Opinion

Key Aide to Gordon Campbell Helped Craft Mail-in HST Referendum

FOI documents reveal former lobbyist, pro-HST spinner Tom Syer was in the loop.

By Bob Mackin, 23 Jul 2011, TheTyee.ca

Gordon Campbell makes a speech

Former BC premier Gordon Campbell pitching HST before resignation.

Related

What is the real reason that the British Columbia Liberal government scrapped the planned Sept. 24, 2011 election-style referendum on the Harmonized Sales Tax and employ a mail-in ballot system?



Attorney General Barry Penner said on March 25, 2011 that moving the referendum ahead and employing a mail-in ballot "was expected to" save taxpayers $18 million and reduce voter fatigue. 



Who could argue with saving taxpayers money or making democracy swift and fair? 



My curiosity was piqued. I wanted to see proof. I wanted answers.



What was the methodology for the alleged $18 million savings? What proof was there that voter fatigue would hinder citizen participation in the HST referendum? Did politicians and staff do their homework and know about the potential impact of a Canada Post strike or lockout on a mail-in ballot? 



The same day it was announced, I filed a Freedom of Information request with the Office of the Premier, Ministry of Attorney General and Public Affairs Bureau for the communications plan announcement of the HST referendum process, including the briefing notes for Attorney General Barry Penner and Premier Christy Clark; cost-benefit analysis or business case for a mail-in ballot vs. general election-style balloting. 



After several delays by the government, I finally received the documents on July 22, 2011 -- which just so happens to be the last day for citizens to request a ballot to either vote yes to extinguish the HST or no to keep it. A coincidence? I think not. 



See the documents at the bottom of my blog post here.

HST Information Office's slanted info



Whatever Deputy Attorney General David Loukidelis recommended was censored. 



However, the documents do show that a key aide to the father of the HST, Gordon Campbell, had a hand in crafting the mail-in referendum. This suggests that the government is engineering the process to reach the outcome it wants: to keep the HST. 



An email sent March 9, 2011 by Loukidelis to Penner said the report to the March 16, 2011 cabinet meeting "has been developed with commentary from Tom Syer along the way."



Who is Tom Syer and who did Syer call sire? 



Syer was Campbell's deputy chief of staff who, after a stint as a lobbyist, returned to government to head the HST Information Office that was announced Oct. 25, 2010 -- two days before Campbell spent $240,000 of taxpayers funds to buy TV airtime on Oct. 27, 2010 for a televised speech intended to boost the HST.



The HST Information Office was supposed to inform, not persuade. Its website includes news releases with headlines such as: "Harmonized Sales Tax To Boost Investment, Job Creation," "HST, The Right Move at the Right Time," and "Look Who's Backing the HST." It's spending $5 million on the famous stickman TV ads.



I ask again: Is the mail-in ballot system engineered by the government to convince you to agree to keep the HST? 

Is this exercise in democracy really just an expensive sham?



Why the secrecy, Mr. Penner? Why the secrecy, Ms. Clark?   [Tyee]

37  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Skywalker

    44 weeks ago

    The whole exercise was a con.

    I have spoken to a number of folks who delighted in telling me how they voted against the HST. When I ask them if the checked "yes" or "no" they say why "no" of course. The whole thing was rigged to confuse. With a bit of luck the same number of people will check the "yes" when they actually meant "no" and it will be a wash. What a way to run a democracy. These Liberal shysters just have to go!

  • realisticman

    44 weeks ago

    Oh My!

    The head of the HST Information Office was asked to comment on the referendum question. So? Would anyone not expect at least a comment from the head of the office?

    Don't worry Skywalker, it will be a wash. I've spoken with a few people that have small businesses and they have no idea what is, was, will be, won't be, taxable under PST, GST or HST, as well as the status of ITCs. The level of, I don't really want to say it but it is, ignorance is astounding.

    I can't agree that it was planned. It's always, for me, been a referendum on extinguishing the HST - yes or no.

