Another Side to Private Power
First Nations, municipalities explore controversial energy source.
China Creek run-of-river hydro project.
Environment Minister Barry Penner decided not to go against a very vocal majority when he nixed a plan to run a power line through Pinecone Burke Provincial Park last month.
Groups opposed to the project, which had been rallying for months in advance of the decision and packed rowdy public hearings in Mission and Pitt Meadows, breathed a collective sigh of relief.
Underlying the controversy around this high-profile project is a greater concern about the private sector's role in power production.
Although some see independent power producers (IPPs) as part of an unwelcome shift away from the centralized publicly owned model British Columbia has known, others view public-private partnerships as essential to foster fledgling renewable energy technologies.
Increasingly, First Nations and municipalities are the IPPs, working with the private sector but retaining full or partial ownership of their utilities and the revenue stream they provide.
Renewable energy is uncharted territory here in B.C. and the rest of Canada -- and it's not as simple as public good, private bad.
Power pioneers
Taking on the responsibilities of an energy utility has been a learning process for some trailblazing communities.
When Hupacasath Chief Judith Sayers and her council decided to take power into their own hands six years ago, the result was a best practices model of how to build a small hydro project from the ground up.
Widespread opposition to the Duke Point natural gas facility in the late '90s was the impetus for council to explore other options for resource development in the Hupacasath territory near Port Alberni, says Sayers.
With help from the Pembina Institute in 2002, the Hupacasath council identified China Creek as having run-of-river hydro potential.
Financing was difficult at first, says Sayers, but with a loan from Vancity, a grant from EcoTrust and the pooling of resources with the Ucluelet First Nation, the council was able to partner with Synex Energy to build a two-turbine, 6.5 megawatt project that has been in operation since December 2005.
The council's corporate arm that manages the project, Upnit Corporation, owns 72.5 per cent of the project, the neighbouring Ucluelet First Nation owns 10 per cent, Synex owns 12.5 per cent and the City of Port Alberni owns five per cent, an "in kind gift," says Sayers, for the city's cooperation and use of its water data.
More to come
"Now we're working on our second project, and we actually had banks knocking on the door," says Sayers. Another 6.5 MW run-of-river operation on nearby Corrigan Creek is scheduled to go online next year.
"These run-of-river projects are, I think, a really good thing," says Sayers.
"As a First Nations, this is how we've been able to use the resources in our territory and actually manage the resources in our territory."
Sayers says she and her council have learned a lot through the process of applying for various licences, commissioning studies on impacts on fish and the environment and negotiating with the city and local logging companies.
"I would encourage any First Nation to really get involved as an IPP," she says. "Some are just taking royalties, but what do you learn?"
Matt Horne of the Pembina Institute says this situation is fairly rare in B.C. because typically it's the IPP that tries to "sell" projects to a community and not the other way around.
"If you're looking at both the technical side of developing a project and the administrative side of management, you're looking at a whole new skill set for most communities," he says.
"It's not simple processes to have to work through . . . but I don't think they're barriers that can't be overcome."
Taking ownership
As chief of Douglas First Nation, located on the north end of Harrison Lake, Darryl Peters spent nearly nine years in negotiations with Cloudworks Energy Corporation on what began as a one-creek project and now includes eight.
Cloudworks initially approached Peters and his council to approve a run-of-river project on Big Silver Creek, about a two-hour drive east of Vancouver.
"We found there was an even better opportunity if we set aside the Big Silver project," says Peters. "We started realizing there was a larger process for our involvement."
In order to offset the cost of a substation required so the community could connect to the B.C. Hydro transmission grid, Peters said more projects needed to come on board.
Now, Cloudworks is developing on eight tributaries of the Upper Harrison River, three of which the Douglas First Nation is directly involved with.
"We're going to be having ownership of two of the projects, on Douglas and Tipella [creeks]" says Peters. "We also have the opportunity to buy into the other projects."
Until these projects are complete and supplying the grid, probably by late 2009, the Douglas First Nation will continue to use diesel generators for electricity.
The fact that his people have had to rely on these generators for so long frustrates Peters.
"We wanted to get out of that concept of being in a Third World state," he says.
