Opinion

Wrong HST Question, Premier Campbell

He asks how we can afford to drop the hated tax, so he can give the wrong answer.

By Bill Tieleman, 22 Jun 2010, TheTyee.ca

HST cartoon, Ingrid Rice

Cartoon by Ingrid Rice.

Related

"We must make some difficult choices. Do we increase income taxes, increase the provincial sales tax, or cut programs and services?" -- Ex-B.C. Liberal MLA Blair Lekstrom, after quitting over the HST

B.C. Liberal MLAs are asking you the wrong question about the 12 per cent Harmonized Sales Tax to be imposed July 1 -- because they want you to give the wrong answer.

The real question on killing the HST isn't about cutting services or raising the provincial sales tax.

The real HST question Premier Gordon Campbell fears is this: "Do you want to personally pay hundreds or even thousands of dollars in new taxes every year to subsidize big business?"

It's that simple.

And it's why the Fight HST citizens Initiative petition campaign has gathered nearly 700,000 signatures in less than 90 days -- because the answer is clear: NO!

All hell won't break loose

But Campbell wants voters to answer a very different and highly misleading question, because he wants you to give the wrong answer and begrudgingly accept the HST.

Don't be fooled.

Campbell wants you to worry that if B.C. rejects the HST and returns the $1.6 billion one-time-only grant from the federal Conservative government to "implement" the tax, all hell will break lose.

Hospital cuts, school cuts, public services slashed and taxes will have to go up, too, they want you to believe. What a disaster. We'd better keep the HST!

What garbage.

The reality is that this B.C. Liberal government is spending many times that $1.6 billion on several projects that won't even benefit most British Columbians and will be paid for over many years.

The new Port Mann Bridge alone is going to cost $3.3 billion -- double the federal HST bribe money.

The Canada Line rapid transit project cost $2 billion, the Golden Ears Bridge, $800 million, the Trade and Convention Centre, $883 million -- including a $388 million cost overrun -- and B.C. Place's new roof will run a minimum $458 million.

And then there's a little item called the Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympics -- with a price tag B.C.'s auditor general estimated at a minimum of $2.5 billion and that some critics say cost $6 billion or more.

And for non-Metro Vancouver residents -- did you happen to notice that none of the B.C. Liberals favourite big ticket items are coming to your town? But you will get to enjoy the HST every day.

A very small bribe

To put the $1.6 billion HST grant amount in perspective, it is just one per cent of British Columbia's total budget expenditures over four years – and only four per cent of one year's roughly $40 billion budget.

It's an amount that can be dealt with sensibly over the budget cycle in a number of ways without cutting needed services.

And by eliminating the HST, B.C.'s recovering economy wouldn't be hurt by the negative effects of the extra seven per cent tax on so many consumer goods and services, meaning higher government revenues are likely.

But keeping the HST means the ongoing transfer of taxes onto consumers from big business amounts to $1.9 billion each and every year -- over four years ordinary British Columbians will have to fork out an extra $7.6 billion from their own pockets in extra HST costs.

And while paying 7 per cent more for restaurant food, domestic airline tickets, haircuts, home repairs, basic cable, realtor fees and hundreds of other items, they won't get one thin dime more from the HST for new healthcare, education or public services.

Perhaps the only thing we will get is the sincere thanks of large corporations whose costs will drop by $1.9 billion.

Pass on the savings? Not likely

But if you think they will reduce prices on consumer goods you purchase by an equivalent amount to balance that, think again.

B.C. companies don't make many of the products we consume here -- so even if they did reduce their prices, it wouldn't balance the increased costs of the HST.

Think about the really large corporations who will benefit -- Alcan, Canfor or Teck Cominco, for example, and then ask yourself -- how many rolls of aluminum foil, two by fours or coal and copper will you use this year?

Even if those companies reduce their prices thanks to the HST -- a very big "if" indeed -- how will individual British Columbians possibly benefit when the products they purchase aren't made here?

The HST supporters also argue that by reducing business costs through shifting the tax burden to consumers, the overall economy will improve, jobs will be created and more money spent in B.C. -- the trickledown theory in other words.

