Opinion

Dear Mr. Harper: A Teen's Plea for Action

Kids can't vote, but we're taught to care about the planet and keep promises. Why don't our leaders live by those same lessons?

By Sophie Harrison, 13 Dec 2010, TheTyee.ca

Sophie Harrison

Writer Sophie Harrison, a Grade 11 student in Vancouver, B.C.

Related

Dear Prime Minister Harper,

Climate change is going to affect everyone, but it is going to hurt today's kids more than it will hurt your generation. We can't even vote -- yet -- but we will suffer the consequences of the inaction of your generation for the rest of our lives.

It is no longer debatable that we need to act on climate change. We have already begun to see its impacts: ecosystems have been devastated locally and on the other side of the world; extreme weather patterns are increasing; water levels are rising; disease control is getting harder in developing countries; and the first climate change refugees have been relocated from a low lying South Pacific Island.

As one of the world's greatest per capita emitters and (not coincidentally) as one of the wealthiest countries in the world, Canada should be demonstrating global leadership on this issue. Instead we have failed miserably.

Our parents have taught us many lessons throughout our lives. But the leaders of their own generation – your government – are failing to live by those same lessons.

Please be an adult we can admire

Kids are taught to keep their promises. Yet Canada's government has a history of promises that were not kept to their own citizens and to the rest of the world. In 1997 Canada signed the Kyoto protocol, saying we would reduce our emissions to 6 per cent below 1990 levels by 2010. We ratified that agreement in 2002. Yet by 2008, Canada's emissions were 23 per cent above 1990 levels. Not only have we not met our goals, but we have been going in the wrong direction. Your governments keep setting new targets and issuing new plans, but you have yet actually follow through on any of them.

Kids are taught to be accountable for our mistakes. Younger kids have time outs when they speak out of turn in class. Teenagers get grounded when they stay out past curfew. Then why is it that our country as a whole is letting others pay for our actions? Wealthy countries like Canada are causing climate change. However, the countries that will be hurt most will be developing countries, which have contributed almost nothing to the problem in the first place, but will suffer the most severe impacts. Adults are polluting all the time, but it will be their children who will truly pay.

Kids are taught to be leaders, not followers. Yet your government's current climate action plan is to wait for the United States to act and follow their lead. For the last two decades we have been relying on individual actions to solve the problem. However, research clearly shows that voluntary actions are not nearly enough. Since the 1990s, our emissions have continued to skyrocket. We need real government leadership on this issue. But even though kids are taught in school all the time to be leaders, your government has failed to lead on this crucial issue.

Do what's right, not what's easy

Parents teach their kids that the right thing to do is not necessarily the easiest thing to do. Parents teach their kids to eat their vegetables because even though they don't taste as good as candy, they will benefit in the long run. Kids are taught that while standing up to a bully is not easy, it's the right thing to do to protect others.

Solving climate change won't be easy. But it's the right thing to do. The poorest people on the planet should not have to pay for our wealthy and polluting lifestyle. And today's children should not have to pay for your generation's unwillingness to act. The luxuries enjoyed by Canada's citizens today can't be treated as a priority over the lives of future generations.

Our parents have always told us to clean up after ourselves. Now it's time for your generation to clean up your own mess. I have been truly embarrassed by Canada's actions in Cancun, where we deliberately hindered international negotiations. So please start showing some real leadership, Mr. Harper -- for your children's sake and for the sake of children even more vulnerable all around the world.  [Tyee]

35  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • samuidave (not verified)

    1 year ago

    dirtmeister figures what?

    that the science is settled and humanity is not contributing significantly, or at all, to climate change within our closed, atmospheric bubble -- is that it?

    How anyone can be so positive of his or her opinion that he/she will not opt for the prudent road is indicative, to me anyhow, of our completely screwed cultural values.

  • Urbanismo

    1 year ago

    Kids can't vote . . .

    " It is no longer debatable that we need to act on climate change."

    Huh, it sure as hell is debatable . . . and there's the rub.

    Global warming, anthropogenic global warming, hockey sticks, hide the decline . . . it has become all too cynical . . . what with governments using our fables to tax, tax and more tax: or the money making CO² exchange for get rich quick banksters!

    How come climate concern is all about money?

