News

A Tyee Series

Province's Boasts of 'New' Homeless Units Don't Add Up

Projects don't replace lost SRO rooms.

By Monte Paulsen, 4 Jun 2007, TheTyee.ca

Rich Coleman - 2007

Coleman: 'Breaking the mould'

BC Housing claims to be "creating 2,287 new housing units" in 20 communities across British Columbia. Variations on this claim have been repeated throughout the provincial housing authority's press releases and in speeches by Housing Minister Rich Coleman.

But The Tyee has learned that new housing represents only a fraction of the "new units" promised by BC Housing. In Vancouver, for example, only 521 of the 1,342 claimed units are actually new. The remainder are a hodgepodge of renovation projects, ownership transfers and even shelter beds dressed up as "new units."

Another two or three years will pass before anyone can move into BC Housing's 521 new supportive housing units. In the meantime, Vancouver continues to lose that many SRO rooms annually.

And with each loss, the region moves a step closer to fielding more homeless than athletes during the 2010 Winter Games.

'I wanted to break the mould'

Responding to homelessness was a top concern for Rich Coleman, who became Minister for Housing in June 2005, shortly after voters handed Gordon Campbell’s BC Liberals a second mandate.

"I wanted to break the mould," Coleman said. He had managed real estate before entering politics. "I thought, you know, I'm in a marketplace for real estate where it takes two to three years or more for the City of Vancouver to zone a piece of property and build some housing."

Coleman was also in a provincial government that had slashed funding for social housing just three years earlier. About 1,200 units were axed.

"I had a quiet conversation with the minister of finance and the premier. And I basically said, 'There's something else I'd like to try... I'd like to actually break the back of some of the issues in and around supportive housing with some existing stock.'

"So the people at BC Housing were given a job," he continued, "one that they did very well, quite frankly, and one they did strictly in confidence, under the direction of myself and the CEO. And that was to go out in the marketplace and quietly buy some property."

Coleman's team acquired 10 residential hotels in the City of Vancouver, plus another three buildings in Victoria and two more in Burnaby. (BC Housing has likewise claimed the creation of "new" units within the Garfield Hotel in New Westminster and the BackPackers motel and Spruce Capital hotel in Prince George.)

$1.6 Million in Six Weeks

Investor Robert Wilson pocketed $1.6 million in profit after he sold two Downtown Eastside properties to BC Housing only six weeks after purchasing them.

Wilson bought the Walton Hotel for a reported $1.65 million in February, and sold it for $2.3 million on April 3, according to provincial figures. He bought Orange Hall for a reported $3 million, and sold it for $4.1 million.

At $151,850 each, BC Housing spent more per unit for old apartments in Orange Hall than it did to erect new units at 55 East Hastings. –Monte Paulsen

"I can now build the social services into those buildings, and start to have better outcomes for those folks," Coleman said. "I can transition some of them into other housing going forward. And as they transition out, I can bring others in."

Dates and couch surfers

But while adding support services to Vancouver's SROs will certainly improve life for tenants who remain, the conversion process will likely drive as many as 120 people into the streets.

BC Housing paid $37 million for the 10 Vancouver SROs. That's roughly double the assessed values of $18.8 million. And that's an average of $62,420 for each of 595 rooms.

The rooms are small, and the buildings worn. BC Housing will likely have to tear down some rooms in order to add the offices, meeting areas and other amenities required by a supportive housing provider. One Vancouver property manager estimated that BC Housing will wind up sacrificing 10 per cent of its SRO rooms, reducing the total to about 540 improved units.

Many of those 595 rooms already shelter more than one person. Though SRO owners deny the practice, desk clerks routinely admit overnight visitors in exchange for an (illegal) $5 or $10 "guest fee." As a result of hot bunking and couch surfing, most residential hotels house more bodies than names on the register.

The Tyee asked veteran Downtown Eastside social workers to estimate actual occupancy at BC Housing's 10 SROs. They discounted the occupancy rate at the St. Helens Hotel, where drug dealers have reportedly scared away tenants. They doubled actual occupancy at the Roosevelt Hotel, where "dates" and couch surfers appear to outnumber tenants. They put the rest somewhere in between. Their experienced guesswork suggests that during any 24-hour period, the actual population living in BC Housing's newly acquired SROs is about 660 people.

Since BC Housing is expected to manage these facilities to a higher standard, that population of 660 is expected to winnow until it matches the number of rooms remaining. From the point of view of those (unregistered) residents, BC Housing will not have added 595 "new units" to the Downtown Eastside, but will have taken away as many as 120 existing beds.

Lost rooms and shelter bunks

Another apparently exaggerated claim was made in an oft-cited February 23 press release that boasted, "758 New Housing Units to Help Prevent Homelessness." More than a third of those units are in Vancouver; less than five per cent of those are additional housing.*

For example, BC Housing counts the The Salvation Army's acquisition of an existing four-storey social housing complex at 596 East Hastings as "85 new units." But in fact The Salvation Army will convert four of the modern building's existing 89 units into program space. Thus the room-count impact of the $11 million acquisition is actually net loss of four units.