This is about democracy

Even assuming -- again a huge risk -- that this is actually true, did you get a vote on whether or not to personally finance this enormous corporate subsidy expenditure?

Errr, no.

In fact, the B.C. Liberals in the 2009 election expressly rejected the idea they would introduce the HST when pressed by both the restaurant and home building industry associations.

And previous B.C. Liberal cabinet ministers like Carole Taylor and Rick Thorpe even warned about the negative effects an HST would have on the economy.

So remember the facts when a glad-handing premier and his MLAs make the rounds this summer trying to convince you that paying $1.9 billion every year in new HST costs for the rest of your life is worth getting $1.6 billion just once.  [Tyee]

38  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • bcee

    1 year ago

    HST

    Seems like StatCan this morning adds support to the anti-HST groups.

  • Moonbug

    1 year ago

    you forgot the tax break we gave to banks

    we eliminated the corporation capital tax on banks in 2008... giving up 200+ million every year since then... that is another 600+ million we could have in the coffers... has anyone noticed their bank fees going down since then? I certainly haven't.

  • Open Democracy

    1 year ago

    BCs Hated Tax

    One need look no further than the example of both Nova Scotia and the United Kingdom to see what happens to the HST. Nova Scotia residents were bribed into accepting the HST by promises of a lowered overall HST rate than the existing PST/GST combination, albeit on a far wider range of goods. In their 2010 budget, the Nova Scotia government raised their portion of the HST by 2 percentage points to 15% (still on the far wider range of goods and services), nearly negating the alleged tax saving of 1997. Today, the United Kingdom announced that it too is raising their VAT by 2.5 percentage points.

    The deal that both BC and Ontario made with the federal government only locks in the HST rate for two years; I think that we can guess what direction the tax will take after the two year clock runs out.

    http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/

  • freebear

    1 year ago

    Liberal Charlatans always misleading with spin

    They bragged that the HST was revenue neutral (taxes from big business replaced by taxes from consumers)and now there are saying it's not?

    I am sure the Banks thanked Carole Taylor for that tax shift! A directorship perhaps?

    Who will be the next Liberal MLA to be rewrded with a directorship ('so that they can spend more time with family')?

  • Peter Dimitrov

    1 year ago

    HST and Development of a Right to Truth in Election Campaigns

    The HST debacle is not the first time Gordon Campbell and the BC Liberals promised one thing during an election campaign and then, following their election, did exactly opposite as government. Citizens have a right to "meaningful participation" in elections, and whilst that has thusfar been interpreted to mean 'procedural rights' there is no reason why that reasonable expectation cannot, looking to the future, be expanded to include substantive legal rights, including a right to truth in election campaigns, and if violated, a right to withdraw their consent to a party who violates such a right. Surely we need to look for ways to expand and protect citizen's democratic rights. Also, given the details of the Referendum and Recall legislation there are very slim chances, as others have noted, of being successful in such endeavors. Furthermore, the BC Liberals have demonstrated a willingness to either repeal or significantly amend legislation to further their political purposes - and this may well occur. Twitter me at JusticeNow_2288 regarding your feedback on this, thx.Peter

  • happy

    1 year ago

    Making the inbox rounds....

    This came out of Ontario but I always love a good laugh at politicians expense:

    "Sometime this year, we taxpayers will receive an ' HST Compensation'' payment.

    This is indeed a very exciting program, and I'll explain it by using a Q & A format:

    Q. What is an 'HST Compensation' payment ?

    A. It is money that the provincial government will send to taxpayers.

    Q.. Where will the government get this money ?

    A. From taxpayers.

    Q. So the government is giving me back my own money ?

    A. Only a smidgen of it.

    Q. What is the purpose of this payment ?

    A. The plan is for you to use the money to purchase a high-definition TV set, thus stimulating the economy.

    Q. But isn't that stimulating the economy of China ?

    A. Shut up.

    Below is some helpful advice on how to best help the economy by spending your compensation cheque wisely:

    * If you spend the stimulus money at Wal-Mart, the money will go to China or Sri Lanka ...

    * If you spend it on gasoline, your money will go to the Arabs.

    * If you purchase a computer, it will go to India , Taiwan or China .

