Opinion

Israel's Apartheid

Blacks in South Africa never faced a 20-foot wall dividing their communities. Palestinians' land is still being seized, their orchards bulldozed.

By Murray Dobbin, 8 Mar 2010, TheTyee.ca

Israeli apartheid protestors

Demonstration during 'Israeli Apartheid Week'

Related

For the first two weeks of March, Palestine's supporters around the world focus public attention on Israel's continued brutal occupation of the West Bank and its even more vicious siege of Gaza. They do so through Israeli Apartheid Week and this is the sixth year the public education campaign has taken place.

One of the principal signs of its success has been the ferocious counter-campaign by supporters of Israel. Like so much of the history of Israel's powerful propaganda machine, the facts about Israeli separation of Jews and Arabs -- also known as apartheid -- are beside the point. The response to criticism of Israel has always been one of self-righteous indignation and outrage, accompanied by charges of anti-Semitism.

Yet there is absolutely no doubt that the system of separation of Arabs and Jews can be compared with the apartheid system in South Africa. Indeed, many experts on how the apartheid system was run claim that Israel's system of hafrada, or separation, is far more brutal and deliberately humiliating than anything devised by the racist regimes of Pretoria.

Even members of the Israeli political elite use the term apartheid to describe the system they administer -- the latest being the current defence minister (and former prime minister) Ehud Barak who stated: "If there is only one political entity, named Israel, it will end up being either non-Jewish or non-democratic... If the Palestinians vote in elections, it is a binational state, and if they don't, it is an apartheid state."

Shulamit Aloni, who once served as Minister of Education under Yitzhak Rabin, wrote: "The state of Israel practises its own, quite violent form of apartheid with the native Palestinian population." And in November of 2007, Israel's Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said: "If the day comes when the two state solution collapses, and we face a South African style struggle for equal voting rights, then as soon as that happens, the State of Israel is finished."

Michael Ben-Yair, Israel's attorney general from 1993 to 1996, described Israel's approach to the Palestinian territories captured in 1967 as apartheid in 2002:

"We enthusiastically chose to become a colonial society, ignoring international treaties, expropriating lands, transferring settlers from Israel to the occupied territories, engaging in theft and finding justification for all these activities... We developed two judicial systems: one -- progressive, liberal in Israel. The other -- cruel, injurious in the occupied territories. In effect, we established an apartheid regime in the occupied territories immediately following their capture."

Worse than South Africa?

Those who compare Israel's actions in the West Bank and Gaza to the apartheid regime often express shock at how much worse the Israeli system is. Nothing like Israel's settlement structure in the West Bank ever existed in South Africa. The illegal settlements are all connected by a special set of paved highways. As Shulamit Aloni describes: "Wonderful roads, wide roads, well-paved roads, brightly lit at night--all that on stolen land. When a Palestinian drives on such a road, his vehicle is confiscated and he is sent on his way." Some four million Palestinians are governed not by civil law but by Israeli military law, which is enforced by soldiers. On a daily basis, Palestinians face systematic and deliberate humiliation at hundreds of these road-blocks.

At literally every turn, Palestinians are treated as people with no rights. Israel controls water in the West bank and while its citizens have swimming pools, Palestinians are on water quotas -- prohibited even from digging wells. Ask blacks in South Africa if they were ever faced with a 20-foot concrete wall dividing their communities, their land and the roads connecting their villages. Palestinian land is still being seized for use by Israeli settlers, their orchards bulldozed.

And what of Arab "citizens" living in Israel? This "fact" of Arab citizenship is at the core of the myth of Israeli democracy, for even here a milder form of apartheid prevails. Arab citizens can vote but must carry ID cards saying they are "Arab." Most are obliged to live in exclusively Arab villages that are not allowed to expand; they cannot work for the Israeli government; their schools are starved for funds while Jewish schools are well endowed. Arab political parties cannot advocate for a change in the Zionist system of differential treatment based on race. The current Israeli foreign minister, Avigdor Leiberman has mused publicly about expelling all Arabs from Israel proper -- reflecting the widespread view that Israeli Arabs are a "demographic threat."

Israeli 'exceptionalism'

This morally repugnant state of affairs is often described as Israeli exceptionalism. Israel and its supporters use the horror of the Holocaust to argue that nothing critical can be said about Israel because Jews went through a unique horror -- a horror so unimaginable that no other injustice can compare, nor be used to criticize the survivors, no matter what they do to survive. Israel has always painted itself as fighting for mere survival while under siege by hostile Arab states. Yet, with the fourth most powerful military in the world, and with the U.S. as its ally, and no Arab state (even Iran) seriously considering attacking it, this argument is not convincing.

Israelis and their supporters point to anti-Semitism and hateful declarations by Arabs as justification of their system. But they cannot admit their own hatred. Israelis, in order to rationalize their colonial system, must maintain the belief that as the Chosen People, by definition, they are incapable of evil.

And yet evil there is. What sticks in my mind about the first Palestinian Intifada were the dozens of young Palestinian boys, some as young as nine or ten, who were summarily executed by Israeli soldiers (some just teenagers themselves) for throwing stones. These were not kids caught in a crossfire -- they were, on many occasions, shot in the middle of their foreheads by snipers. In his book Palestinian Children and Israeli State Violence, James A. Graff reported that between Dec. 8, 1987 and Dec. 8, 1989 Israel soldiers and settlers killed 138 children (16 years of age and younger) by gunfire. The numbers of children seriously injured by gunfire and beatings was approximately 30,000.

Serious injury of children was state policy. There is video evidence on YouTube of Israeli soldiers holding down a young man, stretching out his arm and smashing it with large rocks. They were following Defence Minister Yitzhak Rabin's orders to Israeli soldiers called the "break their bones" policy. What other democratic country in the world has ever undertaken such a grotesque campaign?

I often wondered just what the snipers thought as the crosshairs found the centre of the child's forehead. What was going through his (or her) head and what did they feel afterwards? I didn't get the answer for 20 years -- not until the reporting of the deliberate targeting of civilians in the invasion of Gaza in December of 2008, when over 900 civilians died (an action for which Israel has been accused of war crimes).

'Just because you can

In March of 2009, reports in Israeli newspapers revealed the atrocities committed by Israeli troops -- described by the soldiers themselves in a group discussion at an Israeli college and transcribed by a professor. One of the incidents involved a mother and two children who misunderstood the instructions of the Israeli soldiers and turned the wrong direction when ordered to leave their house. An Israeli sniper shot all three dead on the spot. Said the squad leader: "The lives of Palestinians, let's say... is something very, very less important than the lives of our soldiers."

In another incident, reported by the Toronto Star's Oakland Ross: "a company commander is said to have ordered his troops to shoot and kill an elderly woman walking past them. 'You do not get the impression from the officers that there is any logic to it -- to write 'Death to the Arabs' on the walls, to take family pictures and spit on them -- just because you can,' said a squad leader who opposed the order."

The Israeli newspaper Haaretz at the same time discovered T-shirts made for soldiers who had served in Gaza. According to a BBC report on the discovery, "One, printed for a platoon of Israeli snipers, depicts an armed Palestinian pregnant women caught in the crosshairs of a rifle, with the disturbing caption in English: '1 shot 2 kills.'"

As shocking as these revelations were, they should come as no surprise. For if the Israeli political class harbours these overtly racist feelings, they also model them for their soldiers. The Oct. 18, 1973 entry of the British House of Commons in Hansard records the reporting of MP R.J. Maxwell-Hislop to the House on his experience as part of a parliamentary delegation to Israel. He had been a lunch guest of the foreign affairs committee of the Knesset.

"After lunch, the chairman of the committee spoke with great intemperance and at great length about the Arabs. I was constrained to say, 'Dr. Hacohen, I am profoundly shocked that you should preach of other human beings in terms similar to those in which Julius Streicher spoke of the Jews. Have you learned nothing?' I shall remember his reply to my dying day. He smote the table with both hands and said 'But they are not human beings, they are not people. They are Arabs.'"  [Tyee]

92  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • leftofcentre

    1 year ago

    Anti-Semitism in a veiled form...

    Yet another anti-semitic article that neglects to mention little details such as...oh...let's see...terrorists...suicide bombers...enemy states sworn to the destruction of a nation and a race.

    But those are easy to ignore when your eyes are blinded by prejudicial hatred. Appalling.

  • Takuan

    1 year ago

    and this is the kind of thing

    Harper finds instinctively appealing.

