No evidence submitted to Gateway hearings, no public stand. Who will speak for BC?
BC NDP Leader Adrian Dix on his party's position: 'No to the pipeline and no to oil tankers on our north coast.'

-
Premier won't take position on Northern Gateway but calls NDP concerns 'goofy' and 'gobbledygook.'
-
Gordon Campbell signed away our right to enviro-assess pipeline projects. You can get it back.
-
Pipes could carry 60 per cent more than now proposed. Result: hundreds more tankers off BC's coast.
[Editor's note: The Tyee received this unsolicited op-ed from Adrian Dix's office on Wednesday, July 4. We offered the premier to present her own perspective in a separate article. Her spokesperson said that may be forthcoming.]
Recently, the B.C. New Democrat caucus submitted a letter to the National Energy Board stating that we are opposed to the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline. This decision was made after a lengthy period carefully considering the evidence, the potential risks and benefits, and consulting with British Columbians.
B.C. New Democrats fully support economic development and the creation of jobs in B.C. For example, we support liquefied natural gas plants in Kitimat. We also support the goals of Coastal First Nations, who have a vision of economic development that includes forestry, fisheries, clean power and tourism, but which is in direct conflict with the pipeline and oil tanker traffic on the north and central coasts.
To be worthy of support, proposed projects must generate a net benefit to British Columbians that balances environmental, social, and economic objectives. The Northern Gateway pipeline fails this test: B.C. takes on almost all the risks, while the vast majority of the benefits will be enjoyed by multinational oil companies.
The fate of the Enbridge pipeline will be decided by the NEB's Joint Review Panel, after it has weighed the evidence for and against. That is why the BC NDP caucus submitted our detailed case against the project.
That is also why the Government of Canada and the Government of Alberta have submitted evidence to the panel.
Premier's absence
Yet our own provincial government has been absent without leave on this crucial issue. Premier Clark has refused to take a position on the pipeline, even though she has admitted that -- to use her own words -- B.C. is taking "100 per cent of the risks" yet "gets about the same benefit as Nova Scotia."
At the same time, the premier has stated she is "pro-pipeline."
This contradictory stance can only be interpreted as a deliberate strategy of a premier who wants the Enbridge pipeline to proceed, but doesn't want to say so.
The Liberals have deliberately left the job of arguing for the pipeline to the pro-pipeline governments of Canada and Alberta, along with Enbridge itself.
In fact, the Liberal government has missed the deadline to provide evidence to the panel. This again can only be seen as a deliberate strategy -- the government does not want to introduce evidence because it does not want to take a position. The only other interpretation for missing the deadline is incompetence.
When I questioned the premier about missing the deadline in the Legislature, she claimed "we have the right to present evidence in the final hearings."
This is simply not true: the deadline passed on Jan. 4. The final hearings can only reference evidence introduced by that deadline. The government's opportunities for meaningful participation in the process -- to effectively and forcefully represent B.C.'s interests in the hearings -- are now virtually non-existent.
'Stay tuned' for what?
This is a profound abdication of responsibility by this Liberal government: when her government had its chance to ensure B.C.'s voice would be heard, it passed on the opportunity.
When pressed on the matter, the premier says it's too early to draw conclusions, we need to learn more. The Enbridge application was submitted two years ago. Is that not long enough for the government to draw some conclusions?
Yet all the premier will say when answering these questions is "stay tuned."
Stay tuned for what? For a decision by Ottawa that her government made no effort to influence?
Our government has made a cynical, calculated decision to let other parties, like multinational oil companies and the governments of Canada and Alberta, do the heavy lifting in favour of the pipeline.
Governments have responsibility to represent the people who elect them. Yet the people of B.C. are being denied a voice in the Enbridge pipeline decision because their government is either hiding its agenda by playing cynical political games or is flat out incompetent.
It's time the premier and her government stopped hiding and took a stand on the Enbridge pipeline. Are they for it? Or are they against it?
The people of B.C. deserve to know where their government stands on the Enbridge pipeline. The position of the BC NDP is clear: no to the pipeline and no to oil tankers on our north coast. ![[Tyee]](http://thetyee.cachefly.net/ui/img/ico_fishie.png)
Adrian Dix is leader of the BC NDP.
47
Login or register to post comments
cheena1
46 weeks ago
Poor Christy!
