Opinion

Why Federal Elections Bore

The fun action happens at democracy's local level.

By Rafe Mair, 15 Sep 2008, TheTyee.ca

John Cummins

MP Cummins: Punished for his local integrity.

Readers will know of Mair's Axiom II, namely, "You don't have to be a 10 in politics, you can be a three if everyone else is a two."*

Here, and I suggest you write this down, is Mair's Axiom III. "The closer a politician's throat is to your hands, the nearer you are to democracy."

Federal politicians are rather like absentee landlords who show the flag occasionally to the cloth-capped peasantry, and when that disagreeable exercise is behind them, head back to the huddled musk-ox barn on Parliament Hill, where the food and drink are plentiful and good, subsidized by the peasants, and the worst you face is an unkind question from someone you don't give a damn about anyway.

Provincial elections are more interesting because the politicians are closer to home -- though the news media hardly holds them to account like they used to.

But the rubber really hits the road with local politics. And the smaller the population, the better the fun.

Dogged politics in Lions Bay

I was once an alderman (that's what they were called then and the women on my council didn't seem to mind) in Kamloops, and it was a hairy experience I can tell you! The meetings were public and the access unlimited. Issues didn't go away until something was done. There was no place to hide. That was democracy.

Wendy and I live in the small village of Lions Bay where citizens just by making a nuisance of themselves can get their own way. Every morning we take Chauncey, our chocolate Labrador, down to the ocean for a swim. The parking lot has about 10 stalls and four signs telling people not to park without a permit, two signs telling divers not to expose their underwear when getting into wetsuits and two signs telling people that their dogs must be on a leash. In fact, one could miss the parking lot for the signs. While this is the only place in Lions Bay that these particular signs can be, other signs of similar annoyance abound throughout the rest of our village. One lady set out to count our signs, sure that we'd get into the Guinness Book of Records for signs in a village. But, matched against her life expectancy, the job was two much for her so she quit.

Chauncey is not the only dog that swims at what we affectionately call Bow Wow Beach and all of us delight in removing our dogs' leashes in front of the house whose occupant inspired the signs. And I've been waiting for the right moment to disrobe in the parking lot whilst donning my wetsuit. Trouble is, I don't own a wetsuit and I doubt that wetsuit stores have sizes for my particular shape and avoirdupois. In any event, village democracy reacts to complaints by passing laws and putting in place signs that we non-complainants delight in flouting. It's all rather fun, actually.

Who gets the big bucks

I think at the local level there is sort of a general understanding. People who bitch all the time get to do so as often as they wish and it's understood that once they have worn the council out, a rule will be passed; it's also understood that not only will everyone else ignore the rule but will hail the house with the complainant in it with an upraised fist, one finger showing.

There is, I'm distressed to report, a great problem with local democracy: the job of running things isn't worth the paltry sums paid. The irony is that the further the politician is from the voter, and the less accountable he is, the more money he makes. The comforts of subsidized food, drink, lodging and a handsome pay cheque await the politician who puts himself beyond the voter's reach -- until election time.

Which brings us to Gary Lunn, minister of Natural Resources and MP for Saanich-Gulf Islands. Lunn, clearly not the sharpest pencil in the prime minister's box, takes an industry tour of one of the Autocrat Campbell's river projects and gets so overwhelmed by industrial smarm that he nearly swoons with enthusiasm for this disastrous policy.

It evidently doesn't dawn on His Honour that these projects are environmentally devastating because, I mean wow! The corporate flack that took him on that nice helicopter ride would have said something if there were any downsides, wouldn't he? I mean, aren't we dealing with environmentally conscious, truth-telling public relations chaps who always ignore the greed of their masters, and tell the complete unvarnished truth?

Sticking up for your constituents

When it comes to federal MPs paying attention to folks back home, a prime exception to the rule is John Cummins, M.P., Delta-Richmond East. He is a Conservative, formerly Reform. (I vote Green, incidentally) Cummins has consistently acted in what he felt were the best interests of his consistency.

On one occasion, he felt that a bill should be debated, so flouted the orders of Prime Minister Harper to give leave to have the bill passed forthwith. He lost his shadow cabinet post. Cummins was on the Commons Fisheries Committee and criticized amendments to the Fisheries Act by the minister and was promptly yanked off the committee by Harper. Cummins, though the most knowledgeable MP in the House on the West Coast fishery, is not the Fisheries minister and won't be the minister of anything because he refuses to subvert his constituents feelings to the wishes of the prime minister.

