Mediacheck

A Tyee Series

Who's Still for the War in Afghanistan?

Support dwindles among NATO allies.

By Angus Reid, 23 Jul 2007, TheTyee.ca

Harper thumbs up (he's so hip)

Still bullish on Canadian prospects?

Debate over Canada's mission in Afghanistan, and particularly its tough and bloody deployment in Kandahar, continues to be among the biggest stories in federal politics. But Canada's is just one of the many NATO armies on the ground in the central Asian country. So how do our allies feel about our Afghan prospects?

In Canada, only 16 per cent of respondents want the Kandahar mission extended. Nearly half, meanwhile, believe Canadian troops should be withdrawn from the area before the mandate ends in February 2009. For more, click here.

Netherlands: Support for the mission among the Dutch has dropped slightly from 56 to 50 per cent between April and July. Fifty eight per cent however don't want their troops in the tough province of Uruzgan. For more, click here.

Though still part of the coalition, the Polish are a lot less willing these days. Only 17 per cent of Polish respondents to a recent poll support the presence of their troops in Afghanistan. Click here for more.

In Germany, over half of respondents want their troops pulled, details here.

While in Britain, a majority think the presence of their soldiers in Afghanistan is useless. Click here for more.

And half of Italians want all of Italy's soldiers out of Afghanistan and over 38 per cent consider the mission a waste of money. For more, click here.

It's nearly the same in Spain, where half of respondents want their government to withdraw Spanish troops from the country. Details here.

Finally, in the United States: 69 per cent of respondents think the war in Afghanistan against al-Qaeda and the Taliban is not going well. Read the specifics here.

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

19  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • IAMC

    4 years ago

    we don't have historical polls

    In 1944, did they do a poll anywhere in North America about ours views towards the Second World War ( WW2 )
    Did the British take a poll of public support for Winston Churchill? ( who isn't in favour on educators in Britain )
    This habit of main stream media ( MSM ) of using modern information gathering techniques, to compare our lives to that of our ancestors, is a cheap trick, that won't get past us discerning citizens.
    Nice try though.
    Were the women working in the weapons factories polled?
    Were the voters polled?
    Nobody was polled. So , how can we view this polling information, in any kind of historical perspective?

  • Jeffrey J.

    4 years ago

    Warning: Sham Democracy Ahead

    As western society moves ever further away from democratic principles, we are seeing a widening gap between what citizens want and what elite governments give them. It is thus imperative that members of the non-ellite speak out, discuss and organize to retain the last vestiges of our once great societies. The Tyee is a very good example of the continued use of our democratic freedoms. And all of its readers are another. Great article about one of the most critical issues in the western world today!

  • jwstewart

    4 years ago

    It must be wrong.....

    Because as you can see, our PM has teamed up with Darth Vader

  • Umslopogaas

    4 years ago

    It is all numbers.

    We will run our of soldiers long before the Taliban runs out of fanatics.

  • murdock

    4 years ago

    historical polls

    IAMC, you are mostly correct, however there are records that can reflect those decisions:

    Quote:
    In 1944, did they do a poll anywhere in North America about ours views towards the Second World War ( WW2 )

    nothing taken in '44 would have made any sense, but '39-41 does:

    Quote:
    1941: March 7 The Lend Lease Bill passes the United States Senate by a vote of 60 to 31.
    March 11 House of Representatives passes the Lend Lease bill by a vote of 317 to 71. President Roosevelt signs the measure into law.

    showing that 3-1 of the rep's agreed with doing something to help.

    Quote:
    1941: November 7 U. S. Senate votes 50 to 37 to amend Neutrality Act to permit American merchant ships to arm and cross combat zones to deliver supplies to belligerents.

    The desire to move 'towards active war' was not present in as much veracity with a 13 vote margin, the Neutrality Act was amended, but it was not a 'slam dunk'.

    Quote:
    Did the British take a poll of public support for Winston Churchill? ( who isn't in favour on educators in Britain )

    what? you are speaking of 'revisionist history?'

    Quote:
    This habit of main stream media ( MSM ) of using modern information gathering techniques, to compare our lives to that of our ancestors, is a cheap trick, that won't get past us discerning citizens.

    ok so lies, damn lies and statistics

    Quote:
    Nice try though.
    Were the women working in the weapons factories polled?

    what century are you in?

    Quote:
    Were the voters polled?
    Nobody was polled.

    ahem, I was polled.
    while I know you do not like it, guess what I am a voter.

    Quote:
    So , how can we view this polling information, in any kind of historical perspective?

    It is a 'snapshot' of the views of the 'people' something that in our 'representative democracy' does not happen enough.