Aw Geez, no one wants to give po lil Christy a break - including me! Exactly what is this womans' problem?? Is she a radio host? Is she a Premier? Is she too busy running after harper for a Senate seat when she gets turfed next year?
To think that this silly woman believes she can play 'coy' and get away with it - dumb! How can she be in the position of Premier, and not take a public stand on the Northern Gateway, the biggest issue this province is facing?
O well, her loss (pun intended) ...
bcguy
46 weeks ago
Way to go Adrian. You placed
Way to go Adrian. You placed the Provincial NDP position squarly in front of the commission. Ms Dithers did her usual by wanting but not telling the commision about the pipe lines. She is unable to grast the lack of benefits to our province. Time to get out of town Ms.Christy
Forest_Lover
46 weeks ago
Clark shows her True Colours, Spineless and no conscience too.
The strange silence coming from Clark's otherwise 'bleeting' mouth is a clear indication that she no longer deserves to be leader of BC. This spineless stance on one of the most crutial issues in BC's history should go down in history and told all accross the province in media,radio and television. BC residents should be told flat out that the Liberals would rather stay silent than do what they are paid to do by our tax dollars. To avoid responsibility and do sweet F@&% all.
Fiat lux
46 weeks ago
Nothing unusual in this.
Nothing unusual in this. Christy is trying to play up to the "conservative" vote, Harper, the Fraser Inst. and the university economics departments.
This is all about "prosperity" and "wealth creation", together with their secret deals to sell off BC and Canada to the international corporate mafia, the 15 million slave labour kids in India and the billion slaves in commie China.
Ed Deak.
Van Isle
46 weeks ago
Adrian, I have a problem with
Adrian, I have a problem with the Liquefied Natural Gas that some people in business and Government (and the NDP) have been yakking about. Siberia is loaded with natural gas, they got so much of it they don't know what to do with it. If one looks at a map Siberia is a lot closer to China than we are and it's easier and cheaper to pipe it than to compress it into a liquid and then ship it. So why in hell's sake are we going to go spend all that money to build a whole brand new facility in Kitimat and go in competetion againt the Russians when it's a no-win situation for us? Are we that stupid?
coop
46 weeks ago
The big question...
The big question will be what happens when the oily Harper regime approves the pipeline and the new NDP government says "No Way." Will Harper then try to override provincial jurisdiction over the land base? If so, will it become a constitutional debate at the Supreme Court? This should be the topic of another Tyee article that includes interviews with various university experts.
Hakuin
46 weeks ago
this pipeline was a done deal years before
it was ever announced to the people. The only ones who are going to stop it are the people, on the ground, at the front. The war is already on, don't waste your time and energy with the posturing Quislings and idiot Chamberlains.
igbymac
46 weeks ago
what's the point of this article?
It's entirely self-serving. It sheds not a ray of light on anything other than Dix is your prototypical politician.
Do we need to be reminded that Clark and the Liberals are world-class losers? Dix spend 3/4 of the article pointing this out. So the argument goes, since the NDP are the opposition they mustn't be world-class losers as well. Too bad for him some of us know better.
Skywalker
46 weeks ago
The point of the article is obvious.
It is to define the difference between them. Anyone can understand that.
Jim Rosgen
46 weeks ago
Dix to Clark
The opinion Mr. Dix sent to Ms. Clark is the same one many of us have been sending her for quite some time. Her failure to even register the province to present information to the panel is negligent if not criminal. By remaining with her head stuck in the (tar)sand, she is giving tacit approval to the project, regardless of what the people of the province want. Shame on her and shame on this provincial government.
Markerbuoy
46 weeks ago
Adrian, let's hear your position on 10 yrs of Liberal corruption
Full disclosure: I am not inclined to trust any of these politicos further than I can throw them.
Thank you Mr. Dix for explaining the provincial NDP's position on Enbridge etc.
How about a similar declaration on corrupt IPP's, P3's, BC Rail etc. It's a long list. Campbell had no compunction about ripping up contracts when it suited his purpose. It's high time we talked about ripping up corrupt contracts, drawn up in back rooms, against the public interest.
I'm absolutely fed up of politicians of all stripes behaving like wannabe CEO's. Sucking up to corporate influence and paying themselves astronomic salaries and benefits, instead of ALWAYS acting in the public interest. In this regard Mr. Dix has a way to go.