I've been involved in the shocking environmental desecration proposed, and being undertaken, by both senior governments in Cummins' riding and John Cummins has been there fighting alongside his citizens, while the Liberal MLA for the area, Val Roddick, who usually won't shut up, runs and hides. So do the ministers.

There is, after all this, a moral to this story. If we had a system where the member of Parliament had the powers in fact that he has on paper, we would see a lot more John Cummins. As long as we have the same old, "first past the post election system" (if "system" it can be called), we will have more lickspittles like Lunn and Roddick and fewer John Cummins.

It really isn't any more complicated than that.

*Mair's Axiom I is "You make a very serious mistake assuming that people in charge know what the hell they're doing."

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

36  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • ME2

    3 years ago

    Good column, Rafe

    You're right on, Rafe, both Federal and Provincial politics have become a bore. For me, this is because because no matter what they promise to do, and NOT to do, once elected, they'll do damn well what they please (or more usually what they're told to do) anyway.

    All my life I've been a believer in Party politics, but you're right, the only way to escape the domination of the MLA and MP by the Party will be through the dumping of the FPP system. This will force governments to legislate more accordingly to the electorate's wishes.

    And you are quite right that the small town politico is more responsible - and responsive - to her / his constituents when they can be collared on the street and asked "Why in God's name did you vote that way?"

  • G West

    3 years ago

    who knew

    people wear underwear in wetsuits?

  • Fiat lux

    3 years ago

    The silliest part are these

    The silliest part are these election campaigns, trying to warp people's already warped minds into certain directions.

    Totally unnecessary. People who have to make their minds up during these few weeks of madness, or on their way to the polls, obviously have no idea what the issues and party policies are and their vote is wasted.

    Usually on the wrong person, who was able to spend the most during the silly season of the campaign.

    Ed Deak.

  • G West

    3 years ago

    Ed

    I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on the economic meltdown...hearing Allan Greenspan - whose role in creating this phony system was significant - talking about a once in a century event WAS pretty funny.

    He's wishing, and hoping, that's all it is.

    GW

  • G West

    3 years ago

    Here's what Greespan said:

    Alan Greenspan speaking Sunday on “This Week with George Stephanopulos”

    When he was asked if this is the worst economic crisis he’s seen in his career, Greenspan replied: “Oh, by far. There's no question that this is in the process of outstripping anything I've seen, and it still is not resolved and it still has a way to go.”

    When he was asked if the chances of escaping a recession are greater than 50 percent, he said:

    “No, I think it's less than 50 percent. I can't believe we could have a once-in-a-century type of financial crisis without a significant impact on the real economy globally, and I think that indeed is what is in the process of occurring.”

  • Van Isle

    3 years ago

    I cannot understand why

    I cannot understand why Canadians still vote for the same 2 established political parties election after election. At the same time the voter turnout is getting less and less. Maybe the political parties behave the way they do, so more and more voters feel that their vote doesn't have any bearing, so why vote at all; thus it's easier for the politians to do whatever they want when they get elected. Democracy only happens on election day but the average voter is so swooned by the BS that they're numb when they cast their ballot. Democracy is propagated by politians and the mass-media. Democracy in Canada is a myth.

  • slim

    3 years ago

    Undies not allowed. Wear your togs.

    If the Imperial Order of the Lions Bay Kingdom won't let you expose your undies when changing into a wetsuit, wear a speedo--a teeny weeny speedo.

  • Frank

    3 years ago

    Taliban Stephen

    So ol' Steve is gonna "cut and run" in 2011. Someone should see if his Taliban friends are helping to fund his campaign.

    I guess its no wonder your name is "Taliban Stephen" when you just decide to declare one day that helping Afghanistan isn't your problem.

  • Fiat lux

    3 years ago

    I have a fear that this

    I have a fear that this "economic meltdown" is a long, at least 70-80 years, planned event, made possible with bank deregulation and the loss of public control over money creation.

    The real insider, corporate mafia have used this power to "create" incredible amounts of worthless, imaginary capital to take control of the world's resources and now they can destroy the monetary part, causing a huge, worldwide depression, forcing a desperate humanity to beg for corporate dictatorship.

