Mediacheck

The Day the Internet Fought Back

Digital blackout protest clearly upset SOPA laws, but don't cry victory just yet.

By Michael Geist, 24 Jan 2012, TheTyee.ca

Tug of war with the computer

SOPA protest just the start in tussle between anti-piracy efforts and digital freedom.

Related

Last week's Wikipedia-led blackout in protest of U.S. copyright legislation called the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) is being hailed by some as the Internet Spring, the day that millions fought back against restrictive legislative proposals that posed a serious threat to an open Internet.

Derided by critics as a gimmick, it is hard to see how the SOPA protest can be fairly characterized as anything other than a stunning success. Wikipedia reports that 162 million people viewed its blackout page during the 24-hour protest period. By comparison, the most-watched television program of 2011, the Super Bowl, attracted 111 million viewers.

More impressive were the number of people who took action. Eight million Wikipedia visitors looked up contact information for their elected representatives, 7 million people signed a Google petition, and Engine Advocacy reported that it was completing 2,000 phone calls per second to local members of Congress.

The protest launched a political earthquake as previously supportive politicians raced for the exits. According to ProPublica, the day before the protest, 80 members of Congress supported the legislation and 31 opposed. Two days later, there were only 63 supporters and 122 opposed.

Latest in net freedom fighting

The SOPA protest ranks as the largest online action to date, but it was foreshadowed by similar developments around the world. In 2007, tens of thousands of Canadians used Facebook to register their concern with impending copyright legislation (I launched one of the main groups involved). In response, the government delayed introducing the legislation by six months, during which it added several provisions aimed at pacifying the public criticism.

In 2009, thousands of people in New Zealand launched their own blackout campaign against proposed "three strikes and you're out" copyright legislation that would have led to Internet users losing access based on three allegations of infringement. Users blacked out websites and profiles on Facebook and Twitter. The New Zealand government responded by withdrawing the legislation.

The similarities between the SOPA protest and digital activism in other countries does not end there. In virtually all cases, opponents dismiss protesters as pirates or pawns (or in the case of Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore, "radical extremists") who lack a genuine understanding of the issues.

Celebs, lobbyists fight back

Yet the Motion Picture Association of America is happy to trot out well-known movie stars with little copyright law familiarity since they are guaranteed to garner attention. Moreover, during earlier SOPA hearings, several politicians seemed to take pride in their lack of technical knowledge and experience.

The MPAA called the protests "an abuse of power" by platforms that serve as gateways to information, a particularly rich claim coming from a group that once threatened to delay screening movies in Canada unless it passed new copyright rules, and still requires its customers to sit through unskippable anti-piracy messages at the beginning of movies on DVDs or at the theatre.

Most troubling were lobbyists who lamented the politicians' shifting policy positions due to the popular protest, as if their own preferred approach of spending millions on campaign contributions is somehow a more democratic method of lawmaking.

It may be tempting for SOPA protesters to declare victory, but history teaches that political wins are rarely absolute. The current Canadian legislation, Bill C-11, is much more balanced than the 2007 proposal, but the digital lock provisions that sparked the initial protest remain largely unchanged. In New Zealand, the government later introduced a more balanced bill with greater safeguards, but the prospect of terminating Internet access was not completely eliminated.

SOPA appears to be headed for the dustbin, but successor U.S. legislation is sure to follow. A political consensus on anti-piracy legislation will eventually emerge, but the day the Internet fought back will remain the elephant in the room for years to come.  [Tyee]

6  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • packrat2

    17 weeks ago

    learn from history

    oil companies learned from booze; You CAN kill your customers and get away with it.

    micksoft and the media are doing the same. It's LOTS more profitable to sell a few at a high price than saturate billions with a low one.

    Canada already has some of the worst and most expensive electronic service in the world.

    the region-one censorship zone has hardly begun to take traction.

    Ask blackberry what happens to those to don't play ball.

    BBS ing, CB's and other alternate forms of comm HAVE taken off before and that's without any great tech advances.

    look for MORE of them and hacked systems to get more popular.

    packrat

  • Grouchy

    17 weeks ago

    The Day the Internet Fought Back

    What better way to control the people. If you shut off the source of information, then you have won the battle. Sadly, for us, the battle will never be over. Orwell would be flabbergasted to see how prophetic his book ( 1984 ) was.

  • rantnic

    17 weeks ago

    PUT THE ELEPHANT IN THE BALLOT BOX

    This goes to show that democracy is not totally dead as the "Corptocrats" would have us believe. Now is the time to think about "Occupying the Ballot Box".

  • edward01ca

    17 weeks ago

    Megaupload Was A

    big thing a few days ago, but Filesonic and Filestube are have also gone down. I guess the SOPA & PIP laws have already gone into effect.

  • worried

    17 weeks ago

    SOPA

    I don't understand how artists will make money unless we start paying them for their music and films. The people I talked to who did the online petition were all about wanting to continue their free downloading of movies and music. THey weren't worried about freedom of info being compromised. I seem to be the only one I know who pays for songs off the internet and I don't mind paying at all. Should we be allowed to leech of the creators? How does that support the Arts?SOPA may have been too blunt an instrument, but let's get the conversation going about how to guarantee compensation for the artists in this digital world, or they'll be a dying breed. I wish I could see the anti-SOPA movement as some great wave of sophisticated rebellion based on high ideals, but I think it's just people wanting to continue the free lunch.

  • bluerev

    17 weeks ago

    Don't worry about the artists

    Downloading for free doesn't hurt the artists who think outside the box. For example, there is no copyright protection for comedians, who have to come up with creative ways to humour us. Their jokes are reused, reworked, transformed constantly without any financial reward, yet there is a thriving comedy network of artists. They have to remain creative to work, to live off the royalties garnered from previous work. Copyrights only make people lazy (something that conservatives should be against)