BC Housing claims the Helping Spirit Lodge Society is creating 36 new units. The innovative Aboriginal charity reports that, with BC Housing's help and the City of Vancouver, it has purchases an existing 36-unit apartment building on Kingsway. As existing tenants move out, Helping Spirit will replace them with women and families at risk of homelessness.

"Helping Spirit Lodge Society is not asking anyone to move out," Executive Director Hazel Cardinal emphasized. "If we do, then we would be making them homeless and that is something we do not want to do."

BC Housing claims Triage Emergency Services & Care Society is building 24 new units. Triage reports it is rebuilding one of the first low-barrier housing projects for chronically homeless women, one that suffered a major fire last year. "The Viv" is set to reopen later this month.

And BC Housing claims Union Gospel Mission is building 117 new units. Union Gospel reports that it is awaiting city approval to proceed with a vertically integrated facility that would incorporate regional offices, a soup kitchen, a 43-bunk shelter, relocation of an existing 37-bunk treatment centre, and creation of 36 new units of abstinence-based supportive housing.

Together, these four projects account for 262 of the 758 new units claimed. Yet only Union Gospel's 36 yet-to-be-approved apartments will provide additional housing.

521 actual new units

The good news is that BC Housing is building some new housing, including five developments in Vancouver:

The high-profile Woodwards redevelopment will include 100 more units of social housing for an additional $27 million, bringing the project total to 200 all-new units

At 55 East Hastings St., construction is underway on 98 new supportive housing units at a cost of $14 million. And at 1321 Richards St., dirt was shovelled last month to make way for 87 new units slated to cost $17.7 million. Both projects were revived by Minister Coleman, after having been killed by fellow BC Liberals in 2001.

And groundbreakings are anticipated later this year on an 80-unit building at 980 Main, and a 120-unit facility at 337 West Pender. Both are to be provincially-funded projects on city-owned brownfields in downtown areas and are unlikely to face NIMBY resistance.

All five projects will provide precisely the type of supportive housing that research has proven is most effective in helping homeless individuals rebuild their lives. Assuming the next two can be built for per-unit costs on par with the Richards Street building, these 485 tiny apartments will cost taxpayers about $200,000 per unit.

Add to these the 36 new apartments proposed by Union Gospel, and BC Housing can rightfully claim to be funding 521 units of new supportive housing in Vancouver. That's roughly equal to the number of SRO units lost to redevelopment during 2006.

Incremental strategy, redux

"It's frustrating to see this kind of fraudulent accounting, which does nothing to help the homeless," said David Eby, who studies housing for Pivot Legal Society. "What we need right now is housing, not this sort of public relations exercise."

BC Housing spokespeople did not respond to requests for clarification and comment on this report. Minister Coleman did respond candidly to questions after a May 23 speech to an assembly of shelter operators.

Coleman disagreed with the comparison between overcrowded SRO rooms and professionally managed supportive housing, noting that supported residents are much more successful in recovering from addiction and mental illness. And he disputed the implication that BC Housing was exaggerating its achievements in response to criticism related to the 2010 Winter Games.

"2010 is not a magic date," Coleman said. "This isn't over after the Olympics. The strategy has to be incremental for many years to come.... You just have to continue to incrementally build on this stuff."

When asked whether BC Housing was racing to catch up precisely because the BC Liberal party had halted incremental building for the past six years, Coleman just shrugged his large shoulders and returned to his message.

"We're going to keep looking at what more we can do on the supportive housing side," he said, "because we believe that's where the lynchpin is with regards to taking people from the street and getting them back into a quality of life."

*Correction note: At about 10 a.m. on June 4, we corrected this line.

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

10  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Gary

    4 years ago

    Fraudulent accounting...

    isn't the half of it. But now we know how the money for the 165 new spin doctors is being spent. And more silence from the minister when he can't give a spun answer. Great leadership. (not)

  • bpither1

    4 years ago

    At Least the Well Heeled Get A Break

    Good article this week in the Georgia Strait on suggested government collusion with realtors and the Olympics[url=http://]http://www.straight.com/article-93176/developers-are-the-games-real-winners

  • Grumpy

    4 years ago

    Throw them out on the streets!

    Every 'world-class' city has 100's of homeless people drifting about and Vancouver politicians desperately want to be a 'world-class' city. Vancouver wanted a subway to become 'world-class' and now it will get the homeless too!

    Campbell's Liberals do not give a fig about the homeless as they would prefer they all die off. The public odor and the upcoming Olympics (TM) have compelled them to take action.

    What will really happen is a few 'show-case' housing projects and a forced migration (almost like ethnic cleansing) of the poor and homeless to other municipalities, especially Burnaby, New Westminster and Whalley, all being along the SkyTrain Line.