  • mikev

    1 year ago

    anit-semitic?

    Come on Murray, enough with the weasel words, tell us how you really feel! ;-)

    You might call me anti-semitic as well, but I prefer to think of myself as simply anti- whatever you call what the state of Israel is doing to the dispossessed people of Palestine.

    There were literally dozens of Israelis who were within earshot of a militant launched missile coming down over the last year or so, a couple of them actually even got slightly injured. A measly hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of Palestinians killed by the Israeli army in retaliation, well some would call that heroically humanitarian restraint, apparently.

    What a way to start the week - let the flame war begin!

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    International interference at its worst.

    All of this turmoil started in 1948 when the U.N voted to create a Jewish homeland. They picked a place where Jews and Palestinians had lived for centuries without conflict. They never asked the Palestinians for permission; never ensured they had a place and never ensured a one-state democratic structure. Out of the international guilt from the holocaust they forgot that there were other interests to consider. Someone once suggested, tongue in cheek, that they could have given them Ireland for a homeland. How would that have gone over.

    Since then Israelis have justified every violent act against Palestinians, including settlements in the West Bank, by invoking the holocaust. Every opinion arguing against the Israeli position is anti-semitic. I don't buy it anymore. Blaming the Palestinians because you put them in a "nothing left to lose" situation is not working for most people.. The U.S. an Canada by their blind support of Israeli policy are doing nothing but approving of the slaughter of more innocent civilians on both sides. They could force a solution by halting their support for Israel. They would then be forced to find a solution.

  • AbeBird

    1 year ago

    I'm totally disagree with your view over the Pal-tinian conflict

    It seems that you are chosing facts that "help" your cause and hiding much information that refudiete your claims.
    In short, you're very manipulated observer who makes huge efforts to spread a Falsetinian PrpPALganda Shiite.

  • AbeBird

    1 year ago

    Unfortunately, there won’t be a peace because of Arabs

    Unfortunately, there won’t be a peace until the Arabs in Palestine treat the Jews in Palestine as human beings. As long as Arab Anti-Semites and teach their daughters and sons the hatred of the verses of the Koran, you can only dream about peace.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2H8HFb-YG00

  • nolanrh

    1 year ago

    Anti-Semitism

    The failure to mention Palestinian wrongs does not make an article anti-semitic, it makes it incomplete. Any speculation as to the motive behind the unbalance is just that, speculation. Unfounded accusations of anti-semitism distract from the real debate.

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    As I said

    Unfortunately, there won’t be a peace until the Israelis in Palestine treat the Arabs in Palestine as human beings. As long as Israeli Zionists teach their daughters and sons the hatred of the verses of the Torah, you can only dream about peace. Anything that does not recognize the history of this conflict is designed to continue. Without the political influence of Jewish interests in the U.S. support of Israel, this would have been settled long ago.

    No one is denying Palestinian responses. Palestinian responses do not justify the Israeli responses and vice versa. Instead of accusing someone of choosing facts you engage in the same old same old reaction since the beginning. Israel is not justified in all its actions. The international community has been cowered by the corporate Jewish influence long enough. Killing is not justified by any holocaust.

  • Raphael Alexander

    1 year ago

    I have I had four arms

    So I could this article four thumbs down.

  • Takuan

    1 year ago

    Canada has no business

    helping this Israeli oppression.

  • RickW

    1 year ago

    For the Israelis.....

    ....it is nothing more or less than lebensraum.

  • dorothy

    1 year ago

    The people responsible

    for the deaths of those children were those who sent them out there to throw stones. What the ^%*# were they thinking?? Would your children be out there at that age? would mine? certainly not! In our neck of the woods, adults protect their children and fight their own battles. Shame on those who would do otherwise.

  • Bustagrill

    1 year ago

    this does nothing to help the Palestinian cause

    This is a one-sided screed. A polemic of the worst kind. Dobbin, you have misrepresented and selectively chosen facts, and lied throughout this essay.

    Let me state first that I am a zionist (I believe that Israel should exist) yet I am strongly critical of Israeli policy, and I am a strong supporter of the Palestinian cause for self-determination. Your pathetic manipulation of the truth is a disservice to the cause of Palestinian freedom. Such crap only pours fuel on the flames of intolerance and perpetuates this horrible situation by providing (false) moral justification to the violent mindsets on both sides of the conflict.

    Shame on David Beers and the Tyee for debasing this important debate by publishing this disgusting essay. More and more the Tyee appears to be BC's neo-left equivalent of Fox News.

    Dobbin, I hope you one day understand how deeply you are betraying the Palestinian cause through your actions.

  • straightshooter

    1 year ago

    Israel's Apartheid

    To quote Ronnie Kasrils, minister for intelligence in the current South African government, a devout Jew, and a man who certainly knows apartheid when he sees it: "The Palestinian minority in Israel has for decades been denied basic equality in health, education, housing and land possession, solely because it is not Jewish. The fact that this minority is allowed to vote hardly redresses the rampant injustice in all other basic human rights. They are excluded from the very definition of the 'Jewish state,' and have virtually no influence on the laws, or political, social and
    economic policies. Hence, their similarity to the
    black South Africans [under apartheid]." (The
    Guardian, 25 May 2005)
    As the documented record clearly attests, the situation for Palestinians who have been forced to live under Israel's illegal and brutal occupation of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem/the Old City, and the Gaza Strip (still occupied by Israel under international law)for nearly 43 years is much, much worse: Oppression, ongoing dispossession, extrajudicial assassinations, collective punishments, over 10,000 imprisoned, including women and children - many without charge and subject to torture; destruction of homes, olive groves, theft of their water so Jewish settler/colonists can frolic in swimming pools and green grass while Palestinians do not have enough for basic needs; endless checkpoints, humiliation and constant military attacks resulting in many deaths, e.g. Operation Cast Lead in which over 1,400 defenceless caged Gaza Strip Palestinians were slaughtered, the great majority non-combatants, including 100's of women and children. Thankfully, day by day, the truth regarding Israel is being revealed worldwide ever faster. Thank you Murray!!!

  • straightshooter

    1 year ago

    One example of apartheid within Israel

    http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1134898.html
    Ha'aretz, Dec. 14/09: "Jewish town won't let Arab build home on his own land "

    Excerpt: "Aadel Suad first came to the planning and construction committee of the Misgav Local Council in 1997. Suad, an educator, was seeking a construction permit to build a home on a plot of land he owns in the community of Mitzpeh Kamon. The reply he got, from a senior official on the committee, was a memorable one. 'Don't waste your time,' he reportedly told Suad. 'We'll keep you waiting for 30 years.' "

  • alive

    1 year ago

    Conflict can be a way of life

    Lets see, in this country we are bending over backwards to make up for some injustice generations ago, and nothing we do ever seem to satisfy the "victims".
    To me it looks as if thousands of years from now anyone who can claim native status will still have a chip on their shoulders.

    So what is so different about palestine etc.? No matter what you try, it is an ongoing conflict that exists because we allow ourselves to feel guilty about what our forefathers did (mostly in good faith.)

    If the jews insists on being where they are not welcome, is it not their own folly?

    Before the war Jews lived in many different countries, just as did other sects; Who decreed that a sect deserves to be treated like a nation?

    Yes, Hitler persecuted them as he did homosexuals and negroes, but only the jews refused to come back home, once the madness was over.

    Perhaps we should ask what entitles any group to claim a particular piece of land?

    Did the natives pay for the land? no, they were nomads and kept moving on every time they had polluted their own drinking water, but now every last place they ever rested for a week or so becomes their claim?

    It is time that we no longer are obliged to compensate anyone for their ancestors problems, because it is never ending and solves nothing.

  • IranianDude

    1 year ago

    Israel has never been interested in peace

    GREAT ARTICLE - THANKS!

    Israel has never been interested in peace. Israel has been continually rejecting and violating international law since 1948.

    Their genocide and war crimes are well documented.

    It's absurd to request this regime to behave like other United Nation members. The only way forward is what we did to the former South African government. Boycott, divestment and sanctions.

    No conscionsiou human being should sit down and let this apartheid regime murder innocent Paletinians.

    Join the global secular movement to bring down Israeli apartheid:

    http://www.bdsmovement.net/

  • IranianDude

    1 year ago

    Bustagrill spare us with

    Bustagrill spare us with your nonsense. Israel's regime should pay the price for their war crimes and crimes against humanity.