  • Working Man

    4 years ago

    Umslopogaas, you have hit

    Umslopogaas, you have hit the nail exactly on the head; the Taliban will never give up until every last one of them is dead and the only way to get rid of them would be akin the the Boer War where the British invented the concentration camp and put every single Boer family in them so the fighters had no support and could be hunted down.

    I doubt any western democracy had the stomach for that.

  • Chris H

    4 years ago

    IAMC

    "So , how can we view this polling information, in any kind of historical perspective?"

    Did the article try to do this? What is wrong in trying to figure what the people want to do today? Surely you aren't suggesting that we should live in a dictatorship.

  • Chicken Little

    4 years ago

    War spending

    Harper has already managed to dispose of $22 billion on new military spending on tanks, unmanned drones, heavy lift aircraft and frigates. Enough equipment for two armies, one general said, so I guess we'll have to have another army to go with it. And let's not forget the service contracts - billions more.

    The frigates, of course, are useless in the north, where seasoned circumpolar types call them slushbreakers. Very handy in the Persian Gulf, though, where we'll be protecting Canada's north by protecting American aircraft carriers.

    And what, may I ask, do we need with a rapid reaction force to be based in Quebec? More stuff, more fuel, sitting around waiting for something to happen. It seems a shame to have all that stuff around and not use it, doesn't it?

    And reopening the military college in St-Jean-sur-Richelieu? Good move (not).

  • Skywalker

    4 years ago

    Oh dear me.

    Trust the IAMC people to demand a poll to their satisfaction when it suits them. Almost every right wing government decision is not based on any (repeat any) consideration of what the general mood of the population is at the time. Harper know that Canadians do not support the American adventure in Iraq and they also know that Afghanistan is a mess started but not finished by the George W.. The sooner our boys are not picking George W. irons out of the fire the happier we will all be.

    Have the terrorists been stopped? No. They are regrouping and are more entrenched. Are we more secure in our own country? No. Just see how long it takes to get a passport. Or see how long it takes to get through airport security.

    Harper's trip to South America is just a diversion to take our minds off his failure at home. I'm even ready to have the liberals back and that is saying something.

  • Frank

    4 years ago

    The Liberals back

    That would be something since they put us in Afghanistan and are the ones responsible for balancing the budget on the backs of the poor.

  • Umslopogaas

    4 years ago

    Working Man

    My uncle was a bugler boy at Ladysmith and I have always admired the Boers for their courage to stand against the might of the Empire.

    It took the British more men to defeat the Boers than it took them to defeat Napoleon. The Boers had a small volunteer army, probably only around 2000 men towards the end, who fought valiantly to defend their way of life. If the British had not fought the Boers and learned how to fight a modern war, they would have probably lost the First World War.

    Most people would be surprised that the British deserve credit for the invention of the concentration camp. The Afrikaners may never forgive them for inventing it.

    Initially, if it were up to me, I would have left Afghanistan to its own devices but we are up to our necks now. If we leave we will see a resurgent Taliban exact a hideous revenge on our Afghani allies. The alternatives are: to offer all our allies a place in the West, abandon them to their fate, or win the war.

    We cannot win this with the level of commitment we are prepared to give to it. The Liberals got us in to this mess and the Conservatives need to get us out of it.

    Harper can give our troops the best equipment in the world (and I applaud him for at least trying to provide our people with the tools to do the job) but this is not a place for Canadians to be. We are acting like cultural missionaries and we need to quit thinking that we have all the answers.

  • allmyrelations

    4 years ago

    Afghanistan war

    Well, I guess people like to have their family members dying for another men enrichment opportunities.
    Let see:
    1 - This year 18 workers died in BC;
    2 - I have lost the count of how many Canadian Soldiers have died for nothing in Afghanistan.
    3 - I see very small number of people on the streets demanding that the troops return home.
    6 - In BC the attorney general does not find in the public interest to prosecute the responsible supervisor/owner of a company for the death of a worker.
    5 -I don't see the federal Conservatives or the Liberals descending on the pools.
    6 - I also don't see the provincial Liberals going down on the pools.

    Conclusion:
    Workers are expendable. (Soldiers are workers too)
    No one care for the plight of workers, even workers themselves and their families.

    Afghanistan killing fields will continue and so will the number of BC workers dying for a living.
    Has anyone seeing an in-depth story on the :
    Why aren't government applying Bill C-45 to the hundreds of workers death since 2004?