    * If you purchase fruit and vegetables, it will go to Mexico , Honduras and Guatemala ..

    * If you buy an efficient car, it will go to Japan or Korea .

    * If you purchase useless stuff, it will go to Taiwan .

    * If you pay your credit cards off, or buy stock, it will go
    to management bonuses and they will hide it offshore.

    Instead, keep the money in Canada by:

    1) Spending it at yard sales, or

    2) Going to hockey games, or

    3) Spending it on prostitutes, or

    4) Beer or

    5) Tattoos.

    (These are the only Canadian businesses still operating in Canada. )

    Conclusion:

    Go to a hockey game with a tattooed prostitute that you met at a yard
    sale and drink beer all day !

    No need to thank me, I'm just glad I could be of help."

  • seth

    1 year ago

    spend in the US

    No sales tax as of the 1st of July.

  • realisticman

    1 year ago

    Why can't BC be like Denmark or Sweden?

    Standard rates of VAT/HST in the European Union

    Source: European Commission

    Austria
    20

    Germany
    19

    Netherlands
    19

    Belgium
    21

    Greece
    23

    Poland
    22

    Bulgaria
    20

    Hungary
    25

    Portugal
    20

    Cyprus
    15

    Ireland
    21

    Romania
    19

    Czech Republic
    20

    Italy
    20

    Slovakia
    19

    Denmark
    25

    Latvia
    21

    Slovenia
    20

    Estonia
    20

    Lithuania
    21

    Spain
    16

    Finland
    22

    Luxembourg
    15

    Sweden
    25

    France
    19.6

    Malta
    18

    UK (as of 2011)
    20

  • jim1966

    1 year ago

    The Only Response We Can Offer Is Recall

    Good article Bill and people are still angry over the deception that the BC Liberals gave us all before, during and after the last provincial election. Recall is the only response that we as an electorate have towards this arrogant, self serving government. What the hell is wrong with the BC Liberals, did they suddenly seem to forget that we all live in a democratic society?, Seems like they have forgotten. No matter recall in the fall.

  • mary jane

    1 year ago

    like others

    We can be like the places with high taxes because they money in those country's are spent on big business their taxes go to preventing poverty, health care, education, child care etc
    Othe countries must not have corporate welfare or blind-deaf politians

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    Liberals fear the truth.

    Politicians, especially the Campbell types are great for getting us into a mess and then offering "solutions" which favor their voter base. There is never any effort made to determine what it was that got us into this mess, ie. Why are we short of money? Maybe reversing all those corporate friendly tax cuts like the ones to the banks might be a start. Oh no, the solution has to be to go back to the very average income consumer who paid for those same tax breaks. The justification, if that is what you can call it, is always the same: it is good for investors. Right, the same folks who got all the tax breaks that got us here.

    They never seem to learn from their mistakes. Understandable because they never admit they made a mistake so the solution is not to back up out of the muck you are in. Even the voter suffers from the same affliction and will vote for the same group that will screw him every time.

    Now in desperation that try to spread fear that if they don't have the HST then the world as we know it will cease to exist. The truth is that if we don't have the HST the liberals will be forced to admit that they, and they alone, have created this big hole the province is in. Only then will the BC voter learn the truth be in a position to rid themselves of these incompetents. That is the only thing the BC Liberals and Campbell fear. Their world will collapse and that is cause for a celebration

  • G West

    1 year ago

    The HST is not a real Value added Tax

    Many of those countries are socialist...VAT is used to subsidize social services not pay off business friends...furthermore, if one is willing to institute the same levels of marginal tax that obtain in many of the listed countries then we could probably come to some resolution.

    However, the HST in BC is little more than a regressive switch of tax from corporations onto individual taxpayers and consumers - the suggestion that there is any similarity is, frankly, risible.