    If you side with them, you're siding with war criminals. Let me remind you that.

  • Jerry Munro

    1 year ago

    The Echo Still of Fascist Europe in the Middle East

    First, the Palestinian people in Palestine/Israel are a majority, only driven as a diaspora by Zionist terrorism, with the aid of Western Imperialism, into a remnant piece of whats was pre-war II Palestine, and into the surrounding refugee camps of the other Arab states. Time to revisit this reality of the creation of the Zionist State out of the post war !! European Jewish diaspora fleeing "European Persecution", and how the Arab peoples of Palestine were made to pay with their land for that war crime of Europe/Germany. With in but one way suffering being driven from their land and forced into a Zionist/fascist apartheid regime.

    If there is a historical echo anywhere of what the Zionists have done in Palestine, outside of South Africa, which is truely its closest resemblance, it is the Warsaw Ghetto of the Nazis in Poland. And the Zionist State of Israel fears the Right of Return of the Palestinians because even yet, the Palestinians would be a majority in their Palestinian/Israeli homeland.

    The Zionist Jews have attempted to right the crimes of fascist Europe against themselves, by committing their own war crime apartheid/genocide against the innocent people of Palestine, who are but defending and attempting to recover their homeland. And resisting foreign occupation, no matter how you attempt to mask it, is not "terrorism", but "patriotism" by any measure.

    Since the dispersal of the Jews from ancient Palestine by the Romans, some three thousand years ago, the Jews have settled into and become a part of many lands, like Christianity, arguably, really more a religion than "a people" in a nationalist sense.

    It is time to end this war crime of (largely) European Zionist Jewry against the Arab Palestinians, and hope in the aftermath, that in a real settlement peace, they and the Palestinians can find a real "democratic" solution, based on the will of the majority, in a singular "secular" state. The "two state solution" envisioned by Israel is really just a kind of fascist double-speak for "Apartheid", itself a double speak for "Genocide".

    And this is not anti-semitism, but the only rational view of the hisorical and present record. My view, in any case.

  • bluerev

    1 year ago

    There won't be peace because of this sensationalism

    All sides are wrong (including mine). This article, which I am sure has validating statements, plays to demonize the Israelis. When you write articles like this, it does little to bring people over to your point of view, instead it gets people to become more defensive to their previous held notions (we dig our trenches). Israel is wrong, Palestine is wrong, I am wrong, and so are you. However, we have to live together, so lets find a way to see the world, even for a moment, through the other's eyes. Lets try and find some empathy for all peoples. Blaming anyone doesn't solve problems, helping and caring for all people does.

  • IranianDude

    1 year ago

    bluerev

    Israel MUST be demonized. Do you think that we should have been nice toward the last apartheid, the former government of South Africa?

    Apartheid regime MUST be shamed, boycotted and actively demonized.

    Dobbin is right on.

  • Orest Slepokura

    1 year ago

    What's a Palestinian life worth to Israelis?

    Dobbin quotes - with sourcing - an IDF squad leader who describes the negligible value the Israeli military put on Palestinian lives: "The lives of Palestinians, let's say... is something very, very less important than the lives of our soldiers."

    This example will show in the most literal way just how cheaply Israelis value the life a Palestinian. In 1993, four Israeli soldiers killed an 18-year-old Palestinian at a West Bank checkpoint. In 1996, an Israeli military court convicted the soldiers of firing on the victim's car against regulations, but sentenced them to only one hour in jail, which was suspended, and fined them one agora - a third of a U.S. cent.

    Source: Dispatches by Lisa Beyer in Jerusalem [TIME, December 2, 1996, p. 18], The Banality of Abuse.

  • macsasquatch

    1 year ago

    The Palestine Isreal conundrum...

    Sometimes I think that the only topic that brings out more rancour and accusation than the Palestine Israel issue is that of taking fighting out of hockey.

    I see no resolution any time soon.
    The settlements and rights of way in the West Bank make Palestinian state impossible. It would be an injustice to the Palestinians, and a joke in international law. There can be no autonomy or integrity to a state criss crossed by settlements and rights of way of another nation.

    The West will not allow a single democratic, egalitarion state becuase the West will not allow Israel's nuclear weaponry to be influenced by Arabs.

    Israel has the guns, a steady supply of more guns and support from Europe and North America. So there is no reason for the Israeli regime to do other than continue to take Arab land and expand the settlements. There is no reason for Israel to restrain its violent treatment of its neighbours.

    Historically, I see this as a latter day European colony plunked down in Palestine this past century or so. The Israeli regime and its supporters display a vicious apartheid behaviour toward its subjects. I am sure many of the Israeli leaders have a vision of a much greater (geographically)Israel in decades to come.

    I should say that my thinking on this is a tad tainted. For a lot of my teen and adult years, I bought the horse apples about a gallant little beacon of civilization standing up to a sea of three trillion blood lusting sub humans who wanted to perpetrate a holocaust on Israel. I have changed my mind on this.
    I sometimes get an image of an Israel in which the leaders and their supporters are trapped in faulty myth of their own making, a myth that they themselves can see no way out of.

  • Dr Alexander

    1 year ago

    Walks like a Wall, talks like a Wall. I guess......

    that it is a Wall. Apartheid in every sense of the word. An indelible stain upon the State of Israel. For shame. And shame on Canada for supporting and not speaking out against this violation of peoples rights.

    At any rate. Well done Murray. You have a pair and I respect you for it.

    On the other hand, I have to chuckle when folks say the story is unfair and unbalanced.

    A bit of read of the Goldstone Report should bury that b.s. Or an examination of Rachel Corrie vs. Tank.

  • Dr Alexander

    1 year ago

    Correction

    Rachel Corrie vs. Bulldozer.

  • Des

    1 year ago

    The Pronunciation of

    the word, Apartheid, is "Apart Hate." The aggressors on each side - and each side has them - see only the Hate directed toward them by the other side, and reciprocate in kind. But this kind of hate will escalate into the type of behaviour which the Taliban practise, justifying in desperation the suicide of bombers as long as they take more of the "enemy" with them.

    If Israel is prepared to respond to continual minor aggravations with major reprisals, then we can expect another Holocaust to happen. Soon.

  • bluerev

    1 year ago

    IranianDude

    I agree with you... but then so should palestinians, so should you and so should I. Everyone can be demon in certain aspects, my point is we need to see more than who is right (because no one is).

  • straightshooter

    1 year ago

    Des

    The word Apartheid means separation, which is one of the cornerstones of Zionism and the Jewish state, i.e.
    as few non-Jews as possible - hopefully none. In 1948, 800,000 Palestinians were expelled, as were a further 25,000 just prior to and during Israel's first invasion of Egypt in 1956. An additional 450,000 Palestinians were ethnically-cleansed by Israel during and after the war it launched on 5 June 1967. Everyday, we read of more brutal acts by Israel to dispossess Palestinians not only in occupied Palestinian lands but within Israel proper - recently in Jaffa (from which 70,000 Palestinians were expelled in early May 1948, before Israel was declared a state.) Israel is the only aggressor. There are no Palestinians occupying lands within pre-1967 Israel, no Israeli cities are surrounded by heavily armed Palestinians imposing an illegal embargo on life's necessities. Unlike Israel which is armed to the teeth courtesy of American taxpayers, the Palestinians do not have even one tank let alone F16s, missiles, napalm, helicopter gunships etc. in the hands of the IDF and IOF. The documented record is clear: Israel is the occupier, Palestinians are the occupied; Israel is the ethnic-cleanser, Palestinians are the dispossessed; Israel is the oppressor, Palestinians are the oppressed; Israel is the victimizer, Palestinians are the victims; Palestinians have hard won international humanitarian law on their side, Israel violates international law each and every day.

  • Pax R

    1 year ago

    There can be peace!

    Even if you believe that the hope for peace is slim, a cardboard robot is giving it a shot. Let's collaborate together with him.

    Join the Pax Revolution on Facebook and Twitter at Pax_101.

  • doggone

    1 year ago

    If Israel can not figure this who can?

    I was told "apartheid" meant "Out of sight and mind" - GONE!
    So I would have to say it is not gone and never will it be gone.
    I lived and worked in RSA shortly after the official announcement of it's demise there.
    At some point we (engineers and contractors for an hospital upgrade)were having a nice meal in a resort and some young man passed the window with a small touque indicating he was Jewish. The reaction of the other people was shocking to me: "Juden!" from a Brit engineer and support from a contractor from India (both were RSA citizens, not visiting).
    Put that in your hat, Dr Hacohen

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    Imagine for a moment

    If Iran was not run by a nutbar and they had nuclear capability. In other words if there was a balance of power in the middle east. What would be the outcome? The cold war last some 50 years and the only thing stopping the major powers from destroying each other was the knowledge that the end result would leave no winners. Imagine!