"If we're Indians on an Indian reserve struggling away we can never become equal."
Private beats government
Peters won't go into details about the deal between Cloudworks and Douglas, but says the First Nation will also be receiving payments on an annual basis and as part of the agreement Cloudworks will provide the community with energy.
There is also opportunity for an educational endowment fund, he says, and where possible local companies get first dibs on construction contracts.
"Look at what we're able to accomplish now with the private sector rather than with a government agent," says Peters, who says his elders remember promises of B.C. Hydro grid access made thirty years ago.
"No one went to school to learn how to build a power project . . . but we're motivated to do business."
Wind farmers
On the other side of the province, the city of Dawson Creek is developing a totally different resource using a different type of ownership model.
The city has partnered with Peace Energy Cooperative
and Aeolis Wind Power Corporation to build a 120 MW wind farm on Bear Mountain Ridge consisting of up to 57 turbines.
Peace Energy is the only co-op of its kind in the province, with more than 300 members. A $200 membership pays dividends based on annual profits and members can also choose to purchase shares that are expected to appreciate in value as the co-op grows.
"Power production is the biggest drain in local economies because all that money simply goes out," says Emanuel Machado, director of corporate planning for the city.
"The co-op provides a community ownership opportunity around renewable energy that has never existed before."
The wind project is the co-op's first, and it has yet to develop any others. Machado says the city is also exploring other renewable energy options, such as bioenergy, but says it's taking its time.
"There are a lot of questions. This is outside of most municipalities' areas of expertise," he says.
"But I think the writing's on the wall that there's tremendous opportunity there."
Community economic development, while important, isn't solely enough to justify building a power plant, says Gwen Barlee of the Wilderness Committee.
Her group says renewable energy development should be regionally planned, environmentally appropriate and publicly owned.
One of the biggest concerns, she says, is the cumulative impacts of "one-off" projects that aren't part of a larger land and resource use plan.
"From a citizen's perspective, we should be asking, 'Is this the type of power we need?' " says Barlee.
"Let's slow down, take a deep breath and make sure these projects are in the public good."
Related Tyee stories:
- Private River Power Draws Diverse Foes
'Green' claims disputed. - 'B.C.'s Hinterlands Are Opened Up for Business'
River power projects bring roads, people, wildlife threats. - A 'Green' Threat to B.C.'s Rivers?
Touted by B.C. Hydro as renewable electricity, the rush to install privatized 'micro-hydro' schemes may change the flow of 76 B.C. rivers.
![[Tyee]](http://thetyee.cachefly.net/ui/img/ico_fishie.png){kind=small}
- Attawapiskat third party manager will stay: Federal Court judge
- No independent agency, but increased monitoring in oilsands
- Caterpillar shuts Electro-Motive plant in London, Ont., where workers locked out
- Alberta, Ottawa to release plan for oilsands environmental monitoring
- Youth reps: Canada needs national strategy for Aboriginal children
- Report says science, not minister should rule Canada's fisheries
- Rural reporters can't make a living, says former Nelson Post editor
- Federal bureaucrats pose as 'new Canadians' on Sun News citizenship ceremony
- Shadow Workers of the World, Revolt!
- How First Nations Are Gearing Up for Legal Battle Against Gateway
- Bad Apple
- Economist Calls Gateway Pipeline an Inflationary 'Threat'
- Bow Down Canadians, Corporations Are King
- UK urges quick completion of Canada-EU free trade agreement
- Tides Canada: Let's Have Open, Honest Debate about Our Energy Future
- Is Canada Ignoring Signs of a Coming Economic Collapse?
- No Way, YVR!
- My Kodak Moment
- Eleven Oily Questions for Every MP
- How First Nations Are Gearing Up for Legal Battle Against Gateway
- We'll Frack Alberta's Next Election, Vow Landowners
- Economist Calls Gateway Pipeline an Inflationary 'Threat'
- Is Canada Ignoring Signs of a Coming Economic Collapse?
- View from the Reichstag
- Shadow Workers of the World, Revolt!