    They have nothing to lose, except worthless money, but everything to gain with the real power in their hands.

    It won't be long before babies will receive microchip implants at birth to make them "more efficient".

    Such beauties will be the daily norm, unless humanity has the guts to wake and stand up and sweep these crooks from power.

    Starting with some of their pimp governments and politicians pushing us over the brink with their sweet talk and lying promises, right now. Not to mention our universities, handing them the scriptural licence with their brainwashing of students for their service.

    Ed Deak.

  • Skywalker

    3 years ago

    Good one Rafe!

    Excellent piece Rafe. Makes me wonder what Maxim V will be.

  • Fiat lux

    3 years ago

    Frank, the only people the

    Frank, the only people the handful of NATO troops, being picked off one by one, are helping in Afghanistan are the arms manufacturers and the officer corps demanding more and bigger bangs.

    The troops are occupying a few postage stamp sized bases and are getting blown up even on the few roads they patrol, until the countries sending them are forced to take them away from dying for nothing.

    As soldiers have been dying uselessly, by the millions, in the service of ruling classes, for thousands of years.

    It is not countries that fight wars, but rulers and governments.

    Ed Deak.

  • Frank

    3 years ago

    Ed

    Sorry Ed, but I'm just pointing out that "Taliban Stephen" is a hypocrite.

    Here's an article by Thomas Walkom today on this issue titled "Afghan war worth fighting . . . but only until 2011"

    http://www.thestar.com/FederalElection/article/499018

  • bontano

    3 years ago

    Dog chauffeur?

    I like your columns, Rafe, but I have a hard time accepting the sincerity of someone who describes himself as an environmentalist when he makes one car trip a day just to drive his dog to the beach.

  • Frank

    3 years ago

    Taliban supports Stephen Harper

    "A top Taliban commander is applauding Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper's decision to pull troops out of Afghanistan by 2011, saying it will save the lives of soldiers and civilians, while vowing to continue their "domestic war."

    This is excellent for the Conservatives, they've got the Kandahar vote, it should be majority gov't now.

  • realisticman

    3 years ago

    Tyee columnist writes:

    Terry Glavin

    Quote:
    Saturday, September 13, 2008
    In Today's National Post: Why Canada's Politicians Are Ignoring Afghanistan
    From an opinion essay I wrote about the past week's weirdness on the campaign trail:

    . . . .The Conservatives are afraid of the issue because the polls keep tilting against Canada’s Afghan engagement, especially in key Quebec ridings. The Liberals don’t want to talk about the issue either, because they’ve been split on Afghanistan — and, after all, it was their party that got us into Kandahar in the first place.

    The Bloc Québécois, the New Democratic Party and the Greens each claim to be champions of multilateralism and humanitarianism in foreign policy. The mission in Afghanistan serves both principles — yet all three parties oppose an extended Canadian involvement in the country. And so they all risk being seen as hypocritical for making what UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has properly called a “misjudgment of historic proportions” in their troops-out position — a position also opposed by the vast majority of the Afghan people.

  • sanamark

    3 years ago

    Time is on their side

    While posters bemoan the fact that we have no democracy (and if you think that is true, go live in a dictatorship), Canada's pullout of Afghanistan is a direct result of the unpopularity of the war.

    The Taliban are an ancient group of people. They have seen invaders come and go for centuries and they know that sooner or later they will leave.

    Just like we are doing.

  • Frank

    3 years ago

    realisticman

    In other words "Taliban Stephen" is "cutting and running" because the NDP and Greens are against the mission? Cool.

  • morechatter

    3 years ago

    Its the stuff movies are made of

    The commercials the parties have out are a hoot despite the obvious bore of the election which I attribute to our neighbors. The USA media charade of presidential hopefuls is the stuff movies are made of as a war traumatized old man and a small town mom of five who is suffering from downs baby blues are front runners. I am getting a kick out of laid back Layton and his attack on the Conservatives as could easily be about the Liberals as he goes for more seats. And Dion, who I like but believe his green shift will be devastating to the economy as energy prices take their tole on Canadians at the pumps and the food check outs. With the crash to the American market and gas prices escalating the green shift may just become more about the shift from the environment to the green in Canadian pockets rather than the air they breath given its the best the world has to offer. The Liberal's Dion has the best commercials so far but then aren't they the guys with the in, the in on advertising.