  • IranianDude

    1 year ago

    Skywalker

    How do you expect a balance of power in ME when United States gives 5 billion dollars in an unconditional aid to the regime of Israel? Not to mention unlimited military support from both tactical and strategic perspectives. Where do you think Israel's 150+ nuclear warheads have come from?

    Like I said before, the only way to deal with this outlaw regime is through boycott, sanction and divestment.

    You cannot reason with thugs.

  • straightshooter

    1 year ago

  • straightshooter

    1 year ago

    Another video well worth watching

    Israel's apartheid regime as practiced within the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem/the Old City:

    http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=4824

  • Reness

    1 year ago

    Israeli Apartheid

    I would like to ask Mr. Harper to show the Canadian people their wish that he, as prime minister of this country, express publicly unmitigated support to anything Israelis do, and, visa versa, condemn anything not in favor of Israeli policies, as terrorist activities and blatant anti-Semitism. If he cannot show that, he is solely speaking for himself; to which he has no right, as prime minister of this country; and when he lies there, why would the people believe that he is not lying about most anything else?

    Unfortunately, what Mr. Harper and his counterparts in Washington don’t ‘seem’ to get is: their unfettered support, -- being something resembling the wild rigmarole of the Stalinist propaganda machine --, does not do any favors to the people who live in that country, nor to the Jewish people living anywhere else on this earth; and that is always the sad part of brutally applied manipulation and aggression.

    History showed abundantly, where there was aggression without bounds, the pendulum always swung back; and then it was: cometh the time to pays the piper. All the great empires, accrued by force, came crashing down to earth. From Genghis Khan to Napoleon; the great Soviet Union; the 1000-year Reich; the British Empire (where the sun never set); the unbeatable US of A, crawling, tail down, out of Vietnam: ‘Towers of Gold – Feet of Clay’; nothing bad lasts forever. “Where have all the Flowers gone? – When will they ever learn?”

  • rikia

    1 year ago

    Journalism

    This article presents one side of a struggle. Are there other views? Absolutely. Do they all need to be presented in every article? No.

    We can read facts and make up our own minds. A pressure to make every article "balanced" is what has given so much power to climate change deniers. Even though 99% of scientists agree on the facts, the 1% minority, usually funded by oil companies, are given half the space in most articles.

    We're smart people. We can research both sides of a story. Criticize a writer for getting his facts wrong, not for disagreeing with you.

  • zalm

    1 year ago

    Abe-bird

    "Unfortunately, there won’t be a peace until the Arabs in Palestine treat the Jews in Palestine as human beings. As long as Arab Anti-Semites and teach their daughters and sons the hatred of the verses of the Koran, you can only dream about peace."

    And of course there's no such behaviour among the people that have "the most moral army in the world" is there?

    Let me disabuse you of that notion most emphatically. B'Tselem and Human Rights Watch have either prevented or recorded thousands of unprovoked assaults on Palestinians who were not doing anything more than what they were lawfully allowed to do on their own land. Christian Peacemaker Teams has spent years taking the same abuse for protecting one side from the other, regardless of who was at risk.

    Most of the difficulties are between ultranationalist settlers and Palestinians, and Jonathan Cook has documented some of these incidents in his hundreds of articles for the BBC and now on his own. In only one sample, he writes of a settler family in East Jerusalem that is illegally harrassing the Palestinians whose house they have seized:

    "“The family next door makes noise through the night to disturb us, and brings large parties of settler children to play on our shared balcony as though they were on a school outing. We have even seen them put up posters of Palestinians and encourage their children to shoot at them with toy guns.”

    http://www.jkcook.net/Articles2/0322.htm#Top

    That's not the kind of upbringing I'd expect of a people who claim to be protected by the "most moral army in the world". In fact, despicable, I'd call it.

    The overwhelming sentiment expressed by Israelis in conflict with Palestinians is for their deaths. Yes, there are those, even in the army who do not wish them any ill-will, but they are few and far between. I speak from personal knowledge. I have one coworker, one former coworker and two acquaintances who have expressed such sentiments for many years, just as you do, despite being in Canada and away from Israel for many years.

    Or maybe that's the problem.

    Your hasbara will not work any longer. Don't pollute the pages here with it.

  • zalm

    1 year ago

    self-of-centred

    Did you notice that nobody bothered worrying about your racist little diatribe? As anyone familiar with history would know, the asymmetrical warfare now underway in the Middle East has a long and illustrious history in warfare dating back millennia. Jewish heroes of asymmetrical warfare include Abramowitz and Tsadok, who were killed blowing up the King David hotel in 1948 in Jerusalem, killing, among the 91 people, 17 Jews.

    And listen to the rhetoric:

    British Prime Minister Clement Attlee commented in the House of Commons:

    Hon. Members will have learned with horror of the brutal and murderous crime committed yesterday in Jerusalem. Of all the outrages which have occurred in Palestine, and they have been many and horrible in the last few months, this is the worst. By this insane act of terrorism 93 innocent people have been killed or are missing in the ruins. The latest figures of casualties are 41 dead, 52 missing and 53 injured. I have no further information at present beyond what is contained in the following official report received from Jerusalem:

    "It appears that after exploding a small bomb in the street, presumably as a diversionary measure — this did virtually no damage — a lorry drove up to the tradesmen's entrance of the King David Hotel and the occupants, after holding up the staff at pistol point, entered the kitchen premises carrying a number of milk cans. At some stage of the proceedings, they shot and seriously wounded a British soldier who attempted to interfere with them. All available information so far is to the effect that they were Jews. Somewhere in the basement of the hotel they planted bombs which went off shortly afterwards. They appear to have made good their escape."

    And

    Prime Minister Attlee wrote to American President Harry S. Truman: "I am sure you will agree that the inhuman crime committed in Jerusalem on 22 July [1948] calls for the strongest action against terrorism."

    Arabs are relative latecomers to the tactic, which may explain why they're relatively unsuccessful.

    But Israelis have learned the lessons of complaining about the results of asymmetrical warfare very, very very, well indeed. Master complainers they are - Oscar-winning performances indeed.

    The last thing to remember is that no empire has ever decisively won an asymmetrical war with a weaker enemy. Every one of them has been bled into withdrawal. The only question now is whether unconditional support will take down the whole West, or just Israel and the US?

  • zalm

    1 year ago

    dorothy

    Disappointing. Exceedingly disappointing.

  • Dr Alexander

    1 year ago

    Walls and Bulldozers

    If I had one of these running through my neighbourhood

    http://cache1.asset-cache.net/xc/1928540.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF878921F7C3FC3F69D929FD911F6BBD65DC10DFEAB189B96B4C58CB5CBABFE0E394DD82E30A760B0D811297

    I am quite sure that I would be humming a Bruce Cockburn tune.

  • Jerry Munro

    1 year ago

    Dorothy

    "In our neck of the woods, adults protect their children and fight their own battles." Dorothy.

    I'll just echo Zalm's disappointment here. You are capable of being more insightful than that... which you from time to time demonstrate here. Boys certainly, and young girls I have no doubt, in many lands have had to fight alongside men, their fathers and uncles, and women, in defence of the homeland from invaders, where the effort of all the people is required. Russia, and many other parts of Europe against the Nazis I know immediately of. (Even here, as cadets, at fourteen and younger, the majority of working class boys in my neighbourhood started their formal military training. And kid yourself not, we would have been used if absolutely necessary. We were just fortunate in never knowing the circumstances calling for it, such as a foreign occupier like Amerika. I was carrying a rifle in a Reserve infantry regiment as a skinny sixteen year old, and doing battlefield training alongside adult men.)

    Motherhood homilies ring warm and fuzzy in the home and hearth of "normal" circumstances, but in extreme circumstances often mean next to nothing, and quickly exit out the window... becoming just sentimentality, not the real world.

    On the other hand, every once in awhile Dorothy....
    you abandon your own critical/objective faculties.
    Disappointing.

  • Jerry Munro

    1 year ago

    Boys at war...