- Bow Down Canadians, Corporations Are King
- Reality Check for Europe Bashing Republicans
- Tides Canada: Let's Have Open, Honest Debate about Our Energy Future
- How First Nations Are Gearing Up for Legal Battle Against Gateway
- Turning Turtle in Bangkok
- My Kodak Moment
- Where Can You Go for a Real Movie Experience Anymore?
- Bad Apple
- Libs Threaten Hard Won Logging Agreements: Simpson
- Catalyst Paper says one union at Crofton mill voted down new labour agreement
- Market for Enbridge's Gateway Pipeline Remains Murky
- A Tour of Duty in BC's Poverty 'War Zone'
- Tides Canada: Let's Have Open, Honest Debate about Our Energy Future
- New rules for radicals: 10 ways to spark change in a post-Occupy world
- ‘Free-for-all’ decimates fish stocks in the southern Pacific
- Saudi oil minister calls global warming ‘humanity’s most pressing concern’
- Deutsche Bank chief fears ‘social time bomb’
- ‘Yoga body’: the conspiracy
- U.S. Air Force’s ‘big penetrator’ needs to be harder
- How to make a web series and the future of social media (podcast)
- The artful dodgers of Melbourne’s graffiti revolution
28
Login or register to post comments
Luke Skywalker
3 years ago
IPP's...
I think this article provides a good and reasonable insight into the involvement by other important stakeholders in ROR projects.
A good detailed analysis of IPP's was in the Vancouver Sun from one week ago and here are another couple of interesting snipets:
Hydro documents dating from 2003 show it costs BC Hydro $25 per megawatt to produce power.
Documents on file with the B.C. Utilities Commission also show that a recent upgrade to the Alberfeldie Dam in southeastern B.C., an older Hydro-owned facility, has pushed the cost of electricity production there to $62 per megawatt hour - same as an IPP.
http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/business/story.html?id=16849aa0-63a9-4500-97e0-8161af9d23cd&k=37476
Skywalker
3 years ago
More free enterprise bumpf from Luke
The first rule of privatization is to show by any means possible that the private sector can do it more cheaply. Inevitably it is realized that to do it more cheaply requires that workers work for less and the service is worse. The realization always come too late to reverse the process. That the Vancouver Sun would be part of this is hardly a surprise. Who said figures don't lie but liars can sure figure. "Hydro documents dating from 2003 show ...." Yeah right!
UnCivilizedEngineer
3 years ago
Well-Written Articles
Thanks to Colleen for presenting this side of the IPP issue. This is a highly important aspect of IPPs that gets overlooked by many on both sides of the argument.
The more remote First Nations communities in particular will finally be able to wean off the unreliable and expensive diesel generation and start to feel some independence, control, and maybe even participate in an economy that is usually out of reach at the community level.
Municipalities can and have benefitted as well. Almost any municipality with a surface drinking water supply can start looking at opportunities to leverage these assets by adding generation - something that would have been very difficult to the point of not being worth pursuing under previous energy policies. Now we see the District of West Vancouver generating from Eagle Lake, and a number of others looking at proposals. Even if the municipalities don't build the power themselves, IPPs building within municipal boundaries pay tax, which again, benefits the community.
The article Luke Skywalker refers to also makes some very salient points about the oppposition to private power, which I won't discuss the finer details of. Suffice to say, BC Hydro can't deliver new power for any cheaper than the IPPs, and would be forced to expand in order to meet the new power demands. Conservation is a nice idea, but the teeth needed to mitigate our growth requirements would be unpalatable to most customers (and voters!).
If you really want to know some facts about the cost of new power acquisition, I refer to the BC Hydro Resource Options Update process, which has scoped out a wide selection of power sources:
http://www.bchydro.com/info/iep/iep53123.html
And check out the map on the page, in particular:
http://www.bchydro.com/rx_files/info/info54929.pdf
Skywalker
3 years ago
Sure, but will they remain public?
"BC Hydro can't deliver new power for any cheaper than the IPPs, and would be forced to expand in order to meet the new power demands." Yes it can and has done so for years. It is not allowed to by the current government because of an adherence to an ideology which will see us all paying more. All these little IPP's will be bought up by the multinationals because energy is the next easy money for them. In every other country where this hydro has been allowed to go private the cost have skyrocketed just to line the pockets of the big corporations. Oil, energy, water, food all the essentials are at risk.
