Are you part of The Tyee's critical 1%?

Thanks for reading The Tyee today — we hope this article added to your day in some way. Our team of independent journalists takes pride in doing in-depth reporting and taking time to get it right.

We're able to focus our attention on publishing impactful journalism in the public interest, and publish it for free for all to read, because we have the support of Tyee Builders. Tyee Builders are readers who contribute a bit of money — at a level and frequency of their choice — to support our editorial budget.

This core of supporters — making up about 1 to 2 per cent of our daily readership — enables us to pay our writers, keep our articles free and open to all, and not bombard our readers with annoying ads while you try to read.

Instead of focusing on what kind of articles will attract the most advertising dollars, we can spend time devoted to researching and writing stories that our readers find most valuable and make the most positive impact in our region.

If you'd like to join thousands of readers who help make independent journalism possible, consider joining Tyee Builders. Thank you.

— Jeanette Ageson, Publisher

Click here to Join Tyee Builders

Help us un-break journalism in Canada

You made it all the way through the article – I hope that means you liked it (or if not ‘liked’ it, gleaned some useful information from it). Tyee articles are known for being quite lengthy, so we appreciate when people spend some quality time with our work.

Listen, I’ll get to the point – the article you just read was made possible because our non-profit newsroom was able to pay a talented journalist to research and write it. And we can only afford to do that because of our business model, which relies on a certain percentage of our readers signing up for our paid membership program called Tyee Builders.

The traditional business model for journalism in Canada has been completely disrupted, and we’re witnessing a slow collapse as corporate newsrooms buy up distressed publications, lay people off, and suck the value out of them before declaring bankruptcy. And it doesn’t help that tech giant Meta has blocked Canadian news on their Facebook and Instagram platforms.

There is another way and we are carving the path.

Between 1 to 2 per cent of people who visit The Tyee contribute financially, but amazingly, that small percentage is enough to fund half of our overall budget. And it means we can operate without a paywall, too. 1 per cent of people giving means 99 per cent of people get access to quality, fact-based journalism from a talented team of journalists who live and work in B.C., Alberta, and across Canada. We think that’s pretty remarkable.

If you’re concerned about the way journalism is heading in Canada and you’d like to do something about it, consider joining Tyee Builders and contributing an amount that works for you.

— Jeanette Ageson, Publisher

Click here to Join Tyee Builders
Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.
support us subscribe free
Mediacheck
Video
Politics

Waassssssuuuuuppppp!?

Eight years later, the seminal beer commercial is updated for a more sober era.

Jordie Yow 28 Oct 2008TheTyee.ca

Jordie Yow is the editor of Discorder magazine and writes about video and music for The Tyee.
image atom
The difference 8 Bush years makes.

"Hey, dude. Wassup?"

"Nothin' B. Watching the game. Drinking a Bud."

Those are the opening lines to the original, year 2000, Budweiser commercial that inspired people in every social circle to shout, "Waassssssuuuuuppppp!?" Whether it annoyed or amused you, you can't deny that this commercial was one of the most influential of its time, and that you either annoyingly said this word or knew people who did.

Pre-9-11, pre-market crash, the five Joe Sixpacks in the spot had jobs and nothing to worry about but beer, the game and how to alleviate their boredom.

Fast-forward eight years to this week: a video portal called 60 Frames gathered the crew from the original spots to answer the question "Wassup?" In other words, what would each be up to now.

It opens with the original character sitting at home. He's not watching the game, but John McCain announcing that the fundamentals of the economy are strong. This time instead of drinking a beer, he's reading the classified section -- he's lost his home and is looking for a job.

It's revealed that each of the original characters is suffering in some way as a result of the current Bush government's failed polices: one is serving in Iraq, one is unable to pay for health care, another attempts suicide after watching the collapsing stock market, and to top it all off, the last is stuck in a hurricane.

At the end of the commercial, when his Iraq-based buddy (at a phone booth in the desert) asks him again, "Wassup?" the lead character breaks into a smile as he watches Barack and Michelle Obama at a rally on TV.

Nobody embodies Joe Sixpack, or the other average Joes, more than those five actors, famous only for being average guys in a beer commercial. With Obama positioning himself as the protector of the little guy, this spot suggests the message, "Change. That's wassup," might be getting out there.

On the other hand, the Wassup guys are, of course, actors. So does the video suggest Obama is actually reaching Joe Sixpack, or just that more actors wish he were?

Related Tyee stories

[Tyee]

Read more: Video, Politics

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Are You Concerned about AI?

Take this week's poll