    With these sample surveys it does make one wonder if the California example of government by referendum is such a wonderful idea. It's worth remembering that over 90% of us are not passionate about policy details and simply will not take the time to absorb all the details. We live in a 'sound bite' and 'snappy headline' world.

  • Dan the socialist

    44 weeks ago

    This whole thing is a

    This whole thing is a crock... If Campbell and the libs were honest they would of mentioned it during last election campaign and as well let the people vote on it last year with a simple yes or no question not a question where yes means no and no means yes....Sit is set up to pass and keep hst..contrary to popular belief we do not live in a democracy...

    I and 7 other friends have requested ballots a second and third time, we have all voted last time and yet we still have not received them, elections BC blames Canada post..what a sham...I wonder how many people won't or did not get ballots?

  • Karen D.

    44 weeks ago

    I wouldn't be a bit

    I wouldn't be a bit surprised if Canada Post, under Harper's direction, orchestrated the lock-out of the postal workers at a time that would most interupt the mailing of the referendum.

    I'm starting to see boogy men in everything our governments do and say these days. The sad thing is I am probably right to.

  • Grania

    44 weeks ago

    Same old...

    This vote will 'show' that BC wants the HST. It was rigged to ensure that outcome. The deceitful manipulation of this government, that we all know so well, continues to thrive today. These people need to be voted out of office...so that honest democracy can once again be practiced in our provincial legislature. We ALL know that. I am sick and tired of being ripped off by business and their puppets in Victoria.

  • sunshine coast girl

    44 weeks ago

    Hundreds of people have told us

    that they ordered ballots a couple of weeks ago and they haven't arrived and/or tried to get through on the EBC numbers to register, again and again, and couldn't. My advice to anyone now who didn't get the opportunity to vote is to send an email of complaint to Elections BC at

    and copy it to Christy Clark at

    and Adrian Dix, leader of the Opposition at

    You still won't get the chance to vote, but your complaint won't disappear into thin air and if enough people complain.......

  • raging senior

    44 weeks ago

    agree with Karen D

    Governments in power for too long forget why they are there. Time for a change

  • Skywalker

    44 weeks ago

    One example of silliness.

    Who uses the word "extinguish" unless it is in the context of putting out a fire. The wording of the ballot should have been a simple, are you in favor of the HST, yes or no. But oh now they had to come up with something that would confuse those less schooled in Canada.

    We don't set policy by referendum in this country. This is an example of a government so arrogant that the people had no other choice. But the manipulation of the exercise by the BC Liberals is beyond belief. This manipulation was deliberate as was the decision about going to a mail-in ballot.

  • Cool Hand

    44 weeks ago

    Reminds Me...

    ... of 1990's BC NDP cabinet minister Dave Zirnhelt who said "We are government and the government can do whatever it wants."

    And the same crew is present in the BC NDP today.... from disgraced NDP party prez Moe Sihota to "fake memo" party leader Dix.

    Sounds like people here wanna go from the frying pan back into the fire. haha

  • rantnic

    44 weeks ago

    One must wonder

    All those ballots that didn't get delivered, where did they go? Did more of them "not get delivered" in ridings where the Liberals have a poor following? These numbers can be checked by having a simple forensic audit of the referendum results. What do you think would happen if it were found out that the vote was in fact rigged?

  • raging senior

    44 weeks ago

    re Cool Hand

    Just like a liberal--take words out of context and make a big splash--what was David referring to or couldn't you read that much. I guess you would like to bring up the fast cats also, but with the German foepa, how can you?

  • off-the-radar

    44 weeks ago

    @ Cool Hand

    so an NDP cabinet minister makes a stupid comment in the 1990s and the Liberal party gets a free ride for the next 20 years?

  • Mr Hawthorne

    44 weeks ago

    PST will get raised if they don't win HST

    Thanks to the fact these politicians have spent all our money on a 2 week party, they are going to have to get money one way or another. If they don't win their HST, I predict they will just raise PST on everything. The government needs our money desperately in order to continue doing what they do: taking more and more of our money and having more and more power over us.