Hydro production is and easy one that should remain public ownership. WAC proved it could be done.
lynn
3 years ago
Private lies
Skywalker wrote:
As the brain remarked in another thread, corporate rule by privatization demands that perfectly functional public systems be made dysfunctional...How else can privatization be brought in? How else can private companies steal control of our public resources away from us - and all our public profits and benefits as well?
It is the grand lie that privatization builds their foundation of contrived lies on. Their malicious intention is to make proved public successes look like failures.... simply because it serves their sly and greedy cause.
The privatization agenda of the BCLiberals has followed this exact mode - a relentless assault on the public system that is designed to make it it appear that a perfectly functional system like public ownership of power is somehow dysfunctional. In fact, as Skywalker makes clear, BC Hydro has worked... and brilliantly so for the people of BC. It is BC's big success story.
In fact, it is BCLiberal legislation that has intentionally disabled BC Hydro....in order to open the door for IPPs and the lurking multi-nationals that have been droolingly biding their time, in wait for "the easy power" door to swing wide open, for in Skywalker's words, "easy money".
There is no reason that a public system of power cannot amend the past and address power issues for First Nations.
No, what this is is simply the privatization of BC Hydro, the grand theft of this grand public resource, without Gordon Campbell having to say it out loud..without having to admit to it.
It is the sneaky lie their government is (in)famous for.....like the BCLiberal's "misuse" of the treaty process, set up in reality to benefit "their corporate friends" self-interests, but made to look like the saving grace for First Nations - this run-of -river sell-out has been set up to appear in the same way. The only goodwill in reality being extended or offered here by the present BC Liberal government is towards the corporate interests they faithfully represent - a loyalty that knows no bounds.... and apparently has no borders. And that is who the IPP's were really designed for and whose interests they will serve....far into the future as well... sad and incredible as that is for all the people of BC.
snert
3 years ago
lynn
So you're saying that any benefits that might come to FNs are a myth? Are they suckers for believing that any might come their way?
You may call it a "misuse of the treaty process" but we'll never rally know for sure if people keep getting in the way. That is also a misuse of the treaty process.
ME2
3 years ago
Baseless finger-pointing?
Snert, Unless they've been strongarmed into "public" participation - a la the GBR - FNs have never shown any obligation to the commonweal, or any interest in participation in it. The recent ALR deal is proof enough of that.
Sure, there's lots of pretty talk of mutual cooperation, but that always involves significant concessions on the part of others and much larger gains for FNS.
The fact is that Treaty negotiations exist purely for the benefit of FNs and no-one else. Of course there's the much-heralded benefit of "certainty" for business, and IPPs are one such, where RORs are rented out or partnered in, with no guarantee the multis can't wind up with ownership.
OTOH, I guess one can't point fingers, given the total disregard the Campbell gov't holds for the public's interest.
G West
3 years ago
ME2 - I agree with you
I suspect that - just as in the case of the Tsawwassen treaty and the UBC golf course/Pacific Spirit Park betrayal - ROR deals are worked between a few compliant and largely unrepresentative members of bands who are doing the deals as much for their personal gain - and probably more - than any sense of sustainability for the future or in respect of whatever the 'real' First Nations interests are.
In the long run, in my view, this is just another colonial attempt to force the Indians to assimilate, integrate and disappear as cultural and national entities. We know with certainty that's the case in Ottawa under pee wee and I'd say it's exactly the same situation in Victoria - in fact, it is the push from Campbell's corporate backers that started the whole chameleon-like change in the CEO premier's colouration during his first term.
Campbell, at his oleaginous best and flashing that toothily diabolical Cheshire-cat grin on his Maui-tanned face – carries it off with much greater aplomb than the little fat man in Ottawa does.
In fact, he's done exactly the same thing in labour negotiations as well - but that's another story.
Cheers.
The native groups who think they’ve made a good deal with these particular ‘business partners’ ought to look closely at the wampum they’re getting in return for their birthright. All, once again, in my opinion.