    In fact, now that I really think back on it, I was in this Reserve infantry regiment even younger than sixteen, in this country, because I left home just short of my fifteenth birthday... so it had to be at 13-14. You were supposed to be 17, but it was never checked up on, and I simply lied about my age.

    And don't tell me these recruiters didn't know, because they had to. They were just hoping to get a handle on us really young, and funnel us into the full time army as we came of age. And all our parents knew. (Except I went into the Navy instead, at seventeen. :-)

    So, either you came out of a different "neighbourhood", or you are just being naive.

  • Arbor

    1 year ago

    Middle East

    A totally one sided article such as this does nothing but promote more anti-semitism among those who don't wish to know that Jews were in this part of the world thousands of years ago...just pay attention to the historical digs done in Israel and other parts of the Middle East.... and, pay attention to the fact that the Muslim/Islamic/Arabic people are killing each other in Gaza, Lebanon, Egypt, etc., sadly they do not value anyones lives...to blame Israel for all the problems in the Middle East without mentioning
    these facts is totally offensive.

  • straightshooter

    1 year ago

    Dorothy

    I note you made no reference to the fact that while illegally/belligerently/brutally occupying and stealing Palestinian/Canaanite lands well armed Jewish settler/colonialists take their children with them, thereby exposing them to possible violence on the part of the legitimate and entirely justified resistance. The very least these foreign invader/occupiers should do is leave their children within Israel's pre-1967 war borders, or better yet, back home in the U.S. where most of them come from.

  • straightshooter

    1 year ago

    Arbor

    Quite a novel and desperate approach to attempt to justify Israel's well documented apartheid regime along with its litany of crimes committed against Palestinians, including "war crimes" and "crimes against humanity" by referring to the presence of Jewish Hebrews in Palestine/Canaan thousands of years ago. Incidentally, the Jewish Kingdom under David and Solomon lasted a mere 72 years - a grain of sand on the beach in terms Palestine's history.
    Also, for your edification: To quote historian/anthropologist/Palestine specialist, Ilene Beatty: "When we speak of 'Palestinians' or of the ''Arab population [of Palestine]', we must bear in mind their Canaanite origin. This is important because their legal right to the country stems...from the fact that the Canaanites were first, which gives them priority; their descendants have continued to live there, which gives them continuity; and (except for the 800,000 dispossessed refugees [of 1948, along with the 25,000 expelled just prior to and during Israel's first invasion of Egypt in 1956 and the additional 450,000 driven out during and after the war Israel launched on 5 June 1967]) they are still living there, which gives them present possession. Thus we see that on purely statistical grounds they have a proven legal right to their own land." ("Arab and Jew in the Land of Canaan," 1957)

  • Jeffrey J.

    1 year ago

    Anti-Semitic Non Sequitur

    The distinction between legitimate criticism of right-wing Isreali policies vs anti semitism is pretty simple. Those who continue to confuse the two are either failing to read Uri Avnery's weekly columns on Gush Shalom, or are deliberately fomenting spurious rhetoric
    http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery

    It remains a curious allegation that thousands of Jewish peace activists (like Uri Avnery, Noam Chomsky, Naomi Klein etc etc) who oppose the current anti-democratic Israeli regime are somehow excluded from this debate. And when they are finally quoted, they too are dismissed as anti-Semitic (self-hating Jews). This takes the misuse of language to a further absurdity.

    For those curious about the logical difference between antisemitism (which many neocon Western elites still harbour)and critiquing Israel's foreign policy, the best source is The Politics of Antisemitism, a brilliant collection of essays which forever puts to rest the myth that criticizing Isreal is anti-Semitic.
    http://www.counterpunch.org/poas.html

    For those who are not curious about this persistent fallacy, perhaps they should begun studying some other topic besides international politics.

    Great article from the tireless and courageous Mr.Dobbin, brought to us by the great folks at the Tyee.

  • IranianDude

    1 year ago

    Arber is a racist; Dorothy is of course a moron

    "pay attention to the fact that the Muslim/Islamic/Arabic people are killing each other in Gaza, Lebanon, Egypt, etc.,"

    Classic racist and isalmophobe.

    And as for Dorothy, I wouldn't even dignify her extremely retarded "argument."

  • zalm

    1 year ago

    IranianDude

    Well, you still have to argue with them, not call them names. The arguments are manifold and mighty, and there really are a few on the other side as well, you know. Calling names is what arch-Zionists do when their hasbara fails. And when the Jerusalem Post or Yehediot Aranot picks it up and runs with it, then it gets into the mainstream polluting thousands of otherwise fine Jewish minds. Argument is work, but it leads to a fine discernment of the goals and methods of individual people instead of the politicized propaganda. And sometimes you then discover the most amazing common ground.

    Argue or call names - pick your side.

  • IranianDude

    1 year ago

    Zalm

    Zalm

    You're right. I appreciate your reminder.

  • on ways to pleasure

    1 year ago

    "legal right to the country"

    Now that we have a number of different views here, I will not write extensively on the topic. However,please remember that Middle East has a continues history of religious wars and civil wars dating back to king David. What followed after? Expulsion of the Jewish population on few occasions and destruction of Jerusalem! Today though, not even all Israelis agree on what indeed was or is truth and I personally eager to read the last book of Shlomo Sand on this topic(use internet to see what I mean). The creation of a new country in 1948 was collaborated by Big Daddies of Europe and USA, and considering Holocaust and wide-spread antisemitism, the nation without land happily moved back to their roots.
    Ever since every Arab country bordering Israel declared a war on it at one point. Israel invaded Egypt ...was mentioned above! Well, USA and USSR had invaded Germany...for there was a reason, and later divided it by wall!!!!!!! Apartheid?
    Road blocks on the border? Definitely,or else among ten Arab workers getting in, one will bring a bomb and on the way home will smuggle a stolen car to be taken apart in Gaza's body shop. There is about one million Arabs living inside Israel and glad to have access to health care and education and they do work government jobs too.
    We speak war crimes? War is a crime. Sending a home made rocket on my yard is a crime with consequences
    for both sides. Or, by the way, about settlers- from Hudson Bay to a El-Paso how would we call the non-native population?
    Thanks for your time.

  • straightshooter

    1 year ago

    on ways to pleasure

    Conspicuous by its absence is your failure to event mention Israel's illegal (see UN Charter, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Fourth Geneva Convention, several binding UNSC resolutions, declarations of Theodor Meron, the legal counsel of the Foreign Ministry in June, 1967, the US State Dept. etc.) belligerent/brutal occupation and continuous confiscation of Palestinian lands and water resources (i.e., the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip) as well as Syria's Golan Heights and Lebanon's Shebaa Farms - all invaded and occupied by Israel during the war it launched on 5 June 1967 despite the fact that a diplomatic solution was nearly in hand.
    Furthermore, every war that has taken place between the Arab states and Israel was either started directly or precipitated by Israel.

  • IranianDude

    1 year ago

    on ways to pleasure

    "War crime? war is a crime"

    We are not playing who is better in alliteration here! War crimes and crimes against humanity have legal definition. Use Google!

    As extensively documented by UN, Israel has committed these unthinkable and horrendous crimes i.e. war crimes and crimes against Palestinians since its inception in 1948.

    Please refer to Goldstone report on the recent war crimes committed by IDF (Israel Defence Force) murderers in Gaza.

    An no there are not "numerous" views here. There is a global consensus that Israel's apartheid system should be dealt with proactively. We can't have a genocidal regime in the global community that constantly violates international law, mocks any effort toward peace and continually stonewalls any chance for peace. Of course along the way, the supporters of this genocide machine known as Israel throw anti-semtism charges to stall the movement toward boycott and sanctions against Isarel's regime. This tactic has been backfiring so rapidly .... even holocaust survivors are voicing their contempt toward Israel's ethnic cleansing and racist machine.

    Bottomline is Israel has never been interesetd in peace. why would they? they are in the business of stealing someone else's land. Today Israel's court has approved 1500 HOMES TO BE BUILT IN EAST JERUSALEM - PALESTINIAN LAND!

    To bring an end to Israel's apartheid and state sponsored terrorism, there is only one way and one way only: boycott, divestment and sanctions. It worked in South Africa it WILL WORK IN APARTHEID STATE OF ISRAEL.

  • doggone

    1 year ago

    Forgive me if someone has already posted this link:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8558850.stm
    The Yanks dumping Israel?
    What is next?