    Prime Minister Harper isn't the only one who doesn't take it seriously. No one believes it because if they did they would practice what they preach: jetting off to tropical resorts, jabbering in luxury, driving to the mall.

    Even "green" Vancouver, with the Gateway bridge and assorted string of feeding freeways, "green" is an empty PR ploy. To say nothing of 48 storey junk towers downtown! GREEN ya kiddin' me!

    If we believed the planet was in danger we would do something about our WANTS.

    Now if we want to get serious about the environment there is lots to worry about. Let's start with fractional reserve banking.

    On that isn't about GHG eh!

    Oh yes it is when you look at how rapacious corporations finance the plunder of natural resources that BTW, are used to fill our every indulgences from our do-gooder enviro-gadgets to the tar sands devastation of our landscape and indigenous people.

    But hey we must be able to drive to the mall for our morning cuppa! Capricious do-gooders do not the good earth respect . . . Cancun and it nostrums ain't about AGW . . . it's about fun in the Sun!

    Or what about air quality? Mexico City's been reading IMEC for decades: http://www.sma.df.gob.mx/simat2/

    What about water born salmon feed lots or land speculation sprawl, sprawl, sprawl . . .

    AGW . . . get real . . .

  • airwin

    1 year ago

    Way to go Sophie!

    You tell it exactly like it is.

  • wdsomer

    1 year ago

    Open letter written to Prime Minister Harper

    Sophie,

    Job well done, Bravo!!!
    Its very heartwarming to see that young adult Canadians are engaged.

    Wm Derek Somer
    Kelowna, B.C.

  • Urbanismo

    1 year ago

    Earth warms, Earth cools . . .

    Your persistent support of AGW would be admirable

    http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2010/12/nasa-warns-global-warming-models-wrong-dont-account-for-cooling-factors.html

    if it were justified: you appear to have a vested interest in this shibboleth!

    As it is you are distracting young minds fro our real problems not the least of which affordable shelter, rampant suburban sprawl, growing class divide all of which comes back to our concept of money as debt . . .

  • mopled

    1 year ago

    The party continues next year in Durban, SA

    but nothing except PR was accomplished in Cancun.

    "Despite all the usual rhetoric by politicians and campaigners, the fact remains that yet another attempt has failed to reach a legally binding agreement.

    The summit has postponed, once again, all real decisions and has solidified the international deadlock. What little that was agreed was without substance and is not binding in any case."
    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/12/13/news-bites-real-climate-progress-in-cancun/#more-29342

    There is less and less reason to think that the outcome at Durban will be any different.
    http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2010/12/11/nsidc-shows-antarctic-springsummer-sea-ice-above-normal-for-two-straight-years/

  • Chris Keam

    1 year ago

    Young women can make a big difference

    If there was one single thing the young women of the world could do to effect a big shift in our ways of thinking it would be to turn down dates that involve being picked up in a car and instead suggest a bike or transit-friendly outing. While it might not have a huge immediate impact on pollution and land use, over time it would contribute to a rethinking of our towns and cities, our advertising messages, and fashion.

  • Urbanismo

    1 year ago

    I am rapidly losing respect for Tyee . . . .

    Tyee's blatant bias

    http://rense.com/general92/repp.htm

    is clouding your once perceptive commentary . . .

  • Member121

    1 year ago

    Civics Lesson 101

    There is no act of legislation that obligates the government to listen to you except The Canada Elections Act.

    Stephen Harper does not have to listen to you when you write a letter to the media. He doesn't have to listen to you when you go to his office and express your concerns. He doesn't have to listen to you even when you protest in the streets.

    The only time the government has to listen is when you vote.

    Civics Lesson 201:

    The First-Past-The-Post electoral system we use does not obligate the government to listen to anyone who didn't vote for them.

    For example, in the last federal election 5209069 votes were cast for the Conservative Party which, was enough to form the (minority) government we have today. 8625225 votes were cast for every party other than the Conservative Party.

    As you can see a significant majority of voters did not vote for Stephen Harper. He obviously governs as though he doesn't need to consider the input of the 8 million people who voted for someone else. He will do so until he is voted out or we change to a proportionally representative electoral system.

    Civics Lesson Final Exam:

    Will you hold onto your idea of a better Canada? Will you get registered to vote as soon as you are eligible?