Speaking of deals that are too good to be true, did you see this:
http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/business/story.html?id=dc0e01a3-dde7-4415-95a0-40e9b5731525
Seems like current management at MDA was more interested in real estate gold mining than continuing to be a cutting edge space research company. Hope you're not sitting around with any of their stock in your stockings.
snert
3 years ago
So the fact that a band
votes to accept a deal means nothing to you.
Therein lies the problem with most of these deals. There are a whole lot of people like yourself who think they know better but never come up with practical solutions.
Naysayers and NIMBYs, it's a wonder anything gets done.
G West
3 years ago
There are votes and there are votes
I'm not in the habit of criticizing the Native Bands for accepting the deals they've been given - one has to actually read the whole of what I posted to understand where I think the blame lies - and it's not with the First Nations.
Perhaps I should re-post the pertinent passage for you:
"...In the long run, in my view, this is just another colonial attempt to force the Indians to assimilate, integrate and disappear as cultural and national entities. We know with certainty that's the case in Ottawa under pee wee and I'd say it's exactly the same situation in Victoria - in fact, it is the push from Campbell's corporate backers that started the whole chameleon-like change in the CEO premier's colouration during his first term."
I certainly do think I know better than you do snert - as for the circumstances surrounding the 'democratic' institutions in effect in many Indian bands in this province - I'll let the First Nations people themselves speak to that.
If you're really interested you can start here:
http://www.fcpp.org/main/publication_detail.php?PubID=802
It is difficult to overestimate the importance of functional governance. It impacts at all levels of society and plays an essential part in our lives and communities. Governance structures and processes:
1. represent constituent’s welfare and basic human rights;
2. create and enforce policies and laws;
3. administer essential programs and deliver services; and
4. manage human, land and cultural resources; and negotiate with governments and organizations.
How well such structures and processes perform these functions has a direct affect on the strength and well-being of every community. In the same way, effective and stable Indigenous organizations reflective of, and accountable to, their community’s needs and values form the foundations for regional and community socioeconomic development. I’m the last person who’d maintain the native governance structures have served them well – but I’ll leave that for First Nations commentators to discuss – because, in the end, I’m not the ‘nimby’ you’d like to cast me as snert.
If you take some time to understand the actual structure of the negotiating framework as well as learn to appreciate how the people doing the financing (the federal and provincial crown) possess a hammer-lock on the final outcomes (please look specifically at the Cowichan band for an example of this and don’t overlook the role of former Liberal Cabinet minister Graham Bruce) because, in the end, they’re writing the cheques.
Like a lawyer representing both sides in a real estate deal, mischief happens.
snert
3 years ago
I'm sorry but you are in the habit
You have criticized these deals in the past and you will certainly criticize other deals in the future when they don't go the way Mr G West, in his infinite wisdom, deems they should.
As long as they vote the way you feel they should they're ok, I'm guessing.
Ahhhh, "the white man's burden". And of course democracy where maybe none existed before. How very colonial of you.
Maybe Skookum1 will stop by and fill us in on just how democratic the BC FNs really were. I don't know.
You cannot yet see that people are guilty of trying to force a square peg into a round hole instead of working towards practical solutions. The none FNs of the province are just not going to fade away either.
I agree with you 100% you certainly do think that you "know better" than I. Your collection of useless facts must be truly amazing. However, I have yet to see them put to any use other than to criticize.
RickW
3 years ago
snert
You want a practical solution? How about we each of us pay rent in perpetuity to the FN for moving in with them?
No "deals", no "tit for tat". Just good ol' fashion rent.
snert
3 years ago
Just go to the DTES
to see where that would lead. Sorry, can't agree on that one.
G West
3 years ago
Thanks for the vote of confidence snert
I knew you'd come around and revert to your usual style. The interregnum was a nice change though - you should try being constructive more often.
As for Skookum1, he happens to be a personal friend and I always welcome his contributions.
I know perfectly well that I'm on solid moral and historical ground as long as you're disagreeing with me.
ME2
3 years ago
Rick W
Rick, we're already paying "rent in perpetuity" to FNs in the form of the extensive range of benefits we now lay on them and their communities.