Colin65
46 weeks ago
Christy Clark has no backbone
Christy Clark is the most incompetant person who has occupied the Premier's chair in the past 50 years. Her unwillingness to look after BC's interests by at least registering as a government intervenor to the NEB JRP process shows how unworthy she is to lead our government. The NDP and BC Conservatives have now outflanked her with the NDP opposed and the Conversatives in agreement with the Northern Gateway project. Her total focus on the hopeless desire to get elected Premier has trumped doing anything worthwhile for BC. She needs to get the hell out of the way and let someone with the best interests of BC take over. Her ineptitude and incompetance are an embassesment to us all.
frances
46 weeks ago
It's a shell game
Which political hat is the honest leader hiding under? By the time we figure out the answer is none of the above, we're well past our prime.
MacsKid
46 weeks ago
pipeline a done deal comment
I agree with the comment by Hakuin. The battle will be won "by the people, on the ground, at the front." One person at a time ...
Cool Hand
46 weeks ago
An NDP Shell Game
We have the expansion of the Transmountain pipeline from Edmonton to the Lower Mainland/ west coast.
Basically a new oil pipeline twinning the existing pipeline.
More importantly, the twinning will go through more environmentally sensitive territory that the Northern Gateway pipeline. Imagine that!
That is, the Transmountain twinning goes through the Fraser River watershed - BC's most invaluable fishery.
So Northern Gateway is "BAD" but the Transmountain oil pipeline twinning is "OK"?
And oil supertankers in Georgia Strait, the Strait of Juan De Fuca, and the west coast of Vancouver Island/southern BC coast is OK?
What gives? Ohhh, I know. It's the BC NDP. Silly me!
Nothing new here. Time to move on folks.
Cool Hand
46 weeks ago
Van Isle
Apparently you don't understand the international lng industry, the current North American natural gas market, etc.
Simply put, the "we" that you refer to are joint ventures involving $50 billion - $100 billion in private capital. Massive private capital requirements. No taxpayer bucks involved - esp. if natural gas IPP power is involved without BC Hydro. Caveat - with ~7% of that ng power, BC won't receive royalty revenue. C'est la vie.
So far, these are done deals:
1. Encana/Apache/EOG lng terminal (Kitimat);
2. Royal Dutch Shell consortium (Kitimat);
3. Petronas consortium (Prince Rupert);
And the lng purchasers are utilities in Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, even Malaysia in due course, China, India, etc. And they are looking for "stable" political jurisdictions for their lng purchases. Even Europe is now looking to NA to ween itself off Russian ng/lng due to Russia's inherent political/industrial instability.
North American ng prices are ~$2 MMBtu, which is due to the vast new discoveries in shale gas. Japan pays ~$17 MMBTu and enter into 20 - 30 year lng contracts that are based upon the price of oil. And those long-term, tied-in, contracts "monetise" BC's shale gas plays.
Kitimat/Prince Rupert will likely become mini Fort McMurrays over the next 5+ years as a result of lng.
Australia, far ahead of the lng game, has 10+ lng projects in various stages with private capital investment of $250 BILLION!
And Australia's economy is probably the best in the world today as a result of these same lng developments. Relatively low unemployment, rising living standards due to high incomes, etc. You can look it all up online.
BC could potentially be the wealthiest province in Canada rivalling Alberta after 2020 as a result of these lng developments.
Sigh. Based upon your comment it's quite apparent that the MSM has not been fulfilling its duties.
Cool Hand
46 weeks ago
First Nations - Run of River - IPP Power - NDP Support?!
Well, First Nations "CLEAN POWER" is actually Run-of-the-River IPP power delivered to BC Hydro that the NDP and its cronies always seems to scream about in the negative.
Will the real BC NDP stand up? You can fool some of the folks some of the time, but ya can't fool all of the folks all of the time!
This factoid will bite the BC NDP in the butt big time. What the hell is going on here? Curious minds just wanna know!
Hugh
46 weeks ago
Cool hand,
You're right. Projects must generate a net benefit to BC.
'Clean power' IPPs which are bankrupting BC Hydro with un-needed overpriced power don't qualify.
