- Ms Kaye is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Mary Carlisle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Prem Gill is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nancy Flight is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Justin Everett is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
Only Layton's NDP Oppose 'Harper Sales Tax'
Grits and Tories guilty of contempt of BC voters, given their hypocrisy on HST.
Cartoon by Greg Perry.
"Wrongs are often forgiven; contempt never." -- Lord Chesterfield, 1694-1773
Opposition parties defeated the federal government by voting that the Stephen Harper Conservatives were in "contempt of Parliament" for not releasing information on the cost of fighter jets and crime legislation.
But when it comes to a key political issue in British Columbia -- the Harmonized Sales Tax -- both the Liberals and Conservatives have been in "contempt of voters."
When ex-B.C. premier Gordon Campbell announced the HST back in July 2009, the public reacted with anger at paying an extra seven per cent more on restaurant food, basic telephone and cable TV, domestic airline tickets, sports and entertainment events, home renovations and repairs and much more.
A Facebook protest group I formed quickly grew to over 130,000 members, thanks to readers of The Tyee, 24 Hours newspaper and others.
Then 557,383 valid voter signatures were gathered on Canada's first successful citizens initiative petition by Fight HST, the group created by former B.C. Premier Bill Vander Zalm, ex-Unity Party leader Chris Delaney and me.
That forced the BC Liberal government to promise a binding referendum on the HST, which will now be held by mail ballot from mid-June to July 22.
And Liberal MPs in B.C. were very happy to jump on the anti-HST bandwagon.
Vancouver South MP Ujjal Dosanjh sent a flyer out to constituents strongly denouncing the HST -- and Harper.
"Stephen Harper and his Conservatives are pushing a Harmonized Sales Tax hike on B.C. that at the end of the day will only hurt ordinary British Columbians. Everything from food to housing is going to cost more," Dosanjh wrote.
Libs forced to vote against tide
But when the HST legislation came up in Parliament, Dosanjh voted in favour of imposing the HST on B.C., not against it, because Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff ordered his MPs to support it.
"Ultimately, my argument lost out," said Dosanjh. "I still detest the tax. My constituents detest it."
Newton-North Delta Liberal MP Sukh Dhaliwal similarly made his opposition to the HST clear in his winter 2009 constituency report:
"And Harper has added the Harmonized Sales Tax to the burden of B.C. families already struggling to make it through this difficult economic period," he said, calling it the Harper Sales Tax.
"Now that British Columbia has been forced to accept the harmonization of the sales tax, it is time to look a little closer at how it all came together -- and the role the Harper government has played in its implementation," Dhaliwal wrote.
"In smaller communities that depend on tourism, there is considerable outrage from the restaurant and hospitality sector. Just as these businesses were starting to find their footing, they are feeling more vulnerable than ever."
But then Dhaliwal also changed his tune.
Dhaliwal told The Globe and Mail that Ignatieff's position to vote in favour of the HST was "responsible" and "visionary."
"We have to look professional... not opportunist," he said, presumably with a straight face. Not one Liberal MP voted against the HST.
Stephen Harper, raiser of taxes
But Harper and the Conservatives are hypocrites on the HST as well.
Harper made much of his cutting the Goods and Services Tax from seven per cent to six per cent and then five per cent in 2006 and 2008 -- which was the right thing to do with this regressive, punishing and unfair tax on consumers.
"Under our government, taxes are headed only one direction: down," Harper claimed on Dec. 31, 2007. "The two-point reduction will save the average working family hundreds of dollars per year on day-to-day purchases, not to mention hundreds more on a new car or thousands on a new home."
But Harper and his government voted to send taxes in only one direction -- up -- when they imposed the HST on B.C. just two years later.
Harper also trashed ex-Liberal leader Stephane Dion's proposed national carbon tax during the 2008 election, saying a new tax would hurt "the average working family."
"Canadians don't want a new tax and British Columbians don't want double carbon taxation," Harper told the media in a Richmond campaign stop on Sept. 8, 2008.
"Everybody knows -- especially in British Columbia -- that that kind of a carbon tax is not revenue neutral on the average working family," he said. (Harper declined all comment on Campbell's own carbon tax but didn't change his words.)
Harper obviously again implied strongly that his own government would never impose a new tax on British Columbians.
Flip, flop, flip, flop
But then Harper's government forced the HST on British Columbians through an act of Parliament in Dec. 2009.
Harper also paid the $1.6 billion one-time "implementation" grant that Campbell desperately wanted to reduce his massive provincial deficit.
Harper: principled or contemptible?