  • allmyrelations

    4 years ago

    Afghanistan war

    The Afghanistan war is about:
    1 - Population Control
    2 - Natural Resources
    3 - Strategic positioning of USA troops
    4 - Selling weapons
    5 - Enriching a bunch of big business with "fake reconstruction (just like in Iraq).
    6 - Giving a bad name to Canada
    7 - Canada is already part of the US by the "deep integration taking p0lace ( and no one is writing about in any newspaper)
    See:
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6346

    or

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=174

    Did you know that martial law if implemented in the US can be forced upon us here in Canada?

    Go on voting neo-cons, smart people. Go shopping. Consume more and drink more cola!
    y'u all!

  • ME2

    4 years ago

    Is there another way ?

    Does anyone care about those thousands of Afghanis who have supported us and our ideas during our occupation?

    Do we just walk away and leave them to the not-so-tender mercies of the Taliban who do not take too kindly to those who haven't 100% supported their dicta ?

    Don't get me wrong, I'm no supporter of this war to preserve US dominance in the Middle East, nor am I a supporter of Mr Harper who'll ride Bush's coattails wherever they take him.

    IMHO, there's no easy way out of this.

  • SayBlade

    4 years ago

    A very different war!

    IAMC:

    First of all, WW2 was a very different war. While Canada did not have to be involved, there were enough sympathetic ties to Britain that it was not questioned, except perhaps in Québec. We have no war with Afghanistan. It never attacked us or the US. The MSM has painted a large scary picture of Afghanistan, Iraq and Iran. They are tiny countries, smaller than Canada and none had any designs on US destruction. It was a small group of Arabs who MSM told us was The Taliban. If it really exists, it does not have anywhere near the power that Hitler had -- unless it was a CIA invention. Besides, Hitler's power would have eventually fizzled out. WW2 just hastened the process.

    On the question of polling in WW2, well people actively wrote letters to their MPs and the PM then. They didn't have to be asked questions. Words on paper carried far more weight then than now.

  • murdock

    4 years ago

    sure there is ME2

    Quote:
    Does anyone care about those thousands of Afghanis who have supported us and our ideas during our occupation?

    Do we just walk away and leave them to the not-so-tender mercies of the Taliban who do not take too kindly to those who haven't 100% supported their dicta ?

    Bring them here, what difference would another 10 or 20,000 make in the vast lands of Canada?

    Quote:
    Don't get me wrong, I'm no supporter of this war to preserve US dominance in the Middle East, nor am I a supporter of Mr Harper who'll ride Bush's coattails wherever they take him.

    Good, then do the work needed to stick-it to all the war-mongers. Both LIEberal and CONformer have far too much blood on their hands, while I could never vote for the DIPPERS you may. Otherwise vote Independant, make the next election one where the candidates matter, not the party; as I see that as a big reason why we, the people, have lost all control over our national destiny.

    Quote:
    IMHO, there's no easy way out of this.

    Just as there really was no easy way in, we just walked happily along the route of flowers laid by our american 'ally'.

  • ME2

    4 years ago

    Yer right, Murdock

    However, if - according to our usual custom - we follow the lead of our brain-dead "allies", we'll be certain to declare all Afghanis as potential terrorists, and deny them entrance to Canada.

    You are also spot on re not endorsing with a ballot our current political parties. Voting for Independants may indeed be solution, but so also is spoiling one's ballot.

    Most people bridle at this suggestion, thinking that this is a wasted vote. And so it is - if only a few people deliberately do so. However, spoiled ballots ARE counted and duly noted. If there are quite a few of these votes, they indicate the even more who won't resort to this, and thus there is an unrepresented constituency looking for a home.

    Until my present MP came along, I spoiled my ballot in the three previous Fed elections.

  • Muqtaq

    4 years ago

    ... only the dim of wit :)

    Interesting to see Tyee's selection of who/what ranks a best comment :) That's sure to put this one in the "All comments" :)

    Anyway... Irrespective of polls and opinions, wars will always be. I fail to decide which will manage to ruin the earth : war, or the indiscriminate destruction of the earth's environment.

    As to war, Professor of philosophy at Guelph University John McMurtry explains why it is so:

    http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/MiddleEast/TerrorInUSA/NewWar.asp

  • G West

    4 years ago

    Thanks Muqtaq

    Bet he doesn't get too many invitations to speak at Kingston eh?

    I especially liked this passage:

    Quote:
    There is little difference in moral substance between these atavistic gangs, although a megalomaniac rhetoric of each side proclaims direct backing from God. Both sides are mass killers, and both systematically destroy civilians and their means of life with sanctimonious justification overriding all accountability to truth or due legal process. Both proclaim their mission as the working of divine Justice, and both destroy the lives and human conditions of innocent others with a pathological abandon that takes the breath away. This is, in fact, the function of the demonstration killings and destructions - to command by terror, and seize whatever is wanted.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.