They enjoy these without sharing in the taxation for same, now or in the future.
The only Treaty I'm familiar with is the Nisgaa. As with other Treaties, it is tripartite between the Feds, Prov and the Nisgaa. In it, all the benefits current at the time were to remain in place, and if any changes are to be made, they must be agreed upon by all three. "Discussions" are to be held every five years, with no obligation whatever on the part of the Nisgaa to seek or agree to amendments.
I understand the same holds for the Tsawassen Band. Perhaps GWest or some other person familiar with the Treaties might prove me wrong or otherwise clarify how we stand re those Treaty outcomes, but MY understanding is that a Treaty settlement does not result in a Quit Claim - far from it.
snert
3 years ago
Ahhh, missionary tendencies.
Seems that thinking was what got us in trouble in the first place. Get off the moral high ground you seem to think is so important and try to come up with some practical solutions.
G West
3 years ago
ME2
It's some time since I read the Tsawwassen Treaty documents - they're posted on the Band's website, or at least they were.
I don't think there has been any thorough analysis of the indebtedness of any band (specifically or generally) to the Federal and Provincial Crown as a result of finally concluding a treaty settlement. Suffice to say the crown is and has been paying both sides of the cost throughout the process...the interest clock starts to tick, as I recall, once the treaty is accepted. I do know that the auditor general estimated as long as, I think, two years ago, that something in the neighbourhood of 60 – 70% of the total anticipated value of all the treaty settlements for the whole province had already been expended. What the eventual financial burden will eventually be (and who will be on the hook for it) is certainly a valid question. I suspect DPL could tell you more – he’s been much more involved in the process than I have, and for a longer and more attenuated period of time.
As for your other points, the continuing costs and responsibility for financing etc. vary.
In some respects, after a period of time (which varies) at least some of the land can be alienated from a band irrevocably.
Snert:
You don't read very carefully. The economy, human relations and the effects of colonialism are complex and multi-faceted - they don't lend themselves to simple practical solutions - which - given the history of such efforts in the past, seems to be a very good thing.
There aren't many Alexanders around any longer - as George Bush has slowly and painfully come to realize. There ARE NO EASY ANSWERS.
RickW
3 years ago
ME2
And I am sure that any other landlord would be glad to take that, instead of cold, hard cash...........
Why not just pay the rent (to each and every individual FN - musn't let the chiefs gets their hands on the cash, ya know) and let them decide what to do with their due? But of course, paying via "benefits" would show just how little we are coughing up for rent. I would suggest that, for Canada's 1.2 million FN (2006 census) that rent amounting to something like $100,000/yr/person would be adequate in today's economy. That's only $120 billion, and considering that our GDP (2007) was about ten times that, it would amount to a simple tithe. As for FN paying taxes, why -- we live in their house, not the other way around.
ME2
3 years ago
Rick W
C'mon now, Rick,be sensible. The Treaties bestow huge amounts of cash, land, and resources upon those FNs who sign them.
If you or I had similar benefits, we would consider ourselves rich, and certainly have enough to live well and increase those riches in the future.
We fought revolutions to deny similar priveliges to Aristocracies who claimed equally legitimate rights by virtue of birth, or other means. For those who have been unable to manage their wealth properly, taxation is gradually reducing their estates.
Who, Rick W, should come into this world and be offered a free ride? Who should not have to work in some way to earn a living?
Yammer
3 years ago
The pleasures of work
"Who, Rick W, should come into this world and be offered a free ride? Who should not have to work in some way to earn a living?"
Eh, not very well said, but in principle, of course, everyone who is able to work should do so. I believe everyone actually wants to do be useful in that it's hard to imagine anyone waking up and saying, "I think I'd love to be a burden today!"
I would argue against the nation-within-nation concept for that very reason; that legally mandated ethnic separation fetters the opportunity to work in a heterogenous society.
In a way, I am hoping that the First Nations exploit the daylights out of their territories so that the well-meaning persons get the point. Why should they not gill net? Why shouldn't they dam the rivers? Why not have nuclear power plants, or reinstitute slavery? Why not, if they are a separate nation? Not "our" business.
snert
3 years ago
There are practical solutions
which lawyers and their ilk are bound and determined to thwart.