  • straightshooter

    1 year ago

    doggone

    Yes, I saw the BBC item earlier and also on Al Jazeera. Glad you posted it. Such typical arrogance on Israel's part, such contempt for the hand that feeds and protects it - nearly $10 million per day funded by strapped US taxpayers, 365 days a year as well as $billions in tax deductible contributions from US individuals and organizations that serve Israel, the expansionist, occupier ethnic-cleanser state. The question is how much longer will Washington allow Israel to humiliate America. I predict the end is in sight. No matter how you slice and dice it, Israel is America's number one and ever-increasing geopolitical liability. Sooner or later, all nations must act in their own best interests. As of this year, there are 1.75 billion Muslims worldwide. In 20-25 years there will be three billion as well as 650-700 million Arabs, including about 12 million Palestinians between the Jordan River and the Med. Sea. The implications for US foreign policy, especially that of the Middle East are obvious. The handwriting is on the wall, but Israel still refuses to read it.

  • Des

    1 year ago

    In The Litany

    of the state of Israel's various offenses - which have nothing to do with the fact of being Jewish by birth or choice, or practicing Hebrew religious rites, or living anywhere else in the world - which many have listed here, I have not seen any mention of the common abuse by Mossad of using fraudulent documents to assist their agents' deception.

    Canadian identities were used a few years ago, and just recently Australia complained that the same thing was happening there. I expect that if the Australian and Canadian secret services used Israeli documents our governments would be quickly advised to cease and desist.

  • IranianDude

    1 year ago

    Stepheh Hubris

    Stephen Hubris should give Mossad some blank Canadian passport so that these murderers could go around the world and assassinate people with the mobility a Canadian passport offers.

    Think about if we support war criminals unconditionally shouldn't we assist them to be more effective in violating international law?

    Hubris and Kenny's support of apartheid regime of Israel is sickening. It's prime for Canadians to wake up to see what these Jesus freaks are doing to this country.

  • IranianDude

    1 year ago

    Stephen Hubris

    Stephen Hubris should give Mossad some blank Canadian passports so that these murderers could go around the world and assassinate people with the kind of mobility a Canadian passport offers.

    Think about it if we are going to support war criminals unconditionally shouldn't we assist them to be more effective in violating international law?

    Hubris and Kenny's support of apartheid regime of Israel is sickening. CANADIAN GOVERNMENT IS IN THE WROING SIDE OF HISTORY. It's prime time for Canadians to wake up and see what these Jesus freaks are doing to this country.

  • Takuan

    1 year ago

    what makes you think

    he hasn't already?

  • david hadaway

    1 year ago

    everyday life in Palestine

    To get an impression of the way the Palestinians are forced to live I recomend this site.

    http://www.imemc.org/

    It often makes painful reading.

  • zalm

    1 year ago

    Poh!

    Thanks for the link, david hadaway. I'm glad to see this project got off the ground.

    Scary stuff!

    Israeli Ynet News obtained a video showing fundamentalist Jewish settlers celebrating the memory of terrorist Dr. Baroch Goldstein, and praising his crime that targeted Muslim worshipers at the Ibrahimi mosque in Hebron in February 25, 1994, killing 46 worshipers and wounding dozens.

    The setters were dancing and singing a special song meant to praise Goldstein and the way he opened fire at the worshipers killing and wounding dozens of them....

    The Ynet News reported that the festivities of the settlers are similar to those held by fundamentalist settlers in the southern West Bank city of Hebron, where the massacre took place.

    The video that was obtained by Ynet was filmed on Monday; it shows the settlers and their children, dancing and singing to praise Goldstein.

    “Dr. Goldstein, Dr. Goldstein, we all love you, Dr. Goldstein there is nobody like you in the world,” the settlers sang, “he aimed at the heads of the terrorists, squeezed the trigger, and shot and shot….”

    http://www.imemc.org/index.php?obj_id=53&story_id=58127
    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3857671,00.html

    Yep. This is the population the "most moral army in the world" draws its fighters from.

    And hey! Let's remember that Kach is illegal in Israel.

    But not really....

  • dorothy

    1 year ago

    To various detractors and such

    "And as for Dorothy, I wouldn't even dignify her extremely retarded "argument."

    - So why AREN'T you just ignoring it??

    "I note you made no reference to the fact that while illegally/belligerently/brutally occupying and stealing Palestinian/Canaanite lands well armed Jewish settler/colonialists take their children with them, thereby exposing them to possible violence".

    Well, do you hear them whining about every single child that perishes? No, they suck it up and then proceed to get even. Not the same at-all.

    I can only repeat what I've said before: It is extremely hypocritical to spout these anti-israeli rants and never come clean about what you really mean! I take it that you do not want the evetually displaced, if you have your way, Israelis to come and live in your neighborhood? Then what are you imagining? Where do you think they should go, since Ireland didn't pan out? Why not admit that you want them to wither and die, or worse. I am so out of patience with this mealy-mouthed nonsense.

  • zalm

    1 year ago

    Actually

    I, for one, have always called for Israeli immigrants who've made aliyah (for generally the most selfish of reasons) to come home where we can put their talents to work. Of the roughly 2-3000 North American Jews that make aliyah each year, most end up as settlers there on an ideological mission. Of the roughly same amount of French settlers, about half end up as settlers. These are the only ones who end up as settlers by choice, and generally on Palestinian-owned land in Hebron and elsewhere.

    Argentine Jews, Russian Jews, Ethiopian Jews, Sephards, Iranian Jews (yes, there are still about 25,000 Jews left in Iran, mostly in the big cities) and others who make aliyah tend to end up as settlers mostly because the government provides considerable subsidies to settlers so that disruption is not created to the rest of Israeli society by their entry.

    And unfortunately, this barrier ends up sharpening the divisions in that society. Immigrants complain of racist treatment from native-born Israelis, and many move on, having gained that all-important first-world passport to other regions of the world - France, Great Britain, Germany and especially North America.

    It's a weird thing. We're raiding the best of other countries to bring them here to contribute to our society, yet some of you are happy to see them leave. Sigh.

    dorothy, I'm sure you're only speaking to one voice and not all of us on this thread, some of whom, like sharpshooter, are remarkably literate and well-read, but really, your own rant about hypocrisy is.... is.... oh, I don't know, hypocritical? itself. You've got this weird blind spot with Israel, and I don't know what brings it up. Too much snoggin' at the mug while reading Uris' novel Exodus?

    Please, broaden your reading list. We'd be happy to help you with some authentic Israeli authors who've learned to tell a story unencumbered by the ritualistic distortions so prevalent in the political arena.

  • Revenise

    1 year ago

    Prisoners of Zion

    Whatever may be the truth of ‘the’ Holocaust, it is an inescapable truth that any time you make it against the law to question something, there is a good reason to question it. Whatever may be the truth about ‘the’ Holocaust, it is clear that it turned into an industry of intimidation and blackmail. It is the most dreadful of ironies that today the same injuries are being performed upon a captive population by the people claiming the same injuries to have been previously practiced on them.

    There are no justifications and there are no arguments or excuses that can be applied in the defense of this evil behavior. It is what it is.

    Do not trouble your minds as to how it is possible for human beings to behave this way. They are not human beings. The governments of England, the United States and Israel are in the hands of psychopaths and whores. It is true that there are draconian and malicious governments in other places. It is true that there are odious creatures in operation in places all around the world but… they are not threatening the entire world. They are not in a position to finance world wide terror and then blame it on the Muslims in order to systematically exterminate millions of people.

    Why are the Muslims targeted? They oppose usury for one thing and… they do not go willingly into the fleshpots and amusement centers being operated by those seeking to destroy them and who use these allurements to stupefy and enslave everyone else. They do not recognize temporal authority as the highest court.

    Are there corrupt and violent Muslims? Of course. The same could be said about Hindus and Buddhists. Christianity… as an organized entity, is already hand in glove with the temporal authority. Muslims are dangerous to the corporate and banking interests, employed in the effort toward world domination, because they don’t want to play ball. Besides the fact that The Saudis control Hollywood (snicker, nudge nudge, wink wink)) they pretty much stay out of those areas of sensory magic. They are not marketplace oriented. They are not worshiping the corporate gods. It’s more than that but you all know what the ‘more than that’ is so I don’t have to go into it.