Skywalker
46 weeks ago
Cool Hand
You seem to be a little desperate. If you are so willing to accept pipelines running through the Fraser Valley watershed remember the people up North take their environment much more seriously. What works in the biggest clear cut in the lower mainland doesn't work up North. Also then Enbridge line effects the Fraser as well as the Skeena. That comparison is a non starter.
Perhaps you could address the lack of a response on anything from your pal Christy rather than worry about Adrian Dix stating his position. Curious minds wanna know that.
Hakuin
46 weeks ago
China will hit the wall
sooner than gas and oil fetishists care to see. All we have to do is delay the pipelines and our beaches can yet be saved.
John How
46 weeks ago
Dix on Clark on Enbridge
So what's your solution to getting British Columbians' interests re the petrogoo pipeline properly represented, Mr. Dix?
As an avid follower of The Tyee, you're no doubt familiar with economist Robyn Allan's solution: bail out of the Fed-dominated Joint Review [via Clause 6], and establish a Provincial project review.
Clause Six, Mr. Dix; INVOKE CLAUSE SIX !
bcguy
46 weeks ago
Sorry about posting twice but
Sorry about posting twice but we have to see the difference between Adrian Dix and Ms. dithers.Adrian clearly placed the party position in front of the commission, she hasn't and probrably won't. So which is a real leader we can trust. Adrian of course.Less than na year to the booting of many Liberals and most likely the rather airheaded present Liberal so called leader
Fiat lux
46 weeks ago
That pipeline will never be
That pipeline will never be built. Harper will be forced out of office sometime next year and sooner or later the world will find out that the long distance transport of resources and products in not "cheaper", but incredibly more expensive.
Regardless of the BS miseducated monetary economists and " conservative" politicians are telling the sucker public to sell the world to the corporate mafia with their "free trade" fraud.
The present, disastrous Chinese and other slave labour economies will collapse and the world will have to rebuild local, physically efficient and sustainable economies, or commit suicide with the continuation of the present human and environmental destruction.
Ed Deak.
igbymac
45 weeks ago
Skywalker
One would have to be a complete rube to think there is a difference in substance between the BCNDP and the BC Liberals.
realisticman
45 weeks ago
Gateway Proponent gives NDP Cash
"...and Enbridge ($3,000)"
http://thetyee.ca/News/2012/07/03/NDP-Business/
Hakuin
45 weeks ago
I'll just leave this here
http://whowhatwhy.com/2012/02/18/which-is-more-likely-a-conspiracy-of-millions-or-oil-companies-doing-what-they-do/
Skywalker
45 weeks ago
igbymac
I guess anyone who conducts polls and anyone who thinks they have some value or who notices BC Liberal support slipping away, must be a rube. All those voters who will vote NDP even if it is to just get rid of the liberals are rubes as well.
Also anyone who reads this article and gets a sense of the NDP position on the Enbridge pipeline is also a rube and the 90's were the same as the last 12 years, yeah right!
Okanagan Orchardist
45 weeks ago
Articles like this happen too often.
Someone authors an article, makes a lot innuendos, challenges, etc. than walks away. The posters here are asking a lot of questions, and rightly so. Since he wrote an unsolicited article for the TYEE, doesn't he have a responsibility to answer some of the questions that have been brought up? It's not that I disagree with Dix's basic premises, but if there are any misinterpretations of what Dix is saying than it behooves him to stick around, read some of the comments, and answer those questions that need a reply. In my opinion.
happy (not verified)
45 weeks ago
So I guess it's a safe bet
now that Dix has come out and stated the NDP fully supports LNG exports......that the Tyee will no longer be printing Nikofork anti frakking articles that gets the rank and file all cranked up?
And I thought the NDP was one big tent. Mulcair has stated in no uncertain terms the NDP opposes frakking.
So...who blinks first? Or, more likely the party will do what it does best....strike a Committee full of academics and civil servants and public sector reps to "further study" the implications of said mining practices. Meanwhile the gas will be flowing....
Markerbuoy
45 weeks ago
Harper May Be Actually Out Of Line...
Who would have thought?
http://www.economist.com/node/21558303
Markerbuoy
45 weeks ago
Harper May Be Out Of Line...
Who would have thought?
http://www.economist.com/node/21558303
Markerbuoy
45 weeks ago
Harper May be Out Of Line...