And his MPs weren't any better. Surrey North Conservative MP Dona Cadman said she would vote in Parliament to oppose the HST.
"I vote with the people or for the people," Cadman said in Dec. 2009.
But when the vote took place, Cadman was missing from the House of Commons.
"I wanted to show my support for my constituents, but I could not see standing up and voting outwardly no to my party," Cadman now says to explain breaking her promise.
Layton's New Dems steady foes of hated HST
Jack Layton and all NDP MPs should be held to account for their own bad decisions -- including risking a Tory majority by defeating the government when Harper was high in the polls.
But when it comes to the HST, Layton and his caucus have been completely consistent throughout -- they opposed it, they voted against it and the still want to get rid of it -- the only party which can claim that record in this election. The final vote in Parliament on Dec. 9, 2009 showed 253 in favour, 37 against and 18 abstentions.
The NDP also argues the $1.6 billion federal HST grant should not be have to be repaid if British Columbians vote in the referendum to extinguish the tax.
Regardless of your position on the HST, one clear definition of contempt is telling voters one thing and doing the exact opposite afterwards. Rather unforgiveable. ![]()




17
Login or register to post comments
crankypants
1 year ago
Hypocrisy all around
The facts of the article are correct. The problem is that once again we are shown that the MP or MLA we elect is as useless as utilizing an antacid to cure stomach cancer. Party politics and democracy are as compatible as oil and water.
It is time that the candidates that seek a person's vote stop telling voters that they will represent the best interests of him or her and instead be upfront and admit that they will go to Ottawa or Victoria and support what their party leader deems they should represent.
Consider the optics. Across Canada we elect 300+ MPs of which all but 4 are nothing but yes persons. Provincially, we elect 85 MLAs where only 2 rule the roost. Is this democracy? Not in my world.
guystone
1 year ago
Harper decreased GST from 7%
Harper decreased GST from 7% to 5%
I know the Tyee is extremely biased but really? I imagine the writer knows 5 is a smaller number than 7?
maybe not - they are clearly an NDPer
Cyrille
1 year ago
@guystone
They said GST went from 7->5%, but HST increased taxes of certain items. Read the paragraph again.
warbler
1 year ago
Layton can afford to be principled
Layton and the federal NDP can afford to hold principled, united positions on the HST and other issues because they have little to lose; they never come close to holding a majority. Yet, even so, I'm certain if we look back at HOC votes, we can find ample examples of NDP hypocrisy and flip-flops.
The problem is not the parties themselves, but party discipline (which forced BC Liberal MPs to vote against their principles) and the undemocratic, outdated mode of parliamentary democracy, which is anything but representative and breeds voter apathy & cynicism.
I know it's election time, and Tieleman is doing what we all must to to ensure a Torie defeat, but let's use this opportunity to also debate what's horribly wrong with our so-called democracy. Can you imagine how our democracy would look if sitting members actually represented an accurate proportion of every vote cast? And can you further imagine how different democracy would look if most votes in the House were free, principle-based votes, rather than party-disciplined, whipped-into-shape votes? Then, and only then, we might having something approaching a true democracy, and an HST would likely have never happened the way it did.
Federally, the NDP can afford to be holier than thou - and that's the only reason they have a consistent, untied anti-HST position. Provincially, where the NDP has much more to lose because they can win power, the hypocrisy meter shoots way up. This is not a gripe against the NDP, but against our broken, outdated system.
David Beers
1 year ago
guystone, I think you misread these paragraphs
Harper made much of his cutting the Goods and Services Tax from seven per cent to six per cent and then five per cent in 2006 and 2008 -- which was the right thing to do with this regressive, punishing and unfair tax on consumers.
"Under our government, taxes are headed only one direction: down," Harper claimed on Dec. 31, 2007. "The two-point reduction will save the average working family hundreds of dollars per year on day-to-day purchases, not to mention hundreds more on a new car or thousands on a new home."
jim1966
1 year ago
One More Thing
Okay, the dreaded HST has indeed been a disaster since day one. I never supported it and never will. Why?, Mostly because on how it was brought upon us all by the BC Liberals. That to me is one issue while this article points out another. This entire issue has distorted our democracy in BC beyond what I would call fair and equal representation of the people. We were lied to, plain and simple and Harper was the seller of the HST and the BC Liberals bought it lock, stock and barrel and to add insult to injury we as taxpayers were not included in the process of this "deal". So yes there is a referendum approaching and my guess is that people will vote to keep it especially lower income folks who can barely etch out a living without the HST/GST credit supports. Campbell is gone the only thing left to accomplish on this is to remove the governments that caused it, especially the provincial government.