  • realisticman

    1 year ago

    Sophie

    You must send this to the leader of the Liberal Party too. Remember, it was the Liberal Party in power in 1998 when Canada signed Kyoto and emissions kept going up. Stephen Harper became Prime Minister eight years later.

    Many people believe that there are too many people on this little planet and that we have to start controlling this continual explosion in the number of humans.

    Optimum Population Trust (OPT)
    http://www.optimumpopulation.org/opt.aboutus.html

    "'A population-based climate strategy', starts with a list of the organizations and people agreeing that population growth is a main driver for GHG emissions, including the Hadley Centre (which models climate change), Sir Nicholas Stern of the Stern Report and Tony Blair. The report argues that planned cuts in emissions will be canceled out by population growth."

    http://climateandcapitalism.com/?p=348

    Important stuff.

    We have to start charging people more when they have more than one child. Schooling should not be free for more than one child. If people want to have more than one child they should pay more in taxes. Family support payments for more than one child must stop.

    Financial incentives, rather than forced sterilization, should be offered to people that want to be sterilized - unless people have more than society considers acceptable numbers of children.

    We must act now before the seas rise and we all drown!

  • SpencerRasmussen

    1 year ago

    Nice!

    Great piece Sophie. Will I be seeing you at UBC soon?

  • alda

    1 year ago

    Civics lesson 201

    Yes, Kudos, Sophie!

    Continuing Member121's suggested curriculum, consider the following, also:

    1. Not to discourage you, but letters and phone calls to mainstream media and editorials in alternative youth news outlets tend to be more effective than missives to elected politicians who deep-six them as soon as they receive them.

    2. As FPTP nullifies the majority of voters' ballots save for that of the winning 2 mainstream parties, educating the youth & public about the imperative for Proportional Representation should be high on your priority list.

    3. In general, parties that officially support PR are never powerful enough to win government individually, thus, your generation needs to work towards an alliance of Greens, NDP, Bloc, independents -- whichever support PR. Don't nitpick between these parties' similar goals, which only helps the mainstream parties conquer and divide.

    4. Harper's Catch - 22 website idea for strategic voting is a good start. Even better would be a merged youth movement from all progressive parties as the proposition most likely to change things in the future.

    5. Don't burn yourself out by working on individual issues only (tuition, health, environment, etc.) which is akin to putting out fires here and everywhere, to no avail. Progressive political unity is critical to your generation succeeding.

    Good luck.

  • edhendersonmusic

    1 year ago

    Well done Sophie

    Well done Sophie,
    We all need to tell our leaders what we think. I have been writing letters to the PM and premier's offices for years - they invariably answer with rubber stamp communications and rarely are on your point. Don't let that get you down and please, never give up.

    I really like your letter - cheers, Ed

  • VivianLea Doubt

    1 year ago

    ummmm...

    Chris Keam, I am hopeful that a little reflection may show you why your comment is patronizing...and thus deeply offensive.

  • Chris Keam

    1 year ago

    ummmm

    I don't see it as either VLD. I think young women often have the power to define the terms by which they will interact with young men (I suppose I AM being hetero-specific) and they can influence consumer trends through that leverage. I think that 'typically' dating involves a man picking up a woman in his. I'm sure there are plenty of exceptions to this, but generally speaking, this is a common enough situation that I don't think my statement should be construed as some variant on a 'weaker sex' attitude.

  • cboo44

    1 year ago

    "Young women can make a big difference"

    Soooo, suggesting that someone can actually DO something, instead of "just talking about" or wanting "someone else" to "do something" has become "patronizing...and thus deeply offensive" ????
    AMAZING !!
    No wonder nothing will EVER happen!

  • Urbanismo

    1 year ago

    Sophie, these guys have jumped the shark . . .

    [OFFENSIVE COMMENT REMOVED. CONDESCENDING JABS AT TYEE WRITERS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED IN THIS FORUM. -MODERATOR.]

  • Chris Keam

    1 year ago

    missing word

    'in his car.'

  • jglave

    1 year ago

    Sophie the Leader

    Plenty of political advice in here from plenty of frustrated activists; don't sweat it. Just keep doing what you're doing, and do more of it. The flash mob is great. I know you will get a good turnout. You've got plenty of fans out here backing you up.

