leads the way in removals from the ALR since its inception, followed closely by Langley and Kelowna. The ALR is a patchwork quilt within Surrey, and getting so small and threadbare the quilt wouldn't keep a homeless man warm on a summer night.

    "...and put a halt to single-family houses."

    Not on my last trip through there. Not on 64th near 176th, not on 160th north of the freeway and not anywhere I go. Single family construction is still in full swing.

    Is this Condon saying this, or is this a complete verbal screwup by the author?

  • leftofcentre

    3 years ago

    Tired of Agendas on The Tyee

    The provincial agendas people are bringing to local issues are nothing less than destructive. People have to face the fact that SURREY IS A CITY. IT IS A MASSIVE CITY.

    Cities need a downtown. Cities need transit. Cities need towers and homes. Cities need businesses and industries to work in.

    Places like Cloverdale aren't part of a small town. It's part of a city. Tens of thousands of people live there. They need a supermarket. If they don't like the fact it's non-union, they'll choose to shop somewhere else. That's democracy.

    Also, councillors have to realize there's no such thing as "government" councillors and "opposition" councillors...they are all part of the municipal government. If they spent more time dealing with real local problems (ie. traffic lights, transit and property issues) instead of running pseudo campaigns for the NDP and Liberals, municipal government everywhere would start working for everyone. Dianne Watts' government works because she's taking care of these issues without some flaky provincial agenda.

  • donnapassmore

    3 years ago

    Dianne Watts is the Queen of Sprawl

    This kind of nonsense is what happens when a journalist just takes a politician's word at face value.

    Given the extreme limitation of space for commenting, I can only say that this journalist has no idea what he is talking about, and this very false characterization of Dianne Watts on the eve of an election is politically dangerous and a slap in the face to the people of our City who are trying to effect positive change.

    This article is a black eye to the Tyee

    Anyone wanting to know the truth about Surrey's Queen of Sprawl can email me directly at

    Donna Passmore
    Fraser Valley Conservation Coalition
    Farmland Defence League of BC &
    Gateway 40 Citizens Network

  • gordon

    3 years ago

    leftofcenter

    I have lived in surrey for 19 years
    My opinion is as valid as anyones.
    I ran in the provincial election here in 2005.

    Dianne Watts is EDITED FOR SEXIST COMMENT -- TYEE EDITOR.

  • leftofcentre

    3 years ago

    The last Two Comments Above....

    ...only prove my point about people harbouring their own provincial agendas that are completely disconnected from the wants and needs of the citizens of B.C.'s 2nd largest city.

    Gordon, it's easy to see why nobody takes you seriously on the provincial political scene when you use offensive and sexist terms when criticizing a politician. People elect politicians to build society, not create new barriers.

  • Stump

    3 years ago

    extreme limitation of space

    Umm, you can publish paragraphs and paragraphs of information in a single post and break out your information into separate posts if necessary. There is quite simply no limitation such as you are describing Donna.

  • badfreeway

    3 years ago

    Dianne "clearcut" Watts

    I FULLY support Donna Passmore's remarks, this is a new low in journalism for the supposedly feisty one.

    If you want to talk about who's "fighting sprawl" in this city, do a story on the man who literally saved our democracy a few weeks ago and gave you a mayor's race to write about at all, Murray Weisenberger.

    gordon your comment is brilliant, especially the part about Holland Park. try my nick .com and get in touch.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.