    SkyTrain will become the train-of-tears, as it will be the only way the poor can reach (subsidized fares of course) social services, soup kitchens, etc.

    This is the Campbell boys 'Brave New World', where the poor, driven out of Vancouver by lack of housing, for ghettos in other municipalities.

  • jazz

    4 years ago

    Sick and tired...

    Another great Tyee article, well researched, exposing the Liberals again, and more letters from the Tyee readership.

    But where is the rest of the province, how can the silence go on?

    Where are the other journalists? Today's Globe had nothing remotely connected to our plight...

    Is it that the populace is just apathetic, or are they tired of fighting the good fight with seemingly no results, tired of not being heard?

    I'm puzzled how the Liberals lead in the polls. Can the polls themselves be manipulated?

    All I have to offer here is I'm very tired of this situation. They give themselves a raise, somehow the shit sticks to the NDP who voted against it and then the door is slammed in our face.

    As I have written before in here (to the trolls and the converted):

    WHERE IS THE SCREAM?!

  • Working Memory

    4 years ago

    Day Late

    Mainstream media is a day late and a billion or so short in reporting how the Olympics negatively impacts communities. The Georgia Straight article mentioned above is interesting, but issues like this should have been addressed at least three years ago every time they ran ads for the Rennie Marketing machine.

    During Phase I, local newspapers made a small fortune selling condo advertising to gullible Olympic-frenzied buyers who were hyped by misleading articles in the same trusted publications.

    Once the glow of "paper millionaire" real estate status wore off and taxes started to rise local mainstream news then started to tell us about the challenges our community would face as a result of 2010.

    If a newspaper runs a full color double spread that irresponsibly hypes condos that are targeted at Olympic-hyped buyers, then the same publication has a journalistic responsibility to also tell us in the same publication what happens when real estate prices skyrocket obscenely. But they didn't. First they collected their fortune before they shared their secret.

    The tragedy is that this happens in almost exactly the same way in almost all other Olympic regions, and it was preventable here, but as the IOC expected, greed and arrogance kept locals from seeing it until it was too late.

    The IOC has won again, and Vancouverites were played for fools.

    It's too late to complain about spilled milk. It's time to learn how to beat the Olympics at their own game.

    Maurice Cardinal
    OlyBLOG.com

  • skeptikool

    4 years ago

    Radical change in thinking is required

    It will be said that if the Lower Mainland's homeless were to be housed, others would rush in to fill the vacuum.

    That would be less likely to happen if the problem were to be attacked as a national one.

    The situation has been brought about by the sheer greed of the system. I expect little change until those with the power to bring about change admit to a basic level of shelter and sustainance being the right of every citizen.

    Some may recall Habitat. Many good ideas, I believe, came out of that that could be applied to the situation. Some may even include participation of able-bodied homeless of whom many, I strongly suspect, would leap at such opportunity.

  • Working Memory

    4 years ago

    Take Back Your Community

    Vancouverites should watch this video for a few hints at what needs to be done to take back our community from VANOC & the IOC.

    It's never too late.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LU8DDYz68kM

    Warning: Not for the squeamish.

  • Jim Van Rassel

    4 years ago

    The Olympic Village.( vancouver)?

    Let's be crystal clear here. The average person doesn't support anarchy. However the average person doesn't give a ---- about elites, including those directors and others with Vanoc and the Olympic Games. In fact the average person could really care less about the Olympics right now, but does care about losing social programs because of the cash flow requirements for Olympic development.(Movement)
    What the average person does care about is their home, or the ability to purchase a home, and what the Olympics has done, has burst the bubble of citizens who were under the impression that everything was A okay in the real estate rental market in the lower mainland.

    www.robbinssceresearch.com
    Jim Van Rassel 604-328-53978

  • RickW

    4 years ago

  • Rolf Auer

    4 years ago

    Homeless units don't add up

    The Vancouver Olympic Organizing Committee and the three levels of government agreed in March 2007 to--among other things--build 3,200 more units of social housing. So far, not one member of these groups has followed through on the promise.

    Instead, we have Project Civil City, brought forth by City Council, which is intended to crackdown on aggressive panhandling, even more so than what is done under the Safe Streets Act. We have Mayor Sam Sullivan proposing that Riverview be reopened to house the mentally ill. We have an initiative by the provincial government to build more shelters. And let's not forget VANOC's old proposal of taking $500,000 (from their multi-billion dollar operating budget) to make shelter space available for the homeless during the 2010 Olympics.

    What this adds up to is that during the Olympics, the homeless will be in jail, or in Riverview, or in temporary (or even permanent) shelters.

    So much for VANOC and the three levels of government honouring their social housing commitment from the Inner-City Inclusive Housing Table agreement, and so much for homelessness being solved before the Olympics (or after, for that matter).

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.