Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.
Opinion
Indigenous
Politics
BC Politics

Carrier Sekani Chiefs to Province: Reset Talks on Natural Resource Development

Denial of aboriginal rights is 'fundamentally racist.'

Carrier Sekani Chiefs 21 Jan 2015TheTyee.ca

Signatories to this letter include Chief Justa Monk, Tl'azt'en Nation; Chief Martin Louie, Nadleh Whut'en; Chief Dan George, Burns Lake Band; Chief Anita Williams, Takla Lake First Nation; Chief Fred Sam, Nak'azdli Band; Chief Stanley Thomas, Saik'uz First Nation; Chief Archie Patrick, Stellat'en First Nation; and Tribal Chief Terry Teegee, Carrier Sekani Tribal Council.

The "Premier's BC Natural Resource" Forum this week in Prince George provides an important opportunity for First Nations and the provincial government to refocus and develop a new way to address government-to-government engagement.

The present approach by the Crown to addressing land, resource development decision-making and environmental, social and other significant impacts raised by First Nations has not been successful.

The unanimous decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on June 26, 2014 provides clear guidance to governments and industry proponents when it said:

"Governments and individuals proposing to use or exploit land, whether before or after a declaration of Aboriginal title, can avoid a charge of infringement or failure to adequately consult by obtaining the consent of the interested Aboriginal group."

We the Carrier and Sekani peoples are the original peoples to the vast territory in the central plateau of this province. This land has been our homeland since ancient times. It still is. It provides for our people now as it has in the past. Yet the federal and provincial governments treat our people as outsiders who must "prove" that we have historically -- and currently -- use and occupy these lands.

And the best the province is able to commit to is that we have "asserted rights" in and "asserted Aboriginal title" to our "asserted territories." We are seen as "asserted peoples" until we provide proof in court. This government's denial of the existence of fundamental human and constitutional rights of our people is absolutely ridiculous and fundamentally racist.

Crown assumed 'sovereignty'

Since the Crown, without our people's consent in any form, assumed "sovereignty" to our territories in 1846, a mere 149 years ago, our traditional lands and resources have been used as the economic base for and the development of villages, towns, cities, the province and country.

Presently, mining, fishery, forestry, land and energy resources are substantial economic drivers. This is the major source of all wealth creation supporting jobs and business development. There is no good reason for First Nations to be on the sidelines of these economic activities. While properly taking care of the environment, protecting traditional food sources and security and planning for and acting on the inevitable social impacts First Nations should also see economic benefits, including revenues and jobs, from our traditional lands and resources. As everyone knows, the social-economic gaps our people face are significant. We are addressing these in a constructive and proactive way and we need governments to be full partners in this.

The government is promoting liquefied natural gas and the energy industry as a significantly important and beneficial new industry in this province. Our communities have been in discussions with LNG pipeline proponents, and on a limited basis with the government, on potential impacts as well as initiatives, which will benefit our people.

Studies ignored

Our community members have prepared detailed social and economic impact studies with important recommendations to address our concerns.

These have been submitted to the government and industry. However, when the government issued environmental and assessment certificates, these reports and recommendations were largely ignored.

This is why Nadleh and Nak'azdli First Nations with the full support of other Carrier Sekani First Nations filed a judicial review application.

As the elected Chiefs of our respective First Nations, we will continue to fight on behalf of our people and ensure the concerns they have raised with us are fully and effectively dealt with.

Negotiation, in good faith, is our preferred approach. Following the Tsilhqot'in case, the province's approach in determining the "strength" of our land claim and the degree (low, medium or high) of "impacts" is not one we can accept. It is the status quo all over again! The province cannot afford to conduct its "business as usual," because it will continue to create uncertainty for investment and for development.

A prime example of this is the 19 court cases filed against Canada and Enbridge with respect to the Northern Gateway proposal.

We are the original owners of the lands and resources in our respective territories and we have aboriginal rights and aboriginal title to our lands and resources.

The Constitution of Canada "recognizes and affirms" this. We have never given this up. As the Supreme Court of Canada stated in Tsilhqot'in, and given the significant impacts arising from LNG and other resources development, we are firm in our view that our respective First Nation's consent is absolutely necessary. Any agreement with our First Nations about our traditional lands and resources will require this standard.  [Tyee]

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Do You Think Trudeau Will Survive the Next Election?

Take this week's poll