Who would have thought?
http://www.economist.com/node/21558303
realisticman
45 weeks ago
Happy-Frakking-Nikiforuk
As Nikiforuk adoringly wrote about George Monbiot, "I admire his writing
immensely....,
Monbiot admits that his cantankerous proposals will raise the price of electricity and heating by 100 per cent, but adds that peak oil has already ramped up the cost of being comfortable by 70 per cent in recent years. ...
What politician wants to champion "a campaign not for abundance but for austerity." How many
university philosophers would argue "not for more freedom but for less." Strangest of all, how does one deal with a tropical species that has colonized the planet and now unconsciously seeks to establish equatorial climes everywhere, all the time?
Monbiot, God bless him, doesn't have an answer to that one. "
Can you imagine if these guys had their way? BCers are complaining about a few cents on their fuel due to the Carbon Tax and these guys want to up it 100%!
Nikiforuk, no doubt, will be commenting on Monbiot's latest confession of error (remember Monbiot also said he was wrong about veganism) that Peak Oil is no more, in fact it never existed and he, and all the others were wrong. Last weeks' Guardian, "Some of us made vague predictions, others were more specific. In all cases we were wrong. ..."
How about skyrocketing food prices and displaced third-world farmers due to the super-trendy ethanol fuel boom George? Oh that's coming next week.
Fiat lux
45 weeks ago
How about thousands of
How about thousands of dislocated Canadian farmers, sold to the international corporate mafia by " conservative" governments, permitting them to control feed, grains, beef and other animal prices, feedlots, and now planning to dislocate more by wiping out the supply management system .
We were forced to sell out our herd of cattle, because we couldn't afford to feed them in the winters from our pensions, due to the price fixings by a US company in control of the Canadian feed/beef markets.
There are no "lower prices" and "cost cuttings", only cost transfers by dictatorial systems bent to destroy private enterprise with forced collectivization of the economy into the hands of the communist/capitalist conspiracy. "Cost cutting" means making somebody else, or the environment pay the full costs.
A "conspiracy theory" ? Nice PR BS.
What are our corrupt governments engaged in now with their secret negotiations with other crooks, planning to destroy democracy to feed the insatiable profit demands of the corporate mafia. Are these rackets not conspiracies behind tightly closed doors ?
I started my first manufacturing business in Vancouver in 1957 with a $500. bankloan and was employing a half dozen skilled tradesmen within 2 weeks. There were hundreds of thousands of private businesses and family farms all over.
Where are they now ? Collectivized by multinational agribiz and other communist rackets. With people egging for minimum wage "jobs, jobs, jobs" to stay "competitive" with Mr.Harper's and the rest's commie friends in China and Vietnam .
Ed Deak.
G West
45 weeks ago
Be nice if people actually read all of what Monbiot has to say
"There is enough oil in the ground to deep-fry the lot of us, and no obvious means to prevail upon governments and industry to leave it in the ground. Twenty years of efforts to prevent climate breakdown through moral persuasion have failed, with the collapse of the multilateral process at Rio de Janeiro last month. The world's most powerful nation is again becoming an oil state, and if the political transformation of its northern neighbour is anything to go by, the results will not be pretty."
Like the grasshopper, there will always be a few around who're happy to whistle their way into the graveyard.
realisticman
45 weeks ago
Reverse Cassandras
Wired published a piece on US economics professor Julian Simon.
"There seemed to be a bizarre reverse-Cassandra effect operating in the universe: whereas the mythical Cassandra spoke the awful truth and was not believed, these days 'experts' spoke awful falsehoods, and they were believed. Repeatedly being wrong actually seemed to be an advantage, conferring some sort of puzzling magic glow upon the speaker."
Democrat Daniel P. Moynihan, 1969
"It is now pretty clearly agreed that the C02 content will rise 25% by 2000. This could increase the average temperature near the earth' s surface by 7 degrees Fahrenheit. This in turn could raise the level of the sea by 10 feet. Goodbye New York.Goodbye Washington, for that matter. We have no data on Seattle."
Right up there with Paul Ehrlich.
The US Energy Information Admin. shows that US oil production has increased every year since 2004. With the massive, and increasing, deposits in North Dakota and Montana at Bakken (24 billion barrels and rising) the only sensible conclusion is that this whole Peak thing no longer deserves any attention.