  • Moonbug

    1 year ago

    re: freebear "I am sure the

    re: freebear

    "I am sure the Banks thanked Carole Taylor for that tax shift! A directorship perhaps?"

    http://www.globeinvestor.com/servlet/AppNoticeArticleHTMLTemplate?tf=GlobeInvestor/AppNotices/DisplayNotice.html&cf=GlobeInvestor/AppNotices/config-neutral.cfg&slug=Taylor&date=20090828

    I'm sure it is just a coincidence, however:

    Friday, August 28, 2009

    From The Globe and Mail

    TD Bank Financial Group is pleased to announce the recent appointment of Carole Taylor to its Board of Directors. Ms. Taylor currently serves as the Chair of the Federal Finance Minister’s Economic Advisory Council and also serves as a Governor of the Vancouver Board of Trade. Ms. Taylor holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in English from the University of Toronto and was also appointed an Officer of the Order of Canada in 2001. The appointment of Ms. Taylor brings the total number of directors to eighteen.

    Ms. Taylor resides in Vancouver and served most recently as Minister of Finance for British Columbia.

  • RickW

    1 year ago

    R/M old man....

    Now you should post the list of corporate taxes and levies of those same countries........

  • mary jane

    1 year ago

    no services + high taxes

    realisticman -
    AS I understand it the countries with high taxes don't have CHILD POVERTY ETC
    If we got the services those countries got we would be fine with it I am sure. But gordo and gang have mismanaged our money and our resources so badly we would be along time to get near those countries services.

    The problem politians don't see is the resources are ours - Yours and mine and they aren't there to give away

  • happy

    1 year ago

    Sweden

    Why is the unemployment rate skyrocketing? If this trend continues they will have trouble maintaining those high levels of social services.

    http://www.indexmundi.com/sweden/unemployment_rate.html

  • G West

    1 year ago

    No they won't

    Sweden even had a banking crisis a few years ago and managed to keep things going.

    We're the ones who are failing workers - not the Swedes.

  • RickW

    1 year ago

    Sweden

    It was all the rage to foretell the demise of Sweden not too long ago. I wonder where the rock is those "prognosticators" have crawled back under....?

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    Who cares about what Sweden does.

    Campbell is trying to scare everyone into thinking that he will cut health, education and every other motherhood (sorry parenthood) issue if he does not get the HST. That's a load of bull. He knows that if he does that he will be lynched. He may have to go back on all his favored corporate buddies and raise some of their taxes - go back on earlier cuts - and they will be pi@#ed at him. They might not give him any directorships when he leaves the premier's office.

    My heart bleeds for him.

  • realisticman

    1 year ago

  • RickW

    1 year ago

    That's because they weren't told.....

    ....the country is dysfunctional.

  • Talking Stick

    1 year ago

    Prop 13: Cali's Lesson in Tax Shifting = State Bankruptcy

    California shifted their tax base away from business and on to workers in 1978 through Proposition 13 - it is not working out for them, and has added higher volatility to their economy.

    BC's shift of $2 Billion annually to consumption tax income will likewise add volatility to our resource based economy. We are already seeing the results with the wood resource based towns main employers trying to shift their property taxes on to residents - this volatility is spreading like a disease through small communities across BC.

    The HST will cause BC's tax income flows to Yo-Yo like a drunken sailor at Mardi Gras.

    The dream that somehow these multinational foreign based companies will not send excess profits home to their shareholders, but will pass on the savings to consumers can be historically tested. When Canada extended patent coverage to 25 years it was on the promise from industry that companies would use the incentive of added protection to do more research in Canada - didn't happen.

    The law may see corporations as persons, but as persons they are psychopathic liars.

  • Tony Martinson

    1 year ago

    My best sports analogy

    The Libs are like the me-firster baseball outfielder, the one who, on the crack of the bat, takes three steps in, then rushes out to make a diving catch and look like a hero. It's a risky proposition, because they are deliberately putting themselves out of position to make the safe play.

    The Libs have been doing this since 2001, when they took a surplus left behind for them, frittered it away on tax cuts for their rich friends, leaving a big hole. Extricating themselves from the hole makes them look like fiscal geniuses, where had they just been prudent in the first place, the hole never would have been created.

    Here we are again. They deliberately understated the budget deficit, then made a deal to get a $1.6B bribe from the feds and then claim that the only two choices are to impose the HST or have a $1.6B hole to fill. It's machiavellian genius all over again.Fundamentally dishonest, you understand, but genius nonetheless.

  • Camero409

    1 year ago

    The BS is really flying now!