There aren't many Alexanders around any longer - as George Bush has slowly and painfully come to realize. There ARE NO EASY ANSWERS.
Cop out.
RickW
3 years ago
ME2
So in essence you are saying that you (as the renter) can determine just how much "rent" you will pay the landlod?
C'mon now, ME2, be sensible. Where ARE you going to find a landlord who is willing to take whatever handout the renter is willing to pay. And on top of that, the renter proceeds to strip the plumbing out of the "house" while he's at it.....
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100318/
And you can bet any amount that the "beneifits" we accord the FN do not come anywhere CLOSE to a tithe......
ME2
3 years ago
Rick W
Sorry guy, I can't write what I think of your last two posts, since the moderator would delete it.
"Renters" indeed.
RickW
3 years ago
Then you have to admit.....
....that we conquered them. Quit mincing around and say it. We just came in a took everything.
And as conquerers, we have every "right" to extinguish them, should we choose. So they should be damned grateful we haven't.
Instead, The Great White Father gives them the "opportunity" to become good white folk by harnassing the rivers.
Hallelujah!
G West
3 years ago
Rent
I really didn't want to get into this debate, but here goes.
I suspect that those who think we're spending plenty of wampum on 'Indian' issues now subscribe to Jim Prentice's analysis when he says things like this:
“Money is really not the problem.
The government spends nearly $9.1
billion annually to finance programs
and services for aboriginals”.
But, if you really want to spend a little time looking at the situation on the ground instead of calling other people names (this is directed at YOU snert) then you need to recognize that a lot less than 9.1 billion ever gets into the hands of First Nations folks.
For a thorough outing of the real situation please read the following:
http://www.afn.ca/cmslib/general/M-Ex.pdf
And when you're done that, remember that First Nations housing stock, country-wide, is in deficit by between 35,000 and 50,000 units simply to make a dent in the problem of First Nations housing.
I think the rent bill is more than overdue..... Because of miserly public assistance, bureaucratic creep and, it’s true, governance problems at the band level, Aboriginal housing needs are in a state of acute crisis. Some of the reasons for this situation are: rapid population growth, shortage of available capital, rapid deterioration of housing stock caused by severe overcrowding, or lack of maintenance. More than half of the 76, 000 on-reserve houses need renovation or replacement. The housing shortfall will widen due to deterioration and to an anticipated 50 per cent increase in households over the next 10 years.
Despite appearances, things are NOT getting better and pretending that they are is a cop out.
RickW
3 years ago
Thank you, G West!
I honestly don't know why people have a problem with this.
The only word comes to mind is.....fear.
ME2
3 years ago
GWest
GWest, you don't like the totally biased, one-sided links that Mopled sometimes offers, and I don't like yours. Spin is spin, regardless of source.
G West
3 years ago
What are you talking about?
That was a First Nations link - aren't they at least allowed to present their own side of the story?
Or does your vision for First Nations require their total deracination and the complete extinguishment of their voice?
...Do you really think the $9.1 Billion annual budget of Indian Affairs all goes into native pockets?
Have you looked at the BC auditor general’s report from 2006 about the cost of the treaty tables and the legal bills that the governments are covering?
If you have any evidence that the information I've presented isn't accurate then please, let's have it.
Otherwise, I'd suggest, as I have before - and in the politest possible way - that you just don't know what you're talking about.
As for mopled, I just read – in a Canwest paper of all things – that one of his favourite ginger groups is being financed sub rosa by ‘research’ accounts in Stephen Harper’s old school – the University of Calgary.
Money, collected by the University, a public body, took funds collected for a community charity organization (in the neighbourhood of $500,000.) to promote the activities of a little ginger group called the Friends of Science…(you’ll remember them as faves of mopled’s no doubt).
Several sections of the report were blacked out so as not to harm ‘an ongoing law enforcement investigation’. The funds were supposedly expended – in violation of the elections act – during the 2006 campaign only in five key ridings in Ontario.
Some of the money also went to pay lobbyists…and there are strong hints of ties to Harper and the Conmen.
Now, what were you saying about spin?