  • Frank

    3 years ago

    "[OFFENSIVE WORD DIRECTED AT A TYEE COLUMNIST REMOVED.] Glavin"

    Must be tough to be Terry this week, after attacking the NDP for years on this issue he wakes up find that the Conservatives never gave a rat's ass about the women and children of Afghanistan at all, we were just punching a clock to look good. Shift's over in 2011 apparently.

    I bet the soldiers over there are really gung ho now to hear that Harper thinks we need to spend 3 more years there and then come home, nothing about whether we succeed or fail, its just a time limit.

  • alda

    3 years ago

    Van Isle has it right.

    Van Isle couldn't have put it better.

    At the end of the day, democracy in Canada is a public relations joke foisted on the poor little sheeple who don't have a peons' say in the system.

    My fury is directed at the left that refuses to unite. What egotists - powerless Lilliputians in team uniforms running around with string around the sleeping giant, all thinking that their team will take over the giant. Divide and conquer shall forever rule.

  • Frank

    3 years ago

    alda

    The left is united, under the NDP banner. Has been for a long time except for a few who still insist on voting communist or Marxist.

    But the Liberals are not a left-wing party. They weren't under Chretien and Martin and certainly not under the Hitler-loving Mackenzie King or those before. The Pearson-Trudeau period did lean left on some issues, especially when the NDP held the balance of power, but that was a very long time ago.

    If the new leader Dion was left-wing he wouldn't say the Left doesn't understand economics would he?

  • trueman

    3 years ago

    local politics

    A really fun column Rafe. Maybe too much info about your skinny-dip swimming dog. Does Lion's Bay require wet suits for mutts?
    Anyway, my local government isn`t even willing to admit that it is a government. Yeah, the Islands Trust. Good concept but overblown with regulations. When in doubt, create a bylaw.
    Still, its a love hate relationship we have with those brave enough to represent the people locally. That`s why they need to serve for short periods of time; and then return to the role of ordinary person and recharge.

  • Skywalker

    3 years ago

    Realisticman

    It's comments like "The mission in Afghanistan serves both principles" that have me shaking my head. We are going to improve human rights in Afganistan at the point of a gun. We'll force democracy on you whether you like it or not. We are there only becuse the U.S. wanted to use their resources for an oil adventure in Iraq and this is a noble quest for multilateralism and humanitarianism? How strange does it get? Harper is a lap dog for the U.S. oil interests. Him trying to come across as this nice fellow you could have a coffee with is as transparent as the famous Gordo in a working man's shirt.

    The thought of giving Harper a majority is enough to make me a supporter of any system of government besides the first past the post.

  • sanamark

    3 years ago

    Not exactly, Frank

    Quote:
    In other words "Taliban Stephen" is "cutting and running" because the NDP and Greens are against the mission? Cool.

    Harper has pledged to leave Afghanistan because the deployment of troops there is not popular and serves no political end for him and it can certainly do him a lot of political damage.

    I am not a big fan of Harper but I do believe he is a politically astute man. His real challenge will be to suppress the whack jobs in his own party, which he has done with better success than I thought he ever could.

  • Frank

    3 years ago

    sanamark

    Quote:
    Harper has pledged to leave Afghanistan because the deployment of troops there is not popular

    It wasn't that popular with most of the Left before either. It still remains somewhat popular with the Right. The only change is we're in an election campaign.

    Quote:
    and serves no political end for him and it can certainly do him a lot of political damage.

    Too bad Harper hadn't stated that right off the bat, "We're going to fight in Afghanistan for women and children and as long as its politically expedient for me personally". I'm sure that little nugget of truth would have been popular among the soldiers doing the dying eh?

  • alda

    3 years ago

    to Frank

    You're right, of course, but I actually wasn't referring to mainstream, status-quo Liberals (who are one side of the corporate coin), but the sliver - the progressive wing of the Whigs who fool themselves into thinking they're "green," "socially sensitive," etc.

    Ditto for many of my "green party" friends who see themselves as fighting on the side of "right" Still and all, gluing all those slivers together, doesn't make a plank of wood, I know, but it'd be a start. The deliberately constructed political divisions between people wanting to vote for the public good, but not having the common sense to understand how the system works, is completely disheartening.