    As LIbERalS try to pry us out of our opposition to the HST they try to spin a different story. Give us the HST or we'll really punish you with fewer services. Well look up their 2001 election promises. Filled with optimism and open government.

    My how things have changed. Not one promise has been kept. In fact they have decreased services every year in government. They managed to sell BC rail for a billion. But somehow we, the taxpayers of BC, owe CN $600 Million. I'm not a businessman but if I were I would fire the ahole who made that deal.

    It all goes to show that these liars couldn't manage a outdoor toilet. Time to take them out.

  • Camero409

    1 year ago

    HST lesson for the Recall

    We have about 6500 canvassers working on the HST initiative. When the recall starts we will have an abundance of canvassers more than willing to work on the recall. This initiative has taught us valuable lessons. We know how to get signatures, we know where to set up and where to put our signage. We will be successful in some if not most of the ridings selected for recall. LIbERalS if you ignore this initiative you will be punished. I can't wait to work on Gordo's recall but I have heard I will have to wait in line.

  • A Dave

    1 year ago

    Equipment and Machinery is already PST exempt!

    Not only did the banks get the capital exemption in 2008, what is really startling is that, in 2001, the Province eliminated the provincial sales tax on production machinery and equipment.

    Um, aren't those the same big ticket expenses that they now say getting a rebate on will stimulate 100,000 jobs and increase investment in BC? How exactly will a rebate on something that mining and forestry companies haven't paid for since 2001 stimulate either of these industries?

    Back in 2001, the rationale for giving this huge PST exemption was that it would stimulate jobs and investment in BC (sound familiar?). The forest industry has since lost nearly 40,000 jobs, mills closed, raw logs shipped out and virtually no investment in value added production. BC stills lags the Canadian average on investment in construction equipment on machinery. In other words, the PST exemption for big corporations, like this PST rebate for big corporations, has had no effect whatsoever on jobs and investment here in BC...

    The stats don't lie, unlike Campbell and Hansen, the two biggest economic dimwits this province has ever seen.

  • crh

    1 year ago

    those large corporations

    Are those large corporations benefitting from the tax shift the same type of corporations as the one in the Gulf of Mexico spilling millions of gallons of oil into our oceans? Really really BIG uncaring corporations? Who don't give a shit about you or I, only the money they can squeeze from our blood?

    IMHO, the only way to get thru to Campbell is with an economic boycott. JUst shut your wallet on July 1st. Unfortunate it would be that small businesses may suffer, but what can you do? Campbell only lives for business. Hurt business and maybe, just maybe the heat will rise in the kitchen. So far, Campbell is giving every BC'er the finger.

    Give him one back.

  • puppyg

    1 year ago

    I believe it is that

    I believe it is that simple.

    Just yesterday, I got notice that our local family-run theatre is rating the price of a ticket by fifteen percent because the HST will cost them an extra $25,000 per year (these are very honest folks).

    Even if the HST was a good idea (and I am far from convinced of that), I would reject it because of Campbell's contemptuously blatant deception in bringing it forward. The end does not justify the means.

    Democracy is not dead yet. (Still work to be done, you say, Mr. Campbell?)

  • happy

    1 year ago

    Explain how West

    How can a diminishing work force maintain an increasing social services demand?
    It would appear that so far its been by increasing the VAT.
    And you stickhandled around the relevant question-
    WHY is unemployment increasing year over year?

  • G West

    1 year ago

    First of all by reforming the tax system

    I guess there must be general ignorance about how much more concentrated wealth has become in the hands of the top 8 - 10 percent of the population here in Canada since, say,the start of the 1980s.

    You can look it up. You need to also look at the rates of marginal tax in those countries...and remember that BC now has the lowest rates of marginal tax in the country. THE HST is nothing more than a transfer of tax points from corporations and large businesses to consumers and anyone who thinks it's a real VAT (combined with sensible rates of tax on ALL INCOME) simply hasn't been paying attention.

    Why has unemployment been increasing? Because more and more jobs are being eliminated through a wide range of measures that don'e address the reality of peoples' actual lives.

    Sweden is not paradise - but it's a lot closer to it than BC is.

    If Campbell had instituted Sweden's tax system before he switched his emphasis to a 'revenue neutral' - (where have we heard those words before?) HST I might have had some problem attacking him.