    If people want to save money, and curb government power, they should look at how much money is wasted, and how much government power is abused, in the Orwellian named (and Orwellian operated) Ministry of Children and Family Development. For example, after 4 years, a lengthy trial, with MCFD's Shaken Baby Syndrome "experts," flown in and paid for courtesy of taxpayer dollars, numerous MCFD employees testifying or just sitting in court watching, and millions of dollars wasted trying to destroy a good family, the children finally get to go home to their rightful parents, Paul and Zabeth Bayne. By the way, Shaken Baby Syndrome has been completely discredited by hard science, not that the child protection industry cares about hard science.

    If the media intelligently wrote about this insane injustice and waste of taxpayer money, people might start giving a damn. If they did give a damn, injustice such as occured with the Baynes, and which is occuring with countless other parents (such as Derek Hoare, whose 9 year old autistic daughter has been forcibly taken and drugged on 3 powerful anti-psychotics by MCFD, after MCDF tried to get her dad to voluntarily give up his beautiful, much loved daughter - even though MCFD admits there is no abuse or neglect), perhaps wouldn't happen. And if it didn't happen, we would save a ton of money. Child Protection is the biggest and most harmful - to children, families, society and democracy - scam going. MCFD takes children who aren't abused, and ignores ones who need help (remember the little girl who spent days with her dead mother - MCFD did nothing to help them).

    The HST is desperately needed so that all these Ministries can continue to exist and exercise power over us (and MCFD is one of the biggest, and definately the most powerful - no other ministry can take your most valuable property - your children - with such non-existent or fabricated evidence). If any other gov't official took even your garden hose with such undue process, there would be more outrage. MCFD can, and does, just walk into hospital delivery rooms and announce they are taking newborn babies. Ask Zabeth Bayne if you don't believe me. People just don't seem to care or understand what exactly is going on with this Ministry.

    Google Derek Hoare and Ayn and you'll see what I mean by non-existent evidence, gross abuse of power, and obscene waste of taxpayer dollars. If you aren't outraged, you are either comatose or working for MCFD.

  • carioca

    44 weeks ago

    HST

    It will be a very good surprise if the HST will be cancelled but I'm not holding my breath. This mail in ballots is rigged and who do we know who is counting those ballots and who is supervising. The results will be: to keep the tax and it will be no way of proving that it was rigged. This is the state of our province: bunch of corrupt people getting money from big business and doing nothing for the people of BC. It will not change as long as the liberals are in power. It goes for the federal government also.

  • Skywalker

    44 weeks ago

    @ Cool Hand

    The first bill passed in the legislature is a bill called something like "The Supremacy Of Parliament Act". Check it out. Then remember that when talking about a remark made by a former minister. Also let's see if you can find actions of that government that compare in arrogance and deceit to the current one.

  • puppyg

    44 weeks ago

    I have to wonder

    What would be the legal consequences of an outright fraud committed by some Liberal entity to stack this referendum? Could the Liberals get away with trivializing such? How would the fallout differ from that incurred with electoral fraud?

    Could a provincial government be toppled over referendum fraud or would this simply constitute a legal misdemeanor of little consequence?

    So low is my trust of the BC Liberals that I have no doubt they have explored the legal limits and stepped right up to the line and then some.

  • metacomet

    43 weeks ago

    Born to Lose

    The BC Liberals' biggest dilemma, and the reason why virtually none of them wants an election anytime soon (Christy's early election promise aside), is the public's growing distrust of them. Indeed, many suspect that they chose the dubious mail-in ballot because its veracity is nearly impossible to confirm. It seems the more we find out about it, the more our suspicions are confirmed. Therefore, if there's any vote-rigging going on, it will be to engineer a narrow rejection of the HST because that's the only outcome that can, in some way, refute their reputation for dishonesty, at least in the sense that it would disappoint the expectations of many that the government would do anything to save the HST. The reasoning will go like this: 'We BC Liberals have stated unequivocally that we are for the HST, so its rejection is proof that we didn't rig the vote [we aren't dishonest after all.]' That would seem a plausible remedy to their sullied reputation only if an election is called soon after.