Frank
1 year ago
Taxing the little guy to prosperity
Shifting taxes from income to consumption allows high earners to get a huge tax break while increasing the tax burden on those making less than the median income.
Ideology is the only reason we have the GST and now the HST.
The people that support it will tell you its more efficient, but it isn't because we still have income tax which means we still need the same number of people to manage that tax plus we have to hire more to collect this new one.
Efficiency would mean streamlining the tax system and reducing all the various taxes, premiums, fees, tolls and so on and going with a single type of tax. An income tax being the most progressive.
freebear
1 year ago
Remember the (fed) Liberals and the GST promise?
All governments love revenues; the issue is what they spend it on - corporate tax cuts, stealth fighters, Afghanada!
John Corman
1 year ago
HST Regressive???
A single individual earning $20,000 in BC will get refunded about $721.00 to offset consumption taxes paid. In other words, assuming rent and food are his main expenditures,that individual does not pay consumption taxes. What's regressive about that?
RickW
1 year ago
john corman
What's regressive is the fact that the money has to be laid out first - and many people on a shoestring can't do that without cutting back on some essential.
G West
1 year ago
John corman - I know you don't understand the tax system
It' s regressive JOHN CORMAN because it taxes consumption and not ability to pay.
It is NOT BASED UPON INCOME. INCOME TAX IS PROGRESSIVE - PEOPLE WHO CAN AFFORD TO PAY MORE ARE TAXED ON THAT BASIS.
EDITED FOR PERSONAL INSULTS -- MODERATOR
lynn
1 year ago
thoughts worth repeating ::
warbler wrote:
"The problem is not the parties themselves, but party discipline...
Can you imagine how our democracy would look if sitting members actually represented an accurate proportion of every vote cast? And can you further imagine how different democracy would look if most votes in the House were free, principle-based votes, rather than party-disciplined, whipped-into-shape votes? Then, and only then, we might having something approaching a true democracy"
crh
1 year ago
greens
Elizabeth May and the Green party support the HST.
zalm
1 year ago
The Greens
...support a large number of thyings that don't seem reasonable, effective or fair in the cold light of day.
http://greenparty.ca/files/attachments/vision_green_2011en_0.pdf
crankypants
1 year ago
John Corman
Where do you think that your imaginary person gets that $721.00 refund? It does not come from government because they do not have money, other than that extracted from people and businesses in the form of taxes and fees. Seeing as businesses no longer pay a sales tax on their business inputs, they pay nothing towards these rebates nor the total HST revenue raked in by government. The net result is that those people that earn a minimal amount to a fortune above the rebate threshold pay the bulk of HST revenue collected by government, plus this group must also fund the rebates.
The government states that 1.1 million British Columbians qualify for some form of HST rebate, which in itself is a sad statement to think that approximately one-quarter of our population are living on incomes that are woefully inadequate. The stark reality is that the burden of the HST is really being funded by about three-quarters of the citizens of BC.
People like to label taxes as either progressive or regressive, but maybe a better terminology should be fair or unfair. In my mind a fair tax would be so designed that it does not require rebates for some at the expense of others in order to make it saleable.
When one comes to think about it, right-wing think tanks such as The Fraser Institute laud the HST, an unfair tax, which means they really promote a form of socialism.
John Corman
1 year ago
crankypants - "Fair Taxes"
You make some good points but I would argue that the beauty of consumption taxes is that they are voluntary, at least to some degree. For example, you don't have to buy that much more expensive home.
Think about how beautifully the American college system works with such an enormous amount of funding coming from people prepared to pay $100 to watch their college team on Saturday. (voluntary taxation)
Using your definition of poverty, if we increased the exemption for HST so that two million were exempt that would imply double the poverty. You'd agree that that doesn't make sense. That's the problem with using those kinds of stats to make completely unrelated conclusions. Much like StatCan's LICO which, if used to assess the extent of poverty in a jurisdication will result in the worst African country having less poverty than Canada.
I don't think the word "fair" should ever apply to taxes. There are hundreds of examples but, the best I can think of is that a couple each earning $40k pay considerably less taxes than a person earning $80k with a spouse at home.
G West
1 year ago
consumption taxes are 'voluntary'?
I guess you'd probably say eating, sleeping and breathing are also 'voluntary', eh?
The whole point of basing tax - on a sliding scale - upon one's INCOME - is that people who are relatively better off pay a higher percentage of their marginal income than people who are not as well off.
I'm surprised anyone fails to understand and appreciate this.