  • VivianLea Doubt

    1 year ago

    assumptions...

    There are many assumptions in your initial post, Chris Keam - assumptions of class, of gender, of heterosexuality: these reflect your particular world view, I suppose. I find it sad that you believe that the 'one single thing' that young women could do to shift our thinking relates to their choice of transporation on 'dates'. I don't want to presume to give Sophie advice, but it would certainly differ from yours...

    Young women who educate themselves and speak and write their views clearly shall do much to shift our thinking, but more importantly perhaps, they shall, by the very choice of doing so, negate the idea that young women are primarily concerned with 'dating'.

  • nowakn

    1 year ago

    Great article!

    Great article, Sophie! Keep doing what you are doing, it is so important that the voices of young people are heard by our government. I'm screamin' with ya!

  • brewster789

    1 year ago

    Just maybe

    there is hope for this old rock, with young people like this around.
    Thank you.

  • Chris Keam

    1 year ago

    assumptions continued

    "they shall, by the very choice of doing so, negate the idea that young women are primarily concerned with 'dating'."

    That's not something that was even implied in my post IMO. My point is that there is a way for young women to drop a mind bomb in the midst of the North American culture, which is by and large heterosexual and concerned with image and that way requires little more from them than simply living by the precepts so many people espouse but don't practice. My comments come in part from observing the sizable number of single hetero-women who put 'must have a car' as one of their criteria for an acceptable candidate for boyfriend-hood.

  • Wolfboy

    1 year ago

    Future journalist

    That teen can really write. Her writing parallels the beauty of Vancouver as seen in her photo.

    If she needs to be told the reason "Why", then she is too young to hear the real reason "Why". (LOL) (They are just too lazy to develop things)

    Suffice it to say that many get elected, no reference to the PMO but possible to some MPs, and then proceed to simply administer that which was developed by those who came before them.

    The task of developing anything new is what most choose to avoid. Exploration, of ideas or of anything else, is the most popular pastime for people. Exploration is sometimes called "Pipe Dreaming" or "Prospecting". Between the exploration of possibilities, development of tangible assets and policies, or administration of production within an existing institution, it is the development stage that people try to avoid.It involves hard work and risk.

    Taking an idea and developing it into a producing institution is very difficult. Making Canada an overnight world leader in pollution control could very likely cause the collapse of our economy due to related expense and also by destroying our competitive advantage in the global market place.

    This teen's writing skill is a great match to her willingness to ask the tough questions as a leading journalist would do. The only real question is whether we will see this teen next on the TV News or in print.

  • John W. Whitmore

    1 year ago

    Get all of them voting

    Kudos to you Sophie,

    Keep it up. Speak your mind often.

    Please convince the rest of those around you to do the same. I no longer have any faith in my generation. I look to you to harness the incredible ability of you and yours to actually do something. Please put an end to this geriatric, patriarchal course we seem so hell bent on following. You can.

    Just get your friends to start to realize they have power. And can exercise it. Get your generation to put down the Gameboy. Put down the Smart phone. And look up to the world that is theirs. And will be shaped by you and yours. Just do not let the previous holders of the reign of power make you sacrifice all you hold truly precious for a simple price of admission. Turn the world upside down.

    Bugger them. Go make this world yours.

    JWW

  • RickW

    1 year ago

  • RickW

    1 year ago

    Urbanismo

    Quote:
    Oh yes it is when you look at how rapacious corporations finance the plunder of natural resources that BTW, are used to fill our every indulgences from our do-gooder enviro-gadgets to the tar sands devastation of our landscape and indigenous people

    Not for long:
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-14/canadians-with-more-debt-than-u-s-spark-policy-makers-warning.html

  • gibstone

    1 year ago

    Good for You

    Excellent job, Sophie! We're all very proud of you.

  • Wolfboy

    1 year ago

    Sophie

    I bet she wins a Nobel Prize.

    Around 1971 I met John Robbins whose family was of Baskin-Robbins fame and fortune. Mr John Robbins and his wife, Deo, were writers with great concern for human situations.

    Mr Robbins received the Rachel Carson Award, the Albert Schweitzer Humanitarian Award, and the Peace Abbey’s Courage of Conscience Award. He was also nominated for a Pulitzer Prize. I bet that Sophie will do similar work.