    But I have a hunch that they want to use the HST's rejection as an excuse to avoid an early election by manufacturing an "economic crisis," no time, they'll say, to be distracted by a campaign. It'll be a win-win-win for them: demonstrate a little good-sportsmanship by "losing," shift the blame for the economic mess onto the voters and, most importantly, buy some time.

  • Skywalker

    43 weeks ago

    Metacomet.

    There is a fly in the ointment. The financial accounts will have to come out at some point and if the only thing that saves the Liberals arses is the cash cow of the HST it will again confirm that it was on their radar before the last election. They needed the cash to bail themselves out of the impending financial disaster. Some of it will depend on the election campaign the other parties run but I can't believe that after these shenanigans that the other parties won't be taking off the gloves concerning this "outright fraud". .

  • lynn

    43 weeks ago

    The HST and Harper's Majority Win

    Quote: "I wouldn't be a bit surprised if Canada Post, under Harper's direction, orchestrated the lock-out of the postal workers at a time that would most interupt the mailing of the referendum." ~Karen D.

    It wouldn't surprise me either, Karen, though I also wouldn't be a bit surprised that Harper's manipulations go even deeper.

    Harper never wanted to win a majority more than in the past federal election. He needed to pull extra seats in BC - that would result in those needed gains in the West that would help to ensure his much-desired majority win.

    How better than with the cooperation of his old friend Gordon Campbell and the very handy-dandy implementation of the HST?

    Since most people aren't paying attention and are not aware that the BC Liberals and the Harper Conservatives share the same values and policies, (both extremist parties of the right, both reborn from a Socred-Reform coalition)....well, how convenient is it that the furor over the HST enables the 'Liberal' brand to be severely marked down just before a federal election?

    Those all important voters of the center, mad at the HST, and wanting to shift their vote would vote Conservative federally before they would vote NDP. The NDP would hold their own in BC, but the Conservatives would gain votes from the center-right disgruntled with the HST brought in under a supposed but bogus BC 'Liberal' brand - which is, in reality, not liberal in any shape and form but as extreme right as they come.

    The even more surprising election results show Harper doesn't even need Quebec anymore to gain a majority.

    With 'the help' of the Campbell government imposed HST and the cool climate it created for the 'Liberal' brand in BC, Harper pulls those extra needed seats in the West - and the always cooperative Mr. C takes one for the team, and comes through once again for Stevie....and is duly rewarded for this, and for so many other services rendered.... Hello London town!

    Thanks for all your hard work and effort in finding out this info, Bob Mackin, and thanks too, for The Tyee for publishing it.

  • glassghost

    43 weeks ago

    That other mail in referendum

    All we have to do is cast our minds back to 2002 when Gordon Campbell subjected the rights of a minority, BC First Nations, to a referendum of the majority to get "direction" for treaty negotiations.

    The questions were poorly phrased and slanted the outcomes to reflect the ideology of the Campbell Liberals.

    The only thing that's changed is the face of the right wing.

  • realisticman

    43 weeks ago

    Voting by Mail

    In Oregon all voting is done by mail.

    The U.S. state of Oregon established vote-by-mail as the standard mechanism for voting with Ballot Measure 60, a citizen's initiative, in 1998. The measure made Oregon the first state in the United States to conduct its elections exclusively by mail. The measure passed on November 3, 1998, by a margin of 69.4% to 30.6%.

  • rantnic

    43 weeks ago

    Freedom of information!

    The referendum is rigged as far as I'm concerned. So lets use the freedom of information act to get the goods to prove that the fix was in. I have strongly believed that most of those who don't care about the HST will not vote, those who are against it will vote and those who are for it will assume that it is a fait accomli and so most wont vote. The yes vote should win handily! Otherwise means only one thing?