  • netscaper2

    3 years ago

    what about the US elections ?

    Can there be anything more boring than a year long strech of bull shit ? At least in the great white north it's over quickly.

  • netscaper2

    3 years ago

    hey Frank !

    [PERSONALLY OFFENSIVE COMMENT DIRECTED AT ANOTHER COMMENTER REMOVED. PLEASE FOCUS ON ARGUMENTS AND FACTS, NOT PERSONAL SNIPES. -MODERATOR.]

  • Skywalker

    3 years ago

    Netscaper2

    A very well thought out and reasoned rebuttal.

  • G West

    3 years ago

    This comment takes the cake

    The Taliban are an ancient group of people.

    Please, let us have a couple of historical references to back up THAT statement.

  • G West

    3 years ago

    I think you'll find

    That the first mention you'll find of the Taliban dates from 1994 or thereabouts.

    The Taliban (the word means 'student' in Pashto) are a Sunni Islamist and Pashtun nationalist movement that ruled most of Afghanistan from 1996 until 2001.

    Pretty ancient~

  • Frank

    3 years ago

    netscaper2

    I guess its fair to say you support Harper using the lives of Canadian soldiers to support his political goals. Some of us don't.

  • Fish-counter

    3 years ago

    Flogging a dead horse....

    Steven Harper has made a series of mistakes during his Reign of Error:

    1. Setting the date of the next election for 2009. This was wishful thinking. No minority government can set the date of the next election. One vote of no-confidence and you are gone. Harper finessed the opposition parties only because they were leader-disadvantaged or otherwise bankrupt. Tampering with democracy is a serious political offence.

    2. Calling the election early. He just made his first flip-flop and proved he cannot be trusted. He is just as poll-driven as his predecessors.

    3. Trying to deny the Green Party a place in the TV debate. That was chauvinistic, childish and counterproductive.

    4. Changing his mind and agreeing to have Elizabeth May in on the TV event. This was his second flip-flop.

    5. None of the above amount to a hill of beans, but the fifth error will cost lives. Announcing that the Canadian mission in Afganistan will end in 2011 makes every soldier over there a target. It deftly undermines their morale and puts the Canadian commitment to upholding democracy on a par with a 2% tax cut on Diesel fuel. Both are election issues, apparently. Good move, Steven!

    At 59 years of age, and against my own better judgement, I joined a political party last week. Mr. Harper made me join The Greens. I am SO sick of watching the Four Stooges do their same-old deja-vu routine, something has got to change. We are on the brink of more social upheaval than we can possibly imagine. The arctic will soon be ice-free and the climate is most definitely changing, but not apparently, in Ottawa. The time is past due for meaningful policies that will curb our greenhouse gas emissions. We needed to get moving on this stuff ten years ago.

    I only hope The Greens will rise above the muck in the mire and actually DO something. Having a fifth do-nothing party would be too much. The entertainment value plummetted with the stock market.

  • G West

    3 years ago

    Fish counter

    Joining the greens may make you 'feel' good, which is fine as far as it goes.

    May definitely deserves to be heard - but as for her chances of:
    1) electing any members, and;
    2) having much influence after Oct 14...

    Well, I hope that 'good' feeling has sticking power, cause it's gonna have to last you through 4 more years of pee wee rambo government.

  • Frank

    3 years ago

    Voting strategically

    An article on "Anything But Conservative" by Duncan Cameron

    http://www.rabble.ca/politics.shtml?sh_itm=a8e0e0e1ea47cba78448211d146dfaa1&rXn=1&

  • alive

    3 years ago

    is the law an ass?

    Rafe, so democracy is what is manifested in Lions Bay?
    The powers that be gives in to complaints and then everybody ignores the new regulations/laws?
    On a larger scale we see the silly speedlimits that everybody breaks, because they are only there to satisfy a few who still drive 1950 vehicles and have no idea of what modern safety means.
    Going even more up-to-date we have Harpo who now governs by the latest poll, happily going back on his own words!
    My question is when is it OK to break a law? is it OK to walk on the grass in spite of the sign, but not OK to park in a disabled spot?
    Would it not be smarter to have laws that make sense and then enforce them?

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.