  • capedcrusader

    1 year ago

    China

    The big stumbling block to a global deal on climate change seems to be China's status as a developing nation. The West may have created the problems, but if China doesn't have to play by the same rules today, western economies may suffer. Sophie, do you think this is a real concern, and if so, should China continue to have developing nation status? When I look at how China treats people in Africa and in its own country, I have grave concerns about it becoming a sole superpower. I've provided a pro-corporate link below to give you an idea of their concerns.
    http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba694
    The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the International Energy Agency (IEA) recognized that most of the growth in emissions in the 21st century would occur in the developing world:

    * The IPCC predicted that developing nations would account for the majority of greenhouse gas emissions by 2020.
    * The IEA stated that by 2025 China would emit more CO2 than the current combined total of the United States, Japan and Canada.

    These predictions proved to be very optimistic. Since 2003, China has doubled its greenhouse gas emissions, surpassing the United States as the world's largest emitter. In fact, China already emits more CO2 than the United States and Canada combined, and will likely surpass the combined total of the United States, Canada and Japan by 2015.

  • samuidave (not verified)

    1 year ago

    So, Administrator, one question, maybe two

    1. Where is the first comment made in this thread by dirtmeister to whom I was responding?

    2. How did the comment get completely removed with no indication of having ever been made?

    I suspect some may presume I was speaking to myself though, I do admit, some may think this is nothing unusual.;)

  • Kevin Washbrooki

    1 year ago

    Thanks for writing this.

    Way to go Sophie -- we're only going to solve this problem because people like you stand up and say enough is enough. Start a revolution!

  • David Beers

    1 year ago

    Administrator

    samuidave

    The comment was deleted for violating the Tyee's commenting code, being personally insulting to the writer. In retrospect, it would have been better probably to leave it up with the offending material edited and a note admonishing the poster. But, frankly, I lacked the patience and good will given the downright meanness of the post.

  • bob the cat

    1 year ago

    go girl

    Sophie..look at how your radiance has illumined the glass city behind you in your photo! A sign!
    The skies are clearing! You go girl!

  • Neil.Edmondson

    1 year ago

    A Different Perspective

    Dear Sophie,

    You should be thankful that we have a Prime Minister who hasn't panicked over global warming hype. Carbon has never satisfactorily been proven to be the cause of global warming, which isn't global in nature by the way but is concentrated in the Northern hemisphere and especially the polar region. Fewer people believe in AGW than did 5 years ago; you may of heard about Climate gate, in which scientists were found to be dishonest about AGW. Now we are hearing that even if there is massive ice melt many countries will not suffer rising sea levels due to AGW, see http://bit.ly/dSaVrn Spiegel "Sea Level Could Rise in South, Fall in North" and this from last week "Alarming predictions that global warming could cause sea levels to rise 6ft in the next century are wrong, it has emerged." at http://bit.ly/f1KhBz.

    You've been hoodwinked. When I was your age environmentalism meant clean air, clean water, fighting acid rain, stopping deforestation, preserving old growth, containing toxic dumping, saving the whales, and so on. Now all anyone talks about is global warming. Did we solve every other problem? No. Global Warming is bogarting the environmental narrative, and if I were a polluting corporation I'd be very happy that people like you are distracted by AGW so I could go on polluting.

    How many of your friends, or teachers, think global warming is a hoax and say so? How many newspapers and governments (Harper's and Campbell's both officially support AGW thesis) say it is a hoax? How many movie stars and rock stars? Almost none. You want to be a leader, not a follower, then think for yourself and call AGW what it is: a tragic hoax meant to distract people like me and you from real environmental concerns.

    Harper did not sign Kyoto, he wasn't even in parliament at the time. Since we signed Kyoto our population increased nearly 25% - if you are serious about Kyoto that means you have to oppose immigration, are you willing to do that? If every truck and car were removed from the road we still wouldn't meet Kyoto, so you see how it is unrealistic.

    China is building a new coal plant a week for the next 10 years; it's ridiculous to give them a free pass while we freeze in the dark.

    Pierre Trudeau made his cabinet ministers speak to the pros and cons of every proposal they brought to cabinet; you've heard one side of the argument, go research the other side.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.