  • Skywalker

    43 weeks ago

    Sure R/man

    But do they ask the questions in the same way to confuse? Do they spend millions on a dishonest campaign? Do they peddle lies?.And finally, is Oregon in B.C. so we should do as they do?

  • Langley

    43 weeks ago

    I'm sorry everyone

    but if so many registered voters allegedly can't properly understand 'vote yes to get rid of the hst' then we deserve what we get.

    Are you telling me that scores of people in this province can't read?

  • deanr

    43 weeks ago

    Damned if you do Damned if you don't

    I'm disappointed there wasn't an option to scrap the whole tax, I for one am feeling a little over taxed these days. I'm also disappointed at this whole process. I signed the petition, not because I was necessarily against the HST but I was against how it was implemented, and now I'm angry with how they are choosing to implement the referendum, the wording is confusing, and there have been problems receiving the ballots. I have lived in my apartment for the last 5 years, I've received my last tax return here a just after the strike, and I have received voter cards for federal and provincial elections, but for the HST it wasn't me who received a ballot, but the former resident who hasn't received any government mail since I've lived here. Makes me wonder if it's all on purpose.

  • raging senior

    43 weeks ago

    IS THER FRAUD IN THE GOVERNMENT ADS FOR THE HST??

    Where have the stickman ads and the smart tax alliance ads gone?? Bill V asked for a ruling on the legality of the ads being run on tv, radio and signs on the streets. He asked elections BC to rule on their legality under the elections act. Has Craig James told the Government to pull the ads until he (James) makes a ruling on their legality or has he (James)told the Government to pull the ads so that Elections BC does not have to make a ruling one way or the other?? The silence is just deafening.

  • realisticman

    43 weeks ago

    Ooooooo

    I hear that the government have these vans going around with people inside with all kinds of fancy electronics for zeroing in on peoples' brains. They do a quick scan and if they figure that someone's going to vote yes they rush down to the post office and grab that ballot form and burn it!

    Oh, 'deanr' the province can't hold a vote to scrap the GST, you mean the provincial component, I guess. So, like Alberta, BC should have no sales tax? This is an idea that the NDP could float.

  • Vox.Pop

    43 weeks ago

    Real Democracy in BC

    'Realisticman' readily demonstrates the sense of superiority that characterizes all anti-democrats. His statement: "With these sample surveys it does make one wonder if the California example of government by referendum is such a wonderful idea." pushes the idea that only the 'smart' people (like him) should be directing society. This is a widespread assumption amongst conservatives & is used to justify their self-serving social & political positions.
    Democrats must continue to oppose this ancient arrogance at all times.

  • realisticman

    43 weeks ago

    Vox.Pop

    You raise some good points, about the arrogance of superiority thinking - although, I still think that there is a danger with direct democracy. A glance at the anti-tax moves in BC, first axe the carbon tax and now slash the sales tax, can only remind us of the California situation. The California backlash was from a right wing group that was successful. The result has been funding shortfalls with sometimes very serious ramifications.

    Here's an article from last year that describes the problems that this type of democracy has brought forward. Wiki has more:

    http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1904938,00.html

  • realisticman

    43 weeks ago

    Much Better Here...

    This explains the ramifications very well:

    http://www.economist.com/node/18548109

  • gsarahs

    43 weeks ago

    I wonder why we have become raving cynics?

    I must admit that a decade of BC Liberals has definitely turned me into a raving cynic. I have absolutely no trust in them after all of the shananigans that have been pulled on us. I would really like to know the intracacies of the counting process of the ballots that actually did make it to the voters and back for counting. If they can alter the outcome in any way they can, I don't doubt that they will. This is the type of thing you expect from a 3rd world dictatorship,... oops sorry, is that what we have here?

    I wonder why Deputy Attorney General David Loukidelis recommendations were censored? Clearly something that the Liberals didn't want to get out that would feed the opposition to the HST. The only Liberal that has been honest about the HST was Carole Taylor, after she jumped ship.