    Murdering members of a captive people… attacking your own country and killing the people you were sworn to protect in an effort to imprison them with fear of a manufactured enemy, for the purpose of personal power and personal gain are just some of the signs and wonders of the time. Then to attack other nations, which were blamed for the acts you committed, in order to not only plunder those nations but to also profit from the fruits of war and the sale of armaments are some other signs and wonders…but the greatest wonder is that it is just business as usual and the protagonists are looked upon as the leaders and shepherds of humanity.

  • Revenise

    1 year ago

    Prisoners of Zion part 2

    These days I marvel at those with so much more power, influence and opportunity than I who just don’t get it. They’ve got the benefit of those great educations and all those canny advisers and experts and they just don’t get it. They just don’t get it but… they will. They will.

  • Revenise

    1 year ago

    The double standards

    Calling Murray Dobbins article 'one sided' is akin to calling the Israeli/Palestinian conflict a 'war.'

    A war is when two armies are fighting.

    So you see, I think we can both agree.

  • jaydayrock

    1 year ago

    Apartheid Article

    Thank you Murray Dobbin for an excellent article, documenting the systematic and brutal oppression
    of the Palestinians.

    We have too long been lied to by the lobby controlled
    media, and your article says you refuse to be intimidated.

    Bravo,
    jaydayrock

  • Revenise

    1 year ago

    Well Tyee, I guess we will

    Well Tyee, I guess we will see you next year for Israeli Apartheid week. Until then we wi

  • Revenise

    1 year ago

    Censored

    Two years and there is still a news blackout on the existence of Canada’s Israel Allies Caucus, an entity that exists within Canada’s Parliament - presumably to guide the government in a pro Israel direction - something which Canadians have certainly seen with Harper’s codling behaviour towards Israeli war crimes during the Gaza atrocity.

    It is so hard to get news about the Zionist influence on national politics, that Canadians had to get this information from an Israeli paper!
    It's disgraceful for Canada and an insult to Jews (not Zionists).

    http://www.opednews.com/articles/Canadian-Policy-The-Jerus-by-Bahija-Reghai-100125-265.html

  • dorothy

    1 year ago

    Really?

    “..Too much snoggin' at the mug while reading Uris' novel Exodus?”

    That fat book? Nah, I haven’t read it, it would be like…work.

    Well OK, so I am buying that you want them to come home, or stay home, as in staying in Canada. Many people, however, didn’t and don’t feel the same. I think, as a matter of fact, that in 1948, when the state of Israel was proclaimed, Jewish people may have felt singularly unwelcome just about everywhere in the world, for instance in Canada, where they had been denied entry even though there were being killed on our doorstep more or less.

    Maybe my blind spot comes from having grown up in Denmark, where I saw a synagogue in my home town at about age 9, never having noticed it before, and asking my mother if ‘mosaic community center’ meant the people inside were all artists, making tile decorations. So you see, I was not brought up to notice that people were in ‘them and us’ categories. I know now that at least three of my early classmates were Jewish, but I certainly didn’t know it then. Now the Jewish people in Denmark stayed home. In fact, when David Ben Gurion visited the country in order to broach the idea of going home to Israel, he was told politely, but firmly, that these people were Danes first and Jews second, and he would be hard pressed to find anyone of Zionistic bend there.

    So, I am concluding from this, that the Jews elsewhere, who are minded to split and go for the ‘ascent’ may not feel at home where they are for reasons not entirely under their control. Now I can relate to that, being an immigrant myself and having been prodded and ‘looked over’ and pronounced acceptable for more times than I care to count. There are so many little ways one can put down, and no, I am not hyper-sensitive; in fact, I cannot fathom why anyone would not like me, as I am an outreaching kind of person, extremely tolerant of the quirks and hang-ups of others, and usually of good cheer through the darkest of adversities.

    So, this is what I mean by hypocritical. We keep licking at that wound, the infamous ‘Jewish question’, but we are NOT willing to look hard at ourselves and our own frailties, and see it through to calling a spade a spade. And, I do notice that you, which disappoints ME, resort to the put-down of suggesting that I have my head in the clouds and my nose in the grog. If you think I need to know something more, just tell me in your own words! Don’t give me a ‘reading list’.

  • straightshooter

    1 year ago

    Dorothy

    So many words and you say nothing of consequence. Address the realities of today and the past 62 years or move on.

  • dorothy

    1 year ago

    Pot and kettle again...

    "..Such typical arrogance on Israel's part, such contempt for the hand that feeds and protects it - nearly $10 million per day funded by strapped US taxpayers, 365 days a year as well as $billions in tax deductible contributions from US individuals and organizations that serve Israel, the expansionist, occupier ethnic-cleanser state. The question is how much longer will Washington allow Israel to humiliate America. I predict the end is in sight. No matter how you slice and dice it, Israel is America's number one and ever-increasing geopolitical liability. Sooner or later, all nations must act in their own best interests."

    This is stuff 'of consequence'? More like listening to Blanche Hunt on the Corrie.

    What makes you think the US ever has, does now or ever will, not act in its own best interests, or at least the interests of its movers and shakers? It is a nation of blue-eyed idealists, yes? When pigs fly.

    At least I am telling a story that people didn't know before, and those who forget (or ignore) history are doomed to repeat it, but maybe some people don't mind doing the same dumb thing over again.

  • IranianDude

    1 year ago

    straightshooter

    Dorothy is absolutely right, we are better off ignoring her.

    This woman doesn't even have basic critical thinking skills to differentiate between facts and anecdotes.

    Safe to ignore her incoherent and moronic rants.

    Have a good weekend.

  • straightshooter

    1 year ago

    IranianDude

    Agreed!!

  • dorothy

    1 year ago

    Got the dictionary out just for you!

    "IGNORE
    v ignore [igˈnoː]
    to take no notice of; to pay no attention to

    [example] He ignored all my warnings."

    Have you the critical skills to recognize that you’re not doing that, when you’re not only reading my posts, but also commenting on them, plus conjecturing on my mental faculties??

  • Takuan

    1 year ago

  • IranianDude

    1 year ago

    Great link Takuan

    Incidentally, I inquired about 'Israeli' wines at our local BC liquor store. The manager of the store told me that they haven't sold more than three bottles in the last 7 months! And this is fairly big store we're talking.

    So obviously the movement toward boycotting Israeli's product is gaining momentum rapidly.

    And please don't buy books from Chapters.

  • Revenise

    1 year ago

    This is a good list of

    This is a good list of companies that fund Israeli regime.

    Source website: http://stopfundingisrael.com/companies.html

    Warning: the website contains disturbing footage of a baby who was shot strategically in the chest by the Israeli defense force. You would think they would fight someone their own size, but killing babies and defenseless populations is more what they are used to.

    List of companies that support the murder of Palestinian babies:

    AOL
    APAX partners + Co.
    ARSENAL FOOTBALL CLUB
    COCA COLA
    DANONE
    DELTA GALIL
    DISNEY
    ESTEE' LAUDER
    HOME DEPOT
    IBM
    INTEL
    JOHNSON + JOHNSON
    KIMBERLY-CLARK
    LEWIS TRUST GROUP LTD
    L'OREAL
    MARKS + SPENCERS
    MCDONALDS
    NESTLE
    NEWS CORPORATION
    NOKIA
    REVLON
    SARA LEE
    SELFRIDGES
    STARBUCKS
    THE LIMITED INC.
    TIMBERLAND

  • IranianDude

    1 year ago

    Boycott Chapters & Indigo stores

    This is why:

    http://www.canpalnet.ca/mambo/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=193&Itemid=1

    Chapter has strong ties to Israel's genocidal military. So next time you're buying a book from Chapters, picture an IDF murderer putting a bullet in the chest of yet another Palestinian children.

    Your dollars should not go towards financing war crimes and crimes against humanity.

  • dorothy

    1 year ago

    How impressively non-anecdotal!

    "I inquired about 'Israeli' wines at our local BC liquor store. The manager of the store told me that they haven't sold more than three bottles in the last 7 months! And this is fairly big store we're talking.

    So obviously the movement toward boycotting Israeli's product is gaining momentum rapidly."

    I wouldn't be so sure. I have seen any number of people buy plastic buckets marked 'made in Israel' from at least one Canadian Tire store, and that was no small store there.

    Can we please get serious here! Show the subject the respect it deserves and write properly, so we don't have to put up with stuff like "shot strategically in the chest by the Israeli defense force", or "bullet in the chest of yet another Palestinian children."