Flange
45 weeks ago
This issue will define...
what Northwest BC in particular and the rest of this province in general are made of.
The lines have been drawn and there is no fence sitting left for anyone. My Fatheer's and Mother's family fought and some died defending Canadian values against corrupt and totalitarian regimes.
We are now called to do the same against our own corrupt and diseased government.
Fiat lux
45 weeks ago
Don't just blame the
Don't just blame the governments, but also the so called "economists", who are giving them the destructive, dead end advice and the multinational corporate mafia , who are employing all of them.
Our governments, today, are not much more than fully owned subsidiaries of corporations.
Ed Deak.
Hakuin
45 weeks ago
meanwhile, der Harpenfuhrer's Great Kampf proceeds!
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/07/08/candu-energy-inc-strike_n_1657928.html?utm_hp_ref=canada
G West
45 weeks ago
Reverse Cassandras
I call them grasshoppers...
"...Twenty years of efforts to prevent climate breakdown through moral persuasion have failed, with the collapse of the multilateral process at Rio de Janeiro last month. The world's most powerful nation is again becoming an oil state, and if the political transformation of its northern neighbour is anything to go by, the results will not be pretty."
igbymac
45 weeks ago
Skywalker
The understanding of the political game leaves the vast majority of Canadians rubes, unsophisticated in its gross manipulations of virtually everything to ensure the power elite gang never loses its grip.
First they control the money supply; then they make the laws; and all this is supported with controlling the information we are repeatedly bombarded with -- from the past to the future. And us rubes lap it up.
I'd suggest you climb down off your 'educated' horse and begin to listen to some thinkers through our time who have made some of these truths known for centuries.
Calculator60
45 weeks ago
Like the kettle calling the pot black
Fine, the Liberal government has been silent on the Gateway Pipeline BUT where are the NDP policies about anything? I know. Tucked away in a back room to be sprung on the populace at the last minute to avoid any serious scrutiny.
freebear
45 weeks ago
I do not know of any political party
including Greens who can fathom a steady stae economy and sustainability; without hommage to the continued growth mantra!
freebear
45 weeks ago
steady state I meant ! wish there was an edit post button!
must prooof my posts-reminder!
RickW
45 weeks ago
Calculator60
Tsk! Name ANY political party that reveals it's policies in the kind of detail you apparently demand.
The BC Libs were loosy-goosy with their policies in 2001. Oh sure - get rid of photo radar and remove the tax from luxury vehicles (which appeals to the rednecks). But those aren't POLICIES. They're candy.
Skywalker
45 weeks ago
@ igbymac
You stated, "One would have to be a complete rube to think there is a difference in substance between the BCNDP and the BC Liberals." That comment was what I was responding to and I didn't have to get on my 'educated' horse. I doubt he even knows or cares what that means as long as he gets his bag of oats once in a while. The difference you belittle might not be enough for you but as the polls show from time to time and as elections prove, most people would disagree with you. That is partly why we have these discussions. Now if you were to actually state what a political party needs to have for policy in order for you to declare it different enough to get your vote, I and others might be able to decide who the rube is. In the meantime I'll stay with "anything but the BC Liberals".
margot
45 weeks ago
But those aren't POLICIES. They're candy.
But those aren't POLICIES. They're candy.
Very good one, rick w.
My father used to wave his photo-radar photo around as if taken by the KGB. Judges and a cop's mother and anyone else got the same treatment. Vote for privilege, so wealthy Anglicans don't get speeding tickets.
But the candy I see being handed out by John Horgan, who seems to like fracking, and will probably be the next minister of energy or whatever, makes me furious.
http://thecanadian.org/hot-links/item/1553-bc-ndp-confirm-support-for-fracking-lng
This reminds me of the federal NDP unanimously supporting the vote to continue the catastrophe in Libya.
The one vote against was Elisabeth May, who previously just talked pro-blither about it. And Brian Bulroney was the greatest etc.
Democracy is a farce. A great big song and dance and blaring of trumpets, unless we get out and protest and bang pans or whatever it takes, to show politicians they should also pay attention to their polls.
Let's throw unusable shoes. I seem to have been saving them from the landfill for a long time.
We must have higher standards for our politicians. They are selling us out.
And I'd no more switch to Green than try to crap on butterflies. They seem to be crypto Liberals.