  • whitehead

    43 weeks ago

    HST muddle

    There are the missing ballots, plenty of them, there is the lack of staff at Elections BC to deal with the flood of requests on the final days before the phone lines shut down, there is uttter confusion about the deadline for return of the ballot. First it was July, then it was August and Elections BC relied on a few TV ads to let us know of the new date. ( I never saw one of them.)
    Someone should at least be collecting data on those who wanted to vote, could not get through to Elections BC or had a ballot but did not know of the new date for its return.

    We need that data, we need to know just how badly we have been scammed.

  • impala910

    43 weeks ago

    Forms

    My wife and I moved to Vernon in 2005. All of our mail comes to this address. We have been through several elections, census, all of our bills, drivers' license, etc, etc. We had not received our ballots for the referandum so we called elections BC and were informed our ballots had been sent to Victoria, our old address. We went through the process of informing Elections BC about all of the above. It would appear to no avail. So, we called again before the deadline and went through the process all over again, with the same result. Now, we cannot participate in the referandum because of the incompetence of Electios BC to ensure everyone received a ballot. I have no idea what my recourse is, but I am contacting an attorney to see if I have any options. If I do have legal option, you can rest assured that I will be exploring them. It's my legal right to vote in this country.I am a veteran who served to ensure everyone had those rights. Now I have someone in Victoria interfering with that right.

  • crankypants

    43 weeks ago

    Mr. Mackin

    Out of curiosity, is this the FOI featured on GlobalTV's news tonight which came back virtually blank?

    If it is I don't think that you got value for your money.

    Just another example of how such phrases as "open and accountable government" and "families first" are nothing but empty slogans.

  • zalm

    43 weeks ago

    Realisticman

    "You raise some good points, about the arrogance of superiority thinking - although, I still think that there is a danger with direct democracy."

    Which is precisely why anybody thinking of pulling the trigger on that one should be very careful to ensure that all the facts and discussions are already out there in the public arena, and not merely used to justify an ideological goal.

    There could have been a good discussion on this issue - there are good points to be made on both sides - and it would have prevented a lot of the haranguing we're hearing now as people try to make their voices heard. Demagogues will always try to hijack the process, as cantons in Switzerland know only to well.

    There are far too many unanswered questions out there in this discussion to make a choice informed by the best aims of all the people of BC. The waters have been further muddied by cheap attempts to bribe us with tax reductions and payments of our own money to us.

    I'd love to go back a couple of years and start this whole process again, but that's now not an option. The only solution is to defeat it now, and then start the discussion again. You KNOW there are some people who won't let this issue die.

  • zalm

    43 weeks ago

    That said

    I think this article is hunting ghosts where none exist. It's true that a mail-in ballot allows the luxury of reflection, while the tension of Voting Day often leads to emotional choices, certainly a likely beneficiary of which would be the YES side.

    Any organized conspiracy to achieve changes in public policy assumes too great a capability of both our executive and legislative branches. They're simply not that organized, nor that monolithic.

    That said, I'd be interested in what was redacted myself.

  • greenmonkey

    43 weeks ago

    ads are misleading

    On the verge of downright lying.
    "If you want to see the HST be reduced from 12% to 10% vote no. If you want to return to a 12% GST + PST vote yes."

    First off, in spite of what they say, there is no LAW to say they will reduce it. The Harpies did not actually create a new law with Parliament, (another lie) it is only an verbal edict from on high. And if they do it is not for two years - their ads make it sound like it is immediate.

    But most important, they conveniently fail to inform the public that most of the HST taxed services will actually go down to only 7% PST as the GST will not apply.

    In one radio ad, an exacerbated person whines that "they refuse to even debate the issue!". Meanwhile it is Christy that has declined an invitation from Dix on a debate.

    On another note, after reading some of these comments about voters not getting their ballots, I am beginning to think that another card up their sleeves may be to use that, that is their own incompetence in mailing out enough ballots, as a last ditch reason to throw out any outcome they don't like.

    I would not put anything past this group of crooks.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.