  • IranianDude

    1 year ago

    On Israel Apartheid Week

    List of Israeli wines at the BC Liquor store:

    1. AUVIGNON BLANC - GALIL MOUNTAIN 07/08 KOSHER
    2. CHARDONNAY - GALIL MOUNTAIN 07/08 KOSHER
    3. PINOT NOIR - GALIL MOUNTAIN 05/06 KOSHER
    4. CABERNET SAUVIGNON - GALIL MOUNTAIN 07/08 KOSHER
    5. CABERNET SAUVIGNON - YARDEN 2006 KOSHER
    6. MOUNT HERMON RED - YARDEN 2006 KOSHER
    7. CABERNET MERLOT SYRAH - GALIL MOUNTAIN YIRON 03/05 KOSHER
    8. KILLER TOMATOES & WINE
    9. CANAAN CHARD. SAUV. RIESLING - DALTON, MEVUSHAL KOSHER 07
    10. MUSCAT - YARDEN, GOLAN HEIGHTS 05/06 KOSHER
    11. MERLOT - GALIL MOUNTAIN 07/08 KOSHER
    12. CANAAN RED - DALTON 2006 MEVUSHAL KOSHER

    Time to Boycott one Israeli products at the time.

  • IranianDude

    1 year ago

    Excellent news

    http://bdsmovement.net/?q=node/660

    Phon van den Biesen and Adri Nieuwhof
    10 March 2010 - On 25 February, the European Court of Justice ruled that imports manufactured in Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank shouldn't benefit from a trade agreement between Israel and the European Union.

    ---------------------
    And of course we know that Hubris' government doesn't have an ounce of decency to move toward moral direction. Israel lobby anyone?

  • straightshooter

    1 year ago

    Check out these two

    Check out these two informative videos

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bznLR3-kCtU&feature=player_embedded

    http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=4824

    For an analysis of how the world views Israel (before its slaughter of over 1,400 defenceless Palestinians in the Gaza Strip during "Operation Cast Lead), go to this site:
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/for-israel-every-traveller-is-an-ambassador/article1479056/

  • IranianDude

    1 year ago

    I am wondering

    I am wondering what's our Prime Minister's reaction when he sees Palestinians slaughtered by IDF thugs and Israelis genocidal regime.

    What I am trying to understand is the level of financial support his party receives from the Israel lobby to be this blatantly inhumane.

    We haven't forgotten when he shared the same podium with that sorry excuse for a human being Izzy fricking Asper.

  • Revenise

    1 year ago

    Dorothy: "Can we please get

    Dorothy: "Can we please get serious here! Show the subject the respect it deserves and write properly, so we don't have to put up with stuff like "shot strategically in the chest by the Israeli defense force", or "bullet in the chest of yet another Palestinian children.""

    Excuse me... Miss. You are not giving the subject the respect it deserves. What would you do if someone bulldozed your home and shot your children dead, and told you to show some respect and get serious?

    Yeah. I'm sure you would get serious, and some of us are.

    Here is a documented and irrefutable testimony from the mouths of Palestinian mothers, fathers, and children who's unarmed families were strategically slaughtered by Israeli armed forces. Show yourself some respect and watch this series.

    Goldstone Facts-The Real Story Behind Israel's Invasion of Gaza-Part 1
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIpA6sXksNw

    Goldstone Facts-The Real Story Behind Israel's Invasion of Gaza-Part 2
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHDoH4hrFfs

    Goldstone Facts-The Real Story Behind Israel's Invasion of Gaza-Part 3
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftfsGWdHU0A

    Israel will continue to slaughter innocent Palestinians and steal their land until it is severed from all financial support. We can talk, and bicker all we want... but until we get serious and make them stop, the carnage will continue.

  • IranianDude

    1 year ago

    Revenise

    Revenise,

    Please never argue with morons.

  • zalm

    1 year ago

    dorothy

    "And, I do notice that you, which disappoints ME, resort to the put-down of suggesting that I have my head in the clouds and my nose in the grog. If you think I need to know something more, just tell me in your own words! Don’t give me a ‘reading list’."

    Now you're being insulting. My own library has two dozen books I could recommend, each of which addressed mostly different points in Israel's history - bombing of the King David hotel, early Palestinian settlement under the Ottomans, Israel's "settlement" industry, histories of Weizman and Ben Gurion, various histories of the Jews from self-laudatory to critical, other histories of the holy land, and I've read perhaps another two dozen more from the library.

    And you want me to summarize those for you and give you the education you deserve just so we can have a proper argument in two 3000-character posts?

    Insulting, I'd call it. Do your own homework!

    "I think, as a matter of fact, that in 1948, when the state of Israel was proclaimed, Jewish people may have felt singularly unwelcome just about everywhere in the world, for instance in Canada, where they had been denied entry even though there were being killed on our doorstep more or less.

    Wrong. As wrong as you can be.

    Some of the late-comers may have felt that way, but the ones who formed the state of Israel had been there for more than a generation, working to take over large and productive parcels of land to form a Jewish nation, with or without the compliance of the native Arab population (and they got both). I'm not arguing Jews who sought to leave were turned away from many countries including Canada, nor am I going to bring up how Ben Gurion sought to leave Jews behind for the Holocaust in order to secure support for an independent Jewish nation - these points can only be argued when one has a solid and proper grasp of the history of the region from all sides. Which you clearly don't, or you wouldn't be quoting me your lines direct from Uris' novel, like you did above.

    Sigh. Want that reading list now? Or must we maltreat you some more?

  • IranianDude

    1 year ago

    Zalm

    You gave me an advice now let me give you one. You'll never ever win arguing me morons with delusion grandeur. Don't waste your time she isn't worth it. Because, Racist and ignorant folks don't have any interests to move beyond their myopic racist world. Let them die in their perpetual ignorance.

    Stick with the Boycott movement.

  • IranianDude

    1 year ago

    correction

    arguing with morons ...

  • zalm

    1 year ago

    On second thought

    Why leave you hanging? Here's a sample reading list - certainly not comprehensive, nor covering all aspects - but it's fair to both sides, from the unabashedly Zionist panegyric (Cantor) to the scholarly (Hilbert and Bartov), the revisionist (Morris and Pappe) to outsider (Cook).

    But if this list doesn't leave you in tears at the breathtaking stupidity of all sides in this dismal fight, then I don't know what to recommend next.

    Norman Cantor - The Sacred Chain
    David Ben Gurion - Rebirth and Destiny of Israel
    Howard Sachar - A History of Israel from the Rise of Zionism to Our Time
    Benny Morris - The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem
    Omer Bartov - Germany’s War and the Holocaust
    Raul Hilberg - The Destruction of the European Jews
    Ilan Pappe - A history of modern Palestine
    Donna Robinson Divine - Politics and Society in Ottoman Palestine
    Tom Segev - One Palestine, Complete
    Michael Palumbo - The Palestinian Catastrophe: The 1948 Expulsion of a People from Their Homeland
    Bernard Avishai - The Tragedy of Zionism
    Jonathan Cook - Blood and Religion

  • zalm

    1 year ago

    IranianDude

    Just call me Don Quixote. Sometimes I agree with you, which is why I don't enter into some of the fights that aren't worth getting into on these threads. But this one is, and dorothy's worth it too, even if I don't always understand the tenor of her thoughts. The toughest thread battle I ever had with a Zionist took over four months on BCIMC and I had to bring every bit of my reading and analysis up for confrontation, and certainly got taken apart a few times in the process. It only made my understanding more complete.

    See, I think most of us of a certain age (mebbe you excepted) grew up with the myth of Israel in our history books. Many of us learned the truth and swung over to Palestinian apologetics. Fewer still have explored the dismal history on both sides and returned to a more neutral position, which allows our social conscience to effectively advise us how to respond appropriately. Israel isn't going away anytime soon, but neither are the Palestinians. Let's get it together so we can advise Harper et all how wrong-headed and blind they are and how much at risk they're putting Canadian reputations and lives around the world.

    Plus, that reading list applies to you, in case there are any you haven't read. In fact, everyone should start with Avishai - he's an easy read, and fair to both sides, and you'll all be inspired to clean up your arguments and drop the Zionist propaganda forever once you do.

  • zalm

    1 year ago

    By the way

    don't ever argue with Mormons either.... ;>)

  • Revenise

    1 year ago

    It is always a lovely thing

    It is always a lovely thing in seeing a Jewish man and his Rabbi dancing hand in hand with the Palestinian man.

    Jews against Zionism & Israel
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVNw8YrGH9E

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.