    In much the same way I would have had trouble attacking the Campbell Tax if it were a real Carbon Tax and not a money laundry.

    I'm all for real taxes on the people who make enough money to be able to afford to pay them - but I'm not for increased taxes based only upon some phony bullshit notion of 'efficiency' - that sounds like some kind of National Socialist crap to me - more interested in promotion than truth and honesty and really only interested in fooling ignorant people.

    Of which sort of people, as Ed Deak always points out, we already have more than enough.

  • happy

    1 year ago

    Fair enough. Check this out

    Canada and Sweden have both been down the same road

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/budget/6199271/Canada-and-Sweden-inspire-Tory-cutters.html

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    No they have not.

    Get a grip. Sweden was far more socialist as a country than Canada ever was. In fact we never were. There were provinces that tried from time to time but they always had the disadvantage of trying to operate within provincial jurisdictions. Think of Tommy Douglas introducing Medicare. It would have been a lot easier if it had first been done on a national scale. The feds had/have the power and there has not been a single social democratic government in its history. This Sweden comparison is a red herring. It has absolutely nothing to do with the BC folks getting plain fed up with Campbell deciding that all the goodies have to go to big business and the rest of the voters can go *%$# themselves and then trying to tell us that we will be better for it. Nobody I know personally is that dumb.

  • John Carten

    1 year ago

    Civil Services Salaries and Taxation Levels

    The Vancouver Sun reports that 48,000 civil servants made more than $75,000 per year in 2009.

    That is a pile of highly paid people at taxpayers expense.

    Some, such as a fella named Doug Pearce, was paid as much as $1 million. Come on here, gimmie a break, nobody is worth or needs $1 million a year.

    Let's do some mathematical modelling:

    48,000 x $10,000 = $480 million
    48,000 x $20,000 = $960 million - almost 1 billion.
    48,000 x $75,000 = $3.36 billion

    Gordon Campbell was paid $188,602
    Lara Dauphinee, his alleged girlfriend, was paid $150,131

    Take $75,000 away from Gordon Campbell and he still gets paid a hefty $113,602.
    Take $75,000 away from Lara dauphinee and she still gets a hefty $75,151.

    It doesn't take a rocket scientist to calculate that the reason for ever higher taxation levels is that the political class and the government worker class has lost all notions of civility and have become the great rapacious class of beasts that the capitalist class once were.

    Not only are they rapacious beasts but they are in big trouble for alleged criminal misconduct in the Water War Crimes where government insiders sought to loot, pillage and plunder the water wealth of Canada.

    For details visit http://www.waterwarcrimes.com

    When you pay the HST, think about how much Gordon Campbell and his alleged girlfriend, Lara Dauphinee, are being paid. It'll make you angry.

  • Grania

    1 year ago

    HST

    I suggest the MLA's cut their salaries by 25% and Campbell by 50% and, frankly, they are not worth what is left. We need to fight to keep these vultures at bay until we can get rid of them in RECALL

  • Grania

    1 year ago

    Lara

    What are you thinking? Gordon is not exactly my favorite fantasy and I am 65 !

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    Grania

    That is hilarious!

  • happy

    1 year ago

    Carten

    That site is without a doubt the biggest tin hat antenna job I've ever seen. I particularly like this gem:

    "British Columbia Conflict of Interest Commissioner, Paul Fraser, by letter dated May 26, 2010, has asked for "credible information" that Premier Gordon Campbell and his Deputy Chief of Staff Lara Dauphinee have been in a girlfriend boyfriend relationship before continuing with an investigation of whether or not Premier Campbell is in violation of the Members Conflict of Interest Act as a result of this relationship."

    Well, sort of. He was asking YOU for credible information to back up YOUR request for him to investigate Gordo. Reading between the lines he was saying quit wasting my time.
    But I'll let you in on something I know.
    It wasn't Gordo that fathered the lady in questions love child.

    It was an alien.

  • RickW

    1 year ago

    Grania

    The best you will get is a Harper-esque "MPs won't be getting a scheduled pay increase" (although stay tuned for DOUBLE at